The Sneaky Way General Motors Is Catching Tesla
Chevrolet has overtaken the No. 2 spot for EV sales in the U.S.
Cadillac EVs are bringing in new customers, especially from Tesla.
GM has slowly built trust with consumers while Tesla has done the opposite.
10 stocks we like better than General Motors ›
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) took over the U.S. electric vehicle (EV) market in impressive fashion. It went from an intriguing Roadster story to a full-fledged automotive company that's generated bottom-line income -- a rarity for pure-play EV companies these days. While many believed Tesla's dominance to be durable and long-lasting, General Motors' (NYSE: GM) Chevrolet brand is already rocking the boat. And keep your eye on the company's luxury line of EVs, it might sneak up on you.
Providing a spark
Competitors that have been checking the rearview mirror may have seen Chevrolet coming, but most of us probably didn't. Chevrolet is now the second best-selling EV brand in the U.S., overtaking Ford and gaining on the top spot that Tesla has held closely for years.
Amid all the doom and gloom surrounding tariffs, potential disruptions in trade and distribution networks, and uncertainty for long-term planning, Chevrolet has done nothing but shine for General Motors. May was Chevrolet's second-best month ever for EV sales.
That strong May result came on the heels of the company's astounding 94% year-over-year growth in EV sales during the first quarter when GM's Chevrolet became the fastest-growing domestic EV brand. In fact, General Motors' recent surge helped the company's market double to capture 15.5% of EV market share in the U.S.
Chevrolet posted a staggering 134% increase in EV sales during the first half of 2025, compared to the prior year. In fact, the two largest movers in year-over-year EV delivery volume change are GM and Tesla, and they're moving in opposite directions as you can see in the graphic below.
"GM is driving the growth of the U.S. industry, and we have put real distance between us and our traditional competitors," said Duncan Aldred, GM's president of North America, according to Automotive News.
Sneaky Cadillac
While Chevrolet is hauling volume, Cadillac has sneakily been a big boost to GM's EV ambitions. GM is claiming that Cadillac is already the luxury "EV leader" this year with a lineup of luxury electric SUVs hitting the roads, but it should be noted management doesn't include Tesla in the mix due to its pricing structure.
Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today!
Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You
The Insurance Savings You Expect
Great Rates and Award-Winning Service
Cadillac just delivered its best first-half sales since 2008 and sales were up across the board in all 50 U.S. states. Even better, the luxury brand is bringing in new consumers, which is notoriously difficult in the auto industry. In fact, Brad Franz, Cadillac's global marketing director, told CNBC that nearly 80% of Cadillac EV buyers are new to the brand.
Franz even went on to note that at the time Cadillac was seeing an influx of consumers fleeing the Tesla brand with almost 25% of current Cadillac Lyriq buyers coming from Tesla.
Cadillac's momentum is just beginning to accelerate: GM's luxury brand already launched seven EVs in 2025 as it drives toward completing a full lineup. The strategy is simply that if consumers are turned off by the loss of the federal EV tax credit at the end of September, then GM will offer a wide range of product so consumers can find the right vehicle.
Another reason that Cadillac could be a sneaky help to General Motors' EV ambitions is because the administration's tariff policy has a very limited impact on Cadillac. The brand is almost entirely produced in the U.S., with the exception of the Optiq that is produced in Mexico.
Catch me if you can
Right now the EV business isn't very enticing for automakers, but it's a necessity to tap into the future bloodline of consumers. In fact, the vast majority of EVs are losing money for their manufacturers, but General Motors is doing something right by building out not only full lineups of vehicles, but also bolstering the luxury end with Cadillac -- a brand that carries higher margins.
General Motors has slowly built trust with consumers at a time Tesla has undermined itself. While General Motors and its surging Chevrolet and Cadillac EVs have impressively moved up the rank in sales, it still has a long way to catch Tesla -- but for once, the possibility doesn't seem so far-fetched.
Should you buy stock in General Motors right now?
Before you buy stock in General Motors, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and General Motors wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025
Daniel Miller has positions in General Motors. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Sneaky Way General Motors Is Catching Tesla was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What to watch for in today's NASCAR Cup race at Dover
The race for the final Cup playoff spot continues today at Dover Motor Speedway. Here is what to watch for in today's 400-lap race. Kyle Busch on a roll Kyle Busch has scored back-to-back top-10 finishes and cut 35 points off his deficit to the playoff cutline. He enters today's race 37 points behind Bubba Wallace, who holds the final playoff spot. Busch finished fourth in last year's race at this 1-mile high-banked concrete track. Busch's focus is on ending his 77-race winless drought, but he knows another good performance could close his gap to the cutline. 'Points take care of themselves when you run good,' said Busch, who starts 10th. 'Results are what matters. Being able to get stage points and being able to get good finishes will all equate to higher point totals and you not having to look at the sheet. So obviously with a 'win and you're in,' you really don't have to pay any attention to it. 'That's certainly on our radar right now. We've had a couple of good weeks where we've made up some of the deficit. I feel like there is potential and opportunity for us to continue that way, and we want to continue to climb that way and put ourselves above the cut for making the playoffs.' Also looking to make a move is Ryan Preece. He enters today's race three points behind Wallace for the final playoff spot. Preece starts today's race 11th. Wallace starts 22nd. A new tire Goodyear brought a new tire to Dover and teams didn't get any track time Saturday with practice and qualifying canceled by rain. That will present a challenge for competitors in today's race. 'I think all we can really do at this point is just try and dissect any similarities that the tire this weekend might have to a change that we've maybe already seen throughout the year,' said Chase Elliott, who will start on the pole. 'Really just make your best guess off of the information that you have in front of you with that. I feel like that stuff is always a little bit of an educated guess when you're coming to these places for the first time.' In-Season Challenge The NASCAR In-Season Challenge is down to the final four drivers. Tyler Reddick goes against Ty Gibbs. John Hunter Nemechek faces Ty Dillon. Said Reddick of his matchup with Gibbs: 'It does feel like every time I've been at Dover since Ty has been in the Cup Series, I can at least see him on the track when I'm making laps, and yeah, last year, I finished directly behind him –- so I feel like that is going to continue. I feel like we are going to be around each other a lot this weekend. Hopefully, we will have some good hard racing.' The winners of both matchups advance to next week's finals at Indianapolis with $1 million to the champion. Watch pit road Dover has one of the tightest pit roads on the circuit. That can lead to issues between competitors. Last year's race had only one pit road speeding penalty but the previous three Cup races at Dover averaged eight pit road speeding penalties. Pit road speed is 35 mph.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You Bought 1 Share of Walmart at Its IPO, Here's How Many Shares You'd Own Now
Key Points Investors continue to gravitate to influential businesses conducting stock splits. Since its October 1970 initial public offering (IPO), Walmart has effected a dozen forward splits. Walmart has a shopping cart full of competitive edges, including its size and willingness to lean on innovation. 10 stocks we like better than Walmart › For years, stock splits have been one of the most exciting trends on Wall Street. A stock split is a tool public companies have available that allows them to adjust their share price and outstanding share count by the same factor. These changes are surface-scratching in that they don't impact a company's market cap or operating performance. Businesses completing forward stock splits (designed to reduce a company's share price to make it more nominally affordable for everyday investors) have a knack for outperforming -- which is something the shareholders of retail goliath Walmart (NYSE: WMT) know all too well. Walmart's stock-split history is a marvel Walmart's initial public offering (IPO) occurred on Oct. 1, 1970, with the company pricing its shares at $16.50. In the nearly 55 years since its IPO, this retail colossus has completed 12 forward splits: May 1971: 2-for-1 stock split March 1972: 2-for-1 August 1975: 2-for-1 November 1980: 2-for-1 June 1982: 2-for-1 June 1983: 2-for-1 September 1985: 2-for-1 June 1987: 2-for-1 June 1990: 2-for-1 February 1993: 2-for-1 March 1999: 2-for-1 February 2024: 3-for-1 If you had spent $16.50 to purchase one share of Walmart at its IPO, you'd now have 6,144 shares worth $586,076, not including dividends. Not too shabby! Walmart's competitive edge is on full display One of the reasons Walmart is so dominant is its size. Being able to buy products in bulk reduces its per-unit cost and allows it to undercut local retailers and even some national grocery chains on price. It offers a value proposition that few retailers can match. In addition to its sheer size, Walmart is leaning on innovation and digitization to drive gains. Relying on automation and artificial intelligence-optimized supply chains, along with building out its high-margin Walmart+ subscription service, have the needle pointing higher. With a 52-year streak (and counting) of dividend increases in its sails, Walmart shows no signs of slowing down. Should you invest $1,000 in Walmart right now? Before you buy stock in Walmart, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Walmart wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If You Bought 1 Share of Walmart at Its IPO, Here's How Many Shares You'd Own Now was originally published by The Motley Fool
Fast Company
5 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Why business schools need to teach character development
Programs to help students discern their vocation or calling are gaining prominence in higher education. According to a 2019 Bates/Gallup poll, 80% of college graduates want a sense of purpose from their work. In addition, a 2023 survey found that 50% of Generation Z and millennial employees in the U.K. and U.S. have resigned from a job because the values of the company did not align with their own. These sentiments are also found in today's business school students, as Gen Z is demanding that course content reflect the changes in society, from diversity and inclusion to sustainability and poverty. According to the Financial Times, 'there may never have been a more demanding cohort.' And yet, business schools have been slower than other schools to respond, leading to calls ranging from transforming business education to demolishing it. What are business schools creating? Historically, studies have shown that business school applicants have scored higher than their peers on the ' dark triad' traits of narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism. These traits can manifest themselves in a tendency toward cunning, scheming and, at times, unscrupulous behavior. Over the course of their degree program, other studies have found that business school environments can amplify those preexisting tendencies while enhancing a concern for what others think of them. And these tendencies stick after graduation. One study examined 9,900 U.S. publicly listed firms and separated the sample by those run by managers who went to business school and those whose managers did not. While they found no discernible difference in sales or profits between the two samples, they found that labor wages were cut 6% over five years at companies run by managers who went to business school, while managers with no business degree shared profits with their workers. The study concludes that this is the result ' of practices and values acquired in business education.' But there are signs that this may be changing. Questioning value Today, many are questioning the value of the MBA. Those who have decided it is worth the high cost either complain of its lack of rigor, relevance and critical thinking or use it merely for access to networks for salary enhancement, treating classroom learning as less important than attending recruiting events and social activities. Layered onto this uncertain state of affairs, generative artificial intelligence is fundamentally altering the education landscape, threatening future career prospects and short-circuiting the student's education by doing their research and writing for them. This is concerning because of the outsized role that business leaders play in today's society: allocating capital, developing and deploying new technologies and influencing political and social debates. At times, this role is a positive one, but not always. Distrust follows that uncertainty. Only 16% of Americans had a 'great deal' or 'quite a lot' of confidence in corporations, while 51% of Americans between 18 and 29 hold a dim view of capitalism. Facing this reality, business educators are beginning to reexamine how to nurture business leaders who view business not only as a means to making money but also as a vehicle in service to society. Proponents such as Harry Lewis, former dean of Harvard College; Derek Bok, former president of Harvard University; Harold Shapiro, former president of Princeton University; and Anthony Kronman, former dean of the Yale Law School, describe this effort as a return to the original focus of a college education. Not ethics, but character formation Business schools have often included ethics courses in their curriculum, often with limited success. What some schools are experimenting with is character formation. As part of this experimentation is the development of a coherent moral culture that lies within the course curriculum but also within the cocurricular programming, cultural events, seminars and independent studies that shape students' worldviews; the selection, socialization, training and reward systems for students, staff and faculty; and other aspects that shape students' formation. Stanford's Bill Damon, one of the leading scholars on helping students develop a sense of purpose in life, describes a revised role for faculty in this effort, one of creating the fertile conditions for students to find meaning and purpose on their own. I use this approach in my course on vocation discernment in business, shifting from a more traditional academic style to one that is more developmental. This is relational teaching that artificial intelligence cannot do. It involves bringing the whole person into the education process, inspiring hearts as much as engaging heads to form competent leaders who possess character, judgment and wisdom. It allows an examination of both the how and the why of business, challenging students to consider what kind of business leader they aspire to be and what kind of legacy they wish to establish. It would mark a return to the original focus of early business schools, which, as Rakesh Khurana, a professor of sociology at Harvard, calls out in his book ' From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession,' was to train managers in the same vocational way we train doctors 'to seek the higher aims of commerce in service to society.' Reshaping business education Institute for Social Concerns and Bates College's Center for Purposeful Work and courses such as Stanford University's Designing Your Life and the University of Michigan's Management as a Calling. These are but a few examples of a growing movement. So, the building blocks are there to draw from. The student demand is waiting to be met. All that is needed is for more business schools to respond.
