&w=3840&q=100)
Who pays GST on bonuses that cover your GST on online gaming bets?
India's online gaming industry is facing a fresh tax quandary as authorities move to levy Goods and Services Tax (GST) on promotional bonuses that are specifically designed to cover the GST paid by users on their bets.
These bonuses, widely used across real-money gaming platforms to attract and retain users, typically match the 28 per cent GST paid by players and are credited as non-withdrawable in-game credits. While players may see them as free rewards, the tax department now argues that these incentives constitute a 'consideration' for services, and should be taxed accordingly.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to The Economic Times, at least four gaming firms have received notices from the indirect tax department alleging non-payment of GST on such bonuses. The authorities claim that even if users do not directly pay for these credits, the platforms are effectively doing so on their behalf, making the amount taxable under GST rules.
'The bonuses are usable for gameplay and are therefore part of the overall transaction value,' a senior official told the publication. The government is relying on Rule 31B of the Central GST Rules, introduced in October 2023, to justify applying the 28 per cent GST rate on the full value of these credits.
Gaming firms argue that the interpretation is flawed. One industry executive said via a closed forum that their company had been issued a summons and urged to make voluntary payments. 'Our business operations have been severely impacted, and we are preparing to challenge this in the Supreme Court next week,' the person said.
The controversy only serves to add another layer to the legal battles on the issue that are already under way, with the sector contesting retrospective tax claims from 2017 to 2023. Now, the key question for regulators and the courts is whether GST applies even when the player isn't the one footing the bill.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Political Line Newsletter: Kanwariyas: kings of faith and the mark
'Consumer is king,' the SC said, during a hearing against government directives to eateries along the Kanwar route. The marketplace of faith has many faces The right to equality and the right to practise a profession are guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. The Supreme Court (SC) recently held that eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route must disclose whether they serve or used to serve meat, because that is a question of consumer rights. Kanwar Yatris are expected to abstain from non-vegetarian food, onion and garlic. The Kanwar Yatra is a pilgrimage of Shiva devotees, known as Kanwariyas, who walk to sacred spots along the Ganga, and carry its water as an offering to Shiva temples near their homes. Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments had ordered eateries to prominently display their licences as a measure of quality assurance, consumer awareness, and even public order, because in the past some yatris had created a ruckus over the use of onion, garlic, or meat products in places they chose to eat. A group of petitioners had challenged these orders, and argued that they hampered the right to practise a profession, amounted to social profiling, and discrimination against Muslims. Abhishek Singhvi, lawyer for the petitioners, also invoked 'anonymity of the marketplace' against the government orders. The SC decided not to determine these Constitutional questions and asked the eateries to display their licenses. 'Consumer is king,' the Court said. The idea that the consumer is king is a secular notion, and nothing could better express the decapitation of religion by capitalism in modern societies than this motto. But the consumer, typically seen as a soulless seeker of pleasure and gratification, is now blending faith into their market choices. Many people are carrying their faith into the market place. Capitalism is struggling to serve god and mammon at the same time. Muslims, Jews, and Hindus want faith-compliant products and services. People might think Christianity sits closely with modern capitalism, but wait! The clash between the business owner and the consumer, driven by faith, reached all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court for a tentative resolution. In 2012, Jack Phillips, a baker in Colorado, refused to create a custom wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The couple filed a case under the State's Anti-Discrimination Act, which prohibits businesses open to the public from discriminating based on sexual orientation. Colorado Civil Rights Commission held that the baker had violated the law. Phillips took the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that forcing him to create a cake for a same-sex marriage would violate his freedom of speech and free exercise of religion, guaranteed by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The SC held, on June 4, 2018, that Philip's protections under the First Amendment had been violated. The Court did not rule on the question of whether businesses can refuse service based on religious beliefs. Like India's, the SC of the United States too steered clear of triggering a trade war — or a religious one as the case may be! Federalism Tract: Notes on Indian Diversity The growing reach of the state Conducting a census among the six main indigenous tribes in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands will not be tough as the Central Government has already made contact and is running several welfare measures for these tribes, said physician Ratan Chandra Kar. It is not a coincidence that economic and military activities in which the aboriginal people have little involvement are also increasing simultaneously. The mapping of the terrain and people is often simultaneous, with the expansion of modern economic activity. See this story, for instance. Martyrs who ceased to be Kashmir parties and the government used to observe July 13 as Martyrs' Day to commemorate the 22 civilians who were killed in an uprising against the Dogra monarchy in 1931. This year, the Lieutenant Governor's administration tried to stop Chief Minister Omar Abdullah from visiting a memorial site. He defied the order, and visited the Naqsbandh Sahib shrine. The popular movement against the monarchy was a point of contention between the national movement led by the Indian National Congress and Sheikh Abdullah, grandfather of the current Chief Minister Omar Abdullah. In 1931, he co-founded the All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Conference — Muslims were treated as second-class subjects by Maharaja Hari Singh — which would be renamed the National Conference the next year to be in alignment with the Congress. Congress leadership and Jawaharlal Nehru were sympathetic to the movement for self-rule and Kashmiri identity, but they were also anxious about the interplay of Islamic and Kashmiri identities in Sheikh's politics. The Congress was willing to accommodate Kashmiri nationalism within the rubric of Indian nationalism but was also fixated on keeping it under permissible limits. This led to the fluctuations in the relationship between the Sheikh and the Congress, particularly Nehru. This history of the Centre alternating between suspicion and accommodation of Kashmiri nationalism was brought to an end by the BJP that nullified Article 370 in 2019. For it, any suggestion of autonomy is unacceptable. Hindutva votaries considered the anti-Dogra movement an Islamist insurrection then and now. You could read more about that history here. Hindu nationalists in India considered the native kingdoms a shield of their politics in general. Under the Centre's rule there was always restriction on the observation of the Martyrs' Day. That is a memory that sits uncomfortably with Indian nationalism — under both the Congress and the BJP. Deploying history for the present The recreation of historical events in public memory is part of nation building, and the shifting approaches to the past are a marker of present day politics. The overturning of the Martyrs' Day narrative repurposes the history of the region in tune with Hindutva. The revised history text books of NCERT are another case in point. Departing from earlier text books, the new ones, among other things, also puts the spotlight on episodes of religious discrimination by Mughal rulers. The DMK government in Tamil Nadu and the BJP government at the Centre are both celebrating the mark of a millennium of Rajendra Chola-I's expedition to the north. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will release a commemorative stamp on July 27th. The Cholas were patrons of Shaivism and Rajendra Chola-I took pride in claiming that he brought the Ganga to his kingdom, reportedly forcing the kings he defeated to carry it on their head. You could watch a video commentary on this here. While for Mr. Modi this could be another occasion to demonstrate Tamil Nadu's Hindu heritage, linking it with Tamil identity, for the Dravidian parties, it is the other way around: it is about the antiquity and statecraft of the Tamil people.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Christian Wilkins released by Raiders after just one season - All you need to know about NFL DT's Net Worth, and more
(Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates.
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Kristin Cabot resigns more than a week after the kiss-cam scandal with former Astronomer CEO Andy Bryon
(Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates.
