Musk's X says it won't cooperate with 'politically motivated' French probe
Earlier this month, Paris prosecutors stepped up a preliminary probe into X for suspected algorithmic bias and fraudulent data extraction, enlisting police to investigate alleged wrongdoing by the company or its executives.
"Based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech," the social network posted on its Global Government Affairs account.
"For these reasons, X has not acceded to the French authorities' demands, as we have a legal right to do."
In the blistering attack, X also said the probe had been instigated by Eric Bothorel, a French lawmaker, who had accused "X of manipulating its algorithm for 'foreign interference' purposes, an allegation which is completely false".
The Paris prosecutors' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did Bothorel.
Musk, a former ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, has accused European governments of attacking free speech and has voiced support for some of the region's far-right parties.
The French probe could deepen a rift between Washington and European capitals over what sort of discourse is permitted online, with senior officials from Trump's administration alleging the censoring of right-wing voices around the world.
PREVIOUS RESEARCH
X said Paris prosecutors had requested it hand over "recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform", for analysis by researchers David Chavalarias and Maziyar Panahi, who it said had both exhibited "open hostility towards X", calling into question the impartiality of the investigation.
Panahi denied any involvement in the investigation.
"My name was mentioned by mistake, based on my previous research projects with David Chavalarias, none of which have ever had any hostile intent toward X," he said in an email.
"The fact my name has been mentioned in such an erroneous manner demonstrates how little regard they have for the lives of others ... I will not hesitate to pursue legal action for defamation should I receive any form of hate speech."
Chavalarias did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
X also chafed at the fact that it was being investigated under organised crime charges, which it said would grant the police measures including wiretapping its employees' personal devices.
Pavel Durov, the Russian-born founder of the Telegram messaging app, is also under judicial supervision in France after being arrested last year and placed under formal investigation for alleged organised crime on the app. He denies guilt.
Early in July, Musk responded "true" to a post on X in which Durov said the French "bureaucrats" investigating X were "waging a crusade against free speech and tech progress".
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Sen Johnson: Media ‘either duped or complicit' in Russia election interference ‘narrative'
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) accused the media of being 'either duped or complicit' on the interference of the 2016 election by Russians. 'I want the press to be honest. I want Pulitzer Prizes to be returned. They were either duped or complicit in pushing that false narrative that put America in political turmoil for years,' Johnson told NewsNation's Blake Burman on 'The Hill.' 'It's continuing to go on, all based on a Hillary Clinton dirty trick, the Steele Dossier that those guys knew was a dirty trick, and yet they used that to gin up the Mueller investigation, impeachments, everything else,' he added. 'Listen, this is, again election interference orders of magnitude worse than anything Russia or China ever, ever could hope to achieve,' he added. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard put out a report last week alleging that Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election. Gabbard argued in a statement that former officials took part in a 'treasonous conspiracy' and said her office was turning over evidence to the Justice Department for possible criminal referrals. The report follows President Trump's March memo ordering the declassification of 'all files related to Crossfire Hurricane,' the name given to the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Trump has long denied that Russia influenced his successful White House bid in 2016 against Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton. On Tuesday, Former President Obama denied the Trump administration's assertions that he manipulated evidence linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement to The Hill's sister network NewsNation. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio,' he added.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Thousands gather to protest as Zelenskyy signs bill weakening anti-corruption agencies
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Thousands of people gathered in Kyiv and other cities across Ukraine on Tuesday to urge the president to veto a controversial bill that threatens anti-corruption infrastructure. It marked the first major rally against the government in more than three years of war. Ukraine 's parliament passed legislation that will tighten oversight of two key anti-corruption agencies, which critics say could significantly weaken their independence and give President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's circle greater sway over investigations. Zelenskyy signed the bill into law, according to the parliament's website late Tuesday. Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's bid to join the European Union and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid. The legislation's passage has triggered public outrage in Ukraine, with some saying it appeared to be a greater moral blow than the routine Russian drone and missile attacks. The changes would grant the prosecutor general new authority over investigations and cases handled by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO). 'In effect, if this bill becomes law, the head of SAPO will become a nominal figure, while NABU will lose its independence and turn into a subdivision of the prosecutor general's office,' the agencies said in a joint statement on Telegram. In a post on X, the EU's Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos expressed concern over the vote in the parliament, called the Rada, calling it 'a serious step back.' Kos added: 'Independent bodies like NABU & SAPO are essential for Ukraine's EU path. Rule of Law remains in the very center of EU accession negotiations.' While rallies have taken place during the war in Ukraine, they have largely focused on the return of prisoners of war or missing people. Protests, however, remain a traditional form of public pressure in Ukraine, where two previous revolutions were victorious for the public. 'Corruption is a problem in any country, and it must always be fought,' said Ihor Lachenkov, a blogger and activist who urged people to join the protest through his social media platforms, which reach more than 1.5 million followers. 'Ukraine has far fewer resources than Russia in this war,' he said. 'If we misuse them, or worse, allow them to end up in the pockets of thieves, our chances of victory diminish. All our resources must go toward the fight.' The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticized parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and damages trust with international partners. The group urged Zelenskyy to veto the law, warning that otherwise he would share responsibility with the Rada for 'dismantling Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure.' Many protesters carried signs reading 'Veto the law,' 'Protect the anti-corruption system, protect Ukraine's future,' or simply 'We are against it.' The mood of anger and frustration among the war-weary Ukrainians prevailed in the crowd. Some protesters accused Ukraine's leadership of prioritizing loyalty and personal connections over the fight against corruption. 'Those who swore to protect the laws and the Constitution have instead chosen to shield their inner circle, even at the expense of Ukrainian democracy,' said veteran Oleh Symoroz, sitting in a wheelchair because both his legs were amputated after he was wounded in 2022. 'Instead of setting an example of zero tolerance for corruption, the president is using his power to take control of criminal cases involving his allies,' he said. On Monday, Ukraine's domestic security agency detained two NABU officials on suspicion of links to Russia and searched other agency employees on unrelated allegations. Zelenskyy's office didn't respond to a request for comment. Last week, the president carried out a reshuffle of his wartime Cabinet, a move widely viewed as further consolidating power within his inner circle.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
These are the top 5 questions Tesla investors have ahead of the company's Q2 earnings call
Tesla will provide an update on its second-quarter earnings on Wednesday. Investors want to know more about the company's progress on robotaxis and affordable Tesla models. Here are the top 5 questions they have for Tesla. Tesla investors have a lot to keep track of for the company's second-quarter earnings call on Wednesday. As Wall Street analysts eye near-term headwinds for Elon Musk 's company, investors appear to be curious about Tesla's longer-term bets, such as robotaxis and the humanoid Optimus robots. The top-rated question from an anonymous retail investor on Say, a communications platform for shareholders and companies, asks what the rate of expansion will be for Tesla's autonomous ride-hailing business. At publication, the question received more than 5,500 upvotes, representing about 2.8 million TSLA shares. Here are the top questions Tesla investors want to be addressed as of Tuesday evening. Robotaxi Tesla has been testing a "pilot launch" of its robotaxi service in Austin for about a month. Last week, the company expanded its service area map. California and Phoenix appear to be up next for a potential robotaxi rollout. Musk previously said the service's ramp-up should be quick, estimating about 1,000 robotaxis in Austin within the next few months "Can you give us some insight how robotaxis have been performing so far and what rate you expect to expand in terms of vehicles, geofence, cities, and supervisors?" an anonymous retail investor asked on Say. Affordable models Musk says Tesla is more than just a car maker, but investors still want to know: Where's the affordable Tesla? "Can you provide an update on the development and production timeline for Tesla's more affordable models? How will these models balance cost reduction with profitability, and what impact do you expect on demand in the current economic climate?" another retail investor asked. As Tesla experiences a sales slump, analysts previously told BI that delivering a cheaper model becomes increasingly crucial for the company. Full Self-Driving (Unsupervised) Tesla owners are currently limited to Full Self-Driving (Supervised), an advanced driver-assistance system that requires constant supervision of a driver. Business Insider previously tested the technology against Waymo 's robotaxis. (Tesla lost after it ran a red light.) At the end of June, the company announced its first autonomously delivered Model Y, driving further anticipation for an unsupervised version of FSD. "What are the key technical and regulatory hurdles still remaining for unsupervised FSD to be available for personal use? Timeline?" a retail investor asked. Musk on Sunday said on X that FSD users will see a "step change improvement as we integrate upgrades for the Austin robotaxi build into the general production release." Optimus Optimus, a humanoid robot, is one of Tesla's focuses that Musk says makes his company not just an EV play but an AI and robotics venture. Musk is so bullish on Optimus — and people's desires to have a personal robot — that the CEO said back in February that Optimus will be a ten-trillion-dollar revenue generator. He has also said that personal robots will unlock massive GDP growth and a "universal high-income situation." That's the long-term outlook. Investors want to know how Optimus will contribute to Tesla in the next couple of years. "What specific factory tasks is Optimus currently performing, and what is the expected timeline for scaling production to enable external sales? How does Tesla envision Optimus contributing to revenue in the next 2-3 years?" a retail investor asked. FSD (again) In a clear sign of high anticipation around improved self-driving capabilities, investors upvoted another question around FSD (Unsupervised) in personal cars. "When do you anticipate customer vehicles to receive unsupervised FSD?" another retail investor asked.
