CT towns granted over $180K for tree planting, invasive species removal. See if your town is on list
More than $180,000 in grant money has been awarded to support urban and community forestry projects in several Connecticut towns and cities, officials said.
The state's Department of Energy and Environmental Protection announced the recipients of 2025 Urban and Community Forestry Planning and Urban Forested Natural Areas and Riparian Corridor Restoration grants. Over $184,000 will be granted to support 11 urban and community forestry projects in Bloomfield, Ellington, Mansfield, New London, North Stonington, Old Saybrook, Ridgefield, Stamford, and Stratford, according to officials.
The grant money, distributed with federal funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Service and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, will help fund projects that protect and enhance urban and community forests, such as tree inventories, forest management plans, invasive species removal and native tree plantings, officials said.
'Urban forests contribute to livable cities and provide numerous benefits, including heat and pollution mitigation, stormwater management and improved health outcomes for residents,' said DEEP commissioner Katie Dykes. 'Urban trees can boost local business and support workforce development and have been linked to reductions in crime. The grants offered through DEEP's Urban and Community Forestry Program help communities in Connecticut access these benefits while also working toward meeting our state's statutory goal to increase urban tree canopy cover by 2040.'
The grants ranged from under $10,000 to $20,000 for some communities. Among the 11 projects awarded funds are $21,000 for Mansfield to help hire a certified forester to inventory and develop a management plan for approximately 1,061 acres of town-owned forest across five ecologically significant parcels, officials said. Other projects include a $20,000 grant for Killingly to help support and manage invasive species after a timber harvest to ensure that native tree species are able to regenerate, maintaining a healthy and resilient forest stand.
DEEP officials said that the Trees for Communities Grant Program, a new grant offered by the agency, is now accepting applications from Connecticut governmental entities and non-profit organizations. A total of $1 million is available for grants up to $200,000 each to support urban forestry projects that increase tree cover and protect trees in low-canopy, high-need communities.
Eligible projects include, but are not limited to, tree planting and maintenance, urban forest planning, workforce development, invasive species management and forest restoration. More information can be found on DEEP's Trees for Communities Grant Program webpage.
A complete list of grant recipients, grant amounts, and project summaries are available on DEEP's Urban Forestry Grant Accomplishments webpage.
Stephen Underwood can be reached at sunderwood@courant.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Senate Republicans' new SNAP proposal prompts GOP concern
A GOP-backed proposal that would shift some of the cost of food assistance to states for the first time is drawing renewed concern in the party, as critics argue the effort could lead to states cutting benefits on their own. Republicans are pushing to pass the proposal — which could see states with higher payment error rates covering a greater share of benefit costs — as a part of the broader spending cuts and tax package in the coming days. But that doesn't mean some Republicans aren't concerned about the measure. 'Our big thing is the data to be used, the data to be used on the error rate,' Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska.) told The Hill on Friday. 'So, that's important to make sure that the data is as accurate and reflective of the year you're judging as possible.' Numbers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed Alaska's payment error rate — which factors in overpayment and underpayment error rates — hit above 60 percent in fiscal year 2023. The national average hit at 11.68 percent. Sullivan noted the state has seen much lower payment error rates prior to the pandemic and is on a path to improving those figures, noting new numbers are expected soon. But he added, 'It's still higher than our traditional error rate, and as you know, the cost share is based in part on that.' According to the Alaska Beacon, the state's error rate hiked after state officials said they violated federal rules in order to continue feeding people amid a significant backlog in applications. Under the initial plan crafted by the Senate Agriculture Committee, Republicans sought to require states to cover some of the cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent. It also proposes states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent and 15 percent. However, Senate Republicans tweaked the plan after facing a setback when their 'state cost-share' proposal was rejected by the chamber's rules referee as part of a megabill the party hopes to pass in the coming days. A release from the agriculture committee said the updated plan would allow states to choose the payment error either fiscal year 2025 or 2026 to 'calculate their state match requirement that begins in Fiscal Year 2028.' For the following fiscal year, the 'state match will be calculated using the payment error rate from three fiscal years prior,' the committee said, adding a 'state must contribute a set percentage of the cost of its SNAP benefits if its payment error rate exceeds six percent.' Asked about further potential changes to the plan, Agriculture chairman Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.) said Friday that negotiators 'worked really hard to try and get a situation that worked for as many people as we could, and I think we've achieved that.' 'Alaska is a unique state, unique situation, so I know that everybody's trying to work hard to accommodate situations that don't fit,' Boozman said Friday afternoon. 'So, I haven't heard of any changes, and I'm sure that, you know, [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune [(R-S.D.)] will grab me if that comes about.' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Ala.) also expressed concerns about the proposal, telling reporters earlier on Friday that she's raised them with others in the party, according to Politico. Asked briefly about the party's SNAP proposal later, Murkowski told The Hill, 'We're still in trouble on SNAP.' 'The implementation is still next to impossible for us,' she said. Republicans say the states' cost-share proposal would incentivize states to improve their error rates. But Sullivan and Murkowski aren't the only Republicans who have voiced concerns about the effort in recent weeks. Originally, the House plan called for all states to cover 5 percent of the cost of allotments in its initial version of Trump's megabill, with states that had higher payment error rates having to pay anywhere between 15 percent and 25 percent. However, the proposal was dialed back after concerns from other Republicans, including Sens. Tommy Tuberville (Ala.) and Jim Justice (W. Va.) over the measure. Asked if he's meeting with Boozman or Thune on the matter, Sullivan also told The Hill on Friday evening that he's 'meeting with everybody.' 'For me, it's just important to get the data as close to the date that you're judging,' Sullivan said, adding that he expects Alaska to see a notable drop in its error rate in a coming report.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Can Sterling Continue to Maintain Its 29% EPS Growth in 2025?
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. STRL has shifted its focus toward large-scale mission-critical projects, including data centers, which are proving incremental for its bottom line and revenue visibility. Supporting this strategic decision of the company is the current favorable market backdrop concerning public infrastructure demand, backed by several government initiatives, namely the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), CHIPS Act and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This shift toward higher-margin service offerings is boding well for STRL's margin and earnings per share (EPS) growth, as evidenced by the 29.4% year-over-year EPS growth in the first quarter of 2025, alongside its adjusted operating margin expanding 618 basis demand for data center-related projects is currently strong in the market thanks to the ongoing surge in Artificial Intelligence applications and the focus on digital transformation initiatives. STRL highlighted that the mission-critical projects hold the majority of its E-Infrastructure segment's (51% of first quarter 2025 revenue) backlog, with data center-related work accounting for more than 65%. Backed by the robust market trends, the E-Infrastructure segment's backlog grew 27% year over year to $1.2 billion as of the first quarter of 2025, with Sterling finishing the quarter with a total backlog of $2.13 Sterling's efficient project management skills and ability to complete projects on or before the deadline are acting as a catalyst toward its growth amid the favorable infrastructure spending market backdrop. Owing to these tailwinds, the company raised its 2025 adjusted EPS guidance to be in the range of $8.40-$8.90 from the previously expected range of $7.90-$8.40. The updated values reflect 18.5-25.5% year-over-year growth. The analysts' sentiments are bullish for Sterling, attributable to increased public infrastructure demand and its ability to capitalize on those opportunities, driving its backlog. For 2025, STRL's earnings estimates have trended upward in the past 60 days to $8.61 per share. The estimated figures reflect 41.2% year-over-year growth. Although the 2026 earnings estimate has been revised downward in the past 60 days to $9.48 per share, the estimated figure indicates 10.1% year-over-year growth. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Moreover, EPS estimates for the second, third and fourth quarters indicate 35.3%, 32.5% and 43.8% year-over-year growth, respectively. The robust trend indicates that the company will be able to maintain or rather outperform its EPS growth streak for the remainder of 2025. STRL shares space with renowned market players, including EMCOR Group, Inc. EME and Quanta Services, Inc. PWR, which are also benefiting from the market backdrop of strong public infrastructure demand, especially across data centers, energy infrastructure and power grid is a Connecticut-based mechanical and electrical construction, industrial and energy infrastructure, and building services provider, which is gaining from the growing infrastructural demand across the network and communications sector. For 2025 and 2026, EMCOR's EPS estimates trended upward in the past 60 days by 0.9% to $23.59 and 0.3% to $25.47, indicating 9.6% and 8% year-over-year growth, is a Texas-based infrastructure services provider, currently benefiting from its involvement in the advancement and implementation of technology solutions throughout the entire decarbonization spectrum. For 2025 and 2026, Quanta's EPS estimates moved up in the past 60 days by 1% to $10.33 and 0.1% to $11.69, indicating 15.2% and 13.2% year-over-year growth, respectively. Shares of this Texas-based infrastructure services provider have gained 35.7% so far this year, significantly outperforming the Zacks Engineering - R and D Services industry, the broader Zacks Construction sector, and the S&P 500 index. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research STRL stock is currently trading at a premium compared with the industry peers, with a forward 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 25.32X, as evidenced by the chart below. The overvaluation of the stock compared with its industry peers indicates its strong potential in the market, given the favorable trends backing it up. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) : Free Stock Analysis Report EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) : Free Stock Analysis Report Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Chicago Tribune
3 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Morton Grove wants to ban THC, kratom products in the village. But leaders say statewide ‘uniform regulation' is more effective.
The Morton Grove Village Board voted to table consideration of a proposed ordinance change that would restrict the sale of THC and kratom products in the village, conceding that a local regulation battle could be futile without support from state leaders. 'This vote is not about inaction, it's about strategic leadership,' Village President Janine Witko said at the June 10 Village Board meeting. The ordinance was on the agenda for a second reading and final consideration. It had been first introduced in April and village leaders at that time said they wanted to have more information. By the June meeting, their desire became to broaden the scope and make a local effort a more encompassing one across the state. 'We must push for uniform regulation that ensures customer safety statewide, not just within our village limits,' said Witko. Illinois legalized recreational use of cannabis – including purchasing, consuming and possessing it – in January 2020. But, the law made no provisions for cannabis-like products, including Delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, and kratom, and towns have seen the boom of shops that sell the substances with few restrictions. At the June 10 board meeting, Witko said that rather than move forward with the Morton Grove ordinance, village leaders plan to work with state partners to advocate for stricter regulations overall. 'This is an issue that extends well beyond Morton Grove's borders,' Witko said. 'While local bans may appear proactive, they do not solve the problem. Residents can simply go a mile down the road and purchase the same products in Skokie or surrounding communities.' The proposed ordinance change seeks to address regulatory gaps left after the state's legalization of recreational cannabis, commonly known as marijuana. The ordinance addresses Delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which the U.S. Department of Agriculture states is a psychoactive substance typically manufactured from the cannabis plant. THC is synthetically derived and is not regulated. 'As a municipality, we are not fully equipped or authorized to regulate these products in a comprehensive or enforceable manner,' said Morton Grove Mayor Janine Witko, explaining the decision to meeting attendees. Witko acknowledged residents' concerns that the state recreational cannabis use law does not provide enough protections. And village leaders have said there's been a concerted effort to locally regulate cannabis products – like vape products, edibles and more. 'However, over the past few years there has been an increase in the availability of 'cannabis-like' products which often contain the same intoxicating effects of cannabis but are sold outside of State-licensed dispensaries. These products are regularly available in stores that sell tobacco and gas stations,' reads a village staff memorandum included with the proposed ordinance change. Village leaders say that not having the regulations for those quasi products 'allows for the sale of these products without restrictions on age or the other deliberate regulations enacted by the Village.' Morton Grove has one state-licensed marijuana dispensary, and zoning rules in the village allow for no more than two in total. But there are at least four times as many vape shops and at least a dozen gas stations that do sell or could carry THC products – which are not allowed to be sold in dispensaries. The ordinance would also put restrictions on the sale of products containing kratom, an herbal ingredient derived from a tree native to southeast Asia. Kratom can produce stimulant and opioid-like effects, and people have reported using it to manage withdrawal symptoms related to opioid use, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse. It has been listed as a 'drug of concern' by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, but it is not listed on the nation's schedule of controlled substances. Like some of the other illicit THC products the Morton Grove ordinance seeks to address, some kratom products have been found to contain contaminants, like heavy metals. But a NIDA fact sheet on kratom notes that this is the case with many products marketed as 'herbal supplements.' David King attended the June board meeting with the intent to speak in favor of the ordinance. He was surprised to learn the issue was being tabled. 'I guess I should throw my prepared remarks out the window,' King said during the public comment portion of the meeting. 'But I'm still gonna say them.' King raised concerns about THC's effects on people's judgment, concentration and mood. He declared that people impaired by the substance are a danger to themselves and others whether at home, work or on the roads. For emphasis, King pointed out that testing kits for THC and cocaine are placed right next to each other on pharmacy shelves. 'The reason why is that THC is a bad substance across the board,' he said. 'It's bad whether you eat, inhale, ingest, or smoke it.' King's comments focused mainly on THC, but he said he has concerns about kratom as well. 'Respectfully, I don't think you needed to table this. I don't care what they do one mile down the road, 10 miles down the road,' he said. 'We're here in Morton Grove, and we can make our community safer right now.' Still, Witko said she is committed to advocating for the cause, and that she is working with village staff and legal counsel to advocate for change at the state level.
