Bridgeport mayor issues statement on city manager's possible removal
In a statement emailed to 12 News on Wednesday morning, Lang wrote 'Thursday's Special Meeting was called by me in accordance with the City's procedural requirements.'
City officials have not commented publicly on the reason they're considering Ford's removal.
'The City Council and I are elected to serve the residents of the City of Bridgeport, and we took an oath to serve and always work in the best interests of the City,' Lang wrote. 'Many times, we must discuss and act on tough issues and make decisions to keep the City moving forward.'
Bridgeport city manager intends to fight for his job
Ford, who was hired in October of 2024, has claimed his possible termination is an effort by city leaders to hide the results of an internal investigation initiated in February of 2025.
In a letter to City Council obtained by 12 News, Ford wrote 'on February 10th, 2025, you (city council) unanimously voted to initiate an internal investigation — the initial results of which you are collectively now attempting to hide through my termination.'
In that same letter, Ford invoked West Virginia State Code, which he said gives him the statutory right to have an open meeting concerning his employment status.
In an email sent to local media outlets Tuesday, Ford said there was a 'wealth of misinformation' circulating about his reputation and character and that he intends to 'fight for what is right — and my job.'
The Thursday special meeting has one item on the agenda: discussion and possible action on Ford's removal from office.
'Thursday's Special Meeting was called by me in accordance with the City's procedural requirements,' wrote Lang in his Wednesday statement. 'As an elected official who takes my responsibilities seriously, I will not deviate from the processes that we are obligated to follow. Rest assured, regardless of any information posted on social media or elsewhere, accurate information will be provided when appropriate. We must follow State Law and the Charter of the City of Bridgeport.'
The special meeting is scheduled for Thursday at 5 p.m. 12 News will be at the meeting and will bring you the latest.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Judge denies Mayor Mike Norris' bid to remove Charles Gambaro from council
A judge on July 3 denied Mayor Mike Norris's bid to remove fellow City Council member Charles Gambaro from his District 4 City Council seat. Norris filed the lawsuit against the city of Palm Coast, Flagler County Supervisor of Elections Kaiti Lenhart and Gambaro. Norris was represented by Attorney Anthony Sabatini who in the lawsuit argued that the City Council violated the city charter by failing to put Gambaro's seat up for a vote in the same November election in which Norris was voted into office. Sabatini said Gambaro's term ended on the night of the election in 2024. Circuit Judge Christopher France asked Sabatini about what standing Norris had to challenge the appointment. Sabatini argued that Norris had standing as a resident of Palm Coast affected by the actions of the City Council. He also argued that Norris was 'injured' because his votes were diluted by the votes in the council. Norris filed his lawsuit as mayor, but under the city charter, the mayor cannot make such a claim unless approved by the City Council. The attorney for the city and Gambaro, Rachael Crews, argued that Norris did not have standing based on Florida law; only the attorney general or the person who claims to be the rightful holder of the seat could challenge. She also spoke about the timing and discretionary language in the city charter. Crews also said that, according to the charter, even if the court were to remove Gambaro, the position would be filled by an appointment, not an election. She said the charter only called for a special election to fill the mayor's seat or in the event of a recall. In a previous email to The News-Journal, Norris said he was funding the lawsuit to remove Gambaro from the council. Gambaro did not attend the hearing. Norris declined to comment after the verdict was read. The lawsuit is another front in Norris' fight against the city. Norris received a unanimous vote of no confidence in April by his four fellow council members last month. The no-confidence vote stemmed from a 57-page report released April 21 regarding allegations that Norris violated the city charter, interfered with city employees and behaved unprofessionally. The Palm Coast City Council on May 9 submitted the letter filing a formal complaint against Norris with the Florida Ethics Commission. Norris' complaint to remove Gambaro states that the city charter gives the council two options if a council member "vacates their seat during the first two years of their term": Either appoint someone within 90 days or delay the appointment, according to a previous News-Journal story. If the council makes an appointment, that councilmember only serves until "the next regularly scheduled election." Palm Coast District 4 Councilmember Cathy Heighter resigned in August, and the council appointed Gambaro 3-1 (with only four members on the panel at that point) to replace her Oct. 1. Those in favor were previous Mayor David Alfin, previous Vice Mayor Ed Danko and previous Councilman Nick Klufas. All three were voted out in November. Theresa Pontieri, the only one to retain her seat after the election, supported Darryl Boyer. According to Norris' complaint, the city charter would have required Gambaro's appointment to expire after the Nov. 5 election. It is Norris' position that the city "has continued to allow Gambaro to occupy the seat beyond the term authorized by the charter." In a social media post referring to the hearing, Norris wrote "Independence Day is gonna get a lot better this year!" In its response to Norris, the city argued that the mayor was trying to use the judicial system to oust a political opponent and force a costly election, which would not be authorized by the city charter anyway. Attorney Crews, representing the city and Gambaro, filed a response on Thursday, May 29, listing a number of reasons Norris' request for Gambaro's removal should be denied. n the response, Crews wrote that Norris 'comes to the court with unclean hands' because he was 'improperly using the judicial system to undo a political opponent.' This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Palm Coast mayor's court bid to remove councilman denied
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Multiple proposals would ban new billboards in Worcester
A Worcester city councilor and a candidate running for city council have submitted two separate petitions that call for the banning of new billboards in the city. District 2 Councilor Candy Mero-Carlson and District 1 City Councilor candidate Keith Linhares both filed petitions to the City Council on the week of June 23 — the same week the city's zoning board of appeals voted against a permit for a proposed 75-foot-tall billboard near Indian Lake. Linhares's petition asks the city council to create an ordinance banning all new billboards in Worcester. He stated that billboards cause distractions for drivers on roads and that the lighting from the signs contributes to light pollution. 'I think I want to see our city make decisions that are more aligned with a positive for the environment are our local ecology,' Linhares said. 'The more that we continue to make these decisions that set us on a negative course like that, the worse off we will be.' Linhares told MassLive that he was inspired to write and submit the petition after hearing opposition from residents during the zoning board of appeals meeting on June 23 about the Indian Lake billboard. Linhares, along with Tony Economou — another candidate running for District 1 — both expressed opposition to the billboard. Mero-Carlson's petition asks City Manager Eric D. Batista to provide the council with a report on regulations relative to the installation of billboards in the city. The report would include information about current practices for installing advertisements on existing billboards and information about banning new billboards in the city, Mero-Carlson said. Like Linhares, Mero-Carlson said the opposition to the proposal for the new billboard near Indian Lake inspired her to submit her petition, and she believes billboards are an environmental and safety concern for city residents. Mero-Carlson, as well as District 2 candidate Robert Bilotta, were against the Indian Lake billboard. 'These types of billboards are destructive to the environment... affecting any type of wildlife,' Mero-Carlson said. The petitions sent to the city council, however, will have to wait until July 15, when the council holds its next meeting. Both Mero-Carlson and Linhares said that their petitions do not call for the removal of existing billboards in Worcester. On June 23, many residents gathered in front of the Worcester Zoning Board of Appeals to voice their opposition to the billboard proposal from Kenjoh Outdoor Advertising. 'We don't need another billboard,' said Worcester resident Diane Fratoni. 'I hope that you don't approve this sign.' Mark A. Borenstein, who works for the law firm Prince Lobel Tye LLP, represented Kenjoh at the meeting. He told the board that residents in the Indian Lake area would not see the sign and that the billboard presents an opportunity for public agencies, governmental agencies or non-profits to have visible signage. Borenstein also said the sign could be used for Amber Alerts. 'Certainly if a parent is concerned about a particular issue, it would be very fortunate to have that as an option,' Borenstein said. Still, the board rejected the permit to erect the billboard. Jordan Berg Powers, the chair of the board, acknowledged the broad opposition to the proposal during the meeting. 'When I talked to people, there wasn't anyone I talked to that felt that this was a good use of the property,' he said. New Central Mass. Big Y to officially open in October This Mass. city ranked among the lowest for public restroom access, cleanliness Vocational school admission change quietly dropped from state budget deal Read the original article on MassLive.
CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Baltimore City leaders call for end of BGE's 'Operation Pipeline' program, multi-year rate hikes
Baltimore City Council President Zeke Cohen and other city leaders are calling for a halt to Baltimore Gas and Electric's 'Operation Pipeline' program. The program aims to upgrade hundreds of miles of natural gas pipes and equipment across Maryland by replacing cast iron and bare steel pipes with new, more durable lines. In 2023, the Maryland Public Service Commission approved BGE's multi-year rate hike plan, which authorized a series of rate increases between 2024 and 2026. The plan, in part, will pay for the upgrades. But city leaders argue the program is driving up customer bills and increasing the company's profits. This isn't the first time city leaders have called for an end to the rate hikes. An analysis released by the Office of the People's Counsel in February found that spending on gas infrastructure is fueling the hikes, and projected even higher winter bills in the future if the company continues its current level of capital investment. The report says gas utilities will spend about $744 million on gas infrastructure in 2025. Shortly after the OPC's report was released, the Baltimore City Council passed a resolution calling on the PSC to stop the multi-year rate hikes, arguing that the infrastructure upgrades should not be paid for by taxpayers. Maryland sees rising utility costs BGE raised their rates on January 1, increasing the average residential gas bill by 9% and the electric bill by 7%. During the winter, Maryland households reported some of their highest gas bills ever. But BGE said that while the pipeline upgrades are a part of the cost increases, a 30% rise in natural gas prices over the past year, and increased spending on energy efficiency programs mandated by the state also play a factor.
