Abrego Garcia Wants A Judge To Seize Pam Bondi's Phone
The slo-mo constitutional clash in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia inched forward with a new filing overnight in which his attorneys are now seeking sanctions against the Trump administration – including individual officials – for stonewalling and defying court-ordered discovery into his wrongful deportation to prison in El Salvador.
Among the wide-ranging sanctions Abrego Garcia is seeking is a possible court order for Attorney General Pam Bondi and other key officials to turn over their personal devices for U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis of Maryland to review privately in her chambers.
The move to impose sanctions comes after what was supposed to be an expedited two-week discovery sprint ordered by Xinis on April 15 turned into a nearly two-month discovery marathon. Xinis ordered the discovery in part to determine with the Trump administration should be held in contempt of court for refusing to abide by her Supreme Court-backed order to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia. In court the day she ordered the discovery, Xinis was adamant that she would brook no more delays or foot-dragging and ordered lawyers to cancel vacations and drop everything else.
'Nearly sixty days, ten orders, three depositions, three discovery disputes, three motions for stay, two hearings, a week-long stay, and a failed appeal later, the Plaintiffs still have seen no evidence to suggest that the Defendants took any steps, much less 'all available steps,' to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return to the United States 'as soon as possible' so that his case could be handled as it would have been had he not been unlawfully deported,' Abrego Garcia's lawyers argue in the latest filing.
The sanctions Abrego Garcia seeks asks the judge:
to make factual determinations that are adverse to the administration, such as formally finding that it did not communicate with El Salvador to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release prior to his May 21 indictment;
order the administration over its objections to produce the documents it has withheld in discovery thus far, deeming some its privileges waived by its misconduct;
or appoint a special master to investigate the administration's 'willful noncompliance' and identify which officials by name 'willfully evaded' the court-ordered discovery, including possibly ordering the personal devices of key officials like Bondi turned over for the judge's review;
impose accumulating fines on officials for each day the discovery defiance continues; and
hold the administration in civil contempt of court.
Notably Abrego Garcia, who was secretly indicted while this discovery dispute raged and subsequently returned to the United States to face charges of conspiracy to transport undocumented immigrants, is not yet seeking sanctions for the weeks-long delay in complying with the court's order to facilitate his return. Instead, he is focused on the administration's alleged misconduct in defying the court's discovery order by failing to produce the required materials and witness and raising frivolous objections and privileges.
That seems to be a strategic decision to avoid the harder questions of whether the courts can order the president to engage in negotiations with a foreign country, to demand the release from a foreign prison of someone wrongfully deported to their home country, and other stickier elements of this case about which the Supreme Court has already expressed reservations.
Meanwhile, in his criminal case, Abrego Garcia asked the judge to release him pending trial.
In another wrongful deportation case, the Trump administration claimed a 'perfect storm of errors' led it to deport Jordin Melgar-Salmeron to El Salvador on May 7 despite an order from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals barring his removal. In the new filing this week, the administration also changed what it had previously told the appeals court about how the wrongful deportation happened.
It took long enough, but U.S. District Judge Michael E. Farbiarz of New Jersey ruled that the Trump administration cannot detain or deport Columbia University graduate and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil. But Khalil won't be released immediately, as the judge stayed his order until tomorrow to give the administration time to appeal his ruling.
The Trump DOJ fired two more people who worked on Special Counsel Jack Smith's team investigating, including a non-lawyer member of the support staff, Reuters reports.
Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for civil rights, has made an unprecedented demand for a huge volume of 2020 and 2024 election data from the state of Colorado, NPR reports. While the data demand is not explicitly connected the criminal conviction of former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, the Trump DOJ has already taken the unprecedented step of intervening in her federal appeal of her state
New reporting from Military.com on the highly politicized speech President Trump gave this week at Ft. Bragg:
Internal 82nd Airborne Division communications reviewed by Military.com reveal a tightly orchestrated effort to curate the optics of Trump's recent visit, including handpicking soldiers for the audience based on political leanings and physical appearance.
One unit-level message bluntly saying: 'No fat soldiers.'
'If soldiers have political views that are in opposition to the current administration and they don't want to be in the audience then they need to speak with their leadership and get swapped out,' another note to troops said.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., announced eight new appointees to the CDC vaccine advisory committee he sacked – and at least a couple of them are real doozies, he NYT reports.
The entire board of the Fulbright program resigned over what it said was political interference from the Trump administration in its selection of this year's Fulbright scholars.
The NYT reported:
The board approved those scholars over the winter after a yearlong selection process, and the State Department was supposed to send acceptance letters by April, the people said. But instead, the board learned that the office of public diplomacy at the agency had begun sending rejection letters to the scholars based mainly on their research topics, they said.
The board posted its resignation statement here.
'It angers me when I see these rioters trying to pull barricades out of the hands of police officers and shoving police officers to try and grab the barricades and break the perimeter … I can tell you that if they try to do that in Mobile, Alabama, the orthopedic hand surgeons will have one hell of a weekend fixing hands. That barricade can become a weapon.'–Mobile County, Alabama Sheriff Paul Burch, commenting on this weekend's planned 'No Kings' rally
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eight men deported from US arrive in war-torn South Sudan
Eight men deported from the United States in May and held under guard for weeks at a US military base in the African nation of Djibouti while their legal challenges played out in court have now reached the Trump administration's intended destination, war-torn South Sudan, a country the US State Department advises against travel to due to 'crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict'. The immigrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan arrived in South Sudan on Friday after a federal judge cleared the way for the Trump administration to relocate them in a case that had gone to the Supreme Court, which had permitted their removal from the US. Administration officials said the men had been convicted of violent crimes in the US. 'This was a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people,' said Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in a statement announcing the men's arrival in South Sudan, a chaotic country in danger once more of collapsing into civil war. The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the transfer of the men who had been put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan. That meant that the South Sudan transfer could be completed after the flight was detoured to a base in Djibouti, where they men were held in a converted shipping container. The flight was detoured after a federal judge found the administration had violated his order by failing to allow the men a chance to challenge the removal. The court's conservative majority had ruled in June that immigration officials could quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger. A flurry of court hearings on Independence Day resulted a temporary hold on the deportations while a judge evaluated a last-ditch appeal by the men's before the judge decided he was powerless to halt their removals and that the person best positioned to rule on the request was a Boston judge whose rulings led to the initial halt of the administration's effort to begin deportations to South Sudan. By Friday evening, that judge had issued a brief ruling concluding the Supreme Court had tied his hands. The men had final orders of removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said. Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities cannot quickly send them back to their homelands.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Touts 'Win' After South Sudan Deportations Completed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Eight men deported from the United States have arrived in South Sudan after a dramatic Independence Day court battle that saw multiple emergency hearings and conflicting judicial rulings. "This was a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people," Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement Saturday announcing the men's arrival. Newsweek has reached out to the White House via email on Saturday for comment. Why It Matters This case represents a significant test of President Donald Trump's administration immigration enforcement policies and establishes precedent for deporting individuals to third countries deemed dangerous by the State Department. South Sudan, the intended destination, remains under a State Department travel advisory warning against visits due to "crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict." The U.S. Supreme Court's June ruling that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries without allowing challenges could reshape how future deportations are handled, potentially affecting thousands of similar cases. What To Know The eight men, originally from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam, and South Sudan, were transported Friday evening to the war-torn African nation following a federal judge's final ruling that cleared the way for their removal. The men had been convicted of violent crimes in the U.S., including murder, robbery, kidnapping, and sexual assault, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Only one of the men is actually a citizen of South Sudan. When their original May deportation flight was diverted to Djibouti, they were held for weeks in a converted shipping container at the U.S. military base while their legal challenges proceeded through the courts. Friday's legal drama unfolded rapidly on the Fourth of July, with courts otherwise closed for the holiday. District Judge Randolph Moss of Washington, D.C., initially issued an emergency order temporarily blocking the deportation until 4:30 p.m. ET. However, he later forwarded the case to Massachusetts District Judge Brian Murphy, who cited previous Supreme Court orders in denying the migrants' petition. Murphy wrote that the Court orders were "binding on this new petition" since the petitioners were raising "substantially similar claims." The Supreme Court had ruled in June that immigration officials could quickly deport people to third countries, halting an order that previously allowed immigrants to challenge removals to countries outside their homeland where they could face danger. This ruling effectively overturned Murphy's earlier decision that immigrants could not be sent to a new country without a court hearing. A worker loads items onto a plane chartered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) before its departure from King County International Airport on April 15 in Seattle. A worker loads items onto a plane chartered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) before its departure from King County International Airport on April 15 in People Are Saying DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin on Friday: "On Independence Day, an activist judge sided with barbaric criminal illegal aliens over American citizens." Judge Randolph Moss on Friday: "It seems to me almost self-evident that the United States government cannot take human beings and send them to circumstances in which their physical well-being is at risk simply either to punish them or send a signal to others." President Donald Trump's Truth Social message on Saturday: "This July 4th weekend I want to give a big 'THANK YOU!' to the Heroic ICE Officers fighting every day to reclaim our Sovereignty and Freedom. One of the most exciting parts of the 'ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL ACT' is that it includes ALL of the Funding and Resources that ICE needs to carry out the Largest Mass Deportation Operation in History. Our Brave ICE Officers, who are under daily violent assault, will finally have the tools and support that they need." He added: "We will not let America become a Third World Country filled with Crime, failing Schools, collapsing Hospitals, and total Social Dysfunction. It's called 'REMIGRATION' and, it will, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" What Happens Next? The Trump administration has indicated this case sets a precedent for future deportations to third countries, with officials reaching agreements with various nations to house immigrants when authorities cannot quickly send them back to their homelands. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
8 deportees land in South Sudan after Supreme Court ruling
Deportees board a U.S. military flight in a manner similar to that in which eight were flown to South Sudan from a U.s. military base in Djibouti on Friday. Photo Courtesy of the Department of Homeland Security July 5 (UPI) -- Eight deported "migrants" who had been held at a U.S. military base in Djibouti are bound for South Sudan aboard a military aircraft that took off on Friday night. The flight carrying the eight deportees had been delayed for six weeks until the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled a lower court erred when it issued a preliminary injunction halting the deportations in April. "These sickos were finally deported to South Sudan on Independence day," said Tricia McLaughlin, Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary, in a press release on Saturday. Immigration and Customs Enforcement "deported these eight barbaric criminal illegal aliens who are so heinous even their own countries will not accept them," McLaughlin added. She accused federal "activist judges" of delaying the deportation flight. "We will continue to fight for the freedoms of Americans while these far-left activists continue to try and force us to bring murderers, pedophiles and rapists back to the U.S.," McLaughlin said. The federal lawsuit forced the flight to land at the Djibouti base while the matter made its way through the federal court system. The eight deportees include two from Cuba, two from Burma, and one each from Laos, Vietnam, Mexico and South Sudan. All have been convicted of crimes, including homicide, armed robbery, kidnapping, sexual assault and sexual offenses involving a minor younger than age 12. The military aircraft left the Djibouti base at 8:30 p.m. EDT with each deportee secured by handcuffs and ankle shackles while surrounded by uniformed personnel, The New York Times reported. The aircraft landed in South Sudan just before midnight EDT on Friday.
