‘Travesty of justice': MK Party slams Constitutional Court's dismissal of Ramaphosa case
Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers
MK Party has lashed out at the Constitutional Court, following its dismissal of the party's application challenging President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave and appoint Professor Firoz Cachalia.
The court determined that the issue did not merit its consideration and should instead be referred to the High Court, a decision that has ignited outrage among members of the MK Party.
Speaking at court, MKP national spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, accused the judiciary of selectively applying justice, saying the ruling revealed "a travesty of justice" and exposed a legal system that "no longer serves the people."
'We are shocked, but not surprised. This is the same court that granted direct access to incarcerate President Jacob Zuma without trial,' Ndhlela said, referring to Zuma's 2021 contempt ruling.
'Now, when faced with Ramaphosa's alleged delinquency, they defer to technicalities.'
Ndhlela said the court's refusal to hear the matter directly flies in the face of its precedent.
'Why was direct access granted in the Zuma, Zondo Commission, and secret ballot matters—but now denied in a case affecting every South African? The inconsistency is glaring,' he added.
He also criticised the judiciary for allegedly shielding Ramaphosa from accountability.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'Phala Phala remains unresolved. The CR17 bank statements are still sealed. And now, even a basic attempt to hold the President to account through judicial channels is being stonewalled,' Ndhlela said.
Lady Justice is no longer blind—she has chosen a side, he stated.
The MK Party has not ruled out further legal or political steps.
'We will consult with our national leadership and legal team. But one thing is clear—South Africans must now ask if this judiciary still serves them,' he said.
Advocate Dali Mpofu SC, representing the MKP, echoed concerns about the legal reasoning behind the court's decision.
'The public must understand the difference between direct access and exclusive jurisdiction,' he said.
Mpofu said: 'Direct access is granted in exceptional cases of national interest. What could be more compelling than allegations that the sitting President manipulated state processes for political expediency?'
Mpofu also challenged what he called the court's double standards.
Direct access was granted in multiple high-profile cases involving Zuma, yet now it is deemed inappropriate for matters involving Ramaphosa. No one seems to ask why, he said.
While Mpofu declined to comment in detail on the merits of the case, he confirmed that the party's legal team would be consulting with their client to explore next steps.
'There's no case before the court now, but that could change. We may be back—here or elsewhere.'
The ConCourt's decision added fuel to the already simmering tensions between the MKP and South Africa's top courts.
With the 2026 local elections looming, the fallout from this judgment may become a rallying point for a party determined to position itself as the voice of the disillusioned.
kamogelo.moichela@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
‘Women should not only be present in science – they must shape its direction'
This year marks 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, a global agenda for advancing women's rights which includes their access to education, technology and leadership. Image: Supplied More than 30 years ago, South Africa took its bold first steps into democracy. It was a moment of unprecedented hope, not just for political freedom, but for the transformation of society in all its dimensions. As the country reflects on passing its three-decade milestone, it's an opportune time to assess the progress made by women in science, technology and innovation (STI). While the road has been uneven, the strides that have been made are undeniable. This year marks 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, a global agenda for advancing women's rights which includes their access to education, technology and leadership. As we mark just over 30 years of freedom and reflect on 30 years of global gender advocacy since the Beijing resolution, we must shift our efforts from a focus on participation to a demand for leadership. Women should not only be present in science – they must shape its direction. That means ensuring that women lead laboratories, policy development, global scientific collaborations, and research and training institutions. It also means rethinking how we define innovation – more value needs to be placed on community-based knowledge, indigenous science and interdisciplinary approaches that centre on people, not just products. To understand how far we've come, we must begin with a pivotal moment in our country's history: the Women's March to the Union Buildings on 9 August 1956. On that day, more than 20 000 women of all races and backgrounds marched peacefully against apartheid's pass laws. They stood united in defiance of an oppressive system, carrying petitions and chanting, 'Wathint' Abafazi, Wathint' Imbokodo!' ('You strike a woman, you strike a rock'). That historic act of resistance was not just about civil liberties – it was a declaration of women's power to shape South Africa's future. Fast-forward to today, and that same spirit continues to drive South African women, not just in politics or activism, but in laboratories, tech hubs, industry and innovation spaces. In many ways, the progress of women in STI is one of the quiet revolutions of our democratic era, largely influenced by our policy frameworks that support women in this sector. The National Development Plan 2030, the Department of Science and Innovation's White Paper on Science, Technology and Innovation, and the more recent Decadal Plan all advocate for gender transformation and gender-responsive planning as national priorities. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Dr Rakeshnie Ramoutar-Prieschl, Head of Research Capacity Development at the University of Pretoria Image: Supplied Yet structural inequalities persist. Women – especially women of colour – remain under-represented in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) leadership roles, with a national representation of a mere 30% of the workforce. Barriers such as unequal access to quality education, limited mentorship opportunities, and gender bias in academia and industry continue to constrain progress. So, how can these systemic challenges be tackled? One of the most effective ways to empower women in STI is through mentorship. Access to mentors helps young women navigate the complex terrain of academia, research and industry, especially in male-dominated environments, such as mining- and engineering-related fields. It builds confidence, opens doors and fosters a sense of belonging. Science outreach efforts in rural and township schools, particularly those that bring in female scientists from similar backgrounds as role models, can have a transformative impact. When girls see someone who looks like them succeeding in science, it fundamentally shifts what they believe is possible. Embedding targeted programmes that focus on raising awareness of women's and girls' rights into school or university curricula can help address some of the societal ills that disproportionately affect girls and women. These include cyberbullying (especially on social media platforms), gender-based violence, exploitative relationships (such as those that involve 'sugar daddies'), and reproductive health and teenage pregnancies, among others. This calls for politicians, governments, higher education leaders, schools and communities to work together to co-create and co-develop inclusive innovation strategies for accelerated change. As we commemorate almost 70 years since the 1956 Women's March, we must remember and honour this defining act of resistance and unity. The women who marched to the Union Buildings were not just resisting oppression; they were demanding a future in which their daughters and granddaughters could be free to learn, lead and innovate. That dream is still being realised, in university labs, coding bootcamps, data science hubs and tech start-ups. But our work is far from done. We must shift from symbolic inclusion to structural transformation: more women in leadership, more equitable funding, more inclusive curricula and sustained support from childhood through to the career stage. The rocks that built this nation must now become the architects of its innovative future. Let us honour their legacy not just with words, but with policies, platforms and partnerships that ensure every girl, from the village to varsity, can rise, lead and transform the world. Dr Rakeshnie Ramoutar-Prieschl, Head of Research Capacity Development at the University of Pretoria
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
30% Tariffs from the US government, 0% Leadership from the GNU government
Trade tensions between SA and the US, and represents a direct threat to thousands of South African jobs in key export sectors such as automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. Image: Armand Hough /Independent Newspapers Build One South Africa (BOSA) expresses deep concern over the imposition of 30% tariffs on most South African imports to the United States, which will come into effect after a seven-day window. This marks a serious escalation in trade tensions between SA and the US, and represents a direct threat to thousands of South African jobs in key export sectors such as automotive manufacturing, agriculture, and mining. The outcome is not solely the result of an increasingly protectionist White House. It is a self-inflicted wound caused by years of incoherent and ideologically driven foreign policy from the South African government. What should have been a moment for skilled diplomacy and strategic engagement has instead become a textbook case in diplomatic failure. Key opportunities to repair and restore trust with US lawmakers and officials were squandered. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Even under the more diplomatic Biden administration, South Africa failed to rebuild trust. We did not use the opportunity to engage, negotiate, or reassure. And now, under a more transactional Trump presidency, patience has run out. What is clear is that South Africa urgently needs a foreign policy rooted in clear principles and strategic interests instead of nostalgia and ideology. Our diplomacy must be led by the state, above party politics, and laser-focused on three core objectives: expanding trade and economic growth, defending human rights, and advancing democracy on the continent and beyond. The current bipolar approach, with mixed signals from different actors, is unsustainable and deeply damaging. BOSA calls for five urgent steps to arrest this crisis and rebuild South Africa's credibility in Washington: Reassert official diplomatic leadership and prevent political freelancing that undermines national trade priorities. South Africa must speak with one credible, united voice. Engage directly with the US Congress, where AGOA's future will ultimately be decided. The case must be made for the mutual benefits of continued trade cooperation and use the over 500,000 US jobs linked to trade with South Africa as leverage. Present a credible trade and investment plan that highlights the potential of key export sectors and aligns with US strategic interests, especially in green energy and technology. Commission an urgent economic risk assessment to quantify the impact of these tariffs on jobs and industries, and guide responsive, sector-specific relief measures. Appoint a qualified ambassador to Washington who understands the intersection of economics and diplomacy and can lead the high-level engagements needed to restore trust and rebuild lost ground. South Africa cannot afford more indecision, ideological posturing, or diplomatic negligence. Our future economic growth depends on pragmatic, clear-headed leadership in foreign policy that puts South African jobs front and centre. Roger Solomons - BOSA Spokesperson
The South African
6 hours ago
- The South African
'Good life': Afrikaner 'refugee' shares update after US move
Errol Langton – an Afrikaner 'refugee' now living in the US – has shared an update about his life abroad. Almost three months ago, Langton was one of 49 white South Africans who applied for the refugee resettlement programme. In February, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order, granting refuge to Afrikaners or 'minorities', over his claims of 'racial discrimination' in South Africa. A second group of South Africans have since departed, with many more expected to follow. Speaking to US intel expert Chris Wyatt, 'Afrikaner refugee' Errol Langton shared an update about his life in his adoptive country. The IT businessman, who also owned a 'leafy green' farm, now lives in Birmingham, Alabama. In a clip posted on social media, Langton detailed the joys and challenges of the resettlement programme. Although his family members did not have social security numbers or a driver's license, they were covered by Medicaid for the first year of their stay. He also revealed how they had been temporarily provided financial assistance. Langton praised the 'efficient' government systems, particularly the healthcare. Despite the backlash of being labelled an 'Afrikaner refugee,' Langton revealed he had encountered helpful and friendly Americans. He said, 'People are very accommodating. People here want to help, they see the need, and they don't treat you like a leper. 'The kids have a good life here'. Of his frustrations, he said: 'The reality is that we're resettling our entire lives, and that's a huge challenge. There are some frustrations, but I downplay them, because I look at the positive'. During the clip, Errol Langton also addressed the backlash he's received after portraying himself as an 'Afrikaner refugee'. He said: 'I've been roasted in South Africa. People have said I'm not an Afrikaner, I'm not a farmer. It's not the case at all. The rhetoric and hate from that side is insane. Speaking to the New York Times, Langton claimed that he was a 'leafy greens' farmer from KwaZulu-Natal. However, his LinkedIn account listed his experience in the IT sector, where he owned a large business. Errol Langton is an Afrikaner 'refugee' who claims he was persecuted in South Africa. Images via Facebook: Errol Langton Many South Africans – including his stepdaughter – questioned his claims of being a 'farmer' and even an 'Afrikaner'. Some also called him 'opportunistic' for wanting to start again in another country, and in particular, a state – Alabama – where his own relatives immigrated to years ago. Speaking to eNCA's Annika Larson in June, Errol Langton rubbished reports that the group of 'refugees' consisted of white South African farmers. He said: 'That was never the mandate. It was minorities that were suffering persecution'. Of his own identity, he said: 'Yes, I'm an Afrikaner, yes, I'm a farmer. But by everybody else's decision? Maybe not so much'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
