Broadcasters have to pay both service, luxury taxes: Supreme Court
'In the same way, the Finance Act along with its amendments seeks to impose a tax on the service rendered by the broadcasting agency which is imposed under Entry 97 List – I. In the same vein, under Entry 62 List – II, the state governments are not imposing any service tax on the assesses,' the top court said.
It further stated that there is no overlapping in fact or in law, inasmuch as different aspects of the same activity are being taxed under two different legislations by two different legislatures.
'This is because the activity of broadcasting is a service and liable to service tax imposed by the Parliament (Entry 97 – List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution) and the activity of entertainment is a subject falling under Entry 62 - List II and therefore, the assessees herein are liable to pay entertainment tax as well. Hence, the State Legislatures as well as the Parliament, both have the legislative competence to levy entertainment tax as well as service tax respectively on the activity carried out by the assessees herein,' the judgment stated.
According to it, no entertainment can be presented to the viewers unless the broadcaster transmits the signals for instantaneous presentation of any performance, film or any programme on their television.
'Thus, there are two aspects in this activity; the first is the act of transmission of signals of the content to the subscribers. The second aspect here concerns not only the content of the signals, but the effect of the decryption of the signals by the Set-Top Boxes and the viewing cards inside these boxes provided by the assessees to the subscribers, which is providing and receiving of entertainment through the television. Without the apparatus provided for by the assessees to decrypt the signals, the subscriber would not be able to watch the content that is transmitted, the content being for the purpose of entertainment,' Justice Nagarathna, writing for the bench, said in her 321-page judgment.
The television entertainment provided by them through broadcasting, is a luxury within the meaning of Entry 62 - List II. The assessees who are engaged in the activity of providing entertainment are liable to pay service tax on the activity of broadcasting under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 read with relevant amendments and are also liable to pay entertainment tax in terms of Entry 62 - List II as being a specie of luxuries, the court added.
The apex court was hearing a batch of cases from different high courts (lead case being Kerala vs Asianet Satellite Communications) in which entertainment tax was charged from broadcasters by various states. The broadcasters claimed that they were not liable to pay entertainment tax (or
luxury tax
) under the respective state enactments. They submitted that since they were engaged in broadcasting of signals through television channels to subscribers, hence, were possibly liable to pay only service tax to the Central government.
It set aside the Kerala High Court's 2012 judgment that had held that exemption given to cable operators from luxury tax while making DTH operators to pay the same is a case of discriminatory levy of luxury tax merely because of technological differences in the system of delivery of entertainment in both the services.
The top court said that the 2012 judgment, which declared the levy and collection of luxury tax on cable television operators with connections of 7,500 or more as unconstitutional for being discriminatory was "incorrect".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
40 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Sambhaji Brigade leader Pravin Gaikwad manhandled in Solapur for remarks against Swami Samarth
Sambhaji Brigade founding member Pravin Gaikwad was manhandled and ink was hurled on him allegedly by activists of an organisation over his reported remarks on Swami Samarth in Akkalkot village in Solapur district on Sunday (July 13, 2025), police said. Mr. Gaikwad alleged that he was targeted over his "progressive thoughts" by followers of Hindutva ideology. A viral video shows Mr. Gaikwad being pulled out of his car and manhandled by a group of people in the afternoon. "While Gaikwad was in his car, Shivdharm Foundation supporters staged protests, threw black ink on him and also tried to vandalise his car," an official said. Mr. Gaikwad had come to Akkalkot, widely known for its association with Swami Samarth, who is believed to be a reincarnation of Shree Dattatreya, to attend a felicitation ceremony organised by an educational institute and Sakal Maratha Samaj. The protesters also objected to Mr. Gaikwad's terming Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj as 'Sambhaji'. They demanded that the Sambhaji Brigade be renamed as Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Brigade, the official said. Police booked Deepak Kate and six other members of Shivdharm Foundation under sections 115 (2), 189, 190, and 191 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) for rioting and detained them. They were later allowed to go after the police served them notices. Mr. Gaikwad alleged it was an attempt to kill him for his "progressive thoughts". "I had gone to Akkalkot and suddenly members of the Shiv Dharma Foundation smeared black, sticky oil on me. They attacked me and tried to kill me. You may recall the murders of Dr Pansare, Kalburgi, Dr Dabholkar and Gauri Lankesh. In the current regime, activists with progressive thoughts are unsafe," he alleged while talking to reporters. "Sometimes there are attempts to break political parties. Then there are attempts to divide activists. When all such attempts fail, such attacks are carried out. We work with an ideology rooted in truth. Our thinking is aligned with the Constitution," Mr. Gaikwad added. The Sambhaji Brigade is working for humanity but, unfortunately, some misconceptions are spread about social organisations, following which those claiming to follow the Hindutva ideology carry out such attacks, he claimed. Sambhaji Brigade, a Maratha outfit, is named after Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, son of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. It had gained exposure in 2004 for allegedly attacking and vandalising the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute in Pune, claiming that it helped American scholar James Laine's book on Shivaji Maharaj, certain parts of which were unacceptable to them. "Ideological opposition should be expressed through ideas. This path of violence is highly condemnable and deplorable," NCP (SP) MP Amol Kolhe said. His colleague and MLA Jitendra Awhad offered support to Mr. Gaikwad by calling him a "champion of progressive thoughts" and "a fighter".
New Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump says he is considering 'taking away' the U.S. citizenship of a longtime rival, actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a decades-old Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits such an action by the government. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland 'if they want her.' The two have criticized each other publicly for years, an often bitter back-and-forth that predates Trump's involvement in politics. In recent days, O'Donnell on social media denounced Trump and recent moves by his administration, including the signing of a massive GOP-backed tax breaks and spending cuts plan. It's just the latest threat by Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk. But O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Musk, who was born in South Africa. O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to U.S. citizenship. The U.S. State Department notes on its website that U.S. citizens by birth or naturalization may relinquish U.S. nationality by taking certain steps – but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the Fourteen Amendment of the Constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. 'The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born U.S. citizen," Frost said in an email Saturday. 'In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people.' O'Donnell moved to Ireland after Trump defeated Vice President Kamala Harris to win his second term. She has said she's in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage. Responding to Trump Saturday, O'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and 'add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
South Africa's police minister suspended, inquiry launched
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa on Sunday announced a commission of inquiry into allegations that Police Minister Senzo Mchunu has ties to criminal gangs and interfered in investigations into politically motivated murders. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The announcement comes a week after Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, KwaZulu-Natal's provincial police commissioner, publicly accused the minister and other senior officials of obstructing law enforcement operations targeting organized crime. Despite Mchunu's denials, the allegations dominated headlines throughout the week, prompting widespread calls from across the political spectrum for Ramaphosa to act. "The allegations made in this media briefing raise serious concerns around the Constitution, the rule of law and national security," Ramaphosa said Sunday. Mchunu on leave of absence as broad probe launched Ramaphosa placed Mchunu on a leave of absence with immediate effect and appointed an acting police minister. His position will be filled by Professor Firoz Cachalia Professor of Law at the University of the Witwatersrand, who is not a member of the National Assembly. He is expected to assume the post at the end of July. Meanwhile, Ramaphosa said the commission, headed by the country's deputy chief justice, will investigate claims that criminal groups have infiltrated the police, intelligence services and other parts of the justice system. "The commission will investigate the role of current or former senior officials in certain institutions who may have aided or abetted the alleged criminal activity; failed to act on credible intelligence or internal warnings; or benefited financially or politically from a syndicate's operations," he said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "It is critical that these matters be attended to with the necessary urgency and thoroughness," Ramaphosa added. Critics say Ramaphosa's inquiry falls short Reactions to Ramaphosa's announcement were more muted than the president might have anticipated. "Massive moment was missed," Ian Cameron from the Democratic Alliance (DA), the second-largest party in Ramaphosa's governing coalition, and also chair of Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Police, wrote on social media. "Parliament and SAPS leadership cannot wait for yet another long, expensive process while trust in policing collapses further," he added. The opposition Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) said the arrangement allows the minister to continue drawing a full salary, "while he consolidates power and undermines whistle blowers from behind the scenes." The party also criticized Ramaphosa's track record, saying previous inquiries he appointed into various matters have yielded little tangible outcome. Even before Ramaphosa's announcement the DA, EFF and uMkhonto weSizwe Party laid charges against Mchunu based on Mkhwanazi's statement. The commission is expected to deliver its first interim report within three months and complete its work within a year. What are the allegations against Mchunu? In 2018, the South African Police Service formed a task team to focus on political killings. The team has investigated more than 600 cases, arrested 436 suspects and recovered 156 firearms, at least 55 of which were linked to political crimes. At the end of last year, Mchunu requested that the unit be disbanded. When that did not happen, the unit's case dockets containing information on political killings were seized. Mkhwanazi said Mchunu and Deputy National Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya shut down the task team because it had uncovered links between politicians, police, prosecutors, businesspeople and drug cartels. He said the case files were removed from the unit on the minister's and Sibiya's instructions, without the authorization of his superior, National Police Commissioner General Fannie Masemola. He also claimed Mchunu received funding for his "political endeavours" from a businessman facing corruption allegations. Mchunu has denied Mkhwanazi's claims, calling them "baseless." He accepted Ramaphosa's decision to place him on immediate leave, and has "expressed his full support for the process."
