
‘It's impossible': Will teachers be able to stop cheating for new Leaving Cert coursework?
teacher
at St Flannan's College in Ennis, Co
Clare
, is alarmed.
He is, he stresses, not against
reform
or reimagining how we assess students. It's that he feels plans for the
Leaving Cert
risk undermining education standards, eroding fairness for students and placing teachers in an 'impossible' position.
Under reforms due to roll out for fifth years in September, students will be required to complete research projects worth 40 per cent during the school year, while the traditional written exams in June will be worth the remaining 60 per cent.
These senior cycle reforms are aimed at easing the stress facing students nd providing a broader assessment of students' skills and competencies.
READ MORE
Biology, physics and chemistry are among the first subjects to be reformed, while others will follow over the coming years.
In an era when artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT can generate convincing-looking essays and reports within minutes, is there a way to guarantee these projects will really be the work of students?
'It will be practically impossible for teachers to authenticate the work of each student,' says Conneely. 'There are no legal protections or supports provided for teachers – or principals – who may have suspicions about the authenticity of the work and [this] leaves them open to litigation should they make a claim.
[
Leaving Cert 2025 students will lose out due to grade deflation, but by how much?
Opens in new window
]
'We won't be able to police this, it's impossible. We feel we're thrown under a bus because we're being asked to do something we can't ... We live in small school communities. If a teacher suspects a student is cheating it's very difficult for them to prove it. The burden of responsibility is huge.'
Concerns among teachers over senior cycle changes – the most ambitious in half a century – look set to dominate the annual gatherings of second level teachers' unions this week.
The Association of Secondary Teachers in Ireland (ASTI) and the Teachers' Union of Ireland (TUI) want 'accelerated' changes due to come into force for fifth year students in September to be paused amid wider concerns over equity and exam integrity.
Imagine a student being asked to demonstrate how to play their guitar through a written report? It would be ridiculous and useless from an educational point of view
—
Teacher Adrienne Healy
They say more time is needed to consult them over changes, properly resource science labs and address concerns over how to authenticate students' work.
Among the motions to be debated are calls for an indemnity for teachers from any resulting legal actions as well as calls for union members to cease co-operation with the introduction of the reforms.
Minster for Education Helen McEntee, however, has pledged to push ahead with the changes on the basis that students should not have to wait longer for the planned changes which she says have been in the works for up to decade.
'The Leaving Cert has served students well but this is about making sure we support students and reduce the amount of pressure they are under,' she told the Dáil recently.
'Currently, the focus is on one exam at the end that can often go wrong for students. We need to take away that significant pressure and make sure there is an additional focus on critical and creative thinking and other types of skills. Leaving Cert reform is central to how we do this.'
[
Leaving Cert reforms to press ahead this year despite union opposition
Opens in new window
]
McEntee says she is working with schools, teachers and students to introduce the changes supported by a comprehensive package of support.
Training, she says, has already been taken up by 26,000 teachers, while a total of €12 million has been provided to schools to support the introduction of new science subjects.
Other preparation has involved the
State Examinations Commission
which
recently published sample exam papers
for each of the new subjects, while sample briefs for new research projects or additional assessment components worth 40 per cent will be provided by the commission at the start of the next school year.
In relation to concerns over the use of AI, the SEC says students' coursework must be completed under the supervision of a teacher and authenticated as the candidate's own work by the teacher and school principal.
[
First look: Sample Leaving Cert exam papers for brand new subjects
Opens in new window
]
Under rules in place since 2023, students have been warned that use of tools such as ChatGPT in their project work must be disclosed and failure to do so could result in candidates losing marks, having their results withheld or being debarred from entering State exams. The SEC and the Department of Education, meanwhile, are working on high-level guidance on the use of AI in teaching and learning.
These assurances, however, are doing little to allay the concerns of some teachers.
Adrienne Healy, who teaches biology, science and maths at St Dominic's College, Cabra, in Dublin, feels a written research project ignores key stills.
While subjects such as languages and music involve a 'direct assessment' – such as an oral exam or performance – the research projects will be 'indirect' and will not involve students' practical skills. Original plans for assessing students, she says, involved examiners going into school labs to assess these skills.
'Imagine a student being asked to demonstrate how to play their guitar through a written report? It would be ridiculous and useless from an educational point of view. It's the same for assessing practical skills in biology, chemistry and physics. Just writing or describing a skill makes no educational sense.'
The 40 per cent weighting for the research project mark is also a source of debate. Many see it as too much given the 20 class hours allocated to complete it, based on official guidelines. Some teachers say this will simply incentivise cheating for a high-stakes exam.
Conneely also feels the volume of projects and burden of responsibility placed on science teachers to manage the procurement of materials, safety and validity of the assessments is too much.
'The guideline documents place a disproportionate burden of responsibility on the teacher in the implementation of the research investigations,' he says.
'Teachers are expected to help each student in the planning process, discuss safety considerations, be present when the investigations are being carried out, monitor the data analysis and provide authentication for the work completed. Many teachers may have two or more Leaving Certificate classes, potentially in multiple subjects, meaning they could be asked to manage up to 72 individual student investigations, monitor their progress and validate their work. This is unreasonable.'
What's changing: students face reformed senior cycle over coming years
Under the changes, all redeveloped and revised Leaving Cert subjects will include at least one additional assessment – such as a research project, practical, demonstration or oral – worth a minimum of 40 per cent. The process of rolling out the reforms (see below) will take place on an annual basis. By 2029, all subjects will be revised. It means all those entering fifth year as a Leaving Cert student in 2029 will be following revised curricula and assessment arrangements in all subjects.
September 2025:
Biology; physics; chemistry; business; ancient Greek; Arabic; Latin. In addition, some schools will trial two new subjects: climate action and sustainability; and drama, film and theatre studies
September 2026:
Fifth year students will begin studying the revised curriculum for accounting; construction studies; engineering; English; geography; PE; and LCVP (Leaving Cert Vocational Programme) link modules.
September 2027
:
Agricultural science; computer science; design and communications graphics; history; home economics; maths; music; physics and chemistry
September 2028:
Art; economics; French; Gaeilge; German; Italian; politics and society; Spanish; technology.
September 2029:
Applied maths; classical studies; Japanese; Lithuanian; Mandarin Chinese; Polish; Portuguese; religious education; Russian.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
4 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: In the era of AI, education is at a premium
While the rush by companies to crowbar artificial intelligence into every product imaginable continues — even if it's not actually artificial intelligence and just tools that are good at predicting the answer you're looking for — the technology is already showing detrimental effects on the human mind. A study published this month by researchers at MIT, with an admittedly very small sample size, suggests that the use of ChatGPT and similar tools results in reduced cognition, which is essential for independent critical thinking: 'Over four months, LLM [large language model] users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioural levels. These results raise concerns about the long-term educational implications of LLM reliance and underscore the need for deeper inquiry into AI's role in learning. The rush from AI opponents online was to say something like 'AI makes you stupid', but that is both inaccurate and unfair. Still, the technology isn't going away any time soon, and quite apart from the environmental and, apparently, mental damage we had a warning just this past week that AI could come to the detriment of Irish jobs. Members of the AI Advisory Council — made up of 15 independent experts who advise the Government on Ireland's AI strategy — appeared at an Oireachtas committee to say that they predict software engineers, junior lawyers, and customer service jobs to be the first to take the hit. They note that entry-level programming jobs are already being replaced by AI, as the industry behind the technology applies it to itself first. But whether the technology ends up augmenting or replacing the humans in the loop remains to be seen, largely because most large-scale experiments seem to be giving mixed results at best. Tesla finally launched its seemingly eternally promised autonomous driving taxis in Texas (with a person sitting in the front seat by the way, even if not driving), only for them to make a plethora of basic driving errors. While the shareholders seem happy, especially after the first quarter's debacle on the back of Elon Musk's dalliance with government and despite slumping Tesla car sales generally, whether this will prove a triumph in the long road — pun very much intended — remains to be seen. That doesn't mean that the tech giants aren't prepared to gamble big on automation or artificial intelligence. Last week, Amazon, which employs some 6,500 people here in Ireland and 1.5m worldwide, told staff that AI would probably mean a reduction in the total number of employees, possibly replacing some of its current corporate staff. Microsoft is preparing to lay off another 6,000 people while it simultaneously increases spending on AI. The cuts are across sales and other teams, and the talk is of 'trimming' the workforce and 'aligning it' with company strategy (it still has 2.28m other employees). Microsoft should be warned, though, about expecting an AI solution to bridge any workforce gap: Payments platform Klarna laid off 700 people in 2022 only to have to scramble to rehire many when its AI tool wasn't up to the task of customer service. The head of the AI company Anthropic has claimed that half of all entry-level jobs could be replaced by artificial intelligence — but then, he would say that, wouldn't he? That said, the IMF has previously noted that as much as 60% of jobs in advanced economies are exposed to AI, and not all for the better. Good news, then, that in recent weeks University College Cork has risen in the international university rankings, holding a space in the top 1% globally. It shows that quality education is still in demand, and with it the training in critical thinking and reasoning that will stand to the whole of society in the long run. There are ways that AI tools and apps can be beneficial, but right now the biggest return on investment for the technology has been wanton devastation of climate and copyright. Employment equality With the last school now shut for the summer, we face into a time that prior to covid would have been increasingly fraught for working parents — not just keeping their children entertained, but physically kept hale and hearty while they are off working in an office. The rise of hybrid, flexible, and remote working options has, if not put paid to that, at least made it more easy to navigate for some, though not all. And it must be acknowledged that a great many jobs have never been able to allow for remote or hybrid options, such as retail or manufacturing. Still, for parents of young and not so young children, being able to be physically present in their youngsters' lives represents time reclaimed, with all the emotional and relationship development benefits that brings. Doubly so for the parents or carers of children with disabilities, for whom summer camps and other such activities might be a pipe dream. One might expect that remote and hybrid working, meanwhile, would have levelled the playing field for our disabled citizens. And, while there is evidence generally that more people with disabilities have been able to access employment in the Western world, Ireland is lagging behind. Last week's Feelgood pages noted that Ireland's disability employment rate of 32.6% is not only way below the EU average of 51.3%, but is the absolute bottom of the EU table. More than 1.1m people in this republic have at least one long-lasting condition according to census figures, with some 350,000 experiencing difficulty taking part in activities, and just over 300,000 experiencing a difficulty working at a job or attending school or college. Not all disabilities are visible. Disabled workers find a plethora of obstacles in their way, from losing their social protection payments to the interview and testing process, to not even being part of the conversation because they are not targeted for recruitment. Many companies offer adaptations to work environments, and there are other supports available to firms. The American civil rights activist Fannie Lou Hamer once said: 'Nobody is free until everybody is free.' Isn't it time we did a better job of ensuring that our citizens who face obstacles are given the same freedom as everybody else?


RTÉ News
25-06-2025
- RTÉ News
ASTI to instigate dispute process mechanisms over senior cycle reforms
Second level teachers' union the ASTI has said it will instigate dispute process mechanisms to seek to advance the "significant" concerns of teachers regarding senior cycle redevelopment. Meeting in Killarney the union's executive agreed to, "in the first instance", seek resolution of the issues of concern to teachers by invoking dispute resolution mechanisms available to them under the current Public Service Agreement. "The pressing concerns of teachers include the exacerbation of inequalities for students, the lack of adequate infrastructural supports and human resources in many schools, and developments in AI which create substantial authentication issues for new Leaving Cert Additional Assessment Components, among others," ASTI president Donal Cremin said. Under changes due to be introduced from this coming September, at least 40% of Leaving Certificate students final marks will be awarded for projects carried out during the school year, called Additional Assessment Components. The terminal June exams will be worth just 60% of marks or less in the case of some subjects. The first subjects to experience the shift include the three main science subjects: Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. They are among 7 subjects for which the change will be introduced this September for incoming 5th year students. Earlier this month, ASTI members voted to reject the document Senior Cycle Redevelopment – Implementation Support Measures by 68% to 32%. The results came in a ballot with a particularly high turnout of 73%. The document contained measures designed to assuage teachers. Just over two-thirds of ASTI members also voted in favour of industrial action, if necessary, up to and including strike action, in the event of rejection of the support measures. The union has not ruled out industrial action.


The Irish Sun
23-06-2025
- The Irish Sun
ChatGPT bosses fear its AI will be used to create devastating new ‘bioweapons' and warns app will ‘hit that level' soon
THE company behind ChatGPT has warned that future versions of its artificial intelligence (AI) tool could be used to create bioweapons. AI has long been hailed for its potential in future medical breakthroughs, by helping scientists create new drugs and faster vaccines. 3 Anthrax under the microscope Credit: Science Photo Library But in a recent That includes, according to OpenAI, the ability to "assist highly skilled actors in creating bioweapons." "Physical access to labs and sensitive materials remains a barrier," the blog post continued. "However those barriers are not absolute." Since its initial release in late 2022, ChatGPT has only gotten smarter. READ MORE ON CHATGPT Bosses believe upcoming models will reach "'high' levels of capability in biology". That's why they say they are taking precautions to prevent ChatGPT from helping to build a bio-threat. Bioweapons are devices or agents that cause disease, injury or death to humans, livestock and even plants. "We don't think it's acceptable to wait and see whether a bio threat event occurs before deciding on a sufficient level of safeguards," the company wrote. Most read in Tech In a However, the AI chatbot might still be advanced enough to help amateurs do so. China's new cheap AI DeepSeek sparks ALARM as it outperforms West's models like ChatGPT amid race to superintelligence "We're not yet in the world where there's like novel, completely unknown creation of biothreats that have not existed before," Heidecke said. "We are more worried about replicating things that experts already are very familiar with." OpenAI said it has worked with experts on biosecurity, bioweapons, and bioterrorism to shape ChatGPT and the information it can give users. The 2001 anthrax attacks in the US, where letters containing deadly anthrax spores were mailed to several news outlet offices, are the most recent confirmed use of a bioweapon. To prevent a scenario where a novice can develop a bioweapon with the helping hand of ChatGPT, future models need to be programmed to "near perfection" to both recognise and alert human monitors to any dangers, Heidecke explained. "This is not something where like 99 percent or even one in 100,000 performance is sufficient," he said. Last year, top scientists warned that The report they co-authored said governments have a responsibility to stop , such that could be used in biological or nuclear warfare. What is ChatGPT? ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) tool created by San Francisco-based startup OpenAI. After launching in November 2022, the AI chatbot has since exploded in both popularity and its own clever abilities. It can converse, generate readable text on demand and produce images and video based on what has been learned from a vast database of digital books, online writings and other media. ChatGPT essentially works like a written dialogue between the AI system and the person asking it questions. Although it now has a GPT stands for Generative Pre-Trained Transformer and describes the type of model that can create AI-generated content. If you prompt it, for example ask it to 'write a short poem about flowers,' it will create a chunk of text based on that request. It can handle very complicated prompts and is even being used by businesses to help with work. But note that it might not always tell you the truth. 'ChatGPT is incredibly limited, but good enough at some things to create a misleading impression of greatness,' OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in 2022. 3 Bosses believe upcoming models will reach "'high' levels of capability in biology" Credit: Getty 3 OpenAI said it has worked with experts on biosecurity, bioweapons, and bioterrorism to shape ChatGPT and the information it can give users Credit: Getty