Far-right RN and allies face new embezzlement scandal at European Parliament
The now-defunct Identity and Democracy (ID) parliamentary group, which comprised around 10 far-right parties during the last European parliamentary term (2019-2024), is accused of irregular spending practices, to the detriment of the Parliament's budget, amounting to at least €4.33 million – a sum close to the total financial damages caused by the RN's fake parliamentary assistants system (€4.5 million). Much of this money benefited former radical activists with close ties to Le Pen, who were awarded lucrative contracts without any genuine procurement process, as well as organizations often linked to far-right officials or causes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
2 hours ago
- Fashion Network
EU avoids US tariff letter, eyes concessions, EU sources say
The European Union will not receive a letter from the United States setting out higher tariffs, EU sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday, and is eyeing possible exemptions from the U.S. baseline levy of 10%. U.S. President Donald Trump began informing, in a wave of letters, a range of trading partners from Japan to Myanmar of sharply higher tariffs on goods they sell into the United States starting August 1. Some EU sources said the bloc was close to an agreement with the Trump administration. This could involve limited concessions to U.S. baseline tariffs of 10% for aircraft and parts, some medical equipment and spirits in an eventual deal with the Trump administration, three sources familiar with the situation said on Monday. Two sources also said that the EU was looking into an arrangement that would allow EU automakers that produce and export cars from the United States to import more EU vehicles at tariff rates below the current 25%. Such an arrangement would benefit German carmakers that have large U.S. plants. The European Commission, which had aimed for a balanced and broader trade agreement with the United States, briefed EU envoys late on Monday that EU countries faced a choice between accepting an unbalanced deal or facing more uncertainty. The Commission also said that there were no guarantees that the Trump administration would not impose further tariffs or demand further concessions. The EU currently faces 50% U.S. tariffs on its steel and aluminium exports, 25% on cars and car parts and 10% on most other products. The U.S. is also looking into further tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.
Fashion Network
4 hours ago
- Fashion Network
EU avoids US tariff letter, eyes concessions, EU sources say
The European Union will not receive a letter from the United States setting out higher tariffs, EU sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday, and is eyeing possible exemptions from the U.S. baseline levy of 10%. U.S. President Donald Trump began informing, in a wave of letters, a range of trading partners from Japan to Myanmar of sharply higher tariffs on goods they sell into the United States starting August 1. Some EU sources said the bloc was close to an agreement with the Trump administration. This could involve limited concessions to U.S. baseline tariffs of 10% for aircraft and parts, some medical equipment and spirits in an eventual deal with the Trump administration, three sources familiar with the situation said on Monday. Two sources also said that the EU was looking into an arrangement that would allow EU automakers that produce and export cars from the United States to import more EU vehicles at tariff rates below the current 25%. Such an arrangement would benefit German carmakers that have large U.S. plants. The European Commission, which had aimed for a balanced and broader trade agreement with the United States, briefed EU envoys late on Monday that EU countries faced a choice between accepting an unbalanced deal or facing more uncertainty. The Commission also said that there were no guarantees that the Trump administration would not impose further tariffs or demand further concessions. The EU currently faces 50% U.S. tariffs on its steel and aluminium exports, 25% on cars and car parts and 10% on most other products. The U.S. is also looking into further tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.
LeMonde
13 hours ago
- LeMonde
Tax on ultra-rich: 'France has the opportunity to lead the way,' say Nobel Prize-winning economists
This op-ed was signed by Daron Acemoglu (MIT), 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics; George Akerlof (Georgetown), 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics; Abhijit Banerjee (MIT), 2019 Nobel Prize in Economics; Esther Duflo (Collège de France and MIT), 2019 Nobel Prize in Economics; Simon Johnson (MIT), 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics; Paul Krugman (CUNY), 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics; Joseph Stiglitz (Columbia), 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics. They have never been so wealthy and yet contribute little, relative to their ability to pay, to the public coffers: From Bernard Arnault to Elon Musk, billionaires have lower tax rates than the average taxpayer. Pioneering research conducted in partnership with tax authorities in several countries demonstrates it: Ultra-wealthy individuals pay around 0% to 0.6% of their wealth in individual income tax – around 0.6% in a country like the United States and 0.1% in a country like France. When including all other mandatory levies (corporate taxes, social security contributions, consumption taxes, etc.) and expressing their tax payments as a fraction of income, their effective tax rates turn out to be lower than those of middle-class or upper-middle-class taxpayers. How did we get here? In short, because the ultra-wealthy can easily structure their wealth to avoid income tax, which is supposed to be the cornerstone of tax justice. In European countries, this optimization is achieved through the creation of family holding companies, in which dividends accumulate sheltered from taxation. In the US, the use of holding companies to dodge taxes has been prohibited since the 1930s, which explains why the wealthy are more heavily taxed there than in Europe – though some have still managed to find workarounds. Fortunately, this situation is not the result of a natural law or some ancient fate: It stems from human decisions and political choices. There is no inevitability here. Not only is it necessary to impose a stronger burden of justice on billionaires, but more importantly, it is possible.
