
Starmer's REAL opposition is mutinous MPs who have strangled every meaningful change… he must know it's all over for him
FIFTY years since the release of Jaws, and almost exactly one year after that Labour landslide, the opposition smell blood in the water.
And nothing can stop them from coming for Keir 'Sharkbait' Starmer now.
10
Sharkbait is desperately paddling for the beach because, in his heart, he must know it is all over for him. The opposition has seen to it.
The opposition? No, not Farage 's Reform UK or Badenoch 's Conservative Party.
The REAL opposition to Starmer 's fragile reign are all those Labour backbenchers who are beyond Keir's control, or the will of his Whips, and have forced him into yet another humiliating U-turn.
On Tuesday, this Labour Government was planning to pass its landmark , trimming a modest £5 billion from the £66 billion that health-related will cost the British taxpayer by the end of the decade.
On Tuesday, this Labour Government was planning to pass its landmark welfare bill, trimming a modest £5billion from the £66billion that health-related benefits will cost the British taxpayer by the end of the decade.
And they could not do it.
More than 120 Labour MPs banded together to kill Sir Keir's modest plans to restrict benefits. By succeeding, they leave Starmer in office but hardly in power.
In the coming days we will hear much talk about Starmer's weakness.
He will be called a dead man walking. A lame duck quacking. A dead parrot of a PM.
But do we really believe that ANY Labour Prime Minister would be able to persuade Labour's backbenchers that the billions blown on benefits has become unsustainable?
The truth is that Labour are uncomfortable in Government.
Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs
Labour have no stomach for taming public spending. They never will.
Keir Starmer should be driving through the changes that he promised. But he exists in a universe of U-turns.
Starmer has already had to repent for taking the winter fuel payment away from pensioners.
The Government is now looking at scrapping the two-child benefit cap — even though Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson warns, 'It would cost a lot of money.'
Because Labour MPs don't like it.
The real problem is not Sharkbait Starmer.
The problem is a Labour Party who were in their comfort zone when they were in opposition.
The Labour backbenchers don't WANT to balance the books.
They want to be virtuous. And that is fine when you are in opposition.
Whelk stall
The performative politics work well when you are free to jeer and virtue-signal from the sidelines.
But this Friday will be exactly one year since Labour's General Election victory. And every meaningful change that Starmer has attempted has been strangled at birth by his mutinous MPs.
Sharkbait's welfare reforms will fail – or be so watered down that they are rendered meaningless. Instead, your taxes will rise.
We will hear lots of blah-blah-blah about those with 'the broadest shoulders' paying more but this is a total lie. The rich can't get out of the UK fast enough.
The increased tax burden will fall on the ordinary working man and woman. And Labour's allergy to taming public spending does NOT prove that they are fonts of human kindness.
It just shows that they are totally unsuited to running a whelk stall, let alone our country.
10
SERVE A LOVE MATCH
10
WIMBLEDON starts tomorrow and the thoughts of all true tennis fans turn inevitably to romance.
Carlos Alcaraz, world number two, and British number one Emma Raducanu will both be in Wimbledon singles action and will play mixed doubles together at the US Open a little later in the summer.
And rumours abound that Emma and Carlos, inset, may have a relationship that extends beyond the court, where love means nothing, to the world beyond, where love is all.
It has been a while since tennis had a great love story.
The big four – Roger Federer, Rafa Nadal, Novak Djokovic, Andy Murray – all married sweethearts from their teenage years.
The UK's Katie Boulter and Australia's Alex de Minaur are engaged and an adorable couple – but lacking the star power of Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf in the Nineties, or Chris Evert and Jimmy Connors in the Seventies.
Alcaraz and Raducanu, both 22, would be on that level. Their union would transcend tennis, exerting the fascination of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, or Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez.
But what would we call them? Raducaraz? Alcacanu? Raducarlos?
If their relationship blossoms – and old romantics will feel that Emma and Carlos are made for each other – then let's hope they have a happier ending than Brangelina and Bennifer.
Cool? You're Kiddin'
10
FROM the young members of The Who dozing under our nation's flag in the Sixties, to Noel Gallagher 's red, white and blue Epiphone guitar, Union Jacks and gilded youth are never really out of style.
But most experts agree that the apex of Britpop was when Vanity Fair magazine put Liam Gallagher and Patsy Kensit on the cover in 1997, when even their pillows and the duvet were made from the Union flag.
With Oasis about to go back on the road, Tatler magazine has declared – Cool Britannia is Back!
That Vanity Fair cover was so iconic that you get Tatler's reference at first sight.
Tatler's cover models are Molly Moorish-Gallagher, daughter of Liam Gallagher, and Sonny Ashcroft, son of Richard Ashcroft of the Verve, who is a support act for Oasis.
Lovely youngsters, for sure. But they – let's face it – would never be on the cover of a magazine if it wasn't for the fact they are somebody's son and somebody's daughter.
And the rampant nepotism on show is the big difference between then and now.
Back during the heady days of Britpop, nobody gave a toss who your parents were.
Zelensky survives assassination plot
10
UKRAINE President Volodymyr Zelensky has been in the news for so long we take this hero for granted.
When Russia invaded Ukraine, Biden was in the White House and Boris was in 10 Downing Street.
Now come reports that Zelensky survived a plot on his life by Russia's FSB spy service.
Ukraine's own spooks say the would-be assassin was a retired military officer recruited 'decades earlier'.
Russia's murderous threat to Zelensky will be there for the rest of his life. We should be in no doubt – he is what a hero looks like.
Denis gets Bond bout
THE director of the next James Bond film will be Denis Villeneuve.
And we already know the French-Canadian will do a grand job at reinventing 007 because he gloriously rebooted Ridley Scott's Blade Runner with his own Blade Runner 2049.
If Villeneuve can do it with an icon like Blade Runner, then he can do it with a brand like Bond.
Villeneuve is the best thing to happen to 007 since Daniel Craig pulled on those baby-blue budgie smugglers for Casino Royale in 2006.
Long story short, Daisy made the cut
I KNOW I watched American action-comedy The Dukes Of Hazzard because I have vague memories of a brace of amiable young rednecks, an orange hot-rod and a fat man in a white suit – Boss Hogg? – who was some kind of authority figure.
But what I can never forget about The Dukes Of Hazzard – what is seared into my memory and engraved on my soul – is Catherine Bach as Daisy Duke, who was revered for her cut-off denim shorts.
Catherine Bach's Daisy was one of a kind, and now the shorts she wore so well have officially entered the English English Dictionary.
They entered our hearts half a lifetime ago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Why is Bristol's birth rate falling faster than other UK cities?
As the cost of living rises, more people are questioning whether they can afford to have children. Bristol's birth rate is falling more rapidly than that of any other city in England and Wales - reflecting a national trend which has seen the fertility rate drop by 21% over the past Bristol, the birth rate has fallen by 36% in the last 10 years. The Office for National Statistics said this trend may be influenced by financial Young, 32, from the city, told the BBC he believes the current economic climate is making it much harder for people his age to raise a family. "It's always been a goal of mine to have kids in the future," he said."Taking them on holidays, day trips, and just giving them every chance to succeed. "But one of our biggest concerns is finances - whether we'll have the time and resources to raise kids the way we want to."Despite Bristol's economy doubling in size since 2004, the number of babies born has dropped by a third in the past decade. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the UK's total fertility rate - measuring the average number of children per woman - currently sits at Bristol, that number is even lower at 1.14 - a 36% decline in 10 years. Aaliyah Thomas, 30, has two children and said she can sympathise with Mr Young."It's quite difficult having a newborn and an older child," she said. "Trying to balance everything financially is really challenging."She added that she has noticed that more people she knows are delaying parenthood."The cost of living is so high, a lot of people just need to be in a better financial position before they can even think about having kids."Kate, a mother of several adult children, said the cost of moving out is a major barrier for them."They can't move out with their partners, they can't be self-sufficient and live by themselves," she said. "Rents are too high, and even buying a home is difficult. First you have to save for a deposit, and if you're renting, you often can't afford to save at all." Kerry Gadson, head of population analysis at ONS, said: "The reasons behind when and if women have children are very personal."In the 1960s, we had the introduction of contraception, more women entered the workforce and attended university and this is when we saw a real change."It [starting a family] may be driven by a range of factors including financial pressures and the timing of other life events, such as partnership formation and moving into your own home, which is generally happening later at the moment."Ms Gadson explained that women are having babies later, with the average age of new mothers being 31, but it doesn't mean that they are having fewer children."At the moment, birth rates are declining, but it doesn't mean that it will continue to fall."What's really interesting about Bristol is the average age of the people who live there is much younger than the average of the UK and that's by almost 10 years."So you're looking at a median age of 33 versus 41 for the average in the rest of the UK." For others, choosing not to have children is a decision they've embraced Joce, who is child free by choice, said: "When I was younger, I didn't realise it was even an option to not have children. "But as I got older, I realised you didn't have to. Most people I know who do have kids say 'good for you,' because I get to do more things and have more freedom with my time."She said she has never experienced any negative judgements for her decision."Bristol's a very liberal city, and I think we're more accepting of different lifestyles," she added. Filmmaker Maxine Trump, whose film 'To Kid or Not to Kid' documents her her decision not to have children, is part of a growing group of people openly discussing the choice to remain child documentary, which took her eight years to make, explores the pressures and prejudices faced by women who do not want to be mothers."At the time when I was making the decision not to have children, I couldn't verbalise it, because there wasn't a lot of people around me that had made that decision."Having grown up with many nieces and nephews, Mrs Trump explained that she loves children, but felt having her own was not the right choice."I found this wonderful career that enabled me to go out filming and my life wouldn't have been easy to take on the responsibilities of having kids."Mrs Trump said she has a lot of empathy for younger people who want to have also feels the government could offer better incentives for people to have children by introducing more schemes for childcare."Younger people at the childbearing age are making really considered decisions. "The house prices are really going through the roof in Bristol, and it's really hard for people to decide whether or not to have kids."


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Charity praises plans to repair and reopen Redhill theatre
The UK's national advisory body for theatres has welcomed a council's commitment to repair and reopen a Surrey venue which was shut after unstable concrete was Harlequin Theatre in Redhill closed its doors in September 2023 after reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac) was found throughout the and Banstead Borough Council has said it expects the theatre to reopen in late spring 2027 if everything goes to Trust, a charitable organisation, described the arts centre as an "invaluable cultural space". The Surrey venue was at one stage listed among the most likely theatres in the country to close, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. Earlier in June, the council's executive committee agreed a way forward that would involve a £4.5m repair job. Joshua McTaggart, Theatres Trust CEO, said: "We welcome the council's commitment to safely reopening the Harlequin Theatre and cinema while minimising the time the local community is left without this invaluable cultural space."We are also pleased to see progress being made on plans to create an additional art and culture venue in the area, which can only add to the vibrancy and appeal of the town."The agreed work will allow the theatre and cinema to open at its previous capacity, pending final full council sign off in plans, which would have run alongside repair work, have been put on hold, as the council considers handing over control to a private group.


Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's mad planning system is becoming more and more absurd
Across the political spectrum, we don't agree on much. But we can all agree that the UK needs more homes and must start building in earnest. So why is Labour-run Birmingham City Council demanding that Mark Jones rip down the £180,000 two-bedroom 'granny flat' he built in his back garden for his dying father? With bin strikes, rat plagues and near bankruptcy, one might imagine that this particular local authority would have different matters on its mind. Mr Jones said he believed the building complied with planning laws and lodged a retrospective planning application. But the council's officious officers found that the Sutton Coldfield IT engineer has fallen foul of their regulations as it was 'over-intensive', and have ordered it to be demolished by the end of the month. The case shows in microcosm what is wrong with Britain's planning system. Like so much that is wrong on our island, from the NHS to the post-war explosion in council housing, its origins lie with the 1945 Clement Attlee Labour government. The 1947 Town and Country Planning Act established our system of planning permission, as well as the modern system of needing consents to build on land. It also meant that all planning authorities had to come up with a comprehensive development plan. Green belts, the listing of buildings and the anathematising of building in the open countryside can all be dated back to this legislation. In some regards, we should be grateful for Attlee's innovation. Anyone who has taken the seven-hour trip from Boston to Washington DC on the Acela Amtrak train will see why. Apart from a stretch along the Connecticut coastline, the prospect out of the windows is of virtually unending urban sprawl. Or contrast the west coast of Ireland with the west coast of Scotland. While the Irish views are endlessly interrupted by the tackiest imaginable McMansions, complete with fake colonnades and naff statuary, the Caledonian vista is virtually uninterrupted. Our planning system has made large-scale developers hugely powerful to a far greater extent than in most other developed countries. Building your own house is straightforward in much of the United States. But then America is a large country with plenty of space, as defenders of the British status quo might point out. The rules in much of Europe, however, are also vastly more flexible. In France, for example, it is relatively straightforward to buy a plot of land on the fringes of a village and build a family home on it. By contrast, in the UK, to build a new single dwelling in the isolated countryside is extraordinarily difficult. One of the very few routes is via what is now called Paragraph 84 consent. This is a rule, first introduced in 1997 in the dying days of John Major's government, allowing for new country houses to be built, but only if they are of 'truly outstanding' design and 'reflect the highest standards of architecture'. We would all, I am sure, like to live in such houses – but to meet such benchmarks requires money, plenty of it. It is not something that rural Mr Joneses, middle-earning IT engineers and their like, will ever be able to afford. The British system places all the cards in the hands of the vast corporate builders, with their new housing developments. Angela Rayner's Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which is now being pushed through the House of Lords, will only make this problem even worse. It will make development easier, and that is indeed a worthy goal. It will make it easier to overrule Nimby-style objections, but its mechanisms are not there to help people who want to do their own projects. It is all about pushing through large-scale plans in the face of local opposition, be they for new homes, wind or solar farms or the latest railway wheeze dreamt up in Whitehall. It is not about allowing Sir Keir Starmer's much-touted 'working people' to realise their own building ambitions. Our planning system might seem to have been more of a success if our post-war homes were exemplars of design. But that is far from the case. Probably the only country in Western Europe that has uglier townscapes than those found in much of Britain is Germany. Walk through Cologne, and outside of its Cathedral and Romanesque churches you would be hard put to find an uglier city with less inspiring buildings. Colognians have a very good excuse. When their city was rebuilt in the 1950s from the ashes the RAF had reduced it to, beauty was not foremost on their minds. We have no such excuse for some of the horrors that urban planning has imposed on our towns and cities. And our planning laws did little to protect us from these missteps. When Nick Boles was housing minister in the Cameron government, he was evangelical about relaxing planning rules in urban and suburban areas. He wanted to allow thousands upon thousands of Mr Joneses to do pretty much as they pleased with their own land and property, and thought this would make a huge difference to our housing shortage. It would also empower local people. Such an approach would clearly be a disaster if applied to, say, the Victorian garden square of London or the Georgian terraces of Bath. They would soon be scarred with endless glass boxes and extensions which would now be on trend, but soon look very dated. If Labour really wants to empower working people, allowing the Mr Joneses to build on their back gardens could be just the thing. But don't hold your breath.