China claims Canada's order for Hikvision closure ‘damages' trade relations
Beijing's remarks came on Monday after Canadian Industry Minister Melanie Joly announced last week on the social media platform X that Hikvision Canada Inc had been ordered to cease all operations due to concerns their continuation would be 'injurious' to the country's security.
Her statement on Friday did not provide details on the alleged threat posed by Hikvision products, but said departments and agencies would be prohibited from using them, and that the government is 'conducting a review of existing properties to ensure that legacy Hikvision products are not used going forward'.
China's Commerce Ministry responded by accusing Ottawa of 'over-generalising national security', stating: 'China is strongly dissatisfied.'
'This not only undermines the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies and affects the confidence of companies from both countries in cooperation, but also disrupts and damages the normal economic and trade cooperation between China and Canada,' the statement read.
'China urges Canada to immediately correct its wrong practices,' it added.
Hangzhou-based Hikvision is one of the world's leading manufacturers of security cameras and other surveillance products, but it has faced scrutiny abroad for its role in Beijing's alleged rights abuses against the Muslim minority Uighur population.
The United States included Hikvision in a 2019 blacklist of Chinese entities it said were implicated in human rights violations and abuses in the implementation of China's campaign of repression, mass arbitrary detention, and high-technology surveillance against Uighurs and other Muslim minority groups in Xinjiang.
The latest disagreement represents an early test for China-Canada relations after Prime Minister Mark Carney surged to electoral victory in April.
China said in response to the election result that Beijing was willing to improve ties with Ottawa, a relationship rocked in recent years by a range of thorny issues.
The arrest of a senior Chinese telecom executive on a US warrant in Vancouver in December 2018 and Beijing's retaliatory detention of two Canadians on espionage charges plunged relations into a deep freeze.
Ties were further strained over allegations of Chinese interference in Canadian elections in 2019 and 2021, charges Beijing has denied.
Joly had said the decision to ban Hikvision had been reached following a 'multi-step review' of information provided by the Canadian security and intelligence community.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
39 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump administration unveils wide ranging AI action plan
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has unveiled its new artificial intelligence action plan, which includes a strategy it says will boost the US standing in AI as it competes with China for dominance in the rapidly growing sector. The White House released the 25-page 'America's AI Action Plan' on Wednesday. It includes 90 different policy proposals that the administration says will increase AI tools for allies around the globe. It will also promote production of new data centres around the US. It will scrap federal regulations that 'hinder AI development', although it is not clear which regulations are in question. In a statement, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the plan will 'ensure America sets the technological gold standard worldwide, and that the world continues to run on American technology'. The president is expected to announce a series of executive orders which will outline key parts of the plan around 5pm in New York (21:00 GMT). 'We believe we're in an AI race … and we want the United States to win that race,' White House AI czar David Sacks told reporters on Wednesday. The White House says the plan will 'counter Chinese influence in international governance bodies' and also will give the US more control over exports of AI technology. However, the administration did not offer any details on how it plans to do that. The plan outlined by the Trump administration will also include a framework to analyse models built by China to assess 'alignment with Chinese Communist Party talking points and censorship'. Free speech in the spotlight The plan says that it will also uphold free speech in models that will allow systems to be 'objective and free from top-down ideological bias' for organisations wanting to do business with the federal government. A senior White House official said the main target was AI models that consider diversity and inclusion, according to The Wall Street Journal, which, experts say, signals the concern is the government's perceived liberal bias as opposed to an overall bias. 'The government should not be acting as a Ministry of AI Truth or insisting that AI models hew to its preferred interpretation of reality,' Samir Jain, vice president of policy at the Center for Democracy & Technology, said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera. 'The plan is highly unbalanced, focusing too much on promoting the technology while largely failing to address the ways in which it could potentially harm people.' Conservatives have long accused AI chatbots of having a liberal bias, comparable to their comments on legacy media for providing critical coverage of the administration. However, it comes as users of GrokAI, former Trump ally and right-wing tycoon Elon Musk's AI platform, have accused it of having a right-wing lean. Musk's X AI is part of a $200m package with the Pentagon that has other AI companies, including OpenAI. Building out data centres A key focus of the new plan will be to build out new data centers for AI technology as the industry rapidly expands. The administration said that will include streamlining permits for new centre development and the energy production facilities used to power these data centres. The plan sidesteps environmental concerns that have been a major criticism of the AI industry. AI 'challenges America to build vastly greater energy generation than we have today', the plan said. AI data centres have been tied to increased power consumption and, in turn, greenhouse gas emissions. According Google's 2024 sustainability report, there was a 48 percent increase in power greenhouse gas emissions since 2019 which, it says, will only become more prevalent. 'This result was primarily due to increases in data center energy consumption and supply chain emissions. As we further integrate AI into our products, reducing emissions may be challenging due to increasing energy demands from the greater intensity of AI compute, and the emissions associated with the expected increases in our technical infrastructure investment,' the report said. The streamlining of permits also comes as the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to reverse its scientific determination that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health. That change would remove the legal framework that climate regulations are based on, the Reuters news agency has reported, citing two unnamed sources. The reversal would remove the 'endangerment finding', making it easier for the EPA to undo legislation limiting greenhouse gas emissions on energy-producing facilities, including those used to power AI data centres. The administration has created environmental review exceptions for data centre construction and will allow expanding access to federal lands for AI development. 'AI will improve the lives of Americans by complementing their work — not replacing it,' the plan says. It, however, comes as employers across the country scrap jobs because of AI. Earlier this month, Recruit Holdings, the parent company of Indeed and Glassdoor, cut 1300 jobs which it directly attributed to AI. In June, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said that AI is doing 30 to 50 percent of the company's workload. In February, the tech giant laid off 1,000 employees. Analysts say the plan looks promising for investors in the AI sector. 'This is a watershed moment in the AI revolution, and Trump recognises this AI arms race between the US and China. A big step forward,' Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush Securities, told Al Jazeera. As of 4pm in New York (20:00 GMT), stocks of AI-focused companies had mixed results. NVIDIA was up 2.1 percent; Palantir up 3.6 percent, Oracle up 1.5 percent and Microsoft was up 0.3 percent. On the other hand, Google's parent company Alphabet was down 0.5 percent.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump White House probes Harvard University's scholar exchange programme
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has launched a new investigation against Harvard University, this time targeted at an exchange programme that allows foreign scholars to visit the elite school. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement on Wednesday saying the probe was necessary to ensure US security — but the investigation is likely to be seen by critics as the latest attempt to bully the school into compliance with President Donald Trump's policies. 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students,' Rubio wrote in the statement. 'The investigation will ensure that State Department programs do not run contrary to our nation's interests.' At stake is Harvard's exchange visitor programme, which allows professors, students and researchers to come to the US on a temporary basis. Participating scholars receive a J-1 visa, which allows them to participate in cultural and academic exchange programmes on the basis that they are coming to the US not as immigrants but as visitors. But Harvard's ability to host such a programme is contingent on the State Department's approval. Rubio suggested that the school's 'continued eligibility as a sponsor' would hang in the balance of Wednesday's investigation. 'To maintain their privilege to sponsor exchange visitors, sponsors must comply with all regulations, including conducting their programs in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States,' Rubio wrote. Questions of national security Under President Trump's second term, the US has repeatedly cited questions of national security and foreign policy in its attempts to expel foreign students, particularly those involved in pro-Palestinian and antiwar movements. Rubio himself has drawn on the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 — a relatively obscure Cold War-era law — in his efforts to deport student protest leaders like Mahmoud Khalil. The law allows the secretary of state to expel foreign nationals 'whose presence or activities' could pose 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States'. The government's use of such laws, however, is currently being challenged in court. Critics argue they violate the constitutional right to free speech and protest. It was President Trump's opposition to the pro-Palestinian protests that led him to engage in a high-profile confrontation with Harvard, the country's oldest university and a member of the much-vaunted Ivy League. Schools like Harvard in Massachusetts and Columbia University in New York were considered the epicentre of the protest movement. At Columbia, for instance, students erected a tent encampment that inspired similar demonstrations across the world. The schools' crackdowns on those protests, however, were also emulated at other campuses. Columbia, for instance, called in police to clear pro-Palestinian demonstrators, and other schools took similar action, leading to more than 3,000 campus arrests across the country last year. Critics of the protests, including President Trump, have called the demonstrations anti-Semitic and warned they create an unsafe learning environment for Jewish students. Protest leaders, however, point out that most of the demonstrations were peaceful and have forcefully rejected anti-Jewish hate. Rather, they argue their protests are about shining a light on the abuses Israel has perpetrated in Gaza — and the crackdowns are aimed at stamping out views that run contrary to the US's close relationship with Israel. Pressure on schools Upon taking office in January, however, Trump pledged to take 'forceful and unprecedented steps' to root out alleged anti-Semitism on campus. In early March, he began his broadside on Ivy League campuses like Columbia and Harvard. He began by stripping Columbia of $400m in federal contracts and grants and then by requesting compliance with a list of demands, including disciplinary reform and external oversight for certain academic departments. By March 22, Columbia had agreed to make concessions. But Trump encountered greater resistance at Harvard University. On April 11, the Trump administration likewise issued a list of demands that would have required Harvard to commit to 'structural and personnel changes' to foster 'viewpoint diversity', eliminate its diversity programmes and agree to external audits. It refused. Instead, Harvard President Alan Garber said such requests would violate Harvard's rights as a private institution committed to academic freedom. Since then, the Trump administration has stripped Harvard of billions of dollars in federal contracts, research funding and grants. A federal court in Boston began hearing a legal challenge against that decision this week. A multipronged attack But the Trump administration has also explored other avenues to pressure Harvard into compliance. Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status — though critics warn it would be illegal to do so — and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem blocked Harvard from accessing the Student and Exchange Visitor Programme (SEVP), a system that schools are required to use to enrol international students. Foreign students make up about a quarter of Harvard's student body. Losing access to the SEVP system effectively meant those students were no longer able to attend the school. Harvard challenged the Trump administration's ban on its foreign students in court and received a preliminary injunction that allows its international students to remain while the case plays out. But other hurdles have since emerged. Earlier this month, for instance, the Trump administration accused Harvard of civil rights violations and called for a review of its accreditation, the industry-wide quality standard that gives university diplomas their value. Meanwhile, news outlets have reported that officials from the Trump administration and Harvard continue to negotiate over whether a deal can be struck to defuse the ongoing tensions.
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's hefty tariff on Brazil expected to push the country towards China
When Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva was in China earlier this year for his third meeting with Xi Jinping since returning to office in 2023, he hailed the relationship between the two countries as 'indestructible'. That proximity will likely increase even more following United States President Donald Trump's announcement of a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian imported goods for overtly political reasons, experts say. 'The reality is that, today, the relation between Brazil and China is much more positive and promising than the one with the United States,' said Tulio Cariello, director of content and research at the Brazil-China Business Council (CEBC). Trump's pledge to inflict a 50-percent tariff on Brazil, due to come into effect on August 1, sent shockwaves throughout Brazil, especially since under the so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs that Trump had announced on April 2, Brazilian imports would be taxed at 10 percent. That was also significantly less than percentages inflicted on other Brazilian competitors in the American market, prompting a sense of opportunity among businesses in South America's most populous country. Hence, the sudden decision of a 50-percent tariff was a rude shock, particularly for sectors that are big exporters to the US, such as aircraft, car parts, coffee and orange juice. The 50-percent tariff came on the heels of the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, where leaders of developing nations raised 'serious concerns' about the increase of tariffs which it said were 'inconsistent with WTO [World Trade Organization] rules.' In a letter justifying the tariff, Trump directly tied the measure to former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro's current predicament, which he called a 'witch hunt'. Bolsonaro, often dubbed the 'Trump of the tropics', is facing trial for allegedly attempting to orchestrate a coup to remain in power despite his 2022 election loss to Lula. Trump also erroneously claimed a trade deficit with Brazil. Brazil has a deficit of about $7.4bn with the US, and a surplus of about $31bn with China. The political nature of the tariffs marked a sharp departure from Trump's usual rationale, drawing widespread condemnation across Brazil's political spectrum, and from China. 'Tariffs should not be a tool of coercion, intimidation, or interference,' a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in the aftermath. By using tariffs for political leverage rather than economic reasons, Trump risks tarnishing the US's reputation as a reliable trade partner, experts say, making China appear more stable and predictable by comparison. 'China, to date, has shown no indication of backtracking on decisions or making sudden changes,' said Mauricio Weiss, an economics professor at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Strengthening Chinese ties The Asian country overtook the US as Brazil's biggest export market in 2009, and the two countries' trade and investment ties have only grown stronger since then. A notable signal of deepening ties came on Monday, when Brazil's Ministry of Finance announced plans to establish a tax advisory office in Beijing. Brazil only has four other such offices globally – three in South America and one in the US. 'The motivation is not politically driven, but rather justified by the growing importance of bilateral trade relations and the need to deepen cooperation on fiscal and customs matters,' Brazil's ministry said in a statement to Al Jazeera. China has sought to fuel its own domestic growth through access to natural resources and raw materials, such as oil, iron ore, copper, lithium and agricultural products. But since 2007, China has also invested more than $73bn in Brazil, according to CEBC. Much of those funds are pouring into strategic sectors such as energy, infrastructure, agribusiness and technology. 'The United States still invests more heavily in Brazil, but China's investments are more targeted and coordinated between governments,' said Weiss. Chinese products are also becoming increasingly common in Brazil. Electric cars made by Chinese manufacturer BYD are now a common sight, with seven out of 10 electric vehicles sold in Brazil coming from the company. Particularly symbolic of China's growing presence to the detriment of the US was BYD's purchase of a massive factory previously owned by Ford in Brazil's northeastern state of Bahia. The two countries have also agreed to explore transportation integration. Those plans include a bi-oceanic rail corridor linking Brazil to the Chinese-built port of Chancay in Peru. Xi's inauguration in November of the mega-port – where total investment is expected to top $3.5bn over the next decade – put China's regional influence on stark display. Other Latin American nations, including Peru, Colombia, and Chile, have also signalled their rapprochement with China, amid fears of Trump's intentions for the region. He has previously pledged to 'take back' the Panama Canal, including by force. But some have pointed out the deepening relation between China and Brazil does not mean the South American country will start exporting the goods it currently sends to the US to China, as the two countries buy very different products from Brazilian companies. 'Brazil isn't going to export manufactured products to China. That doesn't make much sense,' said Livio Ribeiro, a researcher at the Brazilian Institute of Economics at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. Even then, Chinese investments could play a crucial role in enabling Brazil to boost its industrial capacity and diversify its economy, according to Weiss. 'Simply being able to produce more of these products domestically and for other South American partners will already be a significant growth opportunity,' Weiss said. Speaking during a state visit in China in May, Lula said Brazil and China will be 'indispensable partners' because 'China needs Brazil and Brazil needs China.' 'Together, we can make the Global South respected in the world like never before,' Lula added.
