
Jury finds Erin Patterson guilty of murder
Jury finds Erin Patterson guilty of murder;
Coroner finds cop who shot Indigenous teen racist;
And in tennis, Russia's Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova upset over key point mishap. Erin Patterson has been found guilty of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. The mother of two was found guilty of putting death cap mushrooms in a Beef Wellington that she served to her lunch guests at her Gippsland home in July 2023. Her former in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson all died, whilst Wilkinson's husband Ian spent two months in hospital recovering. Ms Patterson watched on intently as the verdicts were read out. Patterson will return to court for a pre-sentencing hearing later this year. Northern Territory Coroner Elisabeth Armitage has found the former police officer who fatally shot an Indigenous teenager in a remote community was racist, and those attitudes were reflective of an institution which tolerated racism. This comes as she handed down her final report of an inquest into the Aboriginal death in custody of Kumanjayi Walker by Constable Zachary Rolfe. Ms Armitage spoke at the town of Yuendumu, around 300 kilometres northeast of Alice Springs. "Concerning racism. There were direct evidence of clearly racist comments made by Mr Rolfe, and between Mr Rolfe and his superiors. In the lead up to Kumanjayi's death, the telephone text messages that were typed out by Mr Rolfe and some of his colleagues contained extremely racist names and references to Aboriginal people. They are too hurtful to repeat now but I have not shied away from using the exact language in my findings." The 19-year-old was shot three times at close range by then-Northern Territory Police Constable Zachary Rolfe in November 2019 - in the remote community of Yuendumu. Judge Armitage says she found that Rolfe was racist, and he worked in and was the beneficiary of, an organisation with hallmarks of institutional racism. In a statement today, the Northern Territory police force acknowledged the findings and said they recognise the enduring grief experienced by Kumanjayi Walker's family, the Yuendumu community, and many others across the Northern Territory. Listeners seeking support can contact the Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islanders crisis support line on 13YARN - that's 13 92 76 - or Lifeline on 13 11 14. The Opposition leader has led a coalition of leaders to engage with the Chinese-Australian community to help inform policy in response to community needs and challenges. Ms Ley visited the suburb of Epping, northwest of Sydney, where there is a significant Chinese community, to hear from local leaders. The Opposition leader says she pledges to listen very carefully to the community, who shared struggles including relating to financial stress and incidences of racism. She did not specify policies in response to issues raised by the Chinese community but insists her first step is to listen closely to suggestions. "We'll take the time to get this right. It's important that we hear and we hear from everyone. And as we sat at the table today, we all acknowledge that Chinese Australians are not one homogenous group with the same views. They have different views. And as we travel to [], state of Queensland and more broadly across this country, as we will do listening all the while, look at a range of different opinions, different ideas, and different suggestions." Ms Ley also says she wishes the Prime Minister well in his upcoming trip to China, adding that she wants the relationship between Australia and China to be built on mutual respect. Russia's Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova has expressed her upset over losing a key point due to the electronic line calls system. A ball that clearly landed long in her Centre Court match against Sonay Kartal was not called out on Sunday because the electronic system that replaced line judges this year was shut off. She did eventually come back to win the match 7-6 (3), 6-4 against Britain's Kartal. Chair umpire Nico Helworth called for a replay of the point at 4-all in the first set - much to the dismay of Pavlyuchenkova, who would have won the game if the proper call had been made originally. Speaking at a news conference afterwards she said Helworth probably felt like he should have taken the initiative and called it out, but was able to joke about what her reaction would have been if she lost the match.
Wimbledon organisers have apologised after the error, which resulted in three calls being missed in a single game.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
35 minutes ago
- ABC News
Hannah McGuire murder accused Lachlan Young set to face a jury
A jury is expected to be empanelled today in the murder trial of the man accused of killing young Clunes woman Hannah McGuire. Lachlan Young faces one count of murder over the death of Ms McGuire, his former partner. He is expected to plead not guilty in the Supreme Court of Victoria when the trial begins. Ms McGuire was reported missing by her family in April last year and her body found in a vehicle that had been destroyed by fire south-west of Ballarat. Until yesterday, the matter was subject to a suppression order. The trial is expected to run for five weeks.

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
77 per cent of childcare workers operating below safety requirements, union survey finds
More concerns have been raised about safety at childcare centres, with three-quarters of workers telling a survey their place of work was operating below minimum staffing levels at least weekly. The United Workers Union survey of 2,100 childcare workers also found that 42 per cent of workers said their centre was operating below minimum staffing levels on a daily basis. The findings come after the charging of a Melbourne childcare worker with more than 70 offences, including sexual assault, and a long-running ABC investigation revealed examples of profit being placed above care. "While examining the tragic events revealed in Melbourne last week, we also need to understand the alarm that is being sounded by educators," UWU early education director Carolyn Smith said. "Workers report children are left without emotional support, without adequate supervision to stop them hurting themselves or others, and without appropriate education." The union survey was conducted before the Melbourne childcare worker was charged. "I can't even guarantee the safety of the children and myself. I feel sad, unsafe and stressful every day," a Victorian worker told the survey. Do you have a story to share? Email The for-profit operyators that dominate the childcare sector pay staff less and rely more on casual workers, an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission investigation in 2023 found. "Partly because of understaffing, we see a real churn of staff moving through centres, and that's when we don't have that safe, quality environment we need," Ms Smith said. The issues highlighted in the ABC investigation echo the UWU survey, which revealed the top four concerns of educators. Preeti Soodan, a Melbourne educator at a large for-profit provider, told ABC News childcare workers had too many demands placed on them, including cleaning and administration. "There are many challenges we face during the day. We keep changing the hats; we are educators, we are leaders, we are supervising the children, we have many responsibilities with documentation," Ms Soodan said. "We don't only educate them, we have to wipe the tables, clean them, support them emotionally. Throughout our day, we are always juggling." Ms Soodan is a trained primary school teacher with more than a decade's experience working in Australia and India. She said workers were treated as "glorified babysitters" rather than educators. "The neuroscience tells us that 90 per cent of the brain develops till the age of five, so you can understand how precious this profession is," Ms Soodan said. The UWU survey revealed 83 per cent of workers agreed a common staffing loophole called the "under the roof" ratio was used by centres and compromised the wellbeing of children. Ratios are designed to ensure a minimum of staff are present at all times to supervise children but the numbers of workers required in each room varies according to the age of the children. Some staff count all workers "under the roof" rather than numbers in individual rooms required under the National Quality Framework (NQF) and state-based regulators. "Educators tell us that what was supposed to be a commonsense stopgap for changes that occur at centres through the day, has become an overused staffing loophole, entrenching educators regularly working below minimum staffing requirements in their rooms," Ms Smith said. Even where ratios were being met, staff reported an increase in children with additional needs meant safety was still being compromised. "We always work with the correct ratio, but the increase of children with higher needs is making current ratios completely inappropriate," a New South Wales educator told the union survey. Federal Minister for Early Childhood Education Senator Jess Walsh said the survey results were "very concerning". "Providers must meet minimum staffing levels to provide safe, quality early education and care," she said. "We will work with educators and their union to address the concerns raised in this survey." The minister said the government last year agreed to spend $3.6 billion to give childcare workers a pay rise and job vacancies were falling in the sector. The Australian Childcare Alliance, a lobby group representing for-profit providers, said its members had been working with government to improve attraction and retention of workers. "We are unable to comment on a survey with no oversight of the detail included in the data," a spokesperson said. "The sector is rightfully expected to comply with the regulations and National Quality Framework at all times. This is non-negotiable."

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Accidentally unredacted document reveals issues with children at Tasmanian watch houses
Staff at two Tasmanian prisons have "urgently" requested body-worn cameras and reported "high levels of anxiety" when managing children in watch houses, a mistakenly unredacted document shows. Using the Right to Information (RTI) process, the ABC requested information about complaints or concerns regarding Tasmanian children being held in adult custodial facilities — where they await court, bail or police interview. RTI — sometimes called Freedom of Information — is a system that helps people access documents and other public-interest information held by public authorities. When journalists or members of the public receive documents through RTI, they are usually partly blacked out as to not disclose information. The ABC made an RTI request to the Department of Justice, the public authority for the Tasmanian Prison Service. Two months later, a 14-page document was received. See more details of the ABC's request, the information provided and relevant parts of the Right to Information Act, here. By mistake, the document received was completely free from redaction, revealing in full an "issues register" from 2024, where prison staff listed concerns around the detention of children in watch houses and the Department of Justice responded with suggestions or actions to address them. Within minutes the department sent another email saying they "would like to recall" the document. It then sent a second, corrected version of the document, which was completely redacted aside from several paragraphs and a one-page introduction. Watch houses are designed for temporary detention and lack the facilities of long-term prisons or detention centres. The department told the ABC that redactions were made where the document contained personally identifying information, deliberative information, and information "out-of-scope" of the request. The unredacted version contained no names or personally identifying details. The ABC has decided to publish this story, after reviewing the information. The ABC can reveal the hidden information was indicative of staff concerns that: The Department of Justice has since told the ABC: The department said it was in the final stages of acquiring body-worn cameras in reception prisons — where watch houses are located — "with implementation expected before the end of the year". In the issues register, the department responded to staff concerns about health and hygiene risks for children, saying it would "upgrade infrastructure to allow young people to tend to basic hygiene and self-care". "Reducing the risk of trauma to young people in reception prisons remains a key priority. The department is committed to ongoing improvements." Tasmanian prison staff, who manage youth in watch houses on behalf of Tasmania Police, said police officers "regularly" told detainees they "will be at the WH [watch house] for a little while" — which can negatively impact their mental and physiological state. Dysregulation refers to an inability to control or regulate emotional responses. Staff also said police provided insufficient information when transferring people to watch houses, resulting in "significant operational risks and impacts the safety of detainees". But police say an admission form for each detainee outlining personal details, behavioural risks, medical information and child safety concerns is provided to prison staff. "Tasmania Police aims to provide timely and accurate information to prison staff regarding a youth in custody at the time the youth is detained," a police spokesperson said. The department said over the next five years it intended to "advocate for Youth Justice Blueprint to incorporate watch house facility for young people". Johan Lidberg, an associate professor at Monash University, believed because the document was "in the highest public interest" and did not identify people, it was not reasonable to keep it hidden — and considered the "personal information" exemption did not apply. The department was asked for more details on the decision to not disclose the information. It replied: "As outlined in the right to information decision, if you are dissatisfied with the decision you may seek an internal review under section 43 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (the Act)." The ABC requested details of: "Complaints, concerns or similar regarding children and young people being held in an adult remand facility and related correspondence from 2022 to 2025." One 14-page document was given to the ABC titled "Engaging with Young People Training — Issues and Responses". It included a one-page introduction and then a table with two columns — one outlining staff-raised issues with dealing with young people in watch houses and the other with the department's written response to the issue. It was initially completely unredacted but with red outline boxes left around some sections, and then, minutes later a version with those boxes redacted was sent through in which almost all the document was redacted. The initial introduction as well as some sections on pages 2 and 3 were left unredacted. No staff or detainees were named in the document. The department said redactions were made according to the following parts of Tasmania's Right to Information Act: Exemptions subject to public interest test Section 35 — 'Internal deliberative information' I consider that disclosing the above listed items, which contain material compiled by departmental officers may contain information which is wrong or inaccurate — see clause (u) of Schedule 1. The material contains records of ongoing consultations between officers, including material which is deliberative in nature. It is also important to note that the material relates to exchanges by relatively junior Departmental employees and there is no information to indicate their views would be adopted as a formal policy. I also consider that the nature of the comments of Departmental officers are deliberate in nature and should not be disclosed. Officers must feel free to provide their opinions, advice and recommendations, and to participate openly in consultative and deliberative processes, in order for decision and action resulting from those processes to be robust. The overriding public interest consideration is the need to ensure that there is a frank exchange of views between officers when making decisions. The disclosure of consultations or deliberations would likely prevent such exchanges from occurring, with a consequent detrimental impact on good decision-making. Further, it would also lead to a reluctance to document the reasons for decision, with a consequent loss in transparency in the decision-making process. Section 36 — 'Personal information of a person' I consider that disclosing the personal information of members of the public would be detrimental to the interests of those persons — see clause (m) of Schedule 1. The personal information of people who have been held at a watch-house is not in the public domain and those persons might suffer discrimination by reason of their having been in these facilities if disclosed. As a consequence of the above, I am of the opinion that the factor favouring disclosure are outweighed by those against disclosure and it is not in the public interest to provide the personal information of a members of the public. 'Information out of scope' I consider that part of the material contains information which is out of scope of your request. The relevant material has been redacted and marked accordingly.