Bill 106 will not boost productivity of doctors: health policy expert
There is scant evidence that the Quebec government's proposed bill to tie doctors' pay to their performance will lead to more patients being treated, argues a prominent health policy expert.
Damien Contandriopoulos, a professor of public health at the University of Victoria who had previously taught at the Université de Montréal, is highly critical of Bill 106, which proposes linking up to 25 per cent of a doctor's pay to performance targets as an incentive for them to take on more patients.
'It's a government that likes the notion of direct control, top-down, all the way from the ministry to the worker,' Contandriopoulos said in an interview Wednesday after he testified on Bill 106 at a National Assembly hearing.
'Centralized systems, data collection, heavy monitoring, and this kind of top-down, direct-control approach is generally not a great fit for super complex, extremely large systems like the health-care system,' he added.
Bill 106 has sparked an intense backlash in the medical community, with physicians charging that the legislation would drive some doctors away from the profession or the province — and worsen patient care. The bill follows Health Minister Christian Dubé's creation of Santé Québec in December to run the province's $65.5-billion-a-year public system. Despite opposition to Bill 106, Premier François Legault has said the Coalition Avenir Québec government intends to have the legislation adopted.
Dubé tabled the bill on May 8 amid contract negotiations with two Quebec federations representing physicians. The 25-per-cent pay figure tied to performance targets was calculated in a mathematical formula that Contandriopoulos described as 'complete nonsense.' Even if the performance targets aren't met, doctors would still receive 10 per cent, according to the formula written in the bill.
In Contandriopoulos's report on Bill 106, he wrote similar past incentives in Quebec have not notably increased doctors' capitation — which is the term used for the number of patients a physician has on their roster, and the new rules would only make it harder for them to do their jobs.
He illustrates that financial incentive systems are prone to 'gaming,' meaning doctors will try to exploit the system's flaws to their advantage.
He cited a recent initiative in Quebec, the 'Guichet d'accès pour la clientele orpheline,' which tied a payment incentive to the registration of new patients. Because of a flaw in the system, he suggested many doctors retroactively enrolled patients who had already been treated. This gave physicians the financial benefit despite the fact they didn't take on additional patients.
He also suggested that with Bill 106, doctors may be less motivated to take on complex cases that require extra attention and expertise if their remuneration were based largely on the number of patients they see. As a result, doctors may flood their schedules with patients who could be treated by nurses, social workers or other health professionals on their team as a way to maximize their patient load and increase their remuneration, Contandriopoulos said.
If a doctor delegated their straightforward patients to nurses and social workers, 'then they would be stuck with demanding, challenging, long visits,' he explained, adding that this approach would be effectively penalized under Bill 106.
'They would go bankrupt because the system doesn't reward them to do so. So if we want physicians to really focus on the work that they are the best trained to do and where the benefit for society is the highest, we need to incentivize them to really focus on (these complex cases), which we do not.'
Dubé said during a scrum Tuesday afternoon that Bill 106 won't be adopted this session of the National Assembly and he would like for discussions to continue.
Amid the hearings on Bill 106, Dubé reiterated he wants 100 per cent of Quebecers to have access to a health professional by the summer of 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
3 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Libman: Wait a minute — where did the time go?
I was blown away last weekend by reports that it's been 35 years since the 1990 Oka Crisis, the standoff that dominated our news cycle that summer. It's also hard to believe last Sunday marked the 40th anniversary of the Live Aid benefit concert for famine relief. The passage of time is something that I have been thinking about more and more of late, trying to make sense of it all. One can be sitting in a waiting room or stuck in traffic agonizing over how long every minute seems to take. On a long trip, moving from A to B, you can only wait patiently, like staring at an hourglass until your destination. Yet, oddly enough, when you look back in time, everything seems accelerated. I graduated from McGill 40 years ago this summer. It seems impossible that it's been that long as I remember so vividly many memories and specifics from those days. How daunting it is to project the same time frame — which doesn't seem so long ago — into the future and realize I'll be (hopefully!) over 100 years old, for heaven's sake. The sense of aging first hit me when I started to realize that police officers, or professional hockey players, say, could be younger than me — and later, even judges and the like. There are teachers I remember from high school who seemed like old men, yet were younger than I am now. When I became involved in politics and elected to the National Assembly in 1989, I was in my 20s without any political experience. Some commentators were condescending, with one in particular — my predecessor on this Opinion page actually — often gleefully referring to me as 'little Bobby.' (That wouldn't get past my editor today!) But by the time I ran for Stephen Harper's Conservatives in 2015, I was described as the older, experienced politician. For much of my work life, whether in provincial or municipal politics, the private sector or in the community, I always seemed to be the young guy. Then suddenly, I'm not sure when, there's that hinge moment where I am now seen as the vieux routier around the office. When looking in the rear-view mirror (or a regular mirror, for that matter) it's hard not to wonder how and when did this sneak up on you. We somehow end up on this Earth and before we know it, we have less time left than the time we've already spent. It's a crapshoot, of course, as none of us can know how long we will have. We can strive to be healthy and increase the odds of a longer life, but sadly we can't anticipate illness or other accidental circumstances beyond our control. Our time here is finite, and then our departure is infinite. It makes you question why we take certain things to heart and fight among ourselves about politics, for example. Forced language laws, immigration rules, constitutional debates and so on rarely alter social realities in significant ways. With the passage of time, societies evolve naturally. Attempts at social engineering breed conflict and diminish valuable individual relationships and quality of life as so much energy is sucked out of us. A few years ago, I attended an event of former MNAs and sat for dinner with some Parti Québécois hardliners who were very combative back then and used to make my skin crawl. Many of them are now elderly and frail. No one can escape Father Time. We talked about those exhausting debates and how many of the same battles are still being fought today. Given where we were now — discussing families, health and the passage of time — much of it seemed so insignificant in the larger scheme of things. Time is a precious resource that we too often take for granted. It's time we start using it more wisely. Robert Libman is an architect and planning consultant who has served as Equality Party leader and MNA, mayor of Côte-St-Luc and a member of the Montreal executive committee.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
South Korea's ousted President Yoon indicted on additional criminal charges over martial law
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korea's ousted conservative President Yoon Suk Yeol was indicted Saturday on additional criminal charges related to his ill-fated imposition of martial law, about three months after he was formally thrown out of office. Yoon's additional indictments mean he will remain in jail for up to six months as he faces a trial at the Seoul Central District Court on his Dec. 3 martial law declaration that plunged South Korea into huge political turmoil. Yoon was sent back to prison last week after the Seoul court approved his arrest warrant requested by a team of investigators headed by independent counsel Cho Eun-suk. Cho's team indicted Yoon on abuse of power that obstructed the rights of some of his Cabinet members. The charge was imposed because Yoon summoned only select Cabinet members to approve his emergency martial law when South Korean law requires approval of all Cabinet members for such a measure, Park Ji-young, a senior investigator at Cho's team, told a briefing. Park said Yoon was also charged with fabricating an official document in an attempt to satisfy a formal requirement for a martial law declaration before he eventually destroyed it. After declaring martial law, Yoon sent troops and police officers to the opposition-controlled National Assembly, but enough lawmakers managed to enter an assembly chamber and voted down his decree, forcing his Cabinet to lift it. Yoon was later impeached by the assembly, with some of his ruling party lawmakers voting to suspend his presidential powers. Yoon has argued his decree was a desperate attempt to draw public support of his fight against the 'wickedness' of the main liberal opposition Democratic Party, which had obstructed his agenda, impeached top officials and slashed the government's budget bill. He earlier called the National Assembly 'a den of criminals' and 'anti-state forces.' In January, state prosecutors arrested and indicted him on rebellion, a grave charge that would incur the death penalty or life imprisonment if convicted. In March, however, Yoon was released from prison after a judge at the Seoul district court canceled his arrest to allow him to stand trial without being held in custody. In April, the Constitutional Court formally dismissed Yoon as president, prompting a snap election to choose his successor. After winning that election, new President Lee Jae Myung, a former Democratic Party leader, approved legislation to launch independent investigations to uncover fuller details of Yoon's martial law stunt and delve into other criminal allegations involving his wife and administration. Lee named Cho an independent counsel to lead an investigation on Yoon's martial law decree. In May, state prosecutors indicted Yoon on charges of abusing power and forcing soldiers and police officers to try to seal the assembly and election offices, acts that are not part of their duties.
Montreal Gazette
4 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Opinion: A welfare state Quebecers cannot afford
School boards, teachers and parents reacted with fury when François Legault's government announced last month it was cutting $570 million from the province's current-year education budget. Services to students, they argued, would inevitably suffer. The cutbacks having been announced without warning, the anger was understandable — and the government took note. On Wednesday, the Education Ministry responded by promising up to $540 million toward student services. 'We have listened to the concerns and needs,' Education Minister Bernard Drainville posted on X. 'Today, we act.' However, Quebecers would do well to get used to more financial restrictions: the province's fiscal situation is dire, and at this stage, there is no other choice but to slow the rise in expenditures, especially for the two largest parts of the budget by far — health care (44 per cent) and education (15 per cent). The effect of Drainville's olive branch remains to be seen. But several school boards had already announced layoffs of much-needed support staff, notably remedial teachers and speech therapists. Extracurricular activities have also been cancelled. A petition to the National Assembly demanding that last month's spending cuts be reversed gathered more than 150,000 signatures in two weeks. The government argues that, in fact, spending on education this year will be five per cent higher than in 2024-2025. This is true only according to clever calculations by Finance Ministry officials. If you compare the moneys actually spent last year to the amounts planned for this year, the increase is only 2.1 per cent. This is much less than what is needed to compensate for inflation and the generous pay increases negotiated with the teachers' unions. Consequently, school boards have no choice but to cut somewhere. The Coalition Avenir Québec government argues that since it was first elected in 2018, it has increased the education budget by 55 per cent. Exactly! Therein lies the problem: in education as in other fields, the province's expenditures have risen much too fast, so that the deficit is projected to reach a whopping $13.6 billion in 2025-2026. This has led Standard & Poor's to downgrade Quebec's credit rating, citing 'a confluence of factors including slowing population growth, higher remuneration spending, and lower revenues' that will produce 'persistent operating deficits and large after-capital deficits — even before heightened economic uncertainty related to tariffs.' The future is bleak, to say the least. Last spring, Finance Minister Eric Girard introduced a five-year plan to balance the budget. The strategy requires a drastic slowdown in expenditure increases. Even so, the government will have to find a yet unidentified $6 billion in expenditure cuts or additional revenues to reach its objective. In an editorial published this month, the Wall Street Journal noted that 'the crisis of the welfare state — fiscally unaffordable but politically unreformable — afflicts nearly every 21st century Western democracy.' This is certainly the case of Quebec, where the welfare state has become larger than in any other jurisdiction in North America. Of course, this is a policy choice Quebecers have made beginning with the Quiet Revolution in the 1960s: carry a heavier tax burden in order to benefit from more generous public services. Unfortunately, those services have become grossly inefficient while requiring ever increasing amounts of money — money the province simply does not have. That being the case, expect budget cuts like those announced in the education sector to be just the beginning. Such restrictions contribute to the current dissatisfaction toward the Legault government — and deservedly so, considering that the CAQ inherited a significant surplus and transformed it into a gaping deficit. However, even if the October 2026 elections were to deliver a new government, Quebecers will face the same intractable problem that for years they have sought to avoid: How to preserve the large welfare state they hold so dear if they cannot afford it?
