Swinney accuses Reeves of ‘channelling Thatcher' with financial reforms
John Swinney hit out in the wake of Ms Reeves's Mansion House speech which contained a package of reforms aimed at attracting more investment to the UK.
Ahead of Tuesday evening's keynote address, there had been speculation among observers that the Labour Chancellor would 'channel Margaret Thatcher' with a new era of deregulation.
Ms Reeves said she would be 'rolling back regulation that has gone too far' with plans to cut red tape in the City and reform banking rules, including the ring-fencing regime.Addressing the financial sector, the Chancellor insisted the changes are needed for the UK to stay competitive in a more uncertain global economy.
She said she had 'placed financial services at the heart of the Government's growth mission, recognising that Britain cannot succeed and meet its growth ambitions without a financial services sector that is fighting fit and thriving'.
However Mr Swinney said: 'The very idea that a Labour Chancellor thinks that channelling Margaret Thatcher is what our economy needs is extraordinary.
'It is the very last thing we need as we try to recover from Tory austerity.'
He added that people 'right across Scotland' had 'suffered terribly' during Conservative Mrs Thatcher's time as prime minister from 1979 to 1990, and that 'communities were decimated and countless livelihoods were thrown on the scrapheap'.
Going on to claim the country is 'still dealing' with the impact of Thatcherism, Mr Swinney said: 'The UK economy does not work for Scotland.
'Rather than come up with serious solutions to fix it, Labour are doubling down on the same agenda that has failed before.
'We do not need an effort to replicate Thatcher's agenda – we need bold action and investment to tackle the effects of Thatcher that are still with us.
'Labour could relax their fiscal rules or make the choice to ask higher earners to pay a little more to unlock investment, just as we have done in Scotland.'
But the First Minister said the UK Government 'clearly lack the political courage' to do this.
He added: 'Scotland was promised change by Labour – instead we have been given the same tired economic policies, and efforts to balance the books on the backs of the most vulnerable.
'We have learned that you cannot trust a word Labour say before an election – and that if Scotland is to create an economy that works for everyone, the only way we can do so is as an independent country.'
A Labour spokesperson said: 'This Labour Government has delivered the biggest financial settlement for Scotland since devolution began.
'But as NHS waiting lists fall in England with Labour, one in six Scots are waiting for treatment and cancer waiting times are at their worst ever level under the SNP in Scotland.
'John Swinney is out of excuses for his party's failure over 18 years in office. Scotland can't risk a third decade of SNP mismanagement of public services.
'Labour is investing £8.3 billion in funding for GB Energy-Nuclear and GB Energy in Aberdeen, up to £750 million for a new supercomputer at Edinburgh University, £160 million over 10 years for investment zones in the north east of Scotland and in Glasgow City Region, and are investing £452 million over four years for City and Growth Deals across Scotland.
'While Swinney throws juvenile jibes, Labour is getting on with the job of delivering for Scots.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
What is a wealth tax – and would it work in the UK?
Pressure is growing on Rachel Reeves to find new ways to boost the ailing economy after government borrowing reached the second-highest June figure since 1993 last month. Many now predict the chancellor will have little choice but to tweak taxes to find more funds for the Treasury following dramatic changes to government policy over cutting welfare spending and stripping back the winter fuel payment. At the same time, calls are also growing to axe the two-child benefit cap – a Tory-era policy which experts say keeps 400,000 children in poverty and runs contrary to Labour 's missions. These policy decisions, paired with a difficult economic backdrop, will require funds from somewhere. The chancellor has so far stuck to Labour's manifesto commitment not to raise taxes for working people, meaning tweaks to national insurance, income tax, and VAT are off the table. This means more creative tweaks may be under consideration for her next autumn budget, building on changes already made to levies like inheritance tax and employers' national insurance. One option an increasing number of campaigners are pointing to is a ' wealth tax', an economic policy adopted by very few countries which focuses on the ultra-rich. Here's everything you need to know about the idea and what the experts say about it: What is a wealth tax? A wealth tax is a direct levy on an individual's total net assets – things like property, investments, cash, and other possessions. Unlike most regular taxes, the idea is to target accumulated wealth, rather than only income earned that year. Alongside being a new way to raise revenue for the exchequer, the policy is also designed to redistribute wealth to reduce economic inequality. The UK already has some taxes that focus on assets, such as inheritance tax, capital gains tax, and council tax. Tweaking any of these may also be on the table for the chancellor later this year. Capital gains tax is most similar to a wealth tax in that it sees a levy charged on the sale of an asset. However, most models of a wealth tax would see an annual charge based on the value of assets held, even if they are not sold. The idea of a wealth tax has proven divisive among economic experts, with debates ongoing around its fairness, revenue-raising potential, and economic impact. Could a wealth tax work in the UK? Campaigners say a wealth tax could generate significant sums for the Treasury, whilst only affecting a small number of individuals who are less likely to feel the sting of higher receipts. Tax Justice UK is calling for a two per cent levy on individuals who own assets worth more than £10 million. They say this would affect 0.04 per cent of the population, while raising £24 billion a year. The calls come at a time when the wealth of the ultra-rich in the UK has increased massively in recent decades, while living standards have dropped for those on low- to middle-incomes. The Sunday Times rich list recorded 171 UK billionaires in 2023 – up from 15 in 1990. At the same time, there are now record numbers of children living in poverty in the UK, and in precarious living conditions like temporary accommodation. A wealth tax should be seriously considered by the chancellor, said author and host of the Macrodose podcast, James Meadway: 'It starts to chip away at the idea that we're just going to allow wealth to pile up in a very few hands forevermore.' Responding to criticism that a wealth tax would threaten investment in the UK, the economist said: 'Investment has fallen off a cliff between Brexit and the financial crisis. Sixty per cent of wealth in Britain is inherited. It's not something that's been built up by somebody going off and setting up a new business. 'If these people were any good, our economy would be better. It isn't better, so they're not that good, so it doesn't matter that much.' He added: 'It's not going to solve every single economic problem, but 24 billion is not a number to be sniffed at if you're the government right now looking at how you're going to continue to fund the NHS, how you're going to pay for not imposing massive benefit cuts, how you're going to get rid of the two child benefit cap. 'There's a whole stack of things that we could do with that money that isn't being done at the minute because it's just sitting in the hands of very, very wealthy people.' What are the issues with a wealth tax? One of the most difficult factors in calculating the benefits of any wealth tax is predicting what the behavioural response will be. While a wealth tax would raise fairly large sums in any scenario, this uncertainty means it is hard to model. A common concern put forward is the risk of 'capital flight,' where wealthy individuals – who tend to be more globally mobile – simply leave the UK, or at least move some of their assets. Wealth can also be held in a diverse range of assets, anything from cars to art, meaning it may be hard for tax authorities to know exactly how to enforce the levy. Dan Neidle, founder of Tax Policy Associates, said it is highly uncertain how much could be raised by implementing a wealth tax. While it is difficult to estimate exactly how many wealthy individuals would leave the UK should the measure come into force, the tax expert points out that just ten leaving could reduce the revenue by billions. This is because 15 per cent of the projected yield would come from just ten ultra-wealthy individuals, while 80 per cent would come from less than 5,000. Alongside the risk of capital flight, Mr Neidle argues that the economic damage of a wealth tax to the UK would be massive. He explained: 'If you tax something, you get less of it – always. All taxes are a trade-off; you need to just be clear about what they are. With a wealth tax, you're taxing savings and investment, so you get less savings and investment.' The tax expert points to modelling of wealth tax in the US and Germany, which found the long-term effect was a two per cent and five per cent reduction in GDP respectively. This would be damaging for the economy and hit employment hard. 'We need to respond not to what we want policies to do, but what they actually do,' Mr Neidle added. 'There are lots of ways you can reform tax and tax the wealthy fairly in a way that doesn't damage the rest of us.' These could include reforming land tax, capital gains tax, and inheritance tax. Any of these is probably a more likely option for Labour than introducing a wealth tax. But as autumn approaches, calls for some form of more redistributive measure will likely only grow louder.
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Former SNP Westminster deputy leader Mhairi Black quits party
Former SNP Westminster deputy leader Mhairi Black is reported to have quit the SNP, with the ex MP citing the party's 'capitulation' on trans rights as part of the reason for her decision. Ms Black said while she still supported Scottish independence there had been 'too many times' when she did not agree with decisions made by the party. She told The Herald newspaper: 'Basically, for a long time, I've not agreed with quite a few decisions that have been made. 'There have just been too many times when I've thought, 'I don't agree with what you've done there' or the decision or strategy that has been arrived at.' Ms Black said she was 'still just as pro independence, absolutely' but claimed the party's 'capitulation on LGBT rights, trans rights in particular' had been an issue for her. She added: 'I thought the party could be doing better about Palestine as well.' The former MP said: 'If anything, I'm probably a bit more left wing than I have been. I don't think I have changed all that much. I feel like the party needs to change a lot more.' Ms Black was catapulted into the political limelight when she was elected to Westminster at the age of just 20 and became the youngest MP since 1832. She was elected as the MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire South, ousting the former Labour cabinet secretary, Douglas Alexander, with her victory there coming as the SNP captured all but three of the seats in Scotland in the 2015 general election – the first since the independence vote in 2014. She later became her party's deputy leader in the House of Commons when Stephen Flynn took over as group leader, but stepped down at the 2024 general election, blaming the 'toxic' environment at Westminster. She was also diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during her time at Westminster, saying previously that the condition was picked up after she became unwell with 'burn-out' during her time as an MP. An SNP spokesperson said: 'The SNP is the largest political party in Scotland, united under John Swinney's vision of creating a better, fairer Scotland for everyone. 'After a year of disappointment and let-downs from the UK Labour Government, it's clear that real change will never come from Westminster and that independence is essential for a better future.'
Daily Record
18 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Extra £3.45 million awarded to study into possible upgrades to key Dumfries and Galloway road
The UK Government has allocated the cash to a project looking into bypassing the A75 around Springholm and Crocketford. An extra £3.45 million is to be put into investigating upgrades to the A75. The UK Government has allocated the cash to a study looking into bypassing Springholm and Crocketford. The new funding is part of a £66 million package Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced to improve transport links in the west of Scotland. She said: 'We're pledging billions to back Scottish jobs, industry and renewal - that's why we're investing in the major transport projects, including exploring upgrades to the A75, that local communities have been calling for. 'Whilst previous governments oversaw over a decade of decline of our transport infrastructure, we're investing in Britain's renewal. This £66 million investment is exactly what our Plan for Change is about, investing in what matters to you in the places that you live.' The need to upgrade the A75 was identified in the Scottish Government's second Strategic Transport Projects Review and the UK Government's Union Connectivity Review. Despite roads devolved to the Scottish Government, in 2022, the then Chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced £5 million for a feasibility study into bypassing Springholm and Crocketford. That was increased to £8 million by Tory Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in 2023 – but after Labour won last year's General Election, the amount allocated was reduced to 'up to £5 million'. The aaward of an extra £3.45 million now takes the total for the study to a potential £8.45 million. Scotland Secretary, Ian Murray, said: 'This £66 million investment in Scotland's roads demonstrates the UK Government's commitment to improving infrastructure and driving economic growth in all parts of the UK as part of our Plan for Change. This investment will make a real difference to people's daily lives and to the local economies of the south of Scotland, Ayrshire and Renfrewshire. 'The A75 is strategically important just not within but beyond Scotland. Its upgrading is long overdue. I am pleased that the UK Government has stepped up to fund the delivery of the A75 feasibility study in full. 'This investment is yet another example of how the UK Government is building the foundations for a stronger, more prosperous future that benefits communities right across Scotland.' While the UK Government is funding the study, work to upgrade the road will come from Holyrood. The Scottish Government appointed technical advisors to work on plans for upgrades last year.
