Tehran has the right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes
In an interview with RT on Monday, Joshi said Tehran's right to pursue a civilian nuclear program could not be taken away, while drawing parallels between the recent Israeli strikes on Iran and the 2003 US invasion of Iraq.
'Everyone has a right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and that is a fundamental fact,' Joshi said on the sidelines of the Primakov Readings, a summit aimed at promoting global dialogue. 'We've been through this whole WMD nonsense in the case of Iraq also, and we saw what happened there. What worries us is a repetition of that and we are not happy with the way things have been conducted. I personally hope this escalation ends here.'
For nearly two decades, American intelligence agencies have concluded that while Iran has a program to enrich uranium, it has never actually built any atomic bombs, according to a report by The Guardian. This assessment has been at the core of US intel on the country since at least 2007, the UK newspaper added.
Despite this assessment, Iran's nuclear program has been under threat. Since 2010, several Iranian nuclear scientists have been killed in suspected foreign-linked assassinations. Fereydoon Abbasi, a key architect of the Iranian nuclear program and the former head of its atomic energy organization was killed on June 13 when Israel commenced its air strikes on the Islamic Republic.
On Sunday, the US entered the Iran-Israel conflict, deploying B-2 bombers and Tomahawk missiles to strike three Iranian nuclear sites. Tehran responded by attacking a US military base in Qatar a day later. US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire. Tehran's Supreme National Security Council has since confirmed the truce, but warned that it is ready to respond to any 'violating act by the enemy.'
On Tuesday morning, Iranian news agency Nour News reported the death of another nuclear scientist, Mohammad Reza Sadighi, who was believed to have been killed in an Israeli attack that was carried out before a ceasefire was announced.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Dmitry Trenin: World War III has already begun
Many now speak of humanity's drift towards World War III, imagining events similar to those of the 20th century. But war evolves. It will not begin with a June 1941 Barbarossa-style invasion or a Cuban Missile Crisis-style nuclear standoff. In fact, the new world war is already underway – it's just that not everyone has recognized it yet. For Russia, the pre-war period ended in 2014. For China, it was 2017. For Iran, 2023. Since then, war – in its modern, diffuse form – has intensified. This is not a new Cold War. Since 2022, the West's campaign against Russia has grown more decisive. The risk of direct nuclear confrontation with NATO over the Ukraine conflict is rising. Donald Trump's return to the White House created a temporary window in which such a clash could be avoided, but by mid-2025, hawks in the US and Western Europe had pushed us dangerously close again. This war involves the world's leading powers: the United States and its allies on one side, China and Russia on the other. It is global, not because of its scale, but because of the stakes: the future balance of power. The West sees the rise of China and the resurgence of Russia as existential threats. Its counteroffensive, economic and ideological, is meant to put a halt to that shift. It is a war of survival for the West, not just geopolitically but ideologically. Western globalism – whether economic, political, or cultural – cannot tolerate alternative civilizational models. Post-national elites in the US and Western Europe are committed to preserving their dominance. A diversity of worldviews, civilizational autonomy, and national sovereignty are seen not as options, but as threats. This explains the severity of the West's response. When Joe Biden told Brazil's President Lula that he wanted to 'destroy' Russia, he revealed the truth behind euphemisms like 'strategic defeat.' Western-backed Israel has shown how total this doctrine is – first in Gaza, then Lebanon, and finally Iran. In early June, a similar strategy was used in attacks on Russian airfields. Reports suggest US and British involvement in both cases. To Western planners, Russia, Iran, China and North Korea are part of a single axis. That belief shapes military planning. Compromise is no longer part of the game. What we're seeing are not temporary crises but rolling conflicts. Eastern Europe and the Middle East are the two current flashpoints. A third has long been identified: East Asia, particularly Taiwan. Russia is directly engaged in Ukraine, holds stakes in the Middle East, and may become involved in the Pacific. The war is no longer about occupation, but destabilization. The new strategy focuses on sowing internal disorder: economic sabotage, social unrest, and psychological attrition. The West's plan for Russia is not defeat on the battlefield, but gradual internal collapse. Its tactics are all-encompassing. Drone strikes target infrastructure and nuclear facilities. Political assassinations are no longer off-limits. Journalists, negotiators, scientists, and even their families are being hunted. Residential neighborhoods, schools, and hospitals are not collateral damage – they are targets. This is total war. This is underpinned by dehumanization. Russians are portrayed not just as enemies but as subhuman. Western societies are manipulated to accept this. Information control, censorship, and historical revisionism are used to justify the war. Those who question the dominant narrative are labelled traitors. Meanwhile, the West exploits the more open systems of its adversaries. After refusing to interfere in foreign politics for decades, Russia now finds itself on the defensive. But those days must end. As our enemies coordinate their attacks, we must disrupt their unity. The European Union is not a monolith. Hungary, Slovakia, and much of southern Europe are not eager for escalation. These internal fractures must be widened. Western strength lies in unity among its elites and their ideological control over their populations. But this unity is not invulnerable. The Trump administration presents tactical opportunities. His return has already reduced US involvement in Ukraine. Yet Trumpism should not be romanticized. The American elite remains largely hostile to Russia. There will be no new détente. The war in Ukraine is becoming a war between Western Europe and Russia. British and French missiles already strike Russian targets. NATO intelligence is embedded in Ukrainian operations. EU countries are training Ukrainian forces and planning attacks together. Ukraine is just a tool. Brussels is preparing for a wider war. What we must ask is: Is Western Europe preparing to defend or attack? Many of its leaders have lost their strategic judgment. But the hostility is real. The goal is no longer containment, but to 'solve the Russian question' once and for all. Any illusion that business as usual will return must be discarded. We are in for a long war. It will not end like in 1945, nor settle into Cold War coexistence. The decades ahead will be turbulent. Russia must fight for its rightful place in a new world order. So, what must we do? First of all, we must strengthen our home front. We need mobilization, but not the rigid models of the Soviet past. We need smart, adaptive mobilization across all sectors – economic, technological, and demographic. Russia's political leadership is a strategic asset. It must remain steady and visionary. We must promote internal unity, social justice, and patriotism. Every citizen must feel the stakes. We must align our fiscal, industrial, and technological policy with the realities of a long-term war. Fertility policy and migration control must reverse our demographic decline. Secondly, we must consolidate our external alliances. Belarus is a strong ally in the west. North Korea has shown reliability in the east. But we lack a similar partner in the south. This gap must be addressed. The Israel-Iran war offers important lessons. Our adversaries coordinate tightly. We must do the same. Not by copying NATO, but by forging our own model of strategic cooperation. We should also pursue tactical engagement with the Trump administration. If it allows us to weaken the US war effort in Europe, we should exploit it. But we must not confuse tactics with strategy. American foreign policy remains fundamentally adversarial. Fellow European powers like Britain, France, and Germany must be made to understand they are vulnerable. Their capitals are not immune. The same message should reach Finland, Poland, and the Baltics. Provocations must be met swiftly and decisively. If escalation is inevitable, we must consider pre-emptive action – firstly with conventional arms. And if necessary, we must be ready to use 'special means', including nuclear weapons, with full awareness of the consequences. Deterrence must be both passive and active. Our mistake in Ukraine was waiting too long. Delay created the illusion of weakness. That must not be repeated. Victory means breaking the enemy's plans, not occupying territory. Finally, we must penetrate the West's information shield. The battlefield now includes narratives, alliances, and public opinion. Russia must once again learn to engage in others' domestic politics, not as an aggressor, but as a defender of truth. The time for illusions is over. We are in a world war. The only path forward is through bold, strategic article was first published by the magazine Profile and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
European gas reserves sink below normal
Europe's natural gas inventories are particularly low for this time of year, Bloomberg has reported, citing rising demand for air conditioning amid a regional heatwave. Underground storage sites are currently around 62% full, the outlet stated, while typically reserves reach around 80% by early summer, helping ensure a robust buffer ahead of the winter heating season. Extreme heat in Asia has also caused fuel shipments to be diverted away from Europe, as buyers worldwide compete for limited supplies. As a result, European natural gas futures have hovered near a two-week high, meaning 'the continent needs to pay up to keep supply coming,' the outlet wrote. Despite the trend, the EU may still be able to top up its gas inventories to about 80% by the end of the summer, the outlet quoted a note by Goldman Sachs as saying. The EU imports nearly 90% of its natural gas, with Russia still accounting for a significant share in the supply despite sanctions. In May, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen unveiled a plan to phase out all Russian oil and gas imports by the end of 2027, as part of the EU's REPowerEU roadmap, which aims to eliminate the bloc's dependence on fossil fuels from the country and shift to renewable sources. The plan has drawn criticism from landlocked Hungary and Slovakia, which have relied heavily on Russia's pipeline gas. Bratislava blocked the EU's 18th sanctions package, targeting Russia's energy and financial sectors, citing risks of shortages and rising prices. Budapest has joined the veto, and is pressuring the block to make concessions related to energy and broader RepowerEU rules. Moscow has argued that the EU restrictions are self-defeating, causing surging energy prices and weakening the bloc's economy. Since 2022, Germany, the bloc's largest economy, has fallen into recession, while growth across the EU has stalled.
Russia Today
13 hours ago
- Russia Today
Demand grows for BrahMos missiles
Around 15 nations have shown an interest in buying long-range BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles, the country's defense minister Rajnath Singh has said. The weapons were successfully used by India during its military confrontation with Pakistan in May. Speaking at an event on Sunday, Singh praised the 'outstanding role' that the BrahMos missiles played in the conflict, which India codenamed 'Operation Sindoor.' 'During Operation Sindoor, BrahMos missile achieved a miraculous feat. Now, around 14-15 countries want to have this missile,' Singh said. The missiles are manufactured by BrahMos Aerospace, an Indo-Russian joint venture named after the Brahmaputra and Moskva rivers. India's Defense Research and Development Organization has a 50.5% stake in the company, while Russian NPO Mashinostroyenia holds 49.5%. BrahMos missiles, along with the Russian-manufactured S-400s played an important role in defending Indian air bases and other military installations against Pakistani strikes during the four-day conflict in May. ❗️BrahMos Demand Surges After Operation Sindoor - Indian DefMinRajnath Singh has said 14-15 nations have expressed an interest in the 🇮🇳-🇷🇺 developed missiles, calling it a major milestone for defence exports from India's Lucknow-Kanpur facility. The Indian armed forces presently rely heavily on Russian-origin equipment, with around 60% of their arsenal being of Russian make. Last month, Singh held talks with his Russian counterpart Andrey Belousov on the sidelines of a Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) meeting in China, discussing the supply of S-400 systems, Su-30 MKI upgrades, and the procurement of critical military hardware. With India increasingly moving towards domestic production of weapons, New Delhi has welcomed Russian participation in its arms industry. Earlier this month, Russia delivered a new Krivak-class stealth frigate to the Indian Navy, the eighth such vessel to be handed over to India in the last 20 years. The frigate, which has 26% Indian components, was built at the Yantar shipyard in Kaliningrad. Indian specialists from the Warship Overseeing Team monitored the vessel's construction.
