‘Assistance scheme must be more strategic, sustainable'
Connie Tan (PH-Seri Delima) said this was in line with the Yang di-Pertua Negeri Tun Ramli Ngah Talib's call for the state government to continue with the programme.
She said the Governor's speech carried a profound meaning, that Penang government should strengthen this programme in a more sustainable, strategic and integrated manner.
'One of the approaches that can be considered is the integration of resources between state governments, the Federal Government and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to form a more comprehensive and sustainable social support ecosystem.
'Countries like Japan, South Korea and Singapore offer interesting examples, that is through the Silver Support Scheme where cash assistance is only given to the elderly who genuinely lack savings or family support,' she said when debating the motion of thanks to Ramli.
Tan said schemes such as Healthier SG and the Community Health Assistance Scheme offered by Singapore provided regular health check-ups and basic treatments on a subsidised basis to those in need.
She said the i-Sejahtera programme had the potential to evolve into a social development platform that supported active and dignified ageing.
However, she stressed that the state government must ensure that the scheme was carefully reviewed and improved as the intention was to strengthen and refine it for the benefit of all.
The i-Sejahtera programme is an annual financial aid initiative designed to assist residents, particularly senior citizens, disabled individuals, single mothers and housewives.
Meanwhile, Penang Opposition leader Muhammad Fauzi Yusoff said the annual RM60,000 allocation received by opposition members in the state assembly should be increased.
'I appeal for each opposition assemblyman to be granted half of the allocation received by government assemblymen, covering both supplies and infrastructure,' said Fauzi.
He said the current amount was insufficient to assist people in opposition-represented areas.
Chow was earlier quoted as saying that RM60,000 allocation for each opposition member of the Penang Legislative Assembly would be maintained this year.
He said the state government had no intention of increasing allocations to opposition assemblymen, considering that it had appointed coordinating officers in those areas.
Elected representatives in the ruling coalition each receive an annual allocation of RM500,000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
21 hours ago
- The Sun
High Court to decide on Na'imah's legal questions appeal on Aug 12
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court today fixed Aug 12 to deliver its decision on an application by Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid, the widow of the late former Finance Minister Tun Daim Zainuddin, to review the Sessions Court's decision that dismissed her request to refer legal questions in the undeclared assets case. Justice K. Muniandy set the date after hearing submissions from Deputy Public Prosecutor Law Chin How and counsel Datuk Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar, who represented Na'imah. Earlier, Law submitted that a case cited by the applicant had been taken out of context to sustain the notion that she, as a witness, is alleged to have a right to remain silent in the course of investigation. 'However, Section 30(5) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009 stated that any person has no right to remain silent when he or she is required to assist an investigation. 'Therefore, the applicant is under a legal obligation to assist MACC in respect of the asset declaration of her late husband by complying with the notice under section 36(1)(b) of the MACC Act,' he said. Law said the question relating to Section 30(5) of the MACC Act raised by the applicant does not have a direct bearing on the matter of dispute or charge before this court. 'The applicant has failed to show to this court that Section 30(5) of the MACC Act is a clear transgression of the constitutional principles,' he said. Section 30(5) of the MACC Act states that a person who is being investigated for an offence under this act, or any other person whom the officer has reason to believe to have any information or document relating to the commission of such offence, may be examined orally by the officer investigating the offence, and shall be legally bound to answer such questions truly to the best of his knowledge or belief. Gurdial, however, contended that his client was called to assist in the investigation against her late husband, strictly in her capacity as a witness and at all material times, she was never regarded as a co-suspect. On Jan 23, 2024, Na'imah was charged in the Sessions Court for failure to comply with a notice to declare her assets, which included Menara Ilham and several other properties in Kuala Lumpur and Penang. She was charged under Section 36(2) of the MACC Act 2009, which carries a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment or a fine of RM100,000 upon conviction. On Feb 29, 2024, Na'imah filed an application to refer questions of law on Sections 30(5), 36(2) and 62 of the MACC Act 2009, as well as Section 32(3)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLA) 2001 to the High Court. However, on Feb 18 this year, Sessions Court Judge Azura Alwi dismissed Na'imah's application on the ground that it disclosed no merit, holding that no constitutional questions arose for determination. - Bernama
Malaysian Reserve
a day ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Decision on Na'imah's application over legal questions set for Aug 12
KUALA LUMPUR — The High Court today fixed Aug 12 to deliver its decision on an application by Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid (picture), the widow of the late former Finance Minister Tun Daim Zainuddin, to review the Sessions Court's decision that dismissed her request to refer legal questions in the undeclared assets case. Justice K. Muniandy set the date after hearing submissions from Deputy Public Prosecutor Law Chin How and counsel Datuk Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar, who represented Na'imah. Earlier, Law submitted that a case cited by the applicant had been taken out of context to sustain the notion that she, as a witness, is alleged to have a right to remain silent in the course of investigation. 'However, Section 30(5) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009 stated that any person has no right to remain silent when he or she is required to assist an investigation. 'Therefore, the applicant is under a legal obligation to assist MACC in respect of the asset declaration of her late husband by complying with the notice under section 36(1)(b) of the MACC Act,' he said. Law said the question relating to Section 30(5) of the MACC Act raised by the applicant does not have a direct bearing on the matter of dispute or charge before this court. 'The applicant has failed to show to this court that Section 30(5) of the MACC Act is a clear transgression of the constitutional principles,' he said. Section 30(5) of the MACC Act states that a person who is being investigated for an offence under this act, or any other person whom the officer has reason to believe to have any information or document relating to the commission of such offence, may be examined orally by the officer investigating the offence, and shall be legally bound to answer such questions truly to the best of his knowledge or belief. Gurdial, however, contended that his client was called to assist in the investigation against her late husband, strictly in her capacity as a witness and at all material times, she was never regarded as a co-suspect. On Jan 23, 2024, Na'imah was charged in the Sessions Court for failure to comply with a notice to declare her assets, which included Menara Ilham and several other properties in Kuala Lumpur and Penang. She was charged under Section 36(2) of the MACC Act 2009, which carries a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment or a fine of RM100,000 upon conviction. On Feb 29, 2024, Na'imah filed an application to refer questions of law on Sections 30(5), 36(2) and 62 of the MACC Act 2009, as well as Section 32(3)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLA) 2001 to the High Court. However, on Feb 18 this year, Sessions Court Judge Azura Alwi dismissed Na'imah's application on the ground that it disclosed no merit, holding that no constitutional questions arose for determination. — BERNAMA
New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Na'imah's bid to refer legal questions: Court decision on Aug 12
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court has set Aug 12 to deliver its verdict on Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid's bid to reinstate her challenge involving eight legal questions related to her failure to declare assets case. Judge K. Muniandy set the date after hearing submissions from all parties involved in the case today. On Feb 29 last year, Na'imah, 68, filed an application at the Sessions Court to refer legal questions pertaining to Section 30(5), 36(2) and 62 of the MACC Act, as well as Section 32(3)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act to the High Court. However, the lower court dismissed her application on the grounds that her argument, claiming the investigation under the said section had breached her constitutional rights, lacked merit. In today's hearing, deputy public prosecutor Law Chin How submitted that Section 30(5) was constitutionally valid, as it was intended to compel individuals assisting in corruption investigations to speak truthfully. He said Na'imah, who was called as a witness in a probe involving her late husband Tun Daim Zainuddin, had no right to remain silent during the course of the MACC's investigation. On June 13, Na'imah's lawyer Datuk Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar argued that the lower court's decision to dismiss his client application was a miscarriage of justice. He said the High Court should exercise its discretion to intervene and correct the miscarriage of justice caused by the erroneous dismissal under the MACC Act. He said the Sessions Court's dismissal of Na'imah application deprived her of her fundamental right, "thereby failing to ensure that the legal questions, which are central to the case, were properly addressed." Gurdial said the charge relates to an offence that is purely technical as she was issued with a Section 36(1)(b) notice in which she was asked to assist in investigations against Daim as a witness. He said at all material times, Na'imah was never a co-suspect. On Jan 23 last year, Na'imah, 67, was charged in the Sessions Court with failing to comply with a notice to declare her assets, including Menara Ilham and several other properties in Kuala Lumpur and Penang. The charge was brought under Section 36(2) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, which carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment or a fine of RM100,000 upon conviction.
