logo
Douglas Murray: Will NYC fall for the selfie-entitled Zohran Mamdani?

Douglas Murray: Will NYC fall for the selfie-entitled Zohran Mamdani?

New York Post5 days ago
What do you do if something doesn't work?
Why, surely you should double down even harder on the things that make it not work.
Right?
That seems to be the attitude of voters who decided that Zohran Mamdani was the candidate for them in the New York City mayoral race.
There are plenty of excuses that can be made for how New York ever had this woeful candidate put before us.
A self-professed 'democratic socialist.'
You could point to the failure of the Democratic Party to put up viable and talented candidates.
You might wonder at how Andrew Cuomo honestly thought that there was a way back for him in city politics.
And you might blame the vanity of a man who even now seems unwilling to drop out of the race.
Or you might wonder why the Democratic Party has decided to make the same mistake on the city level that it has made on the national level in putting forward tested but failed candidates instead of successful and talented ones.
An American tale
But in the end we have to face the fact that the present front-runner for mayor is the most woefully inadequate candidate possible.
Promising the most woefully impossible agenda.
On Mamdani's qualifications the facts speak for themselves.
Mamdani may be presenting himself as the representative of struggling New Yorkers, but he himself is anything but.
Privately schooled at the Bank Street school, he went on to study at Bowdoin College in Maine.
From there he loafed around for a bit, trying to make it as a rapper before deciding to become a political activist.
Truly a story of American struggle.
He had the cushion of his parents, of course.
Because while Mamdani would like to present himself as the voice of the voiceless, he is in fact the perfect megaphone for a type of entitled coastal elite.
His father is a professor at Columbia University — of course.
And it seems that his father's interest in colonialism, post-colonialism and decolonization has formed his son's political worldview.
The political base that Mamdani junior has decided to appeal to is exactly the sort of person who thinks 'decolonization' is one of the big issues of our time.
A couple of centuries after it had even the slightest impact on the lives of people in this country.
But if you have been educated by people like Mamdani Sr. then you might well think that decolonization is the great issue of our time.
Because there are empires and colonies everywhere these days, aren't there?
Ugly racial politics
Yet that is just the mood music.
The real crux of Mamdani's campaign comes down to just two things.
The first is the playing of overtly racial politics, bringing the most divisive approach to the forefront of his campaign.
This comes not just in Mamdani's promise to tax white New Yorkers, or to pretend that it is white New Yorkers who somehow have the power these days (doubtless because they're all still running those darn colonies).
It is also there in his appeal to communities based on his own ethnic and religious background.
Not just the Muslim card, but the Ugandan immigrant card, the Asian card.
He used this not just to appeal to New Yorkers from South and East Asia but to young, white, college-educated New Yorkers who like to fetishize and glamorize anyone who they think of as 'other.'
It doesn't matter how little Mamdani has achieved in his life to date, or how impossible his promises like rent control are.
Mamdani need only release a video of himself eating without a knife and fork for these grads to coo with appreciation.
You might put this down to the TikTokization of our politics, where a relatively fresh-faced candidate can make a sound bite seem long-winded.
This is politics for a post-sound bite generation, where someone's 'vibe' matters more than their actual platform.
Still we can glimpse where Mamdani might still unravel.
In recent days we had confirmation that Mamdani lacks basic accounting skills.
His promise that as mayor he will use $140 million to fund socialist grocery stores is something he claimed was already accounted for.
It turns out that the money he thought was available for his free-food scheme is private spending which he mistook for government spending.
Still, who cares what is private and what is government when you're promising a socialist utopia?
Anti-white tax scheme
As for his claim that white people need to be taxed more, again this is pure 'decolonization' bunkum.
All recent studies show other racial groups exceeding the earnings of white Americans in this country.
In fact the two groups which nationwide exceed the earnings of white Americans are Asian Americans and, er, Indian Americans.
I wouldn't put it past Mamdani to attack these groups as well in due course.
After all, the only sectarian politicking which Mamdani is keener on than antisemitism is his anti-Indian sentiment.
Mamdani is one of those sectarian politicians who is never happier than when accusing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi of being a 'war criminal.'
Modi is one of the international leaders who Mamdani has said he would like to ban from coming to New York.
But it isn't his grandstanding on the world stage that is his biggest drawback.
Rather it is his incompetence and wishful thinking on the home front.
After all, this city has been run by left-wing politicians for a long time.
If you think the city is unequal, unfair and just begging for more left-wing policies, then why have these policies to date provided such terrible results?
A sensible voter might conclude that it is because left-wing policies don't work.
A naïve voter might be persuaded that it's because they haven't been tried enough, and conclude that what New York needs to thrive is for the rich to be chased out and everyone else to be given free stuff.
There are 5 million voters in this city.
The only way that Mamdani can win is if the only people who come out to vote are the minority of New Yorkers who are as delusional as he is.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The NYC Mayoral Debate: No, You Quit
The NYC Mayoral Debate: No, You Quit

Wall Street Journal

time30 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

The NYC Mayoral Debate: No, You Quit

Andrew Cuomo and Eric Adams apparently agree that the most credible strategy for stopping a socialist takeover of New York is for one of them to drop out of this fall's mayoral race. They simply disagree on the small matter of which one should do it. Zohran Mamdani, now the Democratic nominee, must be chuckling. Mr. Adams said in a TV interview Monday that Mr. Cuomo had asked him to take one for the team, as it were, and quit the campaign. 'I said, 'Andrew, are you that level of arrogant?'' Mr. Adams told CNBC. ''I'm the sitting mayor of the city of New York, and you expect for me to step aside when you just lost to Zohran by 12 points.''

Trump administration takes blows from Epstein conspiracy community it once embraced
Trump administration takes blows from Epstein conspiracy community it once embraced

The Hill

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump administration takes blows from Epstein conspiracy community it once embraced

The Trump administration is stumbling as it seeks to unwind new details about the Jeffrey Epstein case, infuriating its key boosters with a memo concluding the deceased financier was not murdered and did not keep a list of clients. Figures in the Trump administration have long embraced and even promoted various conspiracy theories, including those swirling around Epstein's death. And they've actively courted influencers and voters who have peddled such matters. But the administration's pledges to release details about the case that some have suggested were held back by authorities — only to backtrack and conclude he died by suicide — have failed to satisfy those who fervently believe Epstein was killed to cover up his connections with high-powered figures. Critics say the Trump administration is in a mess of its own making. 'You couldn't try to hurt yourself worse, you couldn't try to discredit the FBI worse than what they've done — Pam Bondi, all of it,' said commentator and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, referring to the attorney general — and nearly coming to tears in a video discussing the matter on Monday morning. 'The current DOJ under Pam Bondi is covering up crimes — very serious crimes, by their own description,' former Fox News host Tucker Carlson said on his show released Tuesday. The interest in the case has dovetailed with Trump's selection of numerous figures who have fanned the flames of intrigue around his death. Vice President Vance has mused about how he 'died mysteriously in a jail,' and referenced Epstein's alleged client list, asking in 2021, 'What possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein's clients secret? Oh…' Meanwhile, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, in his past life as a conservative commentator, fueled speculation about his death, saying 'that Jeffrey Epstein story is a big deal, please do not let that story go. Keep your eye on this.' And at his confirmation hearing, FBI Director Kash Patel vowed to release the Epstein files, saying he would 'make sure the American public knows the full weight of what happened.' Epstein, accused in several cases of sex trafficking young girls, ran in high-powered circles with figures that included President Trump, former President Clinton, Britain's Prince Andrew and a number of other celebrities and ultra-wealthy individuals. His associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, has been convicted of sex trafficking. But while Epstein and Maxwell were accused of abusing the victims themselves, the government did not accuse them of supplying victims for others. The files and evidence under court-ordered seal, the FBI memo released Monday said, 'served only to protect victims and did not expose any additional third-parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing.' That assertion enraged those convinced that the duo ran an operation trafficking young girls to high-powered elites. 'So Jeffrey Epstein went to jail for trafficking kids to no one…. BS,' Newsmax host Carl Higbie posted on the social platform X. And they bristled at Bondi saying Tuesday she has 'no knowledge' of Epstein being a spy or intelligence agent, with provocateur Laura Loomer fuming: 'This is a lie. FBI documents from 2008 prove that Epstein PROVIDED INFORMATION FOR THE FBI 'AS AGREED UPON,'' though the FBI document Loomer quoted and shared did not say Epstein was an intelligence agent. The quiet rollout of the Monday memo stood in contrast to actions taken by the administration in February, when it invited social media influencers to the White House and gave them binders labeled 'The Epstein Files.' That move sparked backlash because the binders did not contain new revelations, but rather information that has long been public, such as pages from Epstein's address book. And then in May, Bongino changed his tune, telling Fox News the files were conclusive. 'I've seen the whole file. He killed himself,' Bongino said. Officials like Bongino are in the awkward position of backtracking after years of highlighting the case and lobbying for the release of information from the sidelines — riling up their viewers and supporters in the process. Now within the arena, the information on hand doesn't back their assertions — and they also have different considerations they didn't have to weigh when outside of government, such as not accusing people of wrongdoing without bringing charges. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), who is leading a task force in the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on 'Declassification of Federal Secrets,' such as on the assassination of former President Kennedy, called on the administration to do more. 'The American people deserve to know [the] truth [regarding] Epstein, regardless of who it impacts,' she wrote, adding that there is 'plenty of evidence' Bondi and Patel could release without disclosing information about victims. 'The American people should be free to come to their own conclusions. The Truth will always come out one way or another.' Bondi sought to play cleanup Tuesday during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, where she was asked about some of the fresh theories spawned by Monday's memo. She explained a one-minute gap in a video from outside Epstein's prison cell released by the Justice Department, saying it was a standard issue where 'every night the video is reset, and every night should have the same minute missing.' The attorney general defended an interview she did in February in which she said documents were on 'sitting on my desk' to be reviewed related to the Epstein case, asserting she was referring to a variety of files that needed to be reviewed pertaining to Epstein, John F. Kennedy Jr.'s assassination and Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination, rather than just simply Epstein's client list. Bondi added that the thousands of hours of video that were part of the Epstein case turned out to be child pornography and would not be released. Trump himself expressed exasperation with the focus on Epstein when it came up during the Cabinet meeting. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking — we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things. And are people still talking about this guy? This creep? That is unbelievable,' Trump said. One source close to the White House argued Bongino, in particular, has built up significant goodwill with the MAGA movement, giving him more credibility than figures like Bondi when he speaks about the Epstein case. 'If it were anyone other than Dan saying it, I think there would be a lot more distrust with it,' the source said. The source downplayed that the frustration on the right over the administration's handling of the issue could be a political liability. 'I don't think it's going to make people go, 'Oh, well, we're not voting for Republicans in the midterm because of what the DOJ has done,'' the source said. But the incident marks one of the biggest fractures between Trump and his rabid MAGA base — and one they are pledging they will not forget. 'We will continue asking about Epstein,' filmmaker and commentator Mike Cernovich posted in response to Trump scolding a reporter for asking about the disgraced financier. 'Trump is massively misreading his base on this,' conservative commentator Liz Wheeler added.

Trump Frustrated with Putin's 'Bullsh-t'
Trump Frustrated with Putin's 'Bullsh-t'

Time​ Magazine

time31 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump Frustrated with Putin's 'Bullsh-t'

It was a rare acknowledgement from President Donald Trump that he has been getting played by Russian President Vladimir Putin. During a televised cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Trump vented his increasing frustration with Putin's refusal to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. 'We get a lot of bullsh-t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' Trump told reporters. 'He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' The U.S. President said he is now considering a bipartisan Senate proposal to impose sanctions on Russia oil exports and has reversed a Pentagon decision to delay key arms shipments to Ukraine. Last week, the Pentagon announced a temporary pause in shipments of air defense missiles and guided artillery, citing concerns over dwindling U.S. weapons stockpiles. But on Tuesday, Trump said he had overruled the decision. 'Putin is not treating human beings right—he's killing too many people,' he said. 'So we're sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine, and I've approved that.' Mark Montgomery, a retired Navy rear admiral and a senior fellow at the The Foundation for Defense of Democracies, says Trump believed he sent a clear message to Putin in June that the time had come to stop the attacks on Ukrainian civilians and come to the table to discuss a ceasefire. But instead of de-esclating, Russia increased the severity of its attacks. Trump felt disrespected, Montgomery says. 'He got a double whammy there. He's getting bullsh-tted by Putin and undercut by his own Department of Defense.' Trump, who campaigned on a promise to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, admitted that had not materialized. 'It's turned out to be tougher,' he acknowledged, saying he's 'not happy' with Putin. 'He's killing a lot of people and a lot of them are his soldiers.' Several months into his presidency, Trump has been unable to get Putin to stop his assault on Ukrainian territory and the ongoing bombardment of civilians. That failure has frustrated Trump, who sees himself as a dealmaker who can resolve entrenched conflicts through the flexing of American military and economic power. He has long been fixated on winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump's support for Ukraine has run hot and cold during his second term. He came into office saying he would cut aid to Kyiv and in February berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a heated Oval Office meeting, telling him 'he didn't have the cards' to win. Zelensky seemed to have repaired his relationship with Trump after a face-to-face meeting at the Vatican in April. Given his frustration with Putin, a reporter asked if there were any steps he plans to take to punish Russia for refusing to end the war in Ukraine. 'I wouldn't be telling you,' he replied. Trump said he is looking at a bill making its way through the Senate that is designed to sanction Russian oil sales to China. Called the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, the bill is designed to push countries that support Russia's war effort in Ukraine, said the bill's author Senator Lindsey Graham of North Carolina in an Op-Ed published on the Fox News website. The bill has been consponsored by 41 Republicans, 42 Democrats and Sen. Angus King of Maine, an independent. Trump said he's looking at the sanctions bill 'very strongly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store