logo
GE2025: Online publication Jom flouted online election advertising rules by boosting articles' access on social media

GE2025: Online publication Jom flouted online election advertising rules by boosting articles' access on social media

CNA30-04-2025
SINGAPORE: Three articles posted on social media by online publication Jom were blocked in Singapore by Meta because they are considered as unauthorised third-party paid online election advertising (OEA) and Jom had "amplified access" to these articles, the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) said.
During the election period, Jom had paid for advertisements on Facebook and Instagram to boost the reach of those articles. Meta is the parent company of these social media platforms.
The advertisements containing links to the articles violated regulations for OEA, the ministry said on Wednesday (Apr 30) in response to queries from CNA.
It stated that Singapore citizens and entities are allowed to publish OEA that are not paid and other articles on Jom's website that constitute such unpaid OEA are still accessible to the public.
OEA is defined under the Parliamentary Elections Act (PEA) as any information or material published online that "can reasonably be regarded as intended to promote or prejudice the electoral success or standing of a political party or candidate, even though the information or material can reasonably be regarded as intended to achieve some other purpose as well", the ministry said.
The three articles by Jom that criticised or praised political parties, candidates and their policies satisfy the legal definition of OEA, it added.
The articles are titled:
Is Shan a good bad cop?
The system has stopped evolving: why Harpreet Singh joined the opposition
Affordability in the lion city: is Singapore's public housing model built to last?
The Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), as the assistant returning officer of this election, issued Meta corrective directions on Apr 23 to disable access for Singapore users to Jom's related advertisements.
"The rules on OEA apply to everyone, including online commentators such as Jom. These rules have been observed by other online commentators," the ministry said.
Under the law, only political parties, candidates, election agents and authorised third parties can publish paid OEA and this must also be declared to the returning officer.
MDDI said that this rule is in place to ensure transparency and accountability and prevent the use of paid advertisements to bypass the election expense limits for political parties and candidates.
The publishing of unpaid OEA is also prohibited during the cooling-off period for election campaigning, which lasts from midnight on May 2 until polling closes on May 3.
Jom said in its Facebook and Instagram posts on Tuesday that it was informed by IMDA that its articles flouted the PEA regarding OEA and that it was barred from "promoting ('boosting') our work on Meta".
It also said that it reached out to Meta and was informed of the same thing.
On its social media accounts, Jom states that it is a weekly digital magazine "covering arts, culture, politics, business, technology and more in Singapore".
It said on Tuesday that its ability to grow its "readership and business through social media is vital".
"To be clear, the order only prevents Jom from promoting (boosting) it through Meta. All four articles are still on our website," it added.
Meta states on Facebook that users who want to advertise on its platforms may do so by boosting a post or creating an advertisement.
A boosted post is an advertisement created from an existing piece of content that the users have published on their Facebook Page or Instagram account and this will help the post to reach more people on Facebook or Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption
Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption

CNA

time19 hours ago

  • CNA

Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption

SYDNEY: Australia said on Wednesday (Jul 30) it will add YouTube to sites covered by its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the Alphabet-owned video-sharing site and potentially setting up a legal challenge. The decision came after the internet regulator urged the government last week to overturn the YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37 per cent of minors reported harmful content on the site. "Social media have a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement. "I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." The decision broadens the ban set to take effect in December. YouTube says it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15, and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," a YouTube spokesperson said by email. Since the government said last year it would exempt YouTube due to its popularity with teachers, platforms covered by the ban, such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, have complained. They say YouTube has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. Artificial intelligence has supercharged the spread of misinformation on social media platforms such as YouTube, said Adam Marre, chief information security officer at cybersecurity firm Arctic Wolf. "The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids," he added in an email. The reversal sets up a fresh dispute with Alphabet, which threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. Last week, YouTube told Reuters it had urged the government "to uphold the integrity of the legislative process". Australian media said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that. The law passed in November only requires "reasonable steps" by social media platforms to keep out Australians younger than 16, or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million. The government, which is due to receive a report this month on tests of age-checking products, has said those results will influence enforcement of the ban.

Australia adds YouTube to teen social media ban, tearing up exemption, World News
Australia adds YouTube to teen social media ban, tearing up exemption, World News

AsiaOne

time20 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

Australia adds YouTube to teen social media ban, tearing up exemption, World News

SYDNEY — Australia said on Wednesday (July 30) it will add YouTube to sites covered by its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the Alphabet-owned video-sharing site and potentially setting up a legal challenge. The decision came after the country's internet regulator last week urged the government to overturn a YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37 per cent of minors reported seeing harmful content on the site. "Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement. "I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." The decision broadens the ban due to take effect in December. YouTube says it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13-15, and it should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. Since the government said last year that it would exempt YouTube due to its popularity with teachers, platforms included in the ban such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok have complained. They contend that YouTube has key similarities to their products including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. The reversal, meanwhile, sets up a fresh dispute between Australia and Alphabet, which threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," a YouTube spokesperson said by email. Last week, YouTube told Reuters it had written to the government "urging them to uphold the integrity of the legislative process". Australian media reported YouTube threatened to challenge the ban in court, although YouTube did not confirm that. The relevant law, which passed in November, says only that social media platforms must take reasonable steps to keep Australians aged under 16 out or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million (S$63.6 million). The government is due to receive a report this month on tests of age-checking products, and it has said those results will influence how the ban will be enforced. [[nid:719261]]

Australia adds YouTube to social media ban for children
Australia adds YouTube to social media ban for children

Business Times

time20 hours ago

  • Business Times

Australia adds YouTube to social media ban for children

[SYDNEY] Australia said on Wednesday it will include Alphabet-owned YouTube in its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the video-sharing platform. Australia's internet watchdog last month urged the government to overturn the proposed exemption for YouTube after its research found 37 per cent of children aged 10 to 15 reported seeing harmful content on the platform, the most of any social media site. Other social media companies such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok had argued an exemption for YouTube would be unfair. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' Social media firms will be fined up to A$49.5 million (S$41.4 million) from December if they break the law, which passed through parliament in November. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up A YouTube spokesperson said the company would consider next steps and would continue to engage with the government. 'We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media,' the spokesperson said by email. Online gaming, messaging apps, and health and education sites will be excluded from the centre-left government's minimum age rules as they pose fewer social media harms to teens under 16, or are regulated under different laws, Communications Minister Anika Wells said. 'The rules are not a set and forget, they are a set and support,' Wells said. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store