Modernising acquiring: What banks must consider in a changing payments landscape
The acquiring market in Europe and the wider world is undergoing a period of strategic rethinking. Traditional financial institutions are evaluating their role in the payments ecosystem, driven by the twin forces of technological disruption and evolving customer expectations. As someone who has worked closely with banks, payment service providers, and retail platforms across multiple regions, I've seen first-hand how priorities are shifting and how approaches to modernisation differ widely.
For many banks, payments are not the most profitable part of the business. Revenue often comes more from ancillary services like credit, FX, M&A advisory, or liquidity management. However, payments are a crucial touchpoint in the broader retail relationship. They're the entry point through which banks build, sustain, and deepen client engagement. Losing that foothold, particularly to non-bank challengers, can lead to a cascade of missed opportunities in more lucrative business lines.
As a result, we're now seeing two distinct strategies emerge. Some banks have opted to exit acquiring or reduce their role, choosing instead to partner with third-party providers who bring technical scale and modern interfaces. Others are recommitting to acquiring as a core service, but doing so requires significant modernisation of infrastructure.
One common misconception I encounter is that migrating to a modern platform is inherently a years-long, high-risk, multi-million-euro endeavour. For many banks, this perception creates inertia. They recognise the need to improve but feel constrained by the expected complexity of change.
The reality is that technology has advanced to the point where integration timelines and costs can be significantly reduced. I've seen implementations go live in as little as five weeks, including commercial onboarding and technical configuration. The key lies in clarity around the migration process: which components move, what remains, how risk is managed, and how internal teams are supported through the transition.
Modern acquiring is no longer just about processing transactions; it's about delivering actionable data. Retailers today want transparency: real-time insight into settlement timelines, fees, reconciliation, fraud risks, etc. The ability to provide a unified view across e-commerce and in-store payments is no longer a nice-to-have; it's expected.
Many legacy systems, built in an era when data storage was expensive and analytical capabilities were basic, are simply not designed to meet these demands. By contrast, modern systems are built around a centralised data model, allowing for full multi-channel visibility. That shift is transformative, not just for the banks but also for their clients, who can use the insights to improve margins, detect fraud, and streamline operations.
Cloud-native architecture is now foundational to any scalable acquiring operation. It brings several benefits:
Scalability: Dynamic auto-scaling allows systems to accommodate sudden volume increases without hardware constraints;
Faster Development: Cloud environments include out-of-the-box tools for everything from data encryption to monitoring, enabling faster iteration, and
Regulatory Flexibility: Local cloud instances satisfy data residency requirements without the need for physical infrastructure in every market.
This agility is especially important as acquiring becomes increasingly global. Banks need platforms that can adapt to diverse regulatory environments while maintaining consistency and resilience.
Today, acquirers are not just serving small merchants or traditional retailers. They're onboarding platform businesses, app-driven marketplaces, and large-scale fintechs. These customers expect direct integration, instant scalability, and a streamlined commercial structure. They also bring high volumes and demanding use cases, making flexibility and real-time performance critical.
I've seen this dynamic play out across Europe, North America, and Southeast Asia. While the market maturity may differ, the core demands are converging – meaning better data, faster settlement, and modular services.
As non-bank players grow their presence in both e-commerce and card-present transactions the competitive pressure on traditional institutions will only increase. This is no longer just about modernising for convenience; it's about defending strategic relevance.
Banks must ask themselves: Do we view acquiring as a necessary service to support broader relationships, or as a core business we aim to lead in? If it's the former, partnering with external providers may make sense. If it's the latter, then investing in future-proof infrastructure is not optional – it's urgent.
The tools are now available. The remaining challenge is mindset.
One of the few people in the world with over 20 years of experience in online payments, Kraal is responsible for maintaining relationships with the card schemes, acquirers, PSPs and regulators
"Modernising acquiring: What banks must consider in a changing payments landscape" was originally created and published by Retail Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Five surprising facts about AI chatbots that can help you make better use of them
AI chatbots have already become embedded into some people's lives, but how many really know how they work? Did you know, for example, ChatGPT needs to do an internet search to look up events later than June 2024? Some of the most surprising information about AI chatbots can help us understand how they work, what they can and can't do, and so how to use them in a better way. With that in mind, here are five things you ought to know about these breakthrough machines. AI chatbots are trained in multiple stages, beginning with something called pre-training, where models are trained to predict the next word in massive text datasets. This allows them to develop a general understanding of language, facts and reasoning. If asked: 'How do I make a homemade explosive?' in the pre-training phase, a model might have given a detailed instruction. To make them useful and safe for conversation, human 'annotators' help guide the models toward safer and more helpful responses, a process called alignment. After alignment, an AI chatbot might answer something like: 'I'm sorry, but I can't provide that information. If you have safety concerns or need help with legal chemistry experiments, I recommend referring to certified educational sources.' Without alignment, AI chatbots would be unpredictable, potentially spreading misinformation or harmful content. This highlights the crucial role of human intervention in shaping AI behaviour. OpenAI, the company which developed ChatGPT, has not disclosed how many employees have trained ChatGPT for how many hours. But it is clear that AI chatbots, like ChatGPT, need a moral compass so that it does not spread harmful information. Human annotators rank responses to ensure neutrality and ethical alignment. Similarly, if an AI chatbot was asked: 'What are the best and worst nationalities?' Human annotators would rank a response like this the highest: 'Every nationality has its own rich culture, history, and contributions to the world. There is no 'best' or 'worst' nationality – each one is valuable in its own way.' Read more: Humans naturally learn language through words, whereas AI chatbots rely on smaller units called tokens. These units can be words, subwords or obscure series of characters. While tokenisation generally follows logical patterns, it can sometimes produce unexpected splits, revealing both the strengths and quirks of how AI chatbots interpret language. Modern AI chatbots' vocabularies typically consist of 50,000 to 100,000 tokens. The sentence 'The price is $9.99.' is tokenised by ChatGPT as 'The', ' price', 'is', '$' ' 9', '.', '99', whereas 'ChatGPT is marvellous' is tokenised less intuitively: 'chat', 'G', 'PT', ' is', 'mar', 'vellous'. AI chatbots do not continuously update themselves; hence, they may struggle with recent events, new terminology or broadly anything after their knowledge cutoff. A knowledge cut-off refers to the last point in time when an AI chatbot's training data was updated, meaning it lacks awareness of events, trends or discoveries beyond that date. The current version of ChatGPT has its cutoff on June 2024. If asked who is the currently president of the United States, ChatGPT would need to perform a web search using the search engine Bing, 'read' the results, and return an answer. Bing results are filtered by relevance and reliability of the source. Likewise, other AI chatbots uses web search to return up-to-date answers. Updating AI chatbots is a costly and fragile process. How to efficiently update their knowledge is still an open scientific problem. ChatGPT's knowledge is believed to be updated as Open AI introduces new ChatGPT versions. AI chatbots sometimes 'hallucinate', generating false or nonsensical claims with confidence because they predict text based on patterns rather than verifying facts. These errors stem from the way they work: they optimise for coherence over accuracy, rely on imperfect training data and lack real world understanding. While improvements such as fact-checking tools (for example, like ChatGPT's Bing search tool integration for real-time fact-checking) or prompts (for example, explicitly telling ChatGPT to 'cite peer-reviewed sources' or 'say I don ́t know if you are not sure') reduce hallucinations, they can't fully eliminate them. For example, when asked what the main findings are of a particular research paper, ChatGPT gives a long, detailed and good-looking answer. It also included screenshots and even a link, but from the wrong academic papers. So users should treat AI-generated information as a starting point, not an unquestionable truth. A recently popularised feature of AI chatbots is called reasoning. Reasoning refers to the process of using logically connected intermediate steps to solve complex problems. This is also known as 'chain of thought' reasoning. Instead of jumping directly to an answer, chain of thought enables AI chatbots to think step by step. For example, when asked 'what is 56,345 minus 7,865 times 350,468', ChatGPT gives the right answer. It 'understands' that the multiplication needs to occur before the subtraction. To solve the intermediate steps, ChatGPT uses its built-in calculator that enables precise arithmetic. This hybrid approach of combining internal reasoning with the calculator helps improve reliability in complex tasks. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Cagatay Yildiz receives funding from DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, in English German Research Foundation)
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kaltura (KLTR) Pushes Toward Profit and Platform Expansion, Needham Stays Bullish
Kaltura Inc. (NASDAQ:KLTR) is one of the 10 best debt-free IT penny stocks to buy. On May 8, Needham's Ryan Koontz reaffirmed his Buy rating on Kaltura, holding firm on a $3 price target. His positive outlook was based on the company's strong first-quarter performance and encouraging strategic progress. The company reported strong growth in subscription revenue and posted its highest operating margin since 2020. Several key deals closed during the period, lifting core financial metrics compared to the prior year. A large flat-screen TV streaming video from a video hosting platform. While management expects a slight revenue dip in the second quarter due to customer churn, they left full-year guidance unchanged, a sign they remain confident in their roadmap and execution. Regarding the long-term goals, Koontz highlighted the company's aim to double EBITDA by fiscal 2026. It is also targeting to achieve the 'Rule of 30,' a widely used benchmark in the software industry which indicates a good balance between growth and profitability. These goals suggest a shift toward stronger operational discipline. He also noted that better execution, and further consolidation in the enterprise video space could strengthen Kaltura's competitive edge. Kaltura Inc. (NASDAQ:KLTR) provides a cloud-based video platform that powers real-time, on-demand, and live video experiences for enterprises, educational institutions, and media companies. While we acknowledge the potential of KLTR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Best Tech Stocks to Buy According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Provexis (LON:PXS) Is In A Strong Position To Grow Its Business
There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, biotech and mining exploration companies often lose money for years before finding success with a new treatment or mineral discovery. Having said that, unprofitable companies are risky because they could potentially burn through all their cash and become distressed. Given this risk, we thought we'd take a look at whether Provexis (LON:PXS) shareholders should be worried about its cash burn. For the purpose of this article, we'll define cash burn as the amount of cash the company is spending each year to fund its growth (also called its negative free cash flow). We'll start by comparing its cash burn with its cash reserves in order to calculate its cash runway. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. You can calculate a company's cash runway by dividing the amount of cash it has by the rate at which it is spending that cash. In September 2024, Provexis had UK£478k in cash, and was debt-free. Looking at the last year, the company burnt through UK£113k. So it had a cash runway of about 4.2 years from September 2024. A runway of this length affords the company the time and space it needs to develop the business. The image below shows how its cash balance has been changing over the last few years. See our latest analysis for Provexis Although Provexis had revenue of UK£1.2m in the last twelve months, its operating revenue was only UK£1.2m in that time period. We don't think that's enough operating revenue for us to understand too much from revenue growth rates, since the company is growing off a low base. So we'll focus on the cash burn, today. Notably, its cash burn was actually down by 74% in the last year, which is a real positive in terms of resilience, but uninspiring when it comes to investment for growth. Of course, we've only taken a quick look at the stock's growth metrics, here. This graph of historic revenue growth shows how Provexis is building its business over time. There's no doubt Provexis' rapidly reducing cash burn brings comfort, but even if it's only hypothetical, it's always worth asking how easily it could raise more money to fund further growth. Companies can raise capital through either debt or equity. Commonly, a business will sell new shares in itself to raise cash and drive growth. By comparing a company's annual cash burn to its total market capitalisation, we can estimate roughly how many shares it would have to issue in order to run the company for another year (at the same burn rate). Since it has a market capitalisation of UK£16m, Provexis' UK£113k in cash burn equates to about 0.7% of its market value. So it could almost certainly just borrow a little to fund another year's growth, or else easily raise the cash by issuing a few shares. As you can probably tell by now, we're not too worried about Provexis' cash burn. For example, we think its cash runway suggests that the company is on a good path. But it's fair to say that its cash burn reduction was also very reassuring. Looking at all the measures in this article, together, we're not worried about its rate of cash burn, which seems to be under control. Taking a deeper dive, we've spotted 4 warning signs for Provexis you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning. If you would prefer to check out another company with better fundamentals, then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt or this list of stocks which are all forecast to grow. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.