Desperate search for missing schoolgirl, 14, who has ‘distinctive tattoos' as anyone who sees her urged to call 999
South Wales Police are urging anyone who spots 14-year-old Meghan to call 999 immediately.
Meghan was last seen on Sunday afternoon, July 20, on Bosworth Road, Skewen.
She is described as approximately 5ft 2in tall and has recently changed her hair colour from blonde to black.
When she vanished she was reportedly wearing a white top and jeans.
Cops pointed out Meghan's "distinctive tattoos" urging the public to keep their eyes peeled for the missing youth.
She has a tattoo of flowers on her right leg and a tattoo of a cross on one of her thumbs.
South Wales Police said: "Help us find Megan, 14. Last seen yesterday, Sun Jul 20, & 2.30pm on Bosworth Road, Skewen.
"5ft2 & has black hair rather than blonde hair. Possibly wearing a white top & jeans.
"Tattoo of flowers on her right leg & tattoo of a cross on one of her thumbs. Quote 2500231824."
1
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Viewers say they're ‘hooked' on ITV detective drama Karen Pirie
ITV 's detective series Karen Pirie has returned for its second season after a three-year wait, starring Lauren Lyle as the titular detective. The new season sees DI Karen Pirie investigating a cold case from 1984 concerning the kidnapping of an oil magnate heiress and her son, which is reopened after a body is discovered. Viewers have largely praised the crime series for its engaging storylines and for portraying a 'normal' detective who is not traumatised or grumpy. Lauren Lyle, the lead actress, noted that the show often surprises audiences by not conforming to typical ITV detective drama expectations. Despite the positive reception, some viewers expressed frustration regarding the frequent and lengthy commercial breaks during the broadcast.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Palestine Action terror ban made UK ‘international outlier', High Court told
Banning Palestine Action as a terror organisation had the hallmarks of a 'blatant abuse of power' and made the UK an 'international outlier', the High Court has heard. The group's co-founder Huda Ammori is making a bid to legally challenge Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed an action which saw two Voyager planes damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. On July 4, Ms Ammori failed in a High Court bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, with the Court of Appeal dismissing a challenge over that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5. The case returned to the High Court in London on Monday, where lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to grant the green light for a full legal challenge against the decision to ban the group, saying it was an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. Raza Husain KC said: 'We say the proscription of Palestine Action is repugnant to the tradition of the common law and contrary to the ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights).' The barrister continued: 'The decision is so extreme as to render the UK an international outlier.' Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' 'The consequences are not just limited to arrest,' Mr Husain later said, telling the court there was 'rampant uncertainty' in the aftermath of the ban. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also for Ms Ammori, later said: 'The impacts (of proscription) have already been significant.' She continued: 'Dozens and dozens of people have been arrested for protesting, seated and mostly silent protest.' The Home Office is defending the legal challenge. Previously, Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Sir James Eadie KC, representing the department on Monday, said that an 'exceptional case' would be needed for it to go to the High Court, rather than the POAC. He said: 'Judicial review is, and has been accepted to be, a remedy of last resort and that is for very good and well-established reasons.' However, Mr Husain told the court on Monday morning that the POAC was not 'convenient nor effective' in this case. He continued: 'It would be quite absurd to say that we should tolerate the consequences of the proscription… even if it is unlawful, and just go to POAC. 'That is an absurd position.' Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'. More than 100 people were arrested across the country during demonstrations this weekend protesting against the proscription, with protests held in London, Manchester, Edinburgh, Bristol and Truro on Saturday. Saturday's arrests brought the total number of people arrested since the ban came into force to more than 200, with more than 72 arrested across the UK last weekend and 29 the week before. The hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain is due to conclude on Monday. A decision may be given at the end of the hearing, or in writing at a later date.
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Suffolk PC made sexual innuendos about 9/11 and sent racist text
A former police officer who sent a racist message and made derogatory references to the 9/11 terror attacks would have been sacked had he not already left the force, a misconduct panel foundAndrew Bedding, formerly of Essex Police, used discriminatory and misogynistic language in a series of texts while working for Suffolk Police between 2022 and ex-police constable was also found to have "recklessly" disclosed personal data from the Police National Computer and disrespected his a misconduct hearing, which he did not attend, he was found to have committed gross misconduct and told he would have been dismissed if he was still serving. 'Misogynistic' The panel heard how Mr Bedding sent information concerning the whereabouts of a suspect and the details of people on a police database to a member of the a separate occasion he also sent a message in which partial details about a Suffolk Police vehicle with automatic number plate recognition capability were Bedding told the recipient to "avoid" and "be careful" if they came across it as "it picks up MOT / insurance etc and pings every time".He also sent disrespectful messages and images of colleagues and described the domestic abuse team as "the most work-shy, slow and painful team to deal with".The former officer used sexual innuendos about September 11 terror attacks while making "misogynistic" comments about a female member of the he also sent a text message with a screenshot of a Twitter post that included a racial comment about women of Indian heritage. Mr Bedding is said to have shown "genuine remorse" and expressed "how truly sorry he is" for how his actions had portrayed Suffolk chief constable Nicholas Davison, who chaired the hearing, said: "I find the officer's conduct was intentional and deliberate."I consider culpability high and harm to be high and my determination is the former officer's conduct is so serious as to justify dismissal and I find gross misconduct." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
