Schools not ready to grade reports against new curriculums
Photo:
Unsplash/ Taylor Flowe
Some primary schools warn they are not ready to grade children against the new English and maths curriculums in mid-year reports to parents.
The curriculums were introduced this year and the Education Ministry has proposed a new four-point scale to standardise the way schools describe children's achievement.
It suggested four descriptors: needs support, progressing towards, proficient, and excelling.
"Needs support" would apply to children who were not meeting the level of achievement expected of their year group and needed significant guidance and assistance,
Pupils who were "progressing towards" could complete tasks with some guidance and needed targeted support while those who were "proficient" would be meeting expectations for their year level.
The draft said "exceeding" could apply to students who consistently showed advanced understanding, knowledge and skills for their year level.
The ministry told schools they could use the descriptors if they wanted to, but there was no requirement to do so this year.
Testing several years ago suggested the new maths curriculum would be more challenging, but the children who sat those tests had not been taught the curriculum.
Principals spoken to by RNZ were reluctant to say children who met curriculum expectations last year might not meet expectations under the new curriculum this year.
Auckland Primary Principals Association president Lucy Naylor said families should regard the mid-year reports as setting a new baseline for their children's achievement against the new curriculum.
"We're no longer reporting against the old curriculum. So there might be a shift for parents, it's a new curriculum, it's a tighter curriculum," she said.
"What parents might see is variation. So where a child might have been proficient against the old curriculum there might be a little bit of a change to that because we have more indicators within the new curriculum to report against."
However, Naylor said this year was a transition year for introducing the new curriculums and schools would be at different stages of readiness to report on children's progress.
Dunedin North Intermediate principal Heidi Hayward said it was too early to know if fewer children were meeting the new maths requirements.
"Schools are really just scratching the surface in understanding the new maths curriculum so I think it's imprudent to try and report against a curriculum that schools have actually not had enough time to learn and use properly," she said.
"We'll be taking a very cautious approach to reporting."
Hayward said teachers would rely heavily on test results this year, but needed to use their overall judgement when deciding how well their pupils' were doing.
She said reports should ideally show parents how well children were achieving against expectations for their age group, and how much progress they had made.
"As a parent what I really want to know is has my child made progress and where do they sit in relation to the expectation for age and they're two quite different things," she said.
She said it was important to know whether high-achievers had improved or progressed much during the year, and also whether pupils performing below expectations had made progress in catching up to their peers.
Hayward said the ministry's proposed descriptors would not provide that information and her school would this year use its old reporting templates.
The principal of Douglas Park School in Masterton, Gareth Sinton, said his school's mid-year reports would not use the ministry's proposed terminology because there was not enough detail to help schools decide which of the four descriptors to use.
"If I pick Year 6 writing, there are 53 what they call sequence statements, so 53 skills that the kids are expected to be taught and pick up across their Year 6 year in writing. So to be proficient it says you need to be meeting the expectations. It doesn't say if you need to have all of those, all 53. If you need to have 90 percent of those, 80 percent of those, 75 percent... So the descriptor is so vague that we don't feel confident enough yet to make a judgement against this new curriculum," he said.
Sinton said greater national consistency was possible, but currently different schools had different ideas about where the cut-off points lay for each level of achievement.
For example, one of his staff was talking with staff from five other schools about the curriculum expectations and all five had different ideas about where the cut-off points should be drawn.
"All five schools had different thoughts. So if you translate that across the whole system of 2000 primary schools, there's an issue and it's not even an issue on the horizon, it's an issue right here in front of us," he said.
Sinton said his teachers would explain to parents in mid-year reports what their children could do in maths and English, but would not make an overall judgement about their performance.
The Education Ministry said the new curriculums had a different approach to learning and school leaders and teachers had asked for clarity on how they should assess and report student progress and achievement against the new curriculum.
"Progress descriptors provide consistent language for how each child's progress is tracking against the new curriculum expectations. The descriptors are in draft and we're consulting on these until 30 June," it said.
"National consistency in how progress is assessed and described will support teachers to meet students' needs and support a common understanding of when additional support or extension needs to be considered. It will also support continuity in teaching, learning and support as students move to the next year level or school."
The ministry said national consistency would ensure parents would not have to interpret different approaches for describing how their children were doing as they moved to the next year level or school.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Rats, not weather, to blame for Golden Bay's mobile phone and internet outage
Photo: RNZ/Mark Papalii It has been revealed rats rather than bad weather were responsible for a mobile phone and internet outage in Golden Bay on Thursday. The severed fibreoptic cable at Uruwhenua Bridge on State Highway 60 knocked out connection to about 1100 households and sparked concern with residents unable to access 111 emergency services. The Telecommunications Forum confirmed rats chewed through the wire. Chief executive Paul Brislen said it's not uncommon to have rat infestations around fibre lines. He wanted the government to look at prioritising upgrades to the 111 emergency phone line. Chorus said the fault had impacted 350 copper connections and 800 fibre connections. It brought in technicians from other areas to help find the fault as quickly as possible in difficult weather conditions. "Our field teams have quickly mobilised to the fault site and are working to identify the cause of the outage," it said in a statement on Thursday. "Priority will be given to faults that affect multiple customers or involve medical or emergency needs. "Additionally, because Chorus' fibre network supports many of New Zealand's mobile towers, restoring mobile coverage is also a focus." Chorus apologised to affected customers for the inconvenience caused by the outage. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Country Life: Rural recycling on the rise, says Agrecovery
Agrecovery chief executive Tony Wilson. Photo: Mark Coote / Supplied Plastic-free July is a time when many try to cut down on their plastic use, but for those on farm it can be a near impossible task, says Agrecovery chief executive Tony Wilson. For 20 years, the Agrecovery stewardship programme has helped farmers and growers to recycle empty agrichemical containers, drums and other plastics. "The plastic's going to be there, it's going to be there for a number of years so what we're really working on is finding solutions for that plastic and the best possible outcome," he told Country Life. New regulations proposed by the government could help them in these efforts. Follow Country Life on Apple Podcasts , Spotify , iHeart or wherever you get your podcasts. The government's new proposed 'Green Farms' scheme will regulate agrichemical containers, wraps and other farm plastics. It would also means manufacturers and importers putting out plastic will pay a levy to Agrecovery, a not-for-profit charitable trust, to develop solutions. Before it was set up, most farmers would burn or bury unwanted plastic waste. In some parts of the country they still can, which Wilson would also like to see stopped. He sees the plastic as a "resource" which can be recycled and reused. The aim would be for a "bottle-to-bottle" scheme where agrichemical bottles get recycled and turned back into agrichemical bottles. Over the years, they've encountered 15 different plastics on farm including silage wrap, one-tonne fertiliser bags, smaller feed, fertiliser and seed bags, and agrichemical containers. There are also fishnets, tunnel house covers, tulip nets, and irrigation pipes and attachments. "There's a whole raft of stuff out there that we need to get back off farm and get recycled," Wilson said. An example of the plastics recycled by Agrecovery. Photo: Gianina Schwanecke / Country Life Most of the plastics are single polymer plastics which are easier to recycle, though they need to be as clean as possible. There's less demand for recycled soft plastics which have been contaminated. Collected plastic is made into reusable products such as underground cable covers and building materials. Wilson said farmers needed evidence that what they send off is in fact recycled, and accreditation also means the scheme is recognised by overseas consumers. He said they'd had "exceptional growth" over the past four to five years. Last year, Agrecovery processed 720 tonnes of HDPE (High Density Poly Ethylene) plastic, which accounts for about 70 percent of agrichemical containers being recycled. It also received 1600 tonnes of silage wrap. If the regulations come into effect, Wilson expects this would jump to over 10,000 tonnes. He believes there's up to 1000 tonnes of HDPE, 1200 tonnes of small bags, 12,000 tonne of silage, and 5000 tonnes of fertiliser bags out there. "We know the farmer and grower are wanting solutions," he said. "We get dozens of phone calls a week from farmers saying I need a solution for this or I need a solution for that." Agrecovery was also looking at ways to respond to new technology such as wearable cow collars and how to process these at their end of life. Wilson said New Zealand had a long way to go compared to Europe where recycling rates were closer to 90 percent. "Europe are 12 years ahead of us in the conversation, 10 years ahead of us in the capital investment." Feeding containers being put in the Agrecovery mobile processing truck. Photo: AGRECOVERY The new regulations would open up new opportunities for Agrecovery to help with this. Wilson said it would "multiply massively in its service offerings". Consultation about the proposed new regulations closed last month, with 144 submissions received by the Ministry for the Environment. Environment Minister Penny Simmonds said the changes would bring together the services of existing schemes Agrecovery and Plasback, simplifying recycling and disposal for farmers and growers, and expanding access into a nationwide service. "This scheme would be funded through an advance disposal fee and offer free, nationwide take-back services. And it won't just benefit farmers - sectors like forestry, tourism, hospitality, and manufacturing could also participate. "Our waste work programme is well underway and we are progressing product stewardship schemes in a measured way to ensure they are well-considered and that cost-of-living impacts are limited." The Ministry was now working with industry and stakeholders on next steps, with further updates expected once Cabinet makes its decision.

1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
Fears pests are using Transmission Gully to enter Wellington
Some conservationists are concerned about the potential impact of ferrets entering Wellington amid a significant rise in the number of pests being caught on Transmission Gully. Documents released under the Official Information Act show that between January 2024 to 14 April this year, 701 pests were trapped or killed on the road. That's up from RNZ's previous reports of 226 pests trapped between November 2022 and January 2024. The animals killed in the latest data set included stoats, weasels, deer, rabbits, rats, pigs and possums. Predator Free Wellington has been working for years to get rid of all pests in the capital. ADVERTISEMENT Project director Julian Wilcocks told RNZ there had been quite a lot more trapping done along Transmission Gully. But Wilcocks said it had also been a "bumper season" recently for mustelids which included animals such as stoats, ferrets and weasels. "That is a real massive concern because we don't have ferrets in Wellington City and so obviously, we want to really keep those from getting into the city." He said if ferrets got into the city it would be "dire straits" for their work. "Ferrets — they have a very high metabolism, so they need to eat a lot of protein which is often our native species." They also had huge roaming distances and were particularly damaging to kiwi, Wilcocks said. "It has taken us a number of years' effective methodologies for eliminating rats, stoats and weasels and so we wouldn't want to be adding ferrets to the mix." ADVERTISEMENT The furthest south a ferret has been found on the motorway was at Haywards in 2023. NZTA Waka Kotahi regional manager Mark Owen told RNZ $165,000 had been allocated for pest management on Transmission Gully for this financial year. Owen said the investment aligned with Greater Wellington Regional Council's pest management plan. "The plan dictates that NZTA/Waka Kotahi is responsible for controlling pests on road reserves that it occupies. "NZTA/Waka Kotahi also manages pest plants in accordance with this plan." He said that it followed best practice and focused on feral pigs, mustelids and deer. Predator Free Waikanae member Kevin Sheppard said his organisation had been trapping along the Kāpiti Expressway which linked up to Transmission Gully. ADVERTISEMENT Sheppard told RNZ the pests were quite lazy and would take the easiest route north and south. He said since they started trapping on the expressway 220 animals had been caught by the group. Sheppard said that while new roads such as Transmission Gully and the Kāpiti Expressway have been "an amazing addition" to the region, work needed to be done to continue trapping along the roads. "It obviously does simply create a pathway for animals such as stoats and ferrets to move along quickly." He said there were likely to be gaps in the trapping network at least along Kāpiti Expressway. "We're trapping between Waikanae heading up to Peka Peka on one side, so there's nothing happening on the other side."