logo
After 9 SpaceX Starship launches, some have been more successful than others

After 9 SpaceX Starship launches, some have been more successful than others

Yahoo28-05-2025
SpaceX's Starship Flight 9 ended in failure — and it is not the company's only one.
Since its first launch in April 2023, SpaceX has seen a mix of failed and successful launches. While not every launch is a success, the company often says that "success comes from what we learn."
SpaceX's first Starship flight test started with success as the spacecraft cleared the orbital launch pad for the first time. However, Starship experienced multiple engine outages, lost altitude and began to tumble. At that point, according to SpaceX, "the flight termination system was commanded on both the booster and ship."
The company experienced another issue during its first flight test beyond what SpaceX livestream hosts described as a "rapid unscheduled disassembly." While the rocket was built to be reusable, no part of the rocket was recovered.
Spacex Successfully Launches Giant Starship Rocket, Explodes Minutes Later
Months after its first flight test failed, SpaceX once again launched Starship. While SpaceX celebrated a number of major milestones with this launch and saw Starship make it further than the first flight, it still ended in failure.
Read On The Fox Business App
Starship's takeoff was successful in this second test, but the separation from the Super Heavy booster ended in an explosion. Despite this premature ending, SpaceX classified the separation itself and the Super Heavy booster's flip maneuver to being successful. Once again, the spacecraft experienced a "rapid unscheduled disassembly."
The third Starship test flight was the first to be considered a success. In its third test, it met the same key milestones as the first two, and it ultimately went further than either of its predecessors.
As the first successful test flight, the Starship was able to experience its first-ever reentry to Earth from space, which gave SpaceX "valuable data on heating and vehicle control during hypersonic reentry."
Celebrating the company's success, SpaceX founder Elon Musk vowed "Starship will take humanity to Mars" following the test flight.
SpaceX's fourth test flight was also a success from takeoff to reentry. Additionally, Starlink was able to capture live high-definition video throughout every phase of reentry, according to SpaceX.
"Flight 4 ended with Starship igniting its three center Raptor engines and executing the first flip maneuver and landing burn since our suborbital campaign, followed by a soft splashdown of the ship in the Indian Ocean one hour and six minutes after launch," SpaceX wrote in a summary of the launch on its website.
Musk celebrated in a post on X, saying that despite Starship losing "many tiles" and ending up with a "damaged flap," the spacecraft successfully made its soft landing in the ocean.
Starbase, Home To Elon Musk's Spacex, To Officially Become A Texas City
In the fifth flight test for SpaceX's Starship, the company achieved a major milestone as Mechazilla's mechanical arms successfully captured the Super Heavy booster, making the reusable design closer to reality. Musk hailed the achievement as "science fiction without the fiction part."
SpaceX celebrated the successful test in a post on X, saying that the ability to launch and return are "fundamental techniques" for Starship's reusable design.
Then-former President Donald Trump reacted to the launch during a campaign rally in Arizona just weeks before the 2024 election. Trump told a crowd of supporters that he "never saw anything like it." He joked that the booster needed a new paint job, which is "a lot cheaper than building a new one."
Spacex Dragon Capsule Sticks Splashdown Landing As Nasa Astronauts Return Home After Months Stuck In Space
Just over a month after SpaceX's impressive achievement during its October 2024 launch, the company saw another successful launch but did not execute a catch at the launch site as it did with its fifth test flight.
Not all the criteria for a booster catch were met, which led to the decision not to go through with the move, according to PBS, which cited SpaceX spokesman Dan Huot. The outlet added that Huot did not mention any specific issue. However, SpaceX says on its webpage dedicated to the launch that the booster pulled off a "pre-planned divert maneuver" before its splashdown in the Gulf of America.
In its first flight test of 2025, SpaceX saw its Starship experience another "rapid unscheduled disassembly." As the Starship upper stage performed its ascent burn to space, SpaceX lost contact approximately eight and a half minutes into the test flight.
Despite the issues with the Starship upper stage, the Super Heavy booster made a successful landing and was caught back at the launchpad.
On its seventh test flight, Starship was carrying mock satellites which SpaceX reportedly planned to use to practice releasing them, according to Reuters. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was briefly forced to slow down and divert flights that could have been in the path of debris from the Starship, though normal operations eventually resumed.
Musk seemed to take it in stride, writing on X that "Success is uncertain, but entertainment is guaranteed!"
Starship's eighth test flight ended when several engines failed, and SpaceX lost connection with the spacecraft approximately nine and a half minutes after it was launched. Ultimately, Starship exploded off the coast of Florida.
While the flight was a failure, SpaceX was able to execute a successful booster catch for the third time.
The FAA said that the test impacted 240 flights, more than two dozen of which were forced to divert due to concerns about debris, according to Reuters. Additionally, the FAA issued ground stops for just over an hour in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Orlando and Palm Beach.
In total, there were 171 departure delays, 28 flights were diverted, and 40 airborne flights were held for an average of 22 minutes, Reuters reported. The outlet said that the average delay time for the 171 flights was 28 minutes.
SpaceX's ninth Starship test flight ended in failure. The mission aimed to deploy eight Starlink simulator satellites and test reentry with 100 heat shield tiles intentionally removed.
The payload door failed to open during the flight. Any parts of the aircraft that did not disintegrate upon reentry landed in the Indian Ocean.
Despite the failure, Musk noted a "big improvement" since Starship's last flight as the craft made it to the scheduled engine cutoff. Additionally, he said there was "no significant loss of heat shield tiles during ascent."
Fox News Digital's Jasmine Baehr contributed to this report.Original article source: After 9 SpaceX Starship launches, some have been more successful than others
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uber's new shuttles look suspiciously familiar to anyone who's taken a bus
Uber's new shuttles look suspiciously familiar to anyone who's taken a bus

Miami Herald

time13 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Uber's new shuttles look suspiciously familiar to anyone who's taken a bus

Uber's new shuttles look suspiciously familiar to anyone who's taken a bus Every few years, a Silicon Valley gig-economy company announces a "disruptive" innovation that looks a whole lot like a bus. Uber rolled out Smart Routes a decade ago, followed a short time later by the Lyft Shuttle of its biggest competitor. Even Elon Musk gave it a try in 2018 with the "urban loop system" that never quite materialized beyond the Vegas Strip. And does anyone remember Chariot? Now it's Uber's turn again. The ride-hailing company recently announced Route Share, in which shuttles will travel dozens of fixed routes, with fixed stops, picking up passengers and dropping them off at fixed times. Amid the inevitable jokes about Silicon Valley once again discovering buses are serious questions about what this will mean for struggling transit systems, air quality, and congestion. Uber promised the program, which rolled out in seven cities at the end of May, will bring "more affordable, more predictable" transportation during peak commuting hours. "Many of our users, they live in generally the same area, they work in generally the same area, and they commute at the same time," Sachin Kansal, the company's chief product officer, said during the company's May 14 announcement. "The concept of Route Share is not new," he admitted-though he never used the word "bus." Instead, pictures of horse-drawn buggies, rickshaws, and pedicabs appeared onscreen, Grist reports. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi was a bit more forthcoming when he told The Verge the whole thing is "to some extent inspired by the bus." The goal, he said, "is just to reduce prices to the consumer and then help with congestion and the environment." But Kevin Shen, who studies this sort of thing at the Union of Concerned Scientists, questions whether Uber's "next-gen bus" will do much for commuters or the climate. "Everybody will say, 'Silicon Valley's reinventing the bus again,'" Shen said. "But it's more like they're reinventing a worse bus." Five years ago, the Union of Concerned Scientists released a report that found ride-share services emit 69 percent more planet-warming carbon dioxide and other pollutants than the trips they displace-largely because as many as 40 percent of the miles traveled by Uber and Lyft drivers are driven without a passenger, something called "deadheading." That climate disadvantage decreases with pooled services like UberX Share-but it's still not much greener than owning and driving a vehicle, the report noted, unless the car is electric. Beyond the iffy climate benefit lie broader concerns about what this means for the transit systems in New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Philadelphia, Dallas, Boston, and Baltimore-and the people who rely on them. "Transit is a public service, so a transit agency's goal is to serve all of its customers, whether they're rich or poor, whether it's the maximum profit-inducing route or not," Shen said. The entities that do all of this come with accountability mechanisms-boards, public meetings, vocal riders-to ensure they do what they're supposed to. "Barely any of that is in place for Uber." This, he said, is a pivot toward a public-transit model without public accountability. Compounding the threat, Philadelphia and Dallas have struggling transit systems at risk of defunding. The situation is so dire in Philly that it may cut service by nearly 45 percent on July 1 amid a chronic financial crisis. That, as one Reddit user pointed out, would be good news for Uber. Meanwhile, the federal government is cutting support for public services, including transit systems-many of which still haven't fully recovered from COVID-19-era budget crunches. Though ridership nationwide is up to 85 percent of pre-pandemic levels, Bloomberg News recently estimated that transit systems across the country face a $6 billion budget shortfall. So it's easy to see why companies like Uber see a business opportunity in public transit. Khosrowshahi insists Uber is "in competition with personal car ownership," not public transportation. "Public transport is a teammate," he told The Verge. But a 2024 study released by the University of California, Davis found that in three California cities, over half of all ride-hailing trips didn't replace personal cars, they replaced more sustainable modes of getting around, like walking, public transportation, and bicycling. And then there's the fact cities like New York grapple with chronic congestion and don't need more vehicles cluttering crowded streets. During Uber's big announcement, Kansal showed a video of one possible Route Share ride in the Big Apple. It covered about 3 miles from Midtown to Lower Manhattan, which would take about 30 minutes and cost $13. But here's the thing: The addresses are served by three different subway lines. It is possible to commute between those two points, avoid congestion, and arrive sooner, for $2.90. So, yes, Uber Route Share is cheaper than Uber's standard car service-which has gotten 7.2 percent pricier in the past year-but Route Share is far from the most efficient or economical way to get around in the biggest markets it's launching in."If anything," Shen said, "it's reducing transit efficiency by gumming up those same routes with even more vehicles." This story was produced byGrist and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.

What's the status of DOGE dividend check? Here's Fishback's new update on stimulus checks
What's the status of DOGE dividend check? Here's Fishback's new update on stimulus checks

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What's the status of DOGE dividend check? Here's Fishback's new update on stimulus checks

Elon Musk is out of the White House and the Department of Government Efficiency, but what of the DOGE savings and dividend checks for taxpayers? Here's the latest update from the idea's original author. Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, the author and architect of the DOGE dividend check proposal announced to Politico that he was stepping away from the movement. However, on his X account, Fishback tweeted, "I believed in Elon Musk's vision to shrink government and make it work better for Americans. I'm proud of the DOGE Dividend proposal I developed and will keep working with the administration to return savings to taxpayers." He added, "The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the President, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay." Amy Gleason is the acting administrator and head of DOGE. Musk's departure from the federal government will likely do little to change DOGE's work carrying out Trump's vision of downsizing the federal government or eliminating the 'fraud and waste.' According to the DOGE website, it cites an estimated $180 billion — approximately $1,118 per individual federal taxpayer — in savings through their cuts and reductions in government spending and proof in their "Wall of Receipts." Albeit, only $70 billion is itemized thus far, raising doubts about accuracy. Here's what to know about the reality of a DOGE dividend check, recipient eligibility and a status updates from Trump, Musk and the DOGE team and Fishback. Fishback's four-page proposal of the 'DOGE dividend' described it as a refund "sent only to tax-paying householders." Noting the difference from past stimulus checks, he added that DOGE checks would not be inflationary as they would be "exclusively funded with DOGE-driven savings, unlike COVID stimulus checks which were deficit-financed." The idea was originally floated by Fishback on Musk's social media platform X, suggesting Trump and Musk "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend' — a tax refund check sent to every taxpayer, funded exclusively with a portion of the total savings delivered by DOGE." Musk replied "Will check with the President." Fishback's proposal would send checks only to households above a certain income level as opposed to pandemic-era checks that were sent 'indiscriminately.' 'A lot of low-income households essentially saw transfer payments of 25% to 30% of their annual … income,' Fishback said of the pandemic stimulus checks, adding, 'This exclusively goes to households that are net-payers of federal income tax, and what that means is that they have a lower propensity to spend and a higher propensity to save a transfer payment like the DOGE dividend.' "I'm honored to have the president's support, but the plan is very simple," Fishback said. "DOGE is going to save X amount of money over the next couple of years. Let's take 20 percent of that and send it right back to the hard-working taxpayers who sent it to D.C. in the first place." By definition, a dividend is a distribution of profits by a corporation to its shareholders and refund is a payment made back to a user that previously paid for something. A stimulus check on the other hand, is a direct payment to encourage spending and stimulate the economy by putting money directly into the consumers' hand. The potential refund would be sent only to households that are net-income taxpayers — people who pay more in taxes than they get back — with lower-income Americans not qualifying for the return, according to news reports. The Pew Research Center cites most Americans who have an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 pay effectively no federal income tax. The proposed DOGE refund check would be issued per household, rather than to each individual taxpayer, including those receiving Social Security benefits that meet the income tax requirements. On June 6, Fishback said, "I believed in Elon Musk's vision to shrink government and make it work better for Americans. I'm proud of the DOGE Dividend proposal I developed and will keep working with the administration to return savings to taxpayers." On April 8 in an interview with Chris Cuomo, the author of the DOGE dividend idea — Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback — was asked "Do you think it is going to happen?" To which he replied "Yes, I really do believe it will happen and I've got unique information because I've been on the Hill for the last two weeks, meeting with members in the House and Senate." He claims he has the support of President Donald Trump, special government agent Elon Musk and the economist Kevin Hassett, Director of the National Economic Council. On March 30, during a rally in Wisconsin, Musk said the DOGE dividend check was up to the president and congressional approval to decide if and when his cost saving measures would result in 'whether a check is cut or not' to taxpayers. 'As government spending is made more efficient and spending is reduced, the tax by inflation is reduced,' said Musk at the rally. 'So one way or another, you will effectively be better off if resources in the United States are not wasted.' Adding, 'We've made a lot of progress but there's still a tremendous amount of work to do,' Musk continued. On March 27 during an interview with FOX News Bret Baier, Musk and the DOGE team discussed the timeline to reduce the deficit by $1 trillion through cutting wasteful government spending and eliminating fraud. DOGE claimed to have saved approximately $130 billion at that time, estimating that savings to be over $800 per taxpayer. On Feb. 19, President Donald Trump said he would consider the plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to taxpayers in the form of a 'DOGE dividend' during a summit in Miami. He explained it as using part of the 20% of the savings identified by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and giving it back to taxpayers. However, he has not shared any further specifics or details about the possible 'DOGE dividend' or its certainty since then. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), officially the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization, is an initiative created by Trump and was initially spearheaded by the former special government employee Musk. The mission of DOGE was to slash federal spending, speed deregulation and "modernize federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity." At the time it was introduced, DOGE's effort was to save as much as $2 trillion a year. DOGE claims to have already saved $180 billion. Maria Francis is a Pennsylvania-based journalist with the Mid-Atlantic Connect Team. This article originally appeared on Why did Elon Musk leave DOGE? What's DOGE dividend check status update Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

OpenAI Says It Does Not Endorse Robinhood's 'Stock Tokens' of ChatGPT Maker
OpenAI Says It Does Not Endorse Robinhood's 'Stock Tokens' of ChatGPT Maker

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

OpenAI Says It Does Not Endorse Robinhood's 'Stock Tokens' of ChatGPT Maker

ChatGPT maker OpenAI distanced itself from the "stock token" project Robinhood announced earlier this week. OpenAI said tokenized versions of its stock are not official equity in the private company. Robinhood said the assets wouldn't technically be equity, but would give European investors exposure to a range of public and private U.S. said Wednesday that it does not endorse the "tokenized" version of its stock that trading platform Robinhood (HOOD) announced it would be making available to its European users. "These 'OpenAI tokens' are not OpenAI equity," the ChatGPT maker said in a statement on X. "We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it. Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval—we did not approve any transfer. Please be careful." Robinhood announced a slate of new features earlier this week expanding its cryptocurrency offerings, along with "stock tokens" of a mix of public and private companies that Robinhood will make available to its European users looking for exposure to U.S. markets. Part of the event included a giveaway of OpenAI and SpaceX tokens to a certain number of users who sign up by July 7. "To cap off our recent crypto event, we announced a limited stock token giveaway on OpenAI and SpaceX to eligible European customers," a Robinhood spokesperson told Investopedia. "These tokens give retail investors indirect exposure to private markets, opening up access, and are enabled by Robinhood's ownership stake in a special purpose vehicle." Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said in response to OpenAI's post that "while it is true that they aren't technically 'equity'," the tokens will still "effectively give retail investors exposure to these private assets." Robinhood shares were down 2% in premarket trading, coming down from a record close of $97.98 on Wednesday. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store