
In Response Increased Threats, High Security Travel Embraces Hi-Tech
As instability proliferates across regions and continents in our time, there's surprisingly little public focus on the security of travel at the highest levels. We are talking not about tourism, which has its own framework, but the kind of travel that, by its very nature, is extra-sensitive and requires informed adjustment to geostrategic perils i.e. diplomatic missions, journalistic teams, top corporate trips and the like. Luckily, developments in tech have kept up sufficiently with the increased complications that safety can still outpace the environment of risk and discomfort.
As recently as 10 years ago, such travel was a complicated process: couriers rushed with sealed envelopes, embassy staff made dozens of calls to coordinate routes, and logisticians manually checked the documents issued. Today, advanced digital platforms have revolutionized the process, with artificial intelligence predicting potential dangers and biometric systems providing instant I.D. support. Diplomatic travel, in particular, has come to embody how hi-tech meets the traditional needs of safe movement across borders.
In response, highly specialized travel agencies have come to the fore offering focused expertise for dealing with the challenges. One such is the international company Tumodo , an early stand-out in digital travel management headed up by Vladimir Kokorin, its founder. Once based in Hong Kong, now commuting between Europe and the Gulf, Kokorin got his law degree in the UK and previously made his career as a legal advisor to large corporations with financial and other security as a particular concern. 'In a world where global challenges require not only speed but also unprecedented precision in security, diplomatic travel management has evolved into an important component of international relations and national security. Few people know the tremendous work of people and technology behind diplomats' conversations."
With identity theft on the rise, diplomatic documents require robust security. Modern blockchain-based platforms create tamper-resistant controls that prevent any information from being tampered with. Private agencies like BCD Travel are using digital tools to simplify international compliance and document preparation. They do a lot of work for US government agencies like the Dept of Defense, Dept of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency. This kind of collaboration evolves the general methodology and, as a byproduct, also improves the efficiency of business travel and reduces costs.
Aviation IT solutions leader crafts modern digital I.D.s to ensure the formation of a digital infrastructure that guarantees trust in travelers' documents worldwide. Such measures are particularly important in regions with high levels of fraud. One example is the Democratic Republic of Congo, where cases of forged diplomatic IDs have been recorded. Now, at Kinshasa airport, biometric systems instantly confirm a diplomat's identity using multi-factor authentication, preventing attackers from accessing confidential meetings.
During international travel, diplomats are given special 'clean' smartphones that are disposed of upon their return. This has become common practice after numerous cases where confidential information about negotiations was stolen through infected devices. Modern systems detect abnormal device behavior within minutes, allowing for immediate isolation of compromised data.
Modern digital platforms like that of Tumodo use standards and protocols similar to those used in the financial sector. These systems encrypt users' personal data, mask payment card numbers and protect highly sensitive information - from passport data to travel details. This is especially crucial when dealing with diplomatic missions.
The movement of diplomats is another example of how modern approaches simplify complex tasks by working in tandem with partners that conduct the more conventional functions. Each does their own part of the overall task of organizing the trips. Traditional providers book flights through the more specialized agencies and provide ground transportation for diplomatic staff.
An example of such a company is Corporate Travel Management, which emphasizes: 'We develop customized travel plans and streamline processes to ensure maximum efficiency and protection.' Their experience with US federal agencies proves that such solutions save millions of dollars annually.
Because of advanced digital platforms like Tumodo and Navan it is not only possible to quickly book necessary travel, but also to predict potential problems and maintain constant 24/7 contact with various supporting services like online payment processing firm Stripe, banking startup Rho and CPT partners above. In a matter of seconds, modern systems can analyze hundreds of variables, track travelers' real-time location and warn of risks.
The U.S. Diplomatic Security Service already uses digital threat analysis technology to assess potential risks. For high-ranking officials, the government funds airplanes and provides airport privileges such as access to diplomatic areas and expedited screening, ensuring efficiency and compliance with bilateral agreements. In volatile regions, private firms sometimes provide additional security, beefing up protection in high-risk areas.
Diplomatic accommodation has also gone far beyond the usual standards. It is not enough to simply book a room in a good hotel or have a permanent residence. Cybersecurity, proximity to the embassy and evacuation routes need to be considered.
Traditional companies that specialize in accommodating diplomatic personnel use booking options through a manager like Hamptons estate agents which has done this work since 1869, matching up people with the right accommodation locally, nationally and internationally. It offers customized accommodation services for diplomats in the UK, and provides long-term accommodation for government employees in the US.
The checklist for preparing accommodations now includes mandatory scanning for electronic bugs and window listening protection. Rather than simply masking conversations with traditional white noise, digital platforms are actively disrupting recording devices to provide a higher level of security.
Varonis offers a specialized application that automatically detects an attempt to intercept data through a fake Wi-Fi point in the hotel lobby. And Safeture emphasizes the high efficiency of status confirmation systems that allow travelers to quickly signal their safe arrival or problems. Such solutions are becoming a standard in the diplomatic travel industry Modern diplomatic security systems integrate regional real-world conditions that directly affect diplomatic activities. An illustrative example of this approach is the joint initiative of the UN and Remesh, implemented in 2021, with an AI powered platform. The analytical algorithm they developed played an important role in peace negotiations in Yemen and Libya. The web application provided the ability to simultaneously analyze the opinions of up to 1,000 participants from conflict regions, forming a consensus decision almost instantly. This allowed UN specialists to gain an understanding of the main problems of the population in conflict zones, which was used in negotiations with political leaders.
In modern diplomatic practice, public opinion is becoming an important factor in shaping strategic initiatives. Thanks to digital analytics, a branch of AI. diplomats are able not only to monitor but also to forecast changes in public sentiment in specific regions. This kind of information becomes indispensable when adapting diplomatic messages and building effective communications with representatives of different cultures.
In sum, the future of diplomatic travel is being rapidly reshaped by digital innovation. Blockchain verifies documents, quantum encryption protects communications, and biometrics simplifies identification. Advanced countries are already adopting these technologies, creating a new standard for diplomatic missions. This kind of tech synergy - its seamlessness - is the real breakthrough, making high-security travel safer than ever.
'The division of roles between the government and the private sector helps optimize resources, improves security and quality of services,' emphasizes Vladimir Kokorin. - The government ensures protection and regulatory compliance, while companies offer digital solutions for booking and risk management."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI power demand poses global supply risks, says Hitachi Energy
The increasing electricity consumption by tech companies for AI training poses risks to global power supply stability, according to Hitachi Energy CEO Andreas Schierenbeck. In an interview with the Financial Times, Schierenbeck emphasised the need for government intervention to regulate the volatile power usage characteristic of AI operations. Schierenbeck highlighted that AI data centres exhibit significant fluctuations in power demand, unlike traditional office data centres. 'AI data centres are very, very different from these office data centres because they really spike up,' he told FT. 'If you start your AI algorithm to learn and give them data to digest, they're peaking in seconds and going up to 10 times what they have normally used.' He advocated for regulatory measures similar to those applied to other industries, such as notifying utilities before initiating high power-consuming operations. The International Energy Agency forecasts that data centre electricity usage will double to 945 terawatt-hours (TWh) by 2030, surpassing the current consumption of countries such as Japan. Countries such as Ireland and the Netherlands have already imposed restrictions on new data centre developments due to concerns over their impact on electricity networks. A US Department of Energy (DOE)-backed report, released in December last year, indicated that data centre power demand is projected to double or triple by 2028. The report, produced by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, noted that total electricity usage by data centres jumped from 58TWh in 2014 to 176 TWh in 2023. Projections estimate this could rise further to between 325TWh and 580TWh by 2028. Analysts at consultancy company Rystad Energy told FT that AI's power demands could potentially stabilise electricity grids if tech companies set maximum power limits and align AI model training with periods of abundant renewable energy. Hitachi Energy is currently dealing with a global shortage of power transformers. Schierenbeck noted that addressing this shortage could take up to three years. "AI power demand poses global supply risks, says Hitachi Energy" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Huawei's AI Lab Fends Off Accusations It Copied Rival Models
(Bloomberg) -- Huawei Technologies Co.'s secretive AI research lab has pushed back against accusations it relied on rivals' models to develop its own Pangu platform, taking the unusual step of rebutting claims about its artificial intelligence efforts. Trump's Gilded Design Style May Be Gaudy. But Don't Call it 'Rococo.' Foreign Buyers Swoop on Cape Town Homes, Pricing Out Locals Are Tourists Ruining Europe? How Locals Are Pushing Back Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos The Pangu Pro MoE is the world's first model of its kind to be trained on Ascend chips — Huawei's answer to Nvidia Corp.'s AI accelerators — the lab said in a WeChat post over the weekend. While the company employed open-source code — as is 'common practice' — Huawei said it respected intellectual property and stuck closely to licensing terms. This followed accusations posted on the coding platform Github that Pangu's source code contained uncredited material from key rivals. Huawei's response is rare for a company regarded as a standard-bearer for China's efforts to wean itself off foreign technology, in spheres from smartphones to semiconductors. In AI services, however, rivals such as DeepSeek and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. have captured investors' and industry executives' attention. 'We strictly adhere to the requirements of open-source licenses, and clearly mark copyright statements in the relevant source files,' Noah's Ark, Huawei's research lab, said in the post. 'We welcome and look forward to in-depth and professional discussions on technical details with everyone in the open-source community.' A Huawei representative declined to comment beyond the statement issued by Noah's Ark. Founded in 2012 to spearhead research into advanced technologies at Huawei, Noah's Ark now mainly focuses on cutting-edge AI and areas such as data mining. Its offices span Shenzhen to Hong Kong and London. The accusations center around the Pangu Pro MoE (Mixture of Exerts) model. The company published its source code last week, which in turn spurred the creation of a GitHub group called 'HonestAGI' that debated its origins. The post was deleted days later. But on Sunday, another lengthy post appeared on the same platform. Entitled 'Pangu's Sorrow,' the unidentified author revived the allegations and also went into detail about how the team came under immense pressure to deliver, yet fell behind rivals. --With assistance from Newley Purnell, Luz Ding, Jessica Sui and Vlad Savov. For Brazil's Criminals, Coffee Beans Are the Target Sperm Freezing Is a New Hot Market for Startups SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I'm a university lecturer concerned that students are using AI to cheat. It's made my workload skyrocket, and I've had to make drastic changes.
This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with Risa Morimoto, a senior lecturer in economics at SOAS University of London, in England. The following has been edited for length and clarity. Students always cheat. I've been a lecturer for 18 years, and I've dealt with cheating throughout that time, but with AI tools becoming widely available in recent years, I've experienced a significant change. There are definitely positive aspects to AI. It's much easier to get access to information and students can use these tools to improve their writing, spelling, and grammar, so there are fewer badly written essays. However, I believe some of my students have been using AI to generate essay content that pulls information from the internet, instead of using material from my classes to complete their assignments. AI is supposed to help us work efficiently, but my workload has skyrocketed because of it. I have to spend lots of time figuring out whether the work students are handing in was really written by them. I've decided to take dramatic action, changing the way I assess students to encourage them to be more creative and rely less on AI. The world is changing, so universities can't stand still. Cheating has become harder to detect because of AI I've worked at SOAS University of London since 2012. My teaching focus is ecological economics. Initially, my teaching style was exam-based, but I found that students were anxious about one-off exams, and their results wouldn't always correspond to their performance. I eventually pivoted to a focus on essays. Students chose their topic and consolidated theories into an essay. It worked well — until AI came along. Cheating used to be easier to spot. I'd maybe catch one or two students cheating by copying huge chunks of text from internet sources, leading to a plagiarism case. Even two or three years ago, detecting inappropriate AI use was easier due to signs like robotic writing styles. Now, with more sophisticated AI technologies, it's harder to detect, and I believe the scale of cheating has increased. I'll read 100 essays and some of them will be very similar using identical case examples, that I've never taught. These examples are typically referenced on the internet, which makes me think the students are using an AI tool that is incorporating them. Some of the essays will cite 20 pieces of literature, but not a single one will be something from the reading list I set. While students can use examples from internet sources in their work, I'm concerned that some students have just used AI to generate the essay content without reading or engaging with the original source. I started using AI detection tools to assess work, but I'm aware this technology has limitations. AI tools are easy to access for students who feel pressured by the amount of work they have to do. University fees are increasing, and a lot of students work part-time jobs, so it makes sense to me that they want to use these tools to complete work more quickly. There's no obvious way to judge misconduct During the first lecture of my module, I'll tell students they can use AI to check grammar or summarize the literature to better understand it, but they can't use it to generate responses to their assignments. SOAS has guidance for AI use among students, which sets similar principles about not using AI to generate essays. Over the past year, I've sat on an academic misconduct panel at the university, dealing with students who've been flagged for inappropriate AI use across departments. I've seen students refer to these guidelines and say that they only used AI to support their learning and not to write their responses. It can be hard to make decisions because you can't be 100% sure from reading the essay whether it's AI-generated or not. It's also hard to draw a line between cheating and using AI to support learning. Next year, I'm going to dramatically change my assignment format My colleagues and I speak about the negative and positive aspects of AI, and we're aware that we still have a lot to learn about the technology ourselves. The university is encouraging lecturers to change their teaching and assessment practices. At the department level, we often discuss how to improve things. I send my two young children to a school with an alternative, progressive education system, rather than a mainstream British state school. Seeing how my kids are educated has inspired me to try two alternative assessment methods this coming academic year. I had to go through a formal process with the university to get them approved. I'll ask my students to choose a topic and produce a summary of what they learned in the class about it. Second, they'll create a blog, so they can translate what they've understood of the highly technical terms into a more communicable format. My aim is to make sure the assignments are directly tied to what we've learned in class and make assessments more personal and creative. The old assessment model, which involves memorizing facts and regurgitating them in exams, isn't useful anymore. ChatGPT can easily give you a beautiful summary of information like this. Instead, educators need to help students with soft skills, communication, and out-of-the-box thinking. In a statement to BI, a SOAS spokesperson said students are guided to use AI in ways that "uphold academic integrity." They said the university encouraged students to pursue work that is harder for AI to replicate and have "robust mechanisms" in place for investigating AI misuse. "The use of AI is constantly evolving, and we are regularly reviewing and updating our policies to respond to these changes," the spokesperson added.