logo
Trump's tariffs could squeeze US factories and boost costs by up to 4.5%, a new analysis finds

Trump's tariffs could squeeze US factories and boost costs by up to 4.5%, a new analysis finds

Japan Today3 days ago
FILE - President Donald Trump talks to workers as he tours U.S. Steel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant, Friday, May 30, 2025, in West Mifflin, Pa. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson, File)
By JOSH BOAK and PAUL WISEMAN
As President Donald Trump prepares to announce new tariff increases, the costs of his policies are starting to come into focus for a domestic manufacturing sector that depends on global supply chains, with a new analysis suggesting factory costs could increase by roughly 2% to 4.5%.
'There's going to be a cash squeeze for a lot of these firms,' said Chris Bangert-Drowns, the researcher at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth who conducted the analysis. Those seemingly small changes at factories with slim profit margins, Bangert-Drowns said, 'could lead to stagnation of wages, if not layoffs and closures of plants" if the costs are untenable.
The analysis, released Tuesday, points to the challenges Trump might face in trying to sell his tariffs to the public as a broader political and economic win and not just as evidence his negotiating style gets other nations to back down. The success of Trump's policies ultimately depends on whether everyday Americans become wealthier and factory towns experience revivals, a goal outside economists say his Republican administration is unlikely to meet with tariffs.
Trump has announced new frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia and Britain that would each raise the import taxes charged by the United States. He's prepared to levy tariffs against goods from dozens of other countries starting on Friday in the stated range of 15% to 50%.
The U.S. stock market has shown relief the tariff rates aren't as high as Trump initially threatened in April and hope for a sense of stability going forward. Trump maintains the tariff revenues will whittle down the budget deficit and help whip up domestic factory jobs, all while playing down the risks of higher prices.
'We've wiped out inflation," Trump said last Friday before boarding Marine One while on his way to Scotland.
But there's the possibility of backlash in the form of higher prices and slower growth once tariffs flow more fully through the world economy.
A June survey by the Atlanta Federal Reserve suggested companies would on average pass half of their tariff costs onto U.S. consumers through higher prices. Labor Department data shows America lost 14,000 manufacturing jobs after Trump rolled out his April tariffs, putting a lot of pressure as to whether a rebound starts in the June employment report coming out Friday.
The Washington Center for Equitable Growth analysis shows how Trump's devotion to tariffs carries potential economic and political costs for his agenda. In the swing states of Michigan and Wisconsin, more than 1 in 5 jobs are in the critical sectors of manufacturing, construction, mining and oil drilling and maintenance that have high exposures to his import taxes.
The artificial intelligence sector Trump last week touted as the future of the economy is dependent on imports. More than 20% of the inputs for computer and electronics manufacturing are imported, so the tariffs could ultimately magnify a hefty multitrillion-dollar price tag for building out the technology in the U.S.
The White House argues American businesses will access new markets because of the trade frameworks, saying companies will ultimately benefit as a result.
'The 'Made in USA' label is set to resume its global dominance under President Trump,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said.
There are limits to the analysis. Trump's tariff rates have been a moving target, and the analysis looks only at additional costs, not how those costs will be absorbed among foreign producers, domestic manufacturers and consumers. Also, the legal basis of the tariffs as an 'emergency' act goes before a U.S. appeals court on Thursday.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview last week on Fox Business Network's 'Kudlow" show countries were essentially accepting the tariffs to maintain access to the U.S. market. 'Everyone is willing to pay a toll,' he said.
But what Bessent didn't say is U.S. manufacturers are also paying much of that toll.
'We're getting squeezed from all sides,'' said Justin Johnson, president of Jordan Manufacturing Co. in Belding, Michigan, northeast of Grand Rapids. His grandfather founded the company in 1949.
The company, which makes parts used by Amazon warehouses, auto companies and aerospace firms, has seen the price of a key raw material — steel coil — rise 5% to 10% this year.
Trump has imposed 50% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum. Jordan Manufacturing doesn't buy foreign steel. But by crippling foreign competition, Trump's tariffs have allowed domestic U.S. steelmakers to hike prices.
Johnson doesn't blame them. 'There's no red-blooded capitalist who isn't going to raise his prices'' under those circumstances, he said.
The Trump White House insists inflation is not surfacing in the economy, issuing a report through the Council of Economic Advisers this month saying the price of imported goods fell between December of last year and this past May. 'These findings contradict claims that tariffs or tariff-fears would lead to an acceleration of inflation,' the report concludes.
Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale University, said that the more accurate measure would be to compare the trends in import prices with themselves in the past and that the CEA's own numbers show 'import prices have accelerated in recent months.'
The latest estimate from the Budget Lab at Yale is the tariffs would cause the average household to have $2,400 less than it would otherwise have.
Josh Smith, founder and president of Montana Knife Co., called himself a Trump voter but said he sees the tariffs on foreign steel and other goods as threatening his business.
For instance, Smith just ordered a $515,000 machine from Germany that grinds his knife blades to a sharp edge. Trump had imposed a 10% tax on products from the EU that is set to rise to 15% under the trade framework he announced Sunday. So Trump's tax on the machine comes to $77,250 — about enough for Smith to hire an entry-level worker.
Smith would happily buy the bevel-grinding machines from an American supplier. But there aren't any. 'There's only two companies in the world that make them, and they're both in Germany,'' Smith said.
Then there's imported steel, which Trump is taxing at 50%. Until this year, Montana Knife bought the powdered steel it needs from Crucible Industries in Syracuse, New York. But Crucible declared bankruptcy last December, and its assets were purchased by a Swedish firm, Erasteel, which moved production to Sweden.
Smith beat the tariffs by buying a year's worth of the steel in advance. But starting in 2026, the specialty steel he'll be importing from Sweden is set to be hit with a 50% duty.
'The average American is not sitting in the position I am, looking at the numbers I am and making the decisions each day, like, 'Hey, we cannot hire those extra few people because we might have to pay this tariff on this steel or this tariff on this grinder,''' he said. 'I want to buy more equipment and hire more people. That's what I want to do.'
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Tariffs on India Imperil India-US Strategic Relationship
Trump's Tariffs on India Imperil India-US Strategic Relationship

The Diplomat

time2 minutes ago

  • The Diplomat

Trump's Tariffs on India Imperil India-US Strategic Relationship

In addition to a 25 percent tariff on Indian exports, Trump has announced an 'unspecified penalty' on India for buying Russian oil and arms. President Donald Trump has announced a 25 percent tariff on all Indian exports to the United States, starting August 7. He also announced an 'unspecified penalty' on India for buying oil and weapons from Russia. The tariffs on India are higher than those Trump imposed on India's export peers in Asia, which will likely make Indian goods less competitive in the U.S. market. American importers will choose suppliers in Vietnam or Indonesia, whose goods will come under lower tariffs. Indian goods worth some $87 billion could be affected if the Trump administration implements the new tariffs. It would shave off 0.5 percent from India's GDP growth, according to some estimates. 'They have one of the highest tariffs in the world now, they're willing to cut it very substantially,' Trump told reporters after his social media post on July 30. 'We're talking to India now – we'll see what happens … You'll know by the end of this week,' he added, seemingly keeping a door open for more talks. A U.S. delegation is to arrive in India for more discussions but that will be well past the August 1 deadline set by Trump for countries to seal bilateral deals with Washington. India's reaction was measured. Its Commerce and Industry Ministry said the government had taken 'note' of Trump's remarks and was examining its implications. Both countries were engaged in talks for arriving at a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' bilateral pact, and India remained 'committed' to that goal, it said. The ministry's statement placed India's red lines front and center – i.e., national interest would take precedence during talks with the U.S., as it had for pacts like the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement concluded between India and the U.K. on July 23-24. In his weekly media briefing today, Indian External Affairs Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said ties between the two countries had 'weathered several transitions and challenges.' The focus, he said, was on the substantive agenda that India and the U.S. have committed to. Trump's announcement of punitive tariffs on India came after he announced trade deals with the Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, the European Union (EU), and South Korea. Pakistan also secured a trade deal that saw its tariff rate lowered to 19 percent. U.S. talks with India's strategic rival, China, are said to be at an advanced stage. Beijing is expected to get off easier as it controls the rare earth elements supply chain that the U.S. industry cannot do without. In his 'Liberation Day' announcement on April 2, Trump had slapped India with 26 percent tariffs. Two Indian officials, whom The Diplomat spoke to separately, said that taking a cue from U.S. deals with Japan, Indonesia, and others, New Delhi had been expecting Washington to impose a 15-17 percent tariff rate on India. India is also upset with the 'unspecified penalty' Trump has imposed on it for its purchase of oil and weapons from Russia. After all, New Delhi has not made any big-ticket arms purchases from Russia since the $5.5 billion S400 Triumf missile system deal in 2018. As a result of its strong ties with the former Soviet Union during the Cold War, a large part of India's defense hardware continues to be of Soviet/Russian origin. However, Moscow's share in Indian defense purchases has fallen over the years. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, India's arms imports from Russia fell from 72 percent of its total defense purchases in 2010-14 to 55 percent in 2015-19 and 36 percent in 2024. India has been diversifying its defense acquisitions, and France, Israel, and the United States have emerged among its top procurement sources. Additionally, India is also stressing self-reliance in defense procurement. It hopes to purchase more military hardware manufactured by local companies. It does seem that India's refusal to condemn Russia's war in Ukraine, its purchase of discounted Russian oil, and participation in BRICS meetings underlie Trump's imposition of an 'unspecified penalty' on India. Trump's harsh treatment of India has taken New Delhi by surprise. In February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump had what seemed to be a successful White House meeting, when the start of talks for a trade pact was announced. Both Modi and Trump had then agreed to boost bilateral trade, which is currently worth $129 billion, to $500 billion by 2030. 'Recognizing that this level of ambition would require new, fair-trade terms, the leaders announced plans to negotiate the first tranche of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by fall of 2025,' a joint statement issued after the Modi-Trump talks said. However, things did not unfold as India expected. Several rounds of talks have followed since then in New Delhi and Washington. But these have not narrowed the differences between the two sides. U.S. demands that India open up its sensitive farm and dairy sectors to U.S. imports, and its seeking of relaxed laws on data storage and digital trade, remain sticking points. Ironically, India was among the few countries that was not worried about Trump's second stint in the White House. It had worked well with the first Trump administration, and New Delhi expected Trump 2.0 to be easy to handle. However, Trump's focus on trade, righting deficits, and abandoning friend-shoring for onshoring has put India in a difficult spot. Trump's tariffs will have implications that go beyond trade. It is likely to have a dampening effect on the India-U.S. strategic relationship, which has been carefully nurtured over the past 25 years by the leadership of both countries across administrations, including Trump himself during his first term in office (2017-2021). In recent decades, India and the U.S. have described themselves as 'engaged democracies' rather than 'estranged democracies' as they were known during the Cold War years, when they were on opposite sides. India-U.S. ties have been warming since the year 2000. The high-water mark came when they signed the 2008 India-U.S. civil nuclear deal that helped integrate Asia's third-largest economy into the global nuclear commerce. With the enhancement of strategic trust, India has also been buying defense hardware from the United States. Since 2008, defense procurement from India has shot up to over $20 billion. U.S. Navy ships now make regular calls at Indian ports, and both sides engage in joint military exercises in India and the U.S. India has been looking to emerge as a pole in a multipolar world with help from strategic partners like the U.S. to achieve its ambition of becoming a developed economy by 2047. Trump's intemperate remarks against the India-Russia partnership, his outreach to Pakistan, which he berated in his first term for its support for terrorism, and his overtures to China, besides pressuring India with high tariffs, have cast a shadow over the India-U.S. strategic partnership. Trump is said to have sought a telephone call with Modi. But it is unclear what the Indian prime minister can offer Trump at this stage to get him to reduce the tariff rate. India had been counting on measures like increased purchases of fuel and military hardware from the U.S., besides making changes in its civil nuclear liability law to remove provisions that penalize suppliers of equipment than operators of plants, to woo Trump. Amendments to India's civil nuclear pact would open the doors for U.S. companies to set up plants in energy-starved India, which currently imports more than 80 percent of its fuel requirements. India does not have the resources to promise reciprocal investments, the central offering made by the EU, Japan, and South Korea in their trade deals with the United States. In the short term, India will have to focus on minimizing the consequences of Trump's punitive tariffs, particularly the ones relating to Russian oil. That is because any disruption in supplies will have a major impact on the Indian economy. In the medium term, a Trump visit to India, planned for September-October, may be deferred if there is no trade deal. This could place a question mark over the future of the Quad and the Indo-Pacific. And in the long run, India may have to examine the consequences of an increasingly unreliable United States. There is talk of a revival of the Russia-India-China or RIC trilateral. Russia has been keen to revive the grouping, while India has seemed noncommittal without an explicit no. Any move to revive the group is likely to anger Trump who sees groupings like RIC and BRICS as anti-U.S. In times of global uncertainty, middle and smaller powers do hedge their bets. In India's case though, China is not a partner it can rely on, given its largely acrimonious relationship with Beijing. Given Russia's current heavy dependence on China, Moscow too may not be the partner to India that it once was. That leaves India with not too many options except for making the best of an existing bad situation — a daunting challenge indeed for Indian diplomacy.

5 takeaways from new US tariffs: Trump and UK win, South Korea loses
5 takeaways from new US tariffs: Trump and UK win, South Korea loses

Nikkei Asia

time3 minutes ago

  • Nikkei Asia

5 takeaways from new US tariffs: Trump and UK win, South Korea loses

U.S. flags flutter in front of shipping containers at the Port of Long Beach in California on July 11. © Reuters KEN MORIYASU and PAK YIU WASHINGTON/NEW YORK -- President Donald Trump's self-imposed trade deadline expired on Friday, putting in place a new trade landscape -- one in which countries pay for the right to access the American market. Since Trump announced "reciprocal" tariffs on countries around the world on April 2, nations have been negotiating with Trump administration officials on terms to reduce the tariff burden.

US employers slash hiring as Trump advances a punishing trade agenda
US employers slash hiring as Trump advances a punishing trade agenda

Japan Today

time32 minutes ago

  • Japan Today

US employers slash hiring as Trump advances a punishing trade agenda

By Paul Wiseman and Christopher Rugaber U.S. hiring is slowing sharply as President Donald Trump's erratic and radical trade policies paralyze businesses and raise doubts about the outlook for the world's largest economy. U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department reported Friday, well short of the 115,000 expected. Worse, revisions shaved a stunning 258,000 jobs off May and June payrolls. And the unemployment rate ticked higher to 4.2% as Americans dropped out of the labor force and the ranks of the unemployed rose by 221,000. 'A notable deterioration in U.S. labor market conditions appears to be underway,'' said Scott Anderson, chief U.S. economist at BMO Capital Markets. 'We have been forecasting this since the tariff and trade war erupted this spring and more restrictive immigration restrictions were put in place. Overall, this report highlights the risk of a harder landing for the labor market.'' Economists have been warning that the rift with every U.S. trading partner will begin to appear this summer and the Friday jobs report appeared to sound the bell. 'We're finally in the eye of the hurricane,' said Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor. 'After months of warning signs, the July jobs report confirms that the slowdown isn't just approaching—it's here.' U.S. markets recoiled at the jobs report and the Dow tumbled more than 600 points Friday. But President Donald Trump responded to the weak report by calling for the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics, which compiles the jobs numbers. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Trump questioned the big revisions, but they are a standard part of the monthly jobs report. The Labor Department revises its numbers as more data comes in. Particularly since COVID-19, responses to its surveys of businesses and households have declined, making the data more subject to revision. Revelations in the new data raise questions about the health of the job market and the economy as Trump pushes forward an unorthodox overhaul of American trade policy. Trump has discarded decades of U.S. efforts to lower trade barriers globally, instead, imposing hefty import taxes — tariffs — on products from almost every country on earth. Trump believes the levies will bring manufacturing back to America and raise money to pay for the massive tax cuts he signed into law July 4. Mainstream economists warned that the cost of the tariffs will be passed along to Americans, both businesses and households. That has begun. Walmart, Procter & Gamble, Ford, Best Buy, Adidas, Nike, Mattel, Shein, Temu, Stanley Black & Decker, have all hiked prices due to U.S. tariffs. Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that overseas exporters have absorbed just one-fifth of the rising costs from tariffs, while Americans and U.S. businesses have picked up the lion's share of the tab. Trump has sowed uncertainty in the erratic way he's rolled the tariffs out — announcing, then suspending them, then coming up with new ones. Overnight, Trump signed an executive order that set new tariffs on a wide swath of U.S. trading partners to that go into effect on Aug. 7, and that comes after a flurry of unexpected tariff-related actions this week. 'There was a clear, significant, immediate, tariff effect on the labor market and employment growth essentially stalled, as we were dealing with so much uncertainty about the outlook for the economy and for tariffs,' said Blerina Uruci, chief U.S. economist for the brokerage T. Rowe Price. Still, Uruci said the data suggests we could be past the worst, as hiring actually did pick up a bit in July from May and June's depressed levels. 'I'm not overly pessimistic on the U.S. economy based on this morning's data,' she said, though she does think that hiring will remain muted in the coming months as the number of available workers remains limited due to reduced immigration and an aging population. 'Because of immigration policy, labor supply growth has nearly ground to a halt,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'So we're going to have very weak employment growth. And we look like southern Europe or Japan.' Still, with fewer workers available, the economy doesn't need to generate many jobs to soak up the unemployed. That could keep the unemployment rate from climbing much, Berger added. Trump has sold the tariffs hikes as a way to boost American manufacturing, but factories cut 11,000 jobs last month after shedding 15,000 in June and 11,000 in May. The federal government, where employment has been targeted by the Trump administration, lost 12,000 jobs. Jobs in administration and support fell by nearly 20,000. Healthcare companies added 55,400 jobs last month – accounting for 76% of the jobs added in July and offering another sign that recent job gains have been narrowly concentrated. The department originally reported that state and local governments had added 64,000 education jobs in June. The revisions Friday slashed those jobs to less than 10,000. Those revisions also revealed that the U.S. economy has generated an average of just 85,000 jobs a month this year, barely half last year's average of 168,000 and well below an average 400,000 from 2021-2023 as the economy rebounded from COVID-19 lockups. The weak jobs data makes it more likely that Trump will get one thing that he most fervently desires: A cut in short-term interest rates by the Federal Reserve, which often -- though not always -- can lead to lower rates for mortgages, car loans, and credit cards. Fed Chair Jerome Powell and other Fed officials have repeatedly pointed to a healthy job market as a reason that they could take time to evaluate how Trump's tariffs were affecting inflation and the broader economy. Now that assessment has been undercut and will put more pressure on the Fed to reduce borrowing costs. Wall Street investors sharply raised their expectations for a rate cut at the Fed's next meeting in September after the report was released. On Wednesday, the Fed left its key rate unchanged for fifth consecutive meeting and Powell signaled little urgency to reduce rates anytime soon. He said the 'labor market is solid' with 'historically low unemployment.' But he also acknowledged there is a 'downside risk' to employment stemming from the slow pace of hiring that was evident even before Friday's weaker numbers. The current situation is a sharp reversal from the hiring boom of just three years ago when desperate employers were handing out signing bonuses and introducing perks such as Fridays off, fertility benefits and even pet insurance to recruit and keep workers. The rate of people quitting their jobs — a sign they're confident they can land something better — has fallen from the record heights of 2021 and 2022 and is now weaker than before the pandemic. Drees Homes, a homebuilder based outside Cincinnati in Fort Mitchell, Kentucky, has hired about 50 people over the past year, bringing its workforce to around 950. Pamela Rader, Drees' vice president for human resources, it's 'gotten a little bit easier'' to find workers. A couple of years ago, Rader said jobseekers were focused on getting more pay. Now, she said, they emphasize stable employment, a better work-life balance, and prospects for advancement. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store