Municipalities, residents decry gaps in N.S. coastal protection as 'death by 1,000 cuts'
When Jessica Bradford first spotted a square patch of dirt infill as she drove along the Queens County coastline in Western Head, N.S., she had one thought.
"That's not going to last very long," Bradford recalled thinking, standing last week near the section of infill as waves washed up on a rocky beach just steps away.
It's unclear whether the infill project on private property along Shore Road follows proper guidelines. But even if it does, Bradford and some municipal leaders say the situation represents a major gap in Nova Scotia's approach to coastal protection.
Bradford said she first noticed work being done on the small strip of land along the roadside beside the beach two weeks ago.
She said trees and grasses were removed to allow for heavy equipment to spread dirt over the site. The move made her concerned the loss of established root systems would speed up erosion and worsen flooding on the road, Bradford said, which often becomes submerged during storms.
"We know the importance of living shorelines," Bradford said. "It made me wonder, how was this allowed to happen?"
When Nova Scotia's Progressive Conservative government decided to not proclaim the Coastal Protection Act that would have brought in provincewide rules last February, it said municipalities could enact own bylaws on the issue.
It also released mapping tools and information, so property owners could make an "informed decision" about protecting their land and buildings from sea-level rise and erosion.
But Bradford said the Region of Queens Municipality — which has land-use bylaws that address coastal setbacks — told her it was not aware of the Shore Road project, and had not received any permit applications for the site. Provincial staff have told Bradford they are looking into whether the project followed their rules and had the correct permits.
CBC News reached out to the property owner but did not receive a response.
Scott Christian, Queens mayor, said legislation allows municipalities to regulate infill and removal of vegetative buffers on a coastline — but only when it's related to development. If a property owner doesn't plan to build anything on their land right away, infill projects fall under provincial jurisdiction.
"I think that's problematic because I think it opens up the door where people could just say, 'Well, I'm not planning on developing,'" Christian said.
"Even if a structure isn't envisioned on a property, I think we need to protect against the problematic removal of natural vegetation along our shoreline. So we need to do better."
Christian said he's had residents complain of seven current Queens County projects where vegetation was removed or infill brought in, including Western Head.
"I appreciate their advocacy, but we simply don't have a leg to stand on," Christian said.
Christian also said municipalities can only govern private property above the high-water mark. Anything happening below that, such as armoured walls reaching into the water, falls under provincial jurisdiction.
If infill stretches farther into navigable waters or fish habitat, federal regulations could also apply.
A large infill project featuring a rock wall on Little Crescent Beach in Lunenburg County brought many complaints from residents, and helped push the Municipality of the District of Lunenburg to bring in its own coastal bylaws last summer.
Recent work on the site shows two wooden buildings coming up to the edge of the wall.
The municipality's mayor, Elspeth McLean-Wile, said the new bylaw requires setbacks of 30 metres from the water's edge, but the project's development permits were issued before the new rules came in.
However, McLean-Wile said there's still nothing the municipality can do to prevent a similar armoured wall project if it falls below the high-water mark like in the Crescent Beach case.
"I think this is a misstep on the part of the provincial government," McLean-Wile said. "There are probably other issues as well, but infilling is one that really frustrates our residents.
"These are the holes that continue to exist."
Nicolas Winkler, coastal adaptation co-ordinator for the Ecology Action Centre in Halifax, said he continues to see coastal infill cases around Nova Scotia he's concerned about. But he said the full extent of the issue is difficult to know, because many are only visible from the water and are "out of sight, out of mind" for residents or government officials.
"That is death by 1,000 cuts. It's these small, consistent … changes to our coastline that, over time, will add up to a coast that we may not recognize," Winkler said.
Both McLean-Wile and Christian said they would prefer to see provincewide rules, and don't agree with the provincial government's comments that municipalities are best fit to handle the file because they know their communities best.
If the province won't bring in the Coastal Protection Act, Christian and McLean-Wile said there needs to be a fulsome conversation between both levels of government about addressing the gaps left behind.
"There's problematic infilling along our shoreline now. And so we need like pretty urgent action on this," Christian said.
If legislation is changed to allow municipalities to regulate infill projects regardless of development plans, Christian said the move must come with far more financial and staffing resources than what has been offered so far.
The province has provided template bylaws, and $1.3 million to the Nova Scotia Federation of Municipalities for local governments to use on consulting fees for climate change and sustainability analysts.
CBC News asked the Department of Environment and Climate Change to respond to the concerns about municipalities having no power over many infill and armoured rock projects, but they did not answer the question.
"We have moved forward to what we feel is a better approach to protecting our 13,000 [kilometres] of diverse coastline," department spokesperson Cindy Porter said in an email.
"The province is committed to continuing to support municipalities every step of the way."
MORE TOP STORIES
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's latest trade threat looms over Wall Street as investors celebrate stock market's return to record territory
Major equity indexes including the S&P 500 tallied their first record closing highs in months on Friday — but something happened on the way to the closing bell that left a bad taste in some traders' mouths. Just a couple of hours before trading was set to conclude for the week, President Trump surprised investors with a Truth Social post that briefly sent stocks skittering into the red. 'He doesn't seem to care': My secretive father, 81, added my name to a bank account. What about my mom? My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him? My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life? Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos Tech stocks are powering this record-setting rally on Wall Street — but how long can it last? The president announced that the U.S. would immediately end all trade talks with Canada in retaliation for Ottawa imposing a digital-services tax on American technology giants. 'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,' Trump said in the post. Although it may have been incidental, the timing of the post didn't sit well with some on Wall Street. Even though stocks had shaken off most of the losses by the closing bell, some investors couldn't help but wonder whether the market's remarkable comeback rally might have emboldened Trump to once again take a more aggressive tack on trade. If that was in fact the case, it could go a long way toward undoing much of the progress that has been made in markets over the past couple of months. Trump blamed turmoil in financial markets for his decision to walk back many of his most troublesome 'liberation day' tariffs in April after the S&P 500 tumbled right to the edge of bear-market territory, while ructions in the bond market stoked widespread alarm. Ultimately, the decision to hit the pause button helped inspire the concept of the 'TACO' trade. In this case, TACO stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' See: The 'Trump always chickens out' trade is the talk of Wall Street. Here's one way to play it. But now that things have calmed down, could the TACO trade return — but this time, in reverse? 'If you think about it, he shifted when the market fell,' said George Cipolloni, a veteran portfolio manager, during a phone interview with MarketWatch Friday afternoon. 'He probably feels like he has a bit of wiggle room because the stock market has done so well over the past couple of months.' It isn't just markets. Cipolloni also pointed out that inflation has remained relatively tame since Trump imposed the first tariffs of his second term earlier this year, defying the expectations of many economists. That price pressures have yet to significantly surface in the data could also encourage Trump to consider taking a hard line on tariffs as he seeks political victories he can bring home to his base. Additional tariff revenue, in theory, could help offset the budgetary impact of his signature budget plan to extend tax cuts passed during his first term in office — unless parts of the economy, like farmers, require another round of significant federal bailouts due in part to tariffs. To be sure, the latest official economic data released this week included some signs of weakness that investors might want to consider, according to Mike O'Rourke, chief market strategist with Jones Trading. Revised first-quarter GDP, released earlier in the week, showed the economy contracted by more than previously believed between the beginning of January and the end of March. Then on Friday, new data showed personal spending declined in May for the first time in four months, while a reading on core inflation came in slightly hotter than expected. Although the inflation reading didn't exactly move the needle, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell did say during congressional testimony earlier in the week that he expected tariffs to start to show up in the inflation data some time this summer. So far, investors have been mostly happy to tune out the constant noise regarding the administration's trade agenda as the Trump team pursued its goal of '90 trade deals in 90 days' as first touted back in April, O'Rourke said. In late May, Trump announced plans to slap a 50% tariff on E.U. imports, before quickly backing down after European leaders promised to speed up talks. Pain for stocks during that episode was pretty short-lived. On Friday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said during an interview that the U.S. and China had completed an accord negotiated last month in Geneva, and added that deals with 10 major trading partners would be announced imminently. Investors will be keeping a close eye on how things go with Canada, and a deal with the E.U. remains top of mind as well, O'Rourke said. Given Trump's unpredictable nature, it is impossible to say with certainty what might happen next. O'Rourke thinks there is almost no chance that Trump will allow the 'liberation day' levies to return. Indeed, Trump himself said earlier that he might not stick to the deadline. But with so much about Trump's trade agenda still up in the air, investors may want to consider taking some chips off the table. 'It's very easy for the tariff situation to come back into play, and this could be the first shot across the bow here,' O'Rourke said about Trump's decision to end talks with Canada. 'The way investors have to look at this is: Do you want to roll the dice here?' The S&P 500 SPX gained 32.05 points, or 0.5%, to finish at 6,173.07 on Friday — a record close, and the index's first since Feb. 19, Dow Jones Market Data showed. The Nasdaq Composite COMP rose by 105.55 points, or 0.5%, to 20,273.46, its own first record close since Dec. 16. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA also finished higher, although it remained shy of record territory. The trade truce between the U.S. and China, strong consumer-confidence data from the University of Michigan, and investors' positive reaction to earnings from Nike Inc. NKE were just some of the factors that helped push stocks higher on Friday, according to Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA. Reports about a coming U.S.-E.U. trade deal and an administration plan to boost energy availability for the purpose of powering the expansion of artificial-intelligence technology also helped, Azarm noted. 'I am horrified': My company won't allow me to tip more than 15% for Ubers. Do I explain this to the driver? JPMorgan has a new way of forecasting the stock market — and there's a surprising finding My cousin died before claiming his late father's $2 million estate. Will I be next in line for this inheritance? S&P 500 scores record high for first time in 4 months. What could push stocks higher from here? Coinbase's stock is up over 40% this month as Wall Street projects amazing profit growth
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Cuts Off Trade Talks With Canada Over Digital Services Tax
President Donald Trump on Friday said he was 'terminating ALL discussions on Trade' with Canada over the country's new digital services tax that aims to collect billions of dollars from American tech giants like Meta and Amazon, starting on Monday. 'We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country,' Trump posted on Truth Social. The president then said he was canceling all trade discussions with America's northern neighbor due to the 'egregious Tax.' He added 'We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,' before adding his trademark sign-off, 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Canada's DST is a 3% tax on large tech companies with more than about $800 million in annual revenue. It targets companies involved in social media services and online advertising, which puts tech giants like Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, Amazon, and Google-parent Alphabet on the hook for payments. The first tax payment is due on Monday, and is retroactive to sales made since the start of 2022. The Wall Street Journal estimated that initial payment would be around $3 billion for the collective U.S. firms being taxed. Upon the president's post on Friday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's office shared a brief response. 'The Canadian government will continue to engage in these complex negotiations with the United States in the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses,' his office said. The post Trump Cuts Off Trade Talks With Canada Over Digital Services Tax appeared first on TheWrap. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
What is Canada's digital services tax — and why does Trump dislike it so much?
In the last few weeks and months, U.S. President Donald Trump has given a number of rationales for escalating the trade dispute between Canada and the United States. On Friday, he zeroed in on Canada's digital services tax — a new levy expected to cost the largest American tech giants billions of dollars in the coming years after it kicks in on Monday. International trade lawyer William Pellerin was only shocked the U.S. president didn't bring it up sooner. "It's actually quite surprising that it took them this long to make a big stink about this issue," Pellerin, who works for McMillan LLP, told CBC News Network on Friday. "If the U.S. was going to take a run at this and really has had a beef with Canada on this issue for a really long time, they really had no choice but to escalate that issue at the last minute now." Here's what you need to know about the tax, which has been a thorn in the side of the Canada-U.S. relationship for years. Canada's digital services tax (DST) affects mega companies that offer digital services — like online advertising or shopping — and earn more than $20 million in revenue from Canadian sources. Giant companies like Amazon, Apple, Airbnb, Google, Meta and Uber will be taxed three per cent on the money they make from Canadian users and customers. The levy has been in place since last year, but the first payments are due starting Monday. It's retroactive to 2022, so companies will end up with a $2-billion US bill due by the end of July. Revenue is one big benefit. The Parliamentary Budget Office estimated last year that the tax would bring in more than $7 billion over five years. The Liberals first promised the tax during the federal election in 2019 under former prime minister Justin Trudeau, but it was delayed for years because a number of other nations wanted to work together on one, overarching digital taxation plan that could be applied in multiple countries. As the delays dragged on, Canada went ahead with its own tax plan. Aside from revenue, Ottawa has pitched the DST as a way to bring the tax code up to date and capture revenues earned in Canada by firms located abroad. The United States has been hostile to the tax from the beginning because it largely affects American tech giants. Officials have argued the tax discriminates against American companies and Congress, notoriously divided between Democrats and Republicans, found a moment of common ground in criticizing Canada's plan. The Computer & Communications Industry Association has estimated U.S. companies could pay as much as $1 billion a year in tax if the measure remains on the books. A number of industry experts — from lawyers to cross-border groups and commerce associations — have warned for years that the tax would strain the relationship between Canada and the U.S., with one going so far as to predict in 2023 that the tax alone would be to blame for a trade war. WATCH | Trump says he's ending talks with Canada over DST: Canadian and U.S. business groups, organizations representing U.S. tech giants and American lawmakers all signed letters in recent weeks calling for the tax to be eliminated or paused. But Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the legislation was passed by Parliament, and Canada would be "going ahead" with the tax. Pellerin, the international trade lawyer, said he suspects the federal government will avoid changing its plan because it's taken a strategy of avoiding knee-jerk reactions to Trump's negotiation tactics. "The Trump administration is not known for negotiating quietly in the back rooms or in the hallways of power … so I don't think this is unexpected," he said. Trump says he's pulling back from the bilateral trade discussions because Canada plans to move ahead with its DST on Monday, a move he described online as "a direct and blatant attack on our country." The move put the 30-day deadline to reach an agreement in the trade dispute into doubt. The Biden administration also opposed the tax, but tried to resolve the issue differently: It asked Canada for dispute settlement consultations under the Canada-United States-Mexico-Agreement (CUSMA) last August. That consultation period ended in November without the Biden administration taking the case to the next step, but there is no time limit on when the U.S. could pick that plan back up — so the CUSMA route is still available to the current administration if Trump wanted to move away from his current tactic. Yes. France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom all have tax regimes in place, to name a few.