ICE Helps Round Up Sex Workers in Florida
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Department of Homeland Security, and the U.S. Army Criminal Investigations Division were involved in Operation Fool Around and Find Out, along with more than a dozen Florida sheriff's offices and police departments.
In addition to targeting adults for trying to consensually engage other adults in private sexual activity, immigration enforcement seems to have been a goal. A press release from the Polk County Sheriff's Office (PCSO) notes that 36 of those arrested "are here illegally."
The sheriff's office also released photos of all of those arrested, with color-coded boxes around some arrestees to denote that they're undocumented immigrants or receiving welfare benefits.
Among those arrested was former NFL player Adarius Taylor, a fact that has catapulted this story into national news. And that's meant a whole lot of outlets playing right into the police's preferred narrative.
Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd has been pulling this trick year after year—arresting a bunch of sex workers and people looking to pay sex workers and then patting his team on the back for all of the "human trafficking" they allegedly stopped. A press release about Operation Fool Around and Find Out touts the arrest of "244 suspects during [a] nine-day human trafficking enforcement operation."
In headlines—and, let's be honest, that's all many people will see—it sure sounds like the PCSO did some heroic work. But read beyond the headlines, and you'll note that no one was arrested on suspicion of human trafficking. Nor was anyone arrested on suspicion of sexual abuse of a minor, sexual assault, kidnapping, or any other charge that might indicate something other than consensual adult activity going on.
According to the sheriff's office, the suspects were "involved in illegal acts related to soliciting prostitutes, offering to commit prostitution, or aiding/abetting or transporting prostitutes."
This isn't just a semantic difference; it's the deliberate creation of a false narrative.
When people hear "human trafficking," they imagine abductions, captivity, violence. Maybe the involvement of children. Maybe people being brought across borders. Not just one adult offering to pay another adult for sex or accepting payment for sex.
And, in fact, this is a distinction under Florida law, too. Human trafficking—a first-degree felony—is a distinct crime from the offenses of offering to commit prostitution, soliciting prostitution, transporting someone for prostitution, or otherwise aiding and abetting prostitution, all of which are misdemeanors upon a first offense. (Second or third offenses on the same charges can be felonies.) Human trafficking of an adult must involve some degree of coercion, whereas the other offenses do not.
In Operation Fool Around and Find Out, the vast majority of arrests were for prostitution or solicitation, with 93 people arrested for allegedly offering sex for a fee and 141 people arrested for allegedly agreeing to pay an undercover cop for sex. In addition, 10 people were arrested for driving someone suspected of the other crimes or facilitating them in some way.
The vast majority of the charges stemming from these arrests—284—were misdemeanors. In addition, 102 felonies were charged.
The inclusion of ICE and Homeland Security in this operation suggests that immigration enforcement was one goal. This is often a sneaky motive behind prostitution stings disguised as human trafficking operations.
But we shouldn't discount good, old-fashioned puritanism and sex shaming as another motive for Polk County authorities. "Several suspects either left their wives or girlfriends at home, or the women thought their partners were at work, visiting a friend, or going to the gym," states the press release from the Polk County Sheriff's Office.
And just for fun, it threw in a little class shaming, too, noting that "22 said they were receiving government assistance."
Toward the bottom of the press release, a quote from Sheriff Judd notes that "in addition to these 244 arrests, we also arrested 11 child predators who solicited who they thought were children online." Judd seemingly wants to give the impression that Operation Fool Around and Find Out did more than just arrest people for wanting to engage in consensual adult activity.
But those 11 arrests were part of a separate operation, with its own name: Operation Child Protector VI. They appear to have nothing to do with the other 244 arrests.
Operation Child Protector VI was a classic To Catch a Predator sting, and these can come with their own due process problems. I'm certainly not here to defend adults arranging to meet a 14- or 15-year-old for sex, but it's unclear if these types of stings actually stop predators or just create criminals out of people who would never actually make such a move without undercover cops luring them in. At the very least, it seems like police time and resources might be better spent stopping harms against actual children who are being abused.
What is clear, however, is that catching child predators in stings like those set up by Polk County authorities does not actually require arresting nearly 100 unrelated sex workers and publishing their photos online. It does not require arresting a bunch of men who simply want to be with another adult, and it does not require making a little chart to tell the public which ones receive public assistance and which ones are here illegally.
Orgasmic meditation on trial: I continue to follow the trial of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz, former leaders at the company OneTaste and proponents of orgasmic meditation. I covered the early days of the trial for this newsletter last week (and wrote at length about the prosecution more generally back in February). For more recent updates, check out this and this thread on X (or click here and here if you prefer Bluesky).
Overall, court proceedings have continued to revolve around some pretty absurd notions about agency and consent, with prosecutors suggesting that Daedone and Cherwitz are guilty of conspiracy to commit forced labor because some employees felt like it was difficult to leave OneTaste since they had tied their whole identities, social lives, and professional goals up in the company.
Throughout the proceedings, there's also been a persistent theme of people rewriting history. Government witnesses will say that their experiences with OneTaste were bad, but contemporaneous social media posts will say they were extremely happy and excited about their lives and work. Government witnesses will say that they feel uncomfortable about sexual activities that were part of the community or part of their jobs, then admit that they never expressed this discomfort to Cherwitz or Daedone or anyone else—and often indicated then, in various ways, that they were fine with or even enthusiastic about it.
Proceedings have also been full of a lot of psychobabble explanations about why college-educated women in their 20s and 30s were somehow unable to make their own financial, professional, social, and sexual choices. The government wants to pretend this case is about helping women, but watching these court proceedings, one would get the impression that women are too fickle and fragile to make any decisions for themselves.
See also, in The American Conservative: "Christians Should Oppose Feds' Targeting Sex Company."
"Revenge porn" bill becomes law: President Donald Trump has signed the TAKE IT DOWN Act into law, instituting a new online censorship scheme under the auspices of thwarting revenge porn and AI-generated "nonconsensual intimate visual depictions."
• Bills to ban kids from social media are advancing in Texas and in Nebraska. The Texas bill is notable because, unlike age-verification bills that have been passed in other states, it prohibits anyone under age 18 from having an account (usually, the age limit is a bit lower) and contains no exception for cases where a teen has obtained parental consent.
• A Virginia politician has come out as "ethically non-monogamous." Yvonne Rorrer, a candidate for Virginia's House of Delegates, apparently wanted to get ahead of the story, since "in politics, people love to dig up the unexpected and spin it into a spectacle," as she put it on social media. "I'm sharing this because I believe in radical honesty, and I refuse to live in the shadows waiting for information to be leaked. If someone's going to talk about my life, it's going to be me."
• The Kids Online Safety Act is back. "Senators have once again put forward the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), reviving a bill that, if enacted, would radically reshape how Americans experience the internet," notes the nonprofit group Reclaim the Net:
Promoted as a measure to protect children, this latest version now carries the backing of Apple, a tech giant that has publicly endorsed the legislation as a meaningful step toward improving online safety.
But behind the bipartisan sales pitch and industry support lies a framework that risks expanding government control over online content and eroding user privacy through mandated age verification and surveillance infrastructure.
• A Nevada bill (Assembly Bill 209) that "would grant sex workers immunity from criminal liability from prostitution-related offenses if they call 911 seeking medical assistance," as the Nevada Current put it, is opposed by local police groups but still advancing in the legislature. "The bill was originally broader and included protections for sex workers who called the police if they were victims or witnesses of crime, including assault or human trafficking. In an attempt to appease law enforcement, Orentlicher narrowed the bill specifically to protect sex workers seeking medical assistance," the Current points out. It passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 15, having previously passed out of the state Assembly. It has until the end of this Friday to pass the full Senate or it will be dead.
• A Texas bill that would have held bookstores liable for the "distribution, transmission, or display of harmful material to a minor" is likely dead. "The bill, filed by Rep. Nate Schatzline, R-Fort Worth, did not get a second reading on the House floor last week, making it effectively dead for this legislative session," reports KERA News. "However, the bill could technically still be revived as an amendment tacked on to another bill in the legislature."
• The National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE)—formerly Morality in Media—is suing several porn platforms on behalf of a Kansas grandmother who says her teenage grandson was able to access them, in violation of Kansas age-verification law.
The post ICE Helps Round Up Sex Workers in Florida appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Venezuelan migrant begged NYC judge to send him to Rikers to avoid ICE but feds got him anyway
A Venezuelan migrant who begged a judge to send him to Rikers Island to avoid being taken into custody to waiting immigration agents has been turned over to the feds. Nolveiro Vera Ordonez, 30, was arraigned in Manhattan Criminal Court June 4 on petty larceny and possession of stolen property charges for allegedly stealing a bicycle while five masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents waited for him outside the courtroom — prompting him to demand to be locked up. Although the judge complied and ordered him held on $100 'voluntary' bail, Ordonez couldn't outrun the feds forever — he was handed over to the Department of Homeland Security on a federal warrant less than three weeks later, authorities confirmed this week. 3 Nolveiro Vera Ordonez was arraigned on theft charges while ICE agents waited, so he asked to go to Rikers Island. AP 'This individual was released to the Department of Homeland Security on a federal arrest warrant,' a spokesperson for the city Department of Correction said in an email. 'Prior to his release, he paid bail on the local matter.' According to the department, Ordonez was turned over to the feds on June 23. While New York is a migrant-friendly 'sanctuary city,' the law dictates that an inmate may be released to another jurisdiction if corrections officials are presented with 'an immigration detainer supported by probable cause' or has a 'qualifying conviction' for a violent crime over the prior five years. 3 Federal immigration agents have been stalking Big Apple court hearings in masks to nab illegal immigrants. Getty Images Federal sources told The Post that Ordonez was being held at the Brooklyn federal lockup this week after being picked up by US Marshals and is awaiting transfer to Texas. As of late Monday, he was not in ICE custody and was not currently due for deportation, sources said. Ordonez was picked up by police for allegedly stealing a bike, and was charged with fourth-degree criminal mischief, petty larceny and fifth-degree criminal possession of stolen property. 3 Judge Rachel Salem Pauley called Nolveiro Vera Ordonez's 'voluntary' bail request 'highly unusual.' In court, his public defender attorney asked Judge Rachel Pauley that he be held on $100 bail, citing a quirk in the law that allows a defendant to request bail, although the charges are not eligible for bail under the state's controversial criminal justice reforms. Pauley granted the request despite noting it was 'highly unusual.' However, less than three weeks later Ordonez was turned over to the feds.
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
Federal agents describe unusual run-up to arrests of Pro-Palestinian academics
Cunningham said that the background information he received on Öztürk included an op-ed she co-wrote in the Tufts student newspaper last year supporting divestment from Israel. The agent said he skimmed the op-ed and didn't see anything obviously criminal in it. 'I didn't see anything in the op-ed that suggested she'd committed a crime,' Cunningham said. McCormack, the agent involved in Khalil's arrest, said department leadership instructed his office to surveil Khalil and 'establish a pattern of life' for his apprehension. The requests prompted McCormack to consult with William Joyce, the head of ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations field office in New York, which typically handles deportation-related matters. 'We historically in recent times had not enforced those laws,' said McCormack, a deputy special agent in charge in New York. 'I wanted to confirm there was a legal basis for arrest.' Asked why the usual personnel didn't handle the arrest, which eventually took place in a hallway of Khalil's Manhattan apartment building, McCormack was stumped. 'I'm not sure why. … I wondered why HSI was effecting this arrest and not ERO,' he said. 'I still don't know.' The agents said the arrests followed standard procedures: They handcuffed the academics and ushered them into unmarked vehicles. All four agents said they were never informed that the academics were being targeted for deportation due to their pro-Palestinian views, their criticism of Israel or for their political views — the central claim in the lawsuit. The agents said they carried out the arrests because the academics' visas or green cards had been revoked and because of Rubio's determination that their presence was at odds with U.S. foreign policy. There was no testimony Tuesday on the basis for Rubio's decisions. Testimony from a top State Department official who could shed light on that subject, John Armstrong, is on hold due to a temporary stay an appeals court issued in a dispute about the confidentiality of documents detailing the investigations into the academics. The HSI agents did testify about some agents' use of masks when making arrests, a practice that has drawn outrage from some immigrant rights advocates. They said that before the Covid pandemic masking was uncommon, although it took place occasionally when undercover agents were asked to help with more routine operations. Now, agents mask more often out of fear of doxxing on social media, the officials said. HSI policy doesn't require or forbid masks, they said. 'In the age of camera phones and the ability of people to identify those agents, people want to protect themselves if they're members of this community or they live here,' Cunningham said. Cunningham said it was 'common practice' for agents to identify themselves when making an arrest and he assumes it was done when Öztürk was arrested, although he conceded he wasn't there. 'I don't know what was said to her,' he said. The trial, taking place before U.S. District Judge William Young without a jury, is expected to resume Thursday.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration seeks to end bond hearings for immigrants without legal status
The Trump administration is reportedly seeking to bar millions of immigrants who allegedly arrived in the US without legal status from receiving a bond hearing as they try to fight their deportations in court. The new policy would apply during removal proceedings, which can take years, for millions of immigrants who entered the country from Mexico in recent decades, according to a report from the Washington Post, which reviewed documents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice). Such immigrants had previously been allowed to request a bond hearing before an immigration judge, but Todd Lyons, Ice's acting director, stated in a memo reviewed by the Post that the homeland security and justice departments had 'revisited [their] legal position on detention and release authorities'. The departments determined that such immigrants 'may not be released from Ice custody', Lyons reportedly wrote in the memo. Related: Trump's tax bill funds $6bn expansion of US-Mexico border surveillance, report finds That new restriction, which is expected to face legal challenges, was issued on 8 July shortly after the Republican-controlled Congress provided Ice $45bn over the next four years to detain immigrants for civil deportation proceedings. 'To be clear, [Ice's] position here is laughable and is being rejected by immigration judges all over the US, and will soon be dismissed by actual federal court judges in habeas proceedings,' Charles Kuck, an immigration attorney and Emory University law professor, wrote on X in a post that alluded to challenges against one's detention. The policy change would mark the latest significant departure for Ice, which during Joe Biden's presidency provided a guide on how immigrants who are detained can post bond. 'Judges see a lot of people every day,' the guide stated. 'You can make your testimony stand out by speaking sincerely. Think about a story that will show the judge how much your family needs you. Explain to the judge why your detention hurts your family very much. 'We hope that this guide provides you with helpful information when preparing for your bond hearing. We wish you the best of luck with your case!' The Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for reducing immigration, defended the new reported policy. 'Detention is absolutely the best way to approach this, if you can do it,' Mark Krikorian, executive director for the Center for Immigration Studies, told the Post. 'It costs a lot of money, obviously. 'You're pretty much guaranteed to be able to remove the person, if there's a negative finding, if … [they're] in detention.' The Trump administration had already worked to limit which immigrants can post bond. Previously, people arrested after they had entered the US and placed in regular removal proceedings were eligible for a bond hearing, according to the National Immigration Project, a non-profit whose attorneys have defended immigrants facing deportation. But in May, the federal Board of Immigration Appeals issued a ruling stating that such people were subject to mandatory detention, meaning that Ice could jail them during removal proceedings and not provide them an opportunity to appear before an immigration judge and get a bond set. Ice did not immediately respond to the Guardian's request for comment on the reported new policy.
