&w=3840&q=100)
Apache helicopters: India charts its own course amid Korean retreat
South Korea's decision was guided by shifting military doctrines and fiscal restraint. Lawmaker Yu Yong-weon of the People Power Party, speaking to The Korea Times, emphasised the growing obsolescence of manned rotary platforms in modern warfare due to their exposure to low-cost missile and drone threats, as seen in Ukraine. However, while Seoul steps away from legacy systems, India appears to be doubling down though not in contradiction, but in complementary alignment with emerging military thinking.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Indian perspective
Indian military planners have consistently maintained that the country's security dynamics differ significantly from those of East Asia. Positioned between two nuclear-armed adversaries and facing active border challenges, India requires battlefield tools capable of immediate response, tactical flexibility and high survivability. This context supports the Apache's relevance.
Unlike South Korea, which is moving towards unmanned systems following the US Army's cancellation of its next-generation helicopter programme as cited in The Korea Times, India is pursuing a two-pronged modernisation strategy: investing in unmanned systems while also reinforcing manned attack capabilities. As News18 points out, these Apache helicopters will be deployed along the India-Pakistan border — an area where rapid-response capability and precision air support are critical to deterrence and readiness.
Apache: Proven, adaptable and future-ready
According to information published by Boeing, the AH-64E Apache remains the world's most dominant and operationally proven attack helicopter. Its survivability, strike precision and modular adaptability allow it to integrate with next-generation technologies. Manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T), operational on the Apache for more than a decade, enables pilots to command autonomous systems in real-time, extending reach and battlefield awareness.
This hybrid model aligns well with India's evolving military doctrine, which does not treat unmanned systems as a replacement for manned platforms, but rather as force multipliers. In this context, the Apache functions not as an outdated legacy asset, but as a 'quarterback' on the battlefield — coordinating drone inputs, executing precision strikes and adapting to real-time tactical changes, as described in Boeing's defence briefings.
Lessons from Ukraine and beyond
While Korea's defence leaders cite the vulnerability of helicopters in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, India views the same conflict with a nuanced lens. Different theatres require different tools. The Apache's battlefield utility was recently demonstrated in US-Saudi drills, where it was used to neutralise drones using Hellfire missiles expanding its mission set to include counter-UAS (unmanned aerial system) roles.
Further, the Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Systems Office (JCO) in the US recently conducted successful drone swarm countermeasures using Apache-linked systems. As reported by Boeing, the US Army's adoption of a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) enables the rapid integration of emerging technologies—like launched effects (LEs) and drone defence modules — directly onto existing Apache airframes.
This means that India's investment is not just in a platform, but in a future-proof ecosystem of capabilities that will evolve with the battlefield.
Cost-efficiency in Indian context
South Korea's programme faced resistance also due to the sharply increased cost of AH-64Es — 66 per cent higher than previous contracts, per The Korea Times. But India's deal, signed in 2020 for approximately $600 million for six helicopters, was secured before this inflation spike. The Indian Air Force already operates 22 Apache helicopters, acquired via a 2015 deal, with full operational readiness achieved in close air support roles.
By extending this platform to the army, a move that allows for independent operations and inter-service synergy, India is leveraging existing logistical infrastructure and pilot training pipelines, reducing the long-term cost burden. This integration provides a strategic depth that unmanned systems alone cannot offer.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A calculated divergence
India's decision to proceed with Apache induction, even as Seoul pivots to drones, is not a rejection of modernisation. Rather, it is a tailored response to its own strategic imperatives. As Boeing noted, drones alone cannot replicate the full spectrum of Apache capabilities, especially in high-intensity, unpredictable conflicts. India's operational needs emphasise a blend of human adaptability with automated reach and reconnaissance.
Indeed, as Boeing demonstrated through its upcoming plans to integrate 'launched effects' and drone command capabilities directly into Apache cockpits, the aircraft is being repositioned not just as a weapon, but as a command-and-control platform in multi-domain operations.
India's Apache bet is future-focussed
South Korea's decision to drop its Apache acquisition highlights the fluidity of global defence priorities. Yet India's move to induct its fleet at this moment represents more than just continuity, it signals strategic foresight. The Indian Army's Apache helicopters, arriving now, are not legacy holdovers but forward, compatible tools ready for hybrid warfare.
As the world experiments with unmanned platforms, India is not resisting the tide but steering carefully within it — leveraging proven systems, maximising interoperability, and preparing for the hybrid battles of tomorrow. In this context, the Apache is less a symbol of the past and more a key to the future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

India.com
38 minutes ago
- India.com
Dollar Dominance, Trade Risks & Delhi's Balancing Act – Why Trump's BRICS Threats Matter For India
New Delhi: At a time when India inches closer to finalising a trade deal with the United States, a thunderclap from Washington has cast shadows over the celebration. US President Donald Trump's blunt message, posted publicly this week, warned that any country aligning with what he described as BRICS' 'anti-American policies' would face an additional 10% tariff without exceptions. As one of the founding members of BRICS, India finds itself at the centre of this growing storm. The recently concluded Rio de Janeiro summit of the bloc had laid out an ambitious declaration. There was no mention of the United States, but it still sent ripples through Washington. The BRICS statement challenged unilateral economic measures, defended multilateralism, voiced concern over tariffs that disrupt global trade and pushed for changes to global governance. These words appear to have stung. What followed was Trump's retaliation. On his Truth Social platform, he wrote that siding with BRICS' economic vision would come at a cost. The timing could not have been more crucial. He is expected to begin announcing trade deals from Monday, and India is among the countries on the list. In Delhi, this new tension is being watched with a mix of caution and calculation. Trade experts in the capital believe the core of Trump's anger lies deeper within the BRICS push for currency alternatives. For years, Russia and China have spoken of a new financial system to bypass the dollar. In 2022, Russia even floated a proposal for a BRICS reserve currency. Many Indian analysts suspect this is what triggered Trump's fury. The dollar remains Washington's most powerful economic weapon. The United States used it in 2012 to isolate Iran and again in 2022 against Russia. Any attempt to weaken its grip invites blowback. Despite its lack of political cohesion, BRICS still threatens that power by raising the idea of currency diversification. Indian economists see the bigger picture. The call for a common BRICS currency faces hurdles. Political will is scattered. China's dominance in the bloc sparks unease among other members. But the conversations alone unsettle Washington. That is why even vague references to multilateral financial systems draw fire. Meanwhile, India, experts are of the view, must walk a fine line. It is preparing for what is being described as a 'mini trade deal' with the United States. Reports suggest Delhi has already agreed to a baseline 10% tariff, but higher rates – up to 26% – remain on the table. Agriculture and dairy continue to be sticking points. At the same time, India cannot ignore its standing in BRICS. It shares that space with strategic rivals like China but also long-standing defence and energy partners like Russia. The bloc includes emerging economies looking for new trade paths. Turning away completely would be costly. Domestic industry lobbies in India are growing nervous. Sectors like textiles, pharma and information technology could suffer if Trump hikes tariffs further. Executives fear the fallout of a new wave of American protectionism. What adds to the anxiety is the unpredictability. Trump has changed course before. His sudden termination of a long-standing free trade pact with Vietnam has become a cautionary tale. Despite the tensions, some foreign policy voices in Delhi urge calm. They argue that BRICS has always been an idea more than an institution. Its members rarely share political agendas or geographical interests. But that has not stopped it from becoming a target. Others believe Trump's aggressive approach may backfire. His posture could push India to double down on groups such as BRICS and the Global South. But that path brings its own dilemmas, especially with China pulling the strings in many of these platforms. At the heart of it all, the challenge remains the same – can India navigate between its old allies and emerging coalitions without inviting punishment from either? With Trump's new tariffs looming, the question is no longer hypothetical. The countdown has begun.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
No place for double standards on terrorism: PM Modi's strong message in Brazil
India and Brazil strongly oppose terrorism and those who support it, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Tuesday while asserting that there is no place for double standards on terrorism, in a veiled reference to Pakistan and its all-weather ally China."Our thinking on the fight against terrorism is aligned - zero-tolerance and zero-double standards," PM Modi said during a joint press statement with Brazilian President Luiz Incio Lula da Silva after their delegation-level and Brazil strongly oppose terrorism and those who support it, the prime minister said, without naming any country. In the past, India has described Pakistan as the "global epicentre of terrorism." "There is no place for double standards on terrorism," he said, in a veiled reference to China, which is an all-weather ally of Pakistan. PM Modi thanked President Lula for its solidarity and support in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terrorist attack in the meeting, the two leaders held extensive discussions on multifaceted ties, including trade and investment, defence and security, health and pharmaceuticals, space, renewable energy, food and energy security, infrastructure development, digital public infrastructure, culture and people-to-people ties, Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal explored avenues for collaboration in the new areas of critical minerals, new and emerging technologies, AI & supercomputers, digital collaboration & mobility, he said, adding that they set a bilateral trade target of USD 20 billion over the next five the talks, the two sides inked agreements to bolster cooperation in several Modi, who arrived here for a State Visit after attending the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, said his trip to Brazil will add momentum to the bilateral PM Modi received a grand ceremonial welcome featuring a unique 114-horse parade at the Alvorada Palace in Brasilia. He also witnessed an Indian classical bhajan performance during his reception.- EndsTune InMust Watch


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Maharashtra language war: Is the showdown aimed at Mumbai civic poll? Experts debate
On 'To The Point', the focus is on Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's announcement of 35% reservation for women in government jobs, aimed at empowering women and reshaping Bihar's workforce. This policy applies to all government positions at every level and department, but only for original residents of the state. The decision comes months before the Bihar Assembly elections, with women constituting nearly half of Bihar's 7.64 crore voters. In the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, women outvoted men with a 59.4% turnout compared to 53% among men. The government has also approved the formation of a Bihar Youth Commission to address unemployment concerns. The announcement has sparked debate on whether it's a genuine push for empowerment or a well-timed political strategy, especially given that a similar 35% reservation policy has been in place since 2015. Additionally, the transcript covers a controversy between the Indian government and social media platform X (formerly Twitter) over the blocking of Reuters and over 2000 handles. X claims the government ordered blocking without justification, while the government denies issuing any fresh blocking orders, raising concerns about press freedom and censorship. The upcoming Kaavad Yatra is also discussed, with reports of shops and dhabas along the route being made to display 'I am Hindu' posters, sparking a debate on religious profiling and discrimination. The discussion touches on broader issues of religious identity, caste census, and economic discrimination, with opposing views from BJP and Samajwadi Party spokespersons.