Government told after election it would have to quit fossil fuel group if new exploration started
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
An international coalition for phasing out fossil fuels says it told the government after the election it would have to quit the group if it re-started looking for new oil and gas, contradicting what Climate Change Minister Simon Watts previously told the media.
Before last year's world climate summit, Watts told Newsroom he did not expect New Zealand would have to leave the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance once the repeal of the offshore exploration ban went through.
But the alliance has put out a statement, saying it had made the New Zealand government aware of the implications of restarting exploration after the October 2023 election.
It said the 2018 ban was the basis of New Zealand's status as Associate Member of the alliance.
Watts said that while there was some limited dialogue with the Beyond Oil and Gas Secretariat post the election, New Zealand officials remained of the view that there were grounds that meant New Zealand could continue to qualify for associate membership, without the offshore oil and gas exploration ban.
He said an officials' meeting with the secretariat after he made the statement clarified that once the legislation was repealed, the secretariat believed New Zealand would no longer be eligible.
He said the government had "made a principled decision to withdraw".
New Zealand [https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/565147/nz-pulls-out-of-global-coalition-for-phasing-out-fossil-fuels quietly exited the group on 21 June.
In a statement explaining New Zealand's exit, the alliance said it had informed the government that repealing the ban would be a breach of its membership commitments.
"Following the election in October 2023, BOGA initiated a dialogue with the incoming government of New Zealand regarding their pledge to repeal the 2018 ban, which was the basis of their status as associate member of the alliance. The government of New Zealand was made aware of the implications of repealing the ban, and was informed that when the legislation passed, they would be in breach of their membership commitment and would leave the Alliance," it said.
Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said it was never credible for Watts to claim New Zealand that could remain in the alliance while gutting the policies that gained the country entry in the first place.
"The government was warned, as far back as the elections in 2023, that rolling back the ban on fossil fuel exploration and extraction would put our membership in the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance at serious risk. Knowing this, Minister Watts proceeded to publicly assure New Zealanders that everything would be fine and that there'd be no backlash from the international community," she said.
She said if the government cared about energy security it would invest the $200 million it has allocated for for fossil fuel fields into distributed renewable energy.
Watts, however, said New Zealand had one of the most renewable electricity sectors in the world and the government had been looking at all options to extend the supply of fossil gas as a "critical energy." He has said gas would play an important role in New Zealand's energy until viable alternatives were found.
When the exit was announced WWF NZ called it "an international embarrassment", while Greenpeace said there was a "growing risk that the government's reversal of climate change policies will result in backlash from New Zealand's trading partners."
New Zealand was a founding member of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance and helped launch it at the Glasgow climate summit in 2021.
The international alliance of governments works together on the "managed phase-out of oil and gas production".
It was led by Denmark and Costa Rica and includes France, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and several Pacific island nations.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
19 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Auckland councillor determined to ban residential helipads
An Auckland councillor is on a mission to ground helicopters taking off and landing in residential areas for good. It follows multi millionaire Auckland couple, entrepreneur Anna Mowbray and former All Black Ali Williams recently getting approval for a helipad at their waterfront Westmere home. Three independent commissioners approved the resource consent application with some concessions, including a maximum of two flights day and 10 flights per month between the hours of 7am and 10pm. They concluded as per previous decisions; the use of helicopters in residential areas is a permitted activity under Auckland Unitary Plan. But one councillor wants these rules amended. Councillor Mike Lee spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Hearings begin on Regulatory Standards Bill
David Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill has been put through its paces at Parliament, with its opponents lining up one by one to tear it down. Beginning this morning, and for the next three days, MPs are hearing feedback on the legislation which sets out new gold-standard principles for lawmaking. Ministers introducing new laws would be required to declare whether they'd met the new standards and to justify themselves if not. Acting political editor Craig McCulloch spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Cutting Red Tape So Young Kiwis Can Start Saving
Associate Minister of Justice Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee is making changes to the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Act that will make it easier for parents to open bank accounts for their children. 'Opening a bank account for children should be a simple and positive step toward teaching them the value of saving. Unfortunately, regulations designed to prevent serious crimes can make the process unnecessarily difficult,' says Mrs McKee. 'The Government is cutting red tape that can make it harder for parents to do the easy thing and open a bank account for their children. 'According to the Act, a parent who wants to open an account for their eight-year-old child needs to gather and verify a long list of information, including their child's address, date of birth, name, and their own authority to act on their child's behalf. The Act also requires banks to obtain the nature and purpose of the business relationship, evaluate whether further due diligence is required, and monitoring the child's transactions on an ongoing basis. 'Under the Government's new reforms, banks will be allowed to apply a simplified processes when risk is low. This means that if a bank puts measures in place to make a child's bank account low-risk (e.g. by setting appropriate transaction limits) all that could be required is a birth certificate to confirm the child's name and date of birth, and prove the relationship to the parent. 'They could also skip the intrusive and unnecessary questions about the 'nature and purpose' of the account, and reduce or forego ongoing monitoring of a child's banking activity, until the account's settings are changed (e.g., removal of transaction limits when a child turns 18). The Government has also directed the future AML/CFT supervisor to issue clear guidance so that businesses like banks know exactly how to apply these simplified checks without fear of penalty. 'This is a common-sense reform. Parents shouldn't be asked to jump through bureaucratic hoops just to open a bank account for their kids. We're streamlining the system so that New Zealanders can spend less time on paperwork and more time teaching their children the value of money. 'These changes reflect the Government's wider commitment to smarter regulation, focusing on outcomes rather than ticking boxes, and trusting New Zealanders to make responsible decisions without being buried under red tape.'
