Hong Kong cancels passports, bans financial support for 16 overseas activists
The activists were among 19 people who were targeted with arrest warrants in July for alleged roles in Hong Kong Parliament, a group the police called a subversive organization abroad. The organisation is not the city's official legislature and its influence is limited.
Three of the original 19 activists were already targeted by similar measures last year.
Secretary for Security Chris Tang banned providing funds or economic resources to the 16 activists, including Victor Ho, Keung Ka-wai, Australian academic Chongyi Feng and U.S. citizen Gong Sasha, the Hong Kong government said in a statement.
Travel documents were canceled for 12 of the 16 who hold Hong Kong passports.
The government also prohibited properties from being leased to the people on the list or forming joint ventures with them. Anyone violating the orders risks a penalty of up to seven years in prison.
The 16 activists are hiding in the UK, the US, Canada, Germany, Australia, Thailand and Taiwan, among other regions, the government said, accusing them of continuing to engage in activities endangering national security.
The notice also accused them of intending to incite hatred against Beijing and Hong Kong through smear and slander.
'We therefore have taken such measures to make a significant impact," the statement said.
Beijing imposed a national security law on the territory in 2020 that has effectively wiped out most public dissent following huge anti-government protests in 2019. Many activists were arrested, silenced or forced into self-exile.
The measures announced Monday were issued under the powers granted by Hong Kong's homegrown national security law enacted last year.
The arrest warrants issued in July have drawn criticism from foreign governments, including the US, the UK and the European Union. Police offered rewards of 200,000 Hong Kong dollars ($25,480) to 1 million Hong Kong dollars ($127,400) for information leading to their arrests.
In a July statement, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the moves.
'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational repression," he said. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on US soil." The Hong Kong office of the Chinese Foreign Ministry responded by opposing criticism from foreign politicians, insisting the actions were legitimate.
The governements in Beijing and Hong Kong said the security laws were necessary for the city's stability. (AP) NSA NSA
view comments
First Published:
August 04, 2025, 12:30 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
For Pakistan & US, it is back to doing business
There is a discernible sense of satisfaction within Pakistan's strategic fraternity at the undeniable uptick in the US-Pakistan interface over the past few months. Some may dispute the extent, but given how the relationship had eroded in the past decade-and-a-half, any improvement represents a big change. Given the transactional nature that dominates the US, there is the temptation to find direct factors for the upswing in US-Pakistan relations. (AP) The principal milestones of the US-Pakistan downturn are well known. For Pakistan, the US detection and killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011 in Abbottabad was a betrayal and a public humiliation. For many Pakistanis, that the US acted clandestinely deep inside Pakistan superseded the enormity of the fact that Osama had been living there all the time under the very noses of the Pakistan military. The free fall continued with mounting US frustrations over Pakistan's double game in Afghanistan. President Trump's 2018 New Year Day tweet exemplified this view. The tweet underlined US foolishness in giving Pakistan billions of dollars in aid in return for deceit and lies! This was consistent with emergent US narratives about Pakistan, but that it was from the President himself made it doubly significant. Through the Biden tenure matters crystallised at a low plateau of bad blood and mutual recriminations. The US's final withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 in disorder and disarray added another layer to the deep strategic mistrust and suspicion that now characterised the relationship. President Biden did not have even a telecon with Imran Khan during the time he was PM and Imran Khan in turn blamed the US for his premature ouster from power. In the meantime, most US military and security assistance was suspended. What perhaps hurt Pakistan the most was the impact this had on training programmes for Pakistan military officers in the US. All this happened also when the India-US relationship seemed effortlessly to go from strength to strength. This further highlighted the distance between Washington and Islamabad. The past few months appear quite different. The change was animated quite dramatically by Field Marshal Asim Munir being hosted by President Trump in June 2025 in the immediate aftermath of Operation Sindoor. It is most unusual — perhaps even unprecedented — for a US president to host a chief of a foreign military who is not a head of State or government. This shift also coincides with new ambiguities in the US-India interface — perhaps triggered by President Trump's constant reiteration of having prevented further escalation in the India-Pakistan conflict during Operation Sindoor. To many in Pakistan, this has 'internationalised' Kashmir and highlighted the importance of third-party intervention as equally that even the US was skeptical about India's claims and demands. There had been earlier indicators of change beginning with President Trump's acknowledgement of Pakistan's counter-terrorism assistance in his State of the Union Address in March 2025. The allocation of a significant financial package as assistance to Pakistan for maintaining its F16 aircraft despite an otherwise stringent foreign aid cutback, was another. Alongside, more even-handed references to the India-Pakistan dynamic, meetings and telephone conversations between the US secretary of State and senior Pakistan leaders further underlined this shift. The announcement of a US-Pakistan Trade Agreement, albeit with a 19% tariff on imports from Pakistan, and Trump's enthusiastic references to hydrocarbon exploration and investment, are but the latest in this trend. The trade agreement may not be the best deal Pakistan could have got, but it is not as bad as could have been, and in any case some deal was better than no deal as far as the government of Pakistan was concerned. It may well be argued that there is nothing particularly significant in these transitions, but for most Pakistanis they suggest a return of their country to the US's radar after a long period of being out in the cold. What explains this shift? Given the transactional frame of mind that dominates the US, there is always the temptation to look for a direct and material factor. Numerous reasons are, therefore, assigned for this shift in US policy. Pakistan's counter-terrorism potential and the assistance it can offer is one. That the US is keen to have some relationship with Pakistan given the growing spread of China in the region is another. There is also the view that recommendations of the US Central Command on Pakistan's military potential vis-à-vis Iran in terms of its geographical location and the value of its air bases may have registered on the Presidency amid the current situation in West and South West Asia. Some argue that this shift in policy was also pushed along by crypto currency deals, and by US interest in potential Pakistani reserves of rare earth minerals. Each of these explanations may have some merit but perhaps the weight of any or all of these should not be exaggerated. Instead, it is useful to refocus on some basics. Pakistan is the fifth largest country in the world in terms of population with some 250 million people. It is riven by instability. It has nuclear weapons. It is situated in a sensitive geo-political location, almost in a global fault line. Given these attributes it was always only a matter of time that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would reverse and US interest in Pakistan would reignite. We are at that stage now. All major powers decide on policies based on an appreciation of their own interests and their own understandings of evolving situations. To think that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would have simply continued or that the US would see developments from our perspective alone is, and never was, a realistic assessment. We should take this shift in our stride. If some in India feel betrayed or dismayed at this turn of events, they have only themselves to blame. TCA Raghavan is a former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan. The views expressed are personal.
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India-US ties in the crosswires
India's blunt response to US President Donald Trump's repeated outbursts on New Delhi's trade and defence relations with Moscow highlighted the double standards of Western powers that have criticised India for purchasing discounted Russian commodities over the past three years. Trump, who follows a completely transactional and unpredictable approach to global trade and key geo-strategic relationships, has spoken more than once in recent days about levying an unspecified penalty on India for its purchases of energy and military hardware from Russia, over and above the 25% tariff that he has already imposed on exports to the US. India-US ties have evolved from the Cold War days, to achieve a relatively balanced relationship based on mutual respect, democratic values, and strategic interests. (AP) The external affairs ministry's response to Trump's latest fusillade against India has two key takeaways: One, New Delhi reserves the right to choose its trade partners and will exercise strategic autonomy to meet its security needs; and two, the West must end its hypocrisy of offering one set of principles for the rest of the world and following another set to meet its own energy imperatives. A year ago, US officials, albeit under a different administration, had assured the Indian side that Russian crude refined in a third country, such as India, is not a 'product of Russia' from a sanctions perspective. For India, Russian energy is a necessity to ensure predictable and affordable costs for Indian consumers amid volatile market conditions. At the same time, members of the EU and the US have retained their energy and other trade ties with Russia under carve-outs from sanctions packages. The EU's latest sanctions, for example, provide exemptions for Canada, Norway, Switzerland, the UK and the US from an import ban on refined products made from Russian oil. Such double standards do not sit well with Trump's sharp remarks about India. Sure, Trump's posturing may be aimed at pressuring India to conclude a trade deal that is to the advantage of the US, but this is no way to treat an important partner. While Washington has taken the moral high ground on Ukraine (one reason Trump has cited for targeting India), it appears unconcerned about Israel's war in Gaza that has claimed more than 60,000 Palestinian lives. Washington will be mistaken to take India for granted at a time when Trump is dining with the Pakistan army chief in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack. Such moves may even push New Delhi closer to Moscow, a longstanding and reliable ally. India-US ties have evolved from the Cold War days, when New Delhi was allied to Moscow and Washington patronised Islamabad, to achieve a relatively balanced relationship based on mutual respect, democratic values, and strategic interests. Trump's short-sighted and transactional approach to diplomacy threatens to disrupt that journey.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
What is the bullying case in China that has led to rare protests?
Protests have erupted in Jiangyou in China's southwest after a video of a schoolgirl being bullied by her classmates went viral. This comes in the backdrop of bullying in China being a subject of fierce public debate. But what happened? How have authorities responded? read more China has vowed to crack down on school bullying. Protest are a rare thing in China. And for good reason. Everyone knows about Tiananmen square in 1989, where the state ruthlessly stamped out political opposition. But that hasn't stopped protests from erupting in Jiangyou in the country's southwest after a video of a schoolgirl being bullied by her classmates went viral. This comes in the backdrop of bullying in China being a subject of public debate. In 2024, a high-profile sparked discussion about the punishment being meted out to juvenile offenders. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what happened? What do we know? How have the authorities responded? Let's take a closer look What happened? Videos on Chinese social media showed a young girl named Lai being pummelled with kicks and slaps in China's Sichuan province. The culprits? Three other teenagers. The video shows Lai, the victim, being forced to kneel in front of her assailants. The incident, which occurred in July, was filmed by passers-by. Videos purportedly show Lai being hit with a stick. Lai warned her assailants she would call the police, only to be dismissed by her attackers. One of the girls said she they were not afraid, while another claimed she had been to the police station over 10 times. She added that she had been let off in under 20 minutes. Lai was left with multiple bruises on Lai's scalp and knees, according to the police. The three suspects, all female, are 13, 14 and 15. There are reports that the girl, Lai, had been bullied incessantly. Her mother, who is reportedly deaf, had been pleading with authorities to act. Things reportedly got bloody after the police used batons and cattle prods to disperse the crowd. Image courtesy: Human Rights in China/X Police on August 4 said two of the attackers were being sent to a correctional The onlookers and a third girl who participated in the abuse were 'criticised and educated', the police added. They said the teens' guardians had been 'ordered to exercise strict discipline'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But not everyone is satisfied. Those online have demanded more punishment for the teenagers who attacked Lai, particularly given the reports that the victim had been bullied for a while. 'The sentence is too light… that is why they were so arrogant,' one top-liked Weibo comment under the police statement read. Then, on Monday, over 1,000 protesters took to the streets in Jiangyou. Protests were held outside local government offices. The demonstrators gathered till well after midnight. How have authorities reacted? By cracking down on protesters. Things reportedly got bloody after the police used batons and cattle prods to disperse the crowd. Video footage taken outside the city hall showed at least two people forcibly pulled aside by a group of blue-shirted and plain-clothes police officers; a woman in a black dress was also dragged away by her limbs. 'They're sweeping away citizens everywhere,' a person can be heard saying on the video, as the woman is dragged away. More footage taken after dark showed the police wearing black Swat uniforms subduing at least three people at an intersection with hundreds of bystanders. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Firstpost has not independently verified the authenticity of the videos. On August 5, Jiangyou was the second top-trending topic on Weibo – China's version of X –before it and related hashtags were censored. Police also denied that the assailants were children of a lawyer and police inspector. They said two of the parents are unemployed, while two others are working outside the province. One is a local salesperson and another is a delivery driver, police added. On August 5, local authorities said on WeChat that the police had punished two people for fabricating information about the school bullying case, warning the public against spreading rumours. They said the posts have 'seriously disrupted public order and caused bad social impact'. A Shanghai-based lawyer wrote on Weibo, 'The penalty for causing minor injuries is too mild, while the physical and mental trauma suffered by victims is overlooked by the law, which leads to a significant imbalance in the protection of their rights". STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This comes after a number of high-profile cases. In January, the death of the teen caused violent protests in northwest China. The protests saw demonstrators target police in Shaanxi province's Pucheng. Authorities claimed the teen died in an accident, but social media was rife with rumours of a cover up. In December, a court sentenced a teenage boy to life in prison and gave another a long prison term for murdering a classmate. The suspects, all aged under 14 at the time of the murder, were accused of bullying a 13-year-old classmate over a long period before killing him in an abandoned greenhouse and burying his body. Another boy was given 12 years in prison, while a third whom the court found did not harm the victim was sentenced to correctional education. With inputs from agencies
