
This bank has changed its name: Will its cheque book, passbook, card and IFSC code still work?
North East Small Finance Bank Limited
to '
slice Small Finance Bank Limited
' in the Second Schedule of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
"We're on a journey to build India's most loved bank. Our mission is to value people's time and money in the products we build so more people can experience banking that truly works for them. he bank will continue to operate under the brand name of slice, and we are in the process of informing all stakeholders, especially customers, about this change to ensure a smooth and seamless transition. We're now expanding nationwide, while keeping our Northeast roots central to who we are," says a spokesperson from slice.
Private vs public bank locker charges 2025: Who is offering lockers at lowest rental?
But what does this mean for customers?
The name change raises several questions in the minds of account holders-whether they need to get new passbooks or cheque books, whether their debit cards will still work, or if IFSC codes will change.
What happens to your current cheque book, passbooks?
According to
RBI guidelines
, in the event of a name change by a bank, customers can continue using their current
banking instruments
, such as passbooks, debit cards, and cheque books, without any interruption-unless explicitly directed otherwise by the bank. Similarly, IFSC codes typically remain unchanged unless separately notified. The transition is expected to be gradual and fully guided, ensuring zero disruption to customer services.
Live Events
Post Office account death claim rules: How to claim money from post office after account holder's death with or without nomination
Vishal Gehrana, Partner Designate at Karanjawala & Co. and Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India, says, "A change in the name of a bank, such as from 'North East Small Finance Bank Limited' to 'Slice Small Finance Bank Limited', does not by itself require customers to immediately obtain new passbooks, cheque books, or debit cards. According to standard banking practice and RBI guidelines, all existing instruments that bear the old name remain valid and can be used as usual unless the bank specifically instructs customers otherwise."
Kinjal Champaneria, Partner at Solomon & Co, says, "Consequent to the change in name of the bank, it is common for items, such as passbooks, cheque books, debit cards, and other banking materials, to be updated with the new name, logo, and branding. However, the bank will officially communicate to the customers regarding the issuance of new banking materials.
Adhil Shetty, CEO of Bankbazaar.com, says, "Any time a bank is amalgamated into a new entity, the bank will reissue an updated passbook, cheque book, and, if needed, account numbers as well. This is a structured process that takes months, sometimes as much as a year."
"Banks are required to inform their customers about the name change and any related procedural updates. If the bank decides to issue new materials with the updated name, it will typically do so over a transition period and provide clear instructions. Until then, customers can continue to use their current passbooks, cheque books, and debit cards without any legal or operational issues," says Gehrana.
"The customers will be updated regularly and will be informed about the update. The bank will also provide customers with a certain period, usually six months, where they can continue to use their older passbook and cheque book even after the transition process is completed. So, customers have enough time to get used to the change and get new passbooks and other details," says Shetty.
This transition may take some time, as the bank will need to manage the replacement process and logistics. Customers will be notified by the bank regarding when they can expect to receive their new passbook, cheque book, debit card, etc. For any clarification or assistance, it is advisable that customers reach out to their local branch or the bank's customer support.
Unless otherwise notified by the bank, the existing passbooks, cheque books, and debit cards are likely to remain valid and fully functional for all banking transactions.
In short, unless you receive direct communication from the bank asking you to replace your banking instruments, you do not need to take any action. The change in the name of the bank does not affect the validity of your existing documents.
What happens to the current IFS codes of the bank?
Gehrana says, "The IFSC (Indian Financial System Code) is a unique identifier for bank branches used in electronic payment systems like NEFT, RTGS, and IMPS. While the code often includes an abbreviation of the bank's name, a change in the bank's name does not automatically result in a change to the IFSC code. If the bank or RBI decides to update the IFSC codes to reflect the new name, this will be done in a phased and well-communicated manner. Customers will be notified in advance, and the transition will be managed to ensure that there is no disruption to banking services. During any such transition, payments made using the old IFSC code are typically redirected to the correct branch, and online banking systems are updated automatically. Therefore, customers do not need to worry about failed transactions or immediate changes to their banking details. Any change to the IFSC code will be clearly communicated, and sufficient time will be given to adapt."
Kinjal Champaneria, Partner at Solomon & Co, says, "Regarding the IFSC code, it will change eventually. However, customers will be informed officially by the bank before any changes take effect. Until then, existing IFSC codes are likely to remain valid for all transactions."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
RBI bars foreclosure charges on floating rate loans to micro, small businesses
The Reserve Bank of India has barred banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) from charging prepayment penalties on floating rate loans to micro and small enterprises (MSEs), effective for all loans sanctioned or renewed on or after January 1, directive, issued under the Reserve Bank of India (Pre-payment Charges on Loans) Directions, 2025, follows a supervisory review that found divergent practices among lenders. The review revealed that several institutions were levying prepayment charges inconsistently and, in some cases, including restrictive clauses in loan agreements to discourage borrowers from switching to other lenders offering better the importance of "easy and affordable financing" for MSEs, the central bank noted that such clauses often led to customer grievances and disputes, particularly when borrowers sought to refinance their loans at lower interest to the new rules, no prepayment charges will be allowed on floating rate loans to MSEs or to individuals borrowing for business purposes. This applies regardless of whether the loan is prepaid in part or full, and irrespective of the source of funds used to make the prepayment. The exemption will apply from the first day of the loan, with no lock-in exception has been made for certain categories of lenders, including small finance banks, regional rural banks, state and central co-operative banks, and NBFCs in the middle regulatory layer, which are already barred from levying prepayment penalties on loans up to Rs 50 lakh. This framework will continue unchanged for these the case of cash credit and overdraft facilities, the RBI has clarified that no prepayment charges will apply if the borrower informs the lender of their intention not to renew the facility within the agreed period and ensures that it is closed by the due strengthen transparency, the central bank has directed lenders to clearly disclose all applicable prepayment terms in the sanction letter, loan agreement and the Key Facts Statement (KFS), wherever applicable. Retrospective charges will not be allowed, and lenders cannot reintroduce any fees that were previously borrowers were already exempt from prepayment penalties under earlier rules. With this move, the RBI is extending similar protections to small businesses, which often face tighter credit conditions and limited ability to negotiate loan decision follows public consultations on a draft circular issued in February and is part of the RBI's broader effort to standardise customer-facing terms and reduce friction in the credit market.- Ends advertisement


India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Madras HC Dismisses Xiaomis Petition Against ED Proceedings In FEMA Violation Case
Chennai: The Madras High Court has dismissed the petitions filed by Xiaomi Technology India Pvt Ltd and its Chief Financial Officer Sameer B.S. Rao, seeking to quash the proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with alleged violations under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) involving royalty payments of Rs 5,551 crore. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, delivering the verdict recently, held that the court would not interfere at the "formation of opinion" stage of proceedings under FEMA adjudication rules, as it was only a preliminary step and not a final determination of liability. Xiaomi India is engaged in the procurement, distribution, and sale of Xiaomi-branded products across India. In this context, the company entered into royalty agreements with Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Technologies Inc. (both US-based entities), and Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd, a group company based in China. According to the ED, Xiaomi remitted Rs 5,551 crore between 2016 and 2022 to these foreign entities as royalty payments, allegedly without obtaining prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) -- a requirement under FEMA for certain types of foreign remittances, especially where third-party transactions are involved. Following its investigation, the ED filed a complaint, and a show-cause notice was issued by the Adjudicating Authority under FEMA, which Xiaomi challenged before the High Court in April 2024. Appearing for Xiaomi, senior advocate K.G. Raghavan contended that the royalty payments were legitimate current account transactions and therefore did not require the RBI's prior approval. He argued that the ED's initiation of adjudication proceedings was unwarranted. However, Additional Solicitor General L. Sundaresan, representing the ED, submitted that the writ petition was premature, as the adjudication process was still at the stage of forming an opinion. He argued that this stage only requires prima facie material suggesting a contravention of FEMA provisions, and need not be based on conclusive findings. Sundaresan also cited a communication from Qualcomm, wherein Xiaomi was referred to as a 'third party' remitting payments on behalf of foreign group entities -- an act which, according to the ED, constitutes a violation under the FEMA. Accepting the ED's submissions, the High Court held that interference at this stage was unwarranted and permitted the adjudication proceedings to continue. Consequently, Xiaomi's plea challenging the show-cause notice and the formation of opinion was dismissed. "In the considered view of this Court, the case has now reached the stage under Rule 4(4) of the FEMA Rules, which is the stage of defence and therefore, the petitioners will be entitled to all the documents sought by them, including the non-RUDs," the court said in its judgement delivered on June 26.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Banking system liquidity hits three-year high as market awaits RBI action
Banking system liquidity rose to a net surplus of Rs 3.74 trillion, the highest since June 2022. The market is now awaiting action from the RBI to manage the surplus and ensure monetary transmission Mumbai Banking system liquidity rose further to a net surplus of ₹3.74 trillion, highest since June 1, 2022, latest data by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) showed. The recent improvement in banking system liquidity can largely be attributed to higher government spending and lower-than-expected goods and services tax (GST) collections, which have eased the usual liquidity pressures. As a result, the liquidity drain was not as sharp as anticipated, dealers said, adding that with RBI already having reduced the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR), its room for deploying other measures for liquidity withdrawal apart from variable rate reverse repo (VRRR) auction