
Inter-American court says states must protect people from climate change
The decision means that around 20 countries across Latin America and the Caribbean that recognise the court's jurisdiction must undertake legal reforms that could increase the requirements imposed on businesses, something environmentalists have long advocated.
"States must adopt all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising... from the degradation of the global climate system," the Costa Rica-based court said in response to a request submitted by Colombia and Chile.
It underlined that "the right to a healthy environment" is included among the rights protected by the American Convention on Human Rights.
The court is an autonomous legal institution that interprets and applies the American Convention, which has been ratified by more than 20 countries including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Peru.
The court said countries must "adopt legislative and other measures to prevent human rights violations committed by state and private companies."
"States must urge all companies domiciled or operating in their territory to adopt effective measures to combat climate change and its impacts on human rights," it said.
The first government reaction to the decision came not from one of the OAS member states, but from the small Pacific island of Vanuatu, which hailed it as "groundbreaking."
The ruling was also welcomed by environmentalists.
The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), which was involved in the case, said such "advisory opinions" were "authoritative statements of binding international law and carry substantial legal weight."
"The court has broken new ground and set a powerful precedent," said Nikki Reisch, the organisation's climate and energy program director.
"The court's conclusions should put big polluters, like the fossil fuel industry, on notice: climate-destructive conduct violates the law."
Viviana Krsticevic, executive director of the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL), said the ruling established "legally binding standards" for the protection of the right to a healthy environment.
Marcella Ribeiro, an attorney with the Interamerican Association for Environmental Defense, said that it was the first time an international court had "directly addressed climate change as a legal and structural human rights issue."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
41 minutes ago
- IOL News
Minister Nyhontso presents R9. 8 billion budget for land reform and rural development
Land Reform and Rural Development Minister Mzwanele Nyhontso says the department's 2025/26 budget was a commitment to redress equitable access to land for all and to improve the lives of people, especially those residing in rural areas. Image: File Land Reform and Rural Development Minister Mzwanele Nyhontso on Tuesday said the implementation of a meaningful land reform program required a coordinated approach to enhance integrated and sustainable interventions. Nyhontso said the department's 2025/26 budget was a commitment to redress equitable access to land for all and to improve the lives of people, especially those residing in rural areas. 'Land is a foundation of identity, dignity, and economic prosperity. Land is a key component of the factors of production. "Therefore, without land, any aspiration of social economic development remains just that- aspirations,' he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The minister also said land reform was an engine for propelling inclusive growth and for reducing poverty and unemployment. 'It is therefore with this in mind that we welcome the current trend of convergence in the national discourse on the land question among those of us who suffer dispositions and oppression.' Nyhontso sang praises to the Inter-Ministerial Committee of Land Reform led by Deputy President Paul Mashatile in coordinating various efforts to avoid overlapping and duplication of functions related to land reform. 'This will enable us to accelerate efforts to address the land question of historical dispossessed communities and to support the poor." He said among the top priorities he has been driving since he assumed office was the development of equitable access to land. 'We will encourage South Africans to participate in the development of these historic pieces of legislation as they will redefine the legislative framework for access to land and on equitable basis. 'I have no doubt that this will be a subject of discussion during the National Dialogue. We are on record in a number of forums as having emphasised that the delivery of land and the provision of support to the beneficiaries of all land reform programs are two sides of the same coin.' He said a particular focus since taking office was to address the phenomenon of poor performance of land reform projects and inadequate pre-and post-settlement support for beneficiaries. 'Indeed, this is a concern that has also been raised by a range of stakeholders.' Nyhontso said the overall budget of the department was R9.820 billion with land tenure reform and restitution receiving the largest share amounting to R6.168 billion of the total allocation. 'This demonstrates that our budget is grounded on our core mandate.' He also said the land redistribution and tenure reform branch has been allocated R1.073 billion. 'With this budget, a total allocation of R559 million has been set aside to acquire and allocate 44, 000 hectares of land.' Nyhontso said his department continued to process applications for hectares of land to labour tenants. 'It should be acknowledged though that the area of tenure security for labour tenants, including the continuing spread of illegal evictions, remains an unacceptable situation.' He added the department was implementing a comprehensive plan to address historical inefficiencies relating to the management of state land, including calls for accountability from some reluctant officials and ensuring consequence management. 'Our department is also addressing the challenges related to communal property associations (CPAs), particularly their dysfunctionality. To address this challenge, the department is implementing measures that include the establishment of an independent CPA office.'

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
How the Phala Phala scandal complicates Ramaphosa's stance on Police Minister Mchunu
A political analyst has cast doubt on whether President Cyril Ramaphosa would be able to act against Police Minister Senzo Mchunu because of his Phala Phala scandal. Image: Jairus Mmutle / GCIS The University of Zululand-based political analyst, Professor Sipho Seepe, said that President Cyril Ramaphosa will find it difficult to act against Police Minister Senzo Mchunu because of the Phala Phala scandal. Weighing in on the explosive revelations by KwaZulu-Natal provincial Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who alleged that Mchunu is in the pocket of the Gauteng crime syndicates, Professor Seepe said the problem is that Ramaphosa is not a neutral bystander in crime fighting and cannot act without being reminded of his sins. 'The allegations made by General Mkhwanazi against the Minister of Police, Senzo Mchunu, are very serious and are likely to exacerbate factional divisions within the ruling party since Ramaphosa does not enter this quagmire as a neutral bystander. The Phala Phala scandal is still hovering over his head. He cannot act without being reminded of his sins,' said Seepe. He further stated that Mchunu's allegations also have the effect of undermining the fight against crime and corruption, and call into question Ramaphosa's renewal programme within the party. 'Given the extent of the allegations, it would be reasonable that nothing short of a judicial commission of inquiry would be required,' concluded Seepe On Sunday, Mkhwanazi claimed that Mchunu allegedly abused his ministerial powers to shield a member of a crime syndicate in Gauteng who was arrested for three attempted murders. He further claimed Mchunu's real reason for disbanding the police's political killings unit was that it assisted in dismantling a drug cartel in Gauteng. Mkhwanazi said last year, he received a request from Gauteng's police organised crime unit for assistance in arresting drug cartel suspects who the unit had discovered were working with top politicians in Parliament. He stated that the unit arrested a businessman, and police discovered text messages between the minister and the suspect. He further stated that the minister's associate also sent a message to the suspect informing him that he had arranged a meeting between the minister and the Deputy National Commissioner from Crime Prevention, Lieutenant-General Shadrack Sibiya, to find a solution. Mchunu and Sibiya both dismissed the rumours as baseless.

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Did Trump rush to close the Epstein case after Elon Musk's explosive accusation?
Following Elon Musk's claim linking Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein's client list, the DOJ's release of a memo and prison footage raises questions about the integrity of the investigation. But is this truly justice, or just another carefully orchestrated coverup? Despite longstanding speculation about Epstein's powerful connections, and the belief by many that he was silenced to protect public figures, authorities now insist there is no evidence of a client list, blackmail, or foul play in Epstein's death. The timing has raised eyebrows, fuelling suspicions that this sudden 'closure' is more of a strategic cover-up than a conclusive investigation. Just weeks after Elon Musk publicly claimed that Donald Trump was included in Jeffrey Epstein's notorious 'client list', the Trump-era Department of Justice and FBI have released a memo and grainy prison footage that seeks to bury the case for good. Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. A convenient conclusion The FBI, under Trump's administration, has claimed there is no evidence Jeffrey Epstein was murdered, maintained no list of clients, or ever blackmailed high-profile individuals. These findings were detailed in a two-page memo obtained by Axios Media, a private US-based outlet. This follows mounting social media pressure and Musk's claim that Trump was implicated in Epstein's files - which he later deleted. In support of its conclusion, the DOJ released a video, both raw and 'enhanced' taken from a common area in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, where Epstein was held. Curiously, the footage does not show the inside of Epstein's cell, nor does it capture the precise moments surrounding his death. Instead, it shows inmates wandering about a shared area, offering little reassurance to sceptics. Investigators claimed they used enhanced imaging techniques to clarify the footage. Yet, the absence of direct visual evidence from Epstein's cell has only intensified public doubt. Former conspiracy theorists are now silent Ironically, some of Trump's closest allies in the FBI, Kash Patel (now FBI Director) and Dan Bongino (now Deputy Director), were once vocal about their disbelief in Epstein's alleged suicide. Prior to their official appointments, both men - staunch MAGA supporters - fuelled speculation that Epstein was silenced to protect a network of powerful individuals. Now, however, both have walked back those claims. Bongino recently told Fox News, 'He killed himself... I've seen the whole file.' Elon Musk's accusation The DOJ's conveniently timed closure comes shortly after Musk publicly stated that Trump's name was on Epstein's list. Trump swiftly responded by sharing a statement from David Schoen, Epstein's former lawyer and Trump's impeachment attorney, who declared Trump had never been implicated in any crime. Musk later retracted his comments, suggesting he had 'gone too far.' Still, speculation lingers. Trump and Epstein were known to socialise in the 1990s, and Epstein is on record as having once called Trump his 'closest friend'- a claim Trump has since denied. No further disclosures The memo concludes with a blanket refusal to release further Epstein-related documents. It claims this is to protect the identities of victims and innocent individuals, citing concerns over child pornography and wrongful allegations. However, critics argue this sweeping justification is a convenient way to avoid deeper scrutiny. The Epstein saga has never been short on secrecy, high-profile associations, and sudden U-turns. This latest move by the Trump-aligned DOJ feels less like closure and more like calculated damage control. If there's truly nothing to hide, why are so many questions still unanswered? IOL News