&w=3840&q=100)
Shrinking profit margins hit popular 'Make in India' trade in electronics
Bloomberg
Listen to This Article
A sector that underpinned the once-popular 'Make in India' trade is faltering as shrinking margins and slowing growth shake investor confidence.
Following triple-digit share gains in recent years, electronics manufacturers — who make everything from Samsung Electronics Co. phones to air conditioning units — are facing a sharp reversal as investor enthusiasm cools. Among them, shares of Dixon Technologies India Ltd. and Kaynes Technology India Ltd. have tumbled more than 15 per cent this year, underperforming the broader market rally.
The unwind marks a turning point of a trade once central to the bullish case about India's manufacturing ascent. As companies boost spending, some investors are questioning whether market demand is keeping pace with the flood of investments. Rich valuations, increased competition and an expiry of government stimulus programmes are adding to the unease.
'There is plenty of topline growth available for the leaders in this space – but when we incorporate high valuations and sensible margin scenarios into the growth outlooks, we believe capital can be more effectively deployed elsewhere,' said Vikas Pershad, a fund manager at M&G Investments.
The underperformance follows years of stellar gains, when shares of these companies surged thanks to hopes India could emerge as a manufacturing powerhouse to rival China. But that market frenzy also pushed valuations higher, with most stocks in the segment trading at above 50 times its one-year forward earnings, more than twice that of NSE Nifty 50 Index. Dixon's Taiwan peers Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. and Wistron Corp. trade at about 11 to 12 times forward earnings.
Wall Street firms are turning less bullish on the outlook. Jefferies analysts said this week that the risk-reward for Dixon appears stretched and reiterated its underperform rating, while Morgan Stanley downgraded the stock to a sell equivalent. Meanwhile, the ratio of sell rating to total recommendations for Kaynes is at the highest since its listing in 2022, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Sentiment has shifted partly due to the looming expiry of the government's production-linked incentive scheme, a key part of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's manufacturing push. While the government has stayed mum on any extensions, media reports say Modi will let it lapse due to disappointing results.
Dixon will likely be impacted when the incentives for mobile phone manufacturers expire in the fiscal year ending March 2026.
Some firms are expanding upstream by acquiring suppliers, raising investor concerns about long-term cost increases. Kaynes is investing 34 billion rupees ($397 million) for a semiconductor assembly facility, while Amber has committed up to 24 billion rupees over five years for its electronics division.
Beyond electronics manufacturing, other segments of the market once central to manufacturing renaissance hopes have also slid this year. Those include shares of some renewable firms like solar panel and battery makers, as well as some auto component makers. In the latest blow, Foxconn Technology Group has asked hundreds of Chinese staff at iPhone plants in southern India to fly home. While India is still expected to significantly increase its manufacturing base, uncertain market growth has prompted many stock investors to step back for now.
'Much of the growth so far was driven by government incentives, and long-term success will depend on quality of the capex and whether firms can develop a lasting edge over its competitors,' said Vipraw Srivastava, an analyst at PhillipCapital India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
America is slipping behind India's clean power boom
Bloomberg Live Events Bloomberg Bloomberg (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Once upon a time, the US was the sole clean energy superpower . Until 2011, it led the world in connecting wind and solar generators to the grid. Then China took over, to a point where its lead now looks unassailable: The People's Republic added eight times more renewables than the US last year. This year, India is likely to overtake country connected 22 gigawatts of wind and solar in the first half — a dramatic recovery from a troubling slowdown in 2022 and 2023, and enough at full output to power nearly one-tenth of the grid. Assuming this is maintained through December, that should put India ahead of the 40 GW that the US government expects this also setting the world's most populous nation on course to hit a target of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's that once seemed implausible: to reach 500 GW of non-fossil generation by 2030. Such a shift will herald the dawn of a new clean energy superpower, and give the world some of its best hopes of averting disastrous climate a remarkable turnaround for a country whose renewable industry looked like a lost cause barely more than a year ago. What happened?One factor is financing. Easing inflation has allowed the Reserve Bank of India to cut its policy rate by a percentage point since December to the lowest in three years. This reduces the price of renewables, which are particularly exposed to debt costs. Regulatory deadlines have also played a role: A waiver on transmission charges for wind and solar expired at the end of last month, causing developers to rush to complete their builds in time to get the financial end of that waiver may cause a wobble for the sector over the next year or so, but the changes will be introduced slowly. Over the balance of the decade there's now good reason to think the recent pace can be sustained. The rash of projects breaking ground this past year means about 414 GW of clean power is already either operating or under construction, including nuclear and hydroelectric plants. That's not far off the 500 GW target, and we've still got more than five years to are counting on it. Solar panel manufacturing has been ramping up to the point where it now runs far in excess of domestic demand, at 91 GW. With lower tariffs into the US than their rivals in China and Southeast Asia, this excess of supply might make local panel makers rare beneficiaries of President Donald Trump's war on clean energy. That certainly seems to be the assumption of a group of US competitors, who last week sought anti-dumping measures to keep Indian products out of their many years, India had a skeptical take on the energy transition, arguing since the 1970s that poverty was a more pressing problem than protecting the environment. The difference now is that zero-carbon power is decisively cheaper than the competition. Rising incomes, meanwhile, mean the government needs to also think about the needs of roughly half a billion middle-class citizens, who worry more about where to find a good job in a clean, livable city than the basics of subsistence is still building coal-fired power plants to make sure those newly-minted urbanites don't suffer power cuts in the middle of punishing heatwaves, but they're not necessarily being used. Thanks to milder weather than in recent years and the rising volumes of renewables pushing it off the grid, fossil-fired power generation fell 4% in the first half relative to 2024. That's the first time it has dropped since the Covid-19 pandemic hit in 2020, and occurred even as electricity generation rose 0.8%. Retirements of old plants mean that fossil-generation capacity has actually declined slightly so far this still possible that emissions from India's power sector won't peak until well into the 2030s. Even so, the faster rollout of renewables, combined with declining pollution from China and the rich world, means the global picture is improving faster than you'd realize if you were focused only on the steampunk posturing in power isn't just cleaner — it's cheaper, and more suited to the aspirations of the billions in the Global South who want a better, healthier nations like the US can afford the indulgence of a campaign against modern energy, at least until their citizens realize how badly they're being shortchanged. It's a fatal myopia, though. For all Trump likes to boast of energy dominance, America is falling behind on the most important energy technologies of the 21st century.
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Centre to launch job incentive scheme on August 1, targets 3.5 crore jobs
The Government of India is set to roll out a new employment-linked incentive scheme, named the PM Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana (PMVBRY), from August 1, 2025. The Labour Ministry confirmed the launch of the scheme in an official statement on Friday. This move aims to boost employment opportunities in the country by directly supporting new job creation across multiple scheme was earlier approved by the Union Cabinet chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. With an ambitious goal of creating over 3.5 crore jobs in two years, the PM Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana has a financial outlay of Rs 99,446 crore. Out of the total, around 1.92 crore beneficiaries will be entering the workforce for the first time. The benefits of this scheme will apply to jobs generated between August 1, 2025, and July 31, scheme reflects the government's commitment to inclusive and sustainable employment generation under the broader Viksit Bharat initiative. By encouraging employers to hire more staff and offering benefits to first-time workers, the scheme plays a crucial role in India's strategy to drive economic growth through employment-led scheme has two components. Part A is designed for first-time employees, while Part B is for employers. Under Part A, employees who are new to the workforce and registered with the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) will receive one month's EPF wage, up to Rs 15,000, in two separate instalments. To qualify, their monthly salary must not exceed Rs 1 lakh. The first instalment will be paid after six months of continuous service, and the second after completing one year of service along with a financial literacy programme. A portion of this incentive will be saved in a deposit account to encourage savings, which the employee can withdraw A will apply to jobs created across all sectors, with special emphasis on Part B of the scheme, employers will be incentivised for each additional employee they hire with a monthly salary of up to Rs 1 lakh. The government will provide up to Rs 3,000 per month per employee for two years. For the manufacturing sector, this support will extend to the third and fourth years as be eligible, EPFO-registered establishments must hire at least two additional employees (if they currently have fewer than 50 employees) or five additional employees (if they have 50 or more) and retain them for a minimum of six under Part A will be made directly to the employees via the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) mode using the Aadhar Bridge Payment System (ABPS). Meanwhile, employers will receive incentives in their PAN-linked new employment-linked scheme is a significant step towards generating long-term employment and supporting economic growth in the country.- Ends advertisement
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
35 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Why angel investors in India may soon be rarer than Bengal tigers
Sebi wants individuals to get accredited like US investors, but with only 650 approvals so far, India's angel investors are rarer than Bengal tigers, threatening early-stage funding Bloomberg Angel investing in India has just crossed a modest milestone of $1 billion in commitments, and already the nascent asset class is facing extinction. Blame it on an overdose of regulatory attention. Until recently, affluent individuals who placed small bets on long shots were targeted with a bizarre 'angel tax,' which viewed startups' fundraising as taxable income. Now that the government has finally scrapped the draconian levy, the Securities and Exchange Board of India has sown fresh seeds of disquiet for people who want to try early-stage allocations via collective investment plans: It wants them to get accredited. Commitments into angel funds have swelled by 44 per cent over the past year, and investments have surged by a third. These are reasonable growth rates, but the Sebi seems to believe that it can give a further boost to the 'ease of doing business.' The regulator means well. It wants to unshackle angel investors from India's Companies Act, which limits participation in private placement of securities to 200 subscribers. Any more will require public offerings. But this rule is unfair to regulated funds, where professional managers are required to have skin in the game. Plus, the risks are explained in a memorandum, and explicit investor consent is needed for each bet. There's clearly a need to distinguish between private placements and angel investing. But how does the regulator sidestep a law made by parliament? It has come up with a plan. From next year, individuals who invest in angel funds will be treated as Qualified Institutional Buyers. Since the law exempts QIBs from the 200-person rule, managers will no longer have to limit participation. This 'would allow angel funds to show opportunities to a wider pool of eligible investors, while staying in conformity with the Companies Act,' the Sebi said last month. There's a catch, however. Since individuals aren't really institutions, the Sebi wants them to become accredited investors like in the US to qualify for the exemption. They will have a year to adjust to the new regime. Trouble is that while 13 per cent of Americans meet the thresholds for buying private securities, so far only 650 Indians have successfully applied for accreditation, according to ET Wealth. That makes them rarer than the Bengal tiger, an endangered species. Do only 0.00005 per cent of Indians earn more than ₹2 crore ($230,000) annually, or have a net worth in excess of $860,000? Not really. Counting just the top tax payers, at least 60,000 people should easily meet those minimum standards. But to get accredited, people have to provide proof to third parties. In a country where authorities send tax bills to roadside vegetable vendors by tracing QR-code-based payments, it's in nobody's interest to furnish documentation showing how rich they are. Not when the memory of the disastrous 'angel tax' is still fresh. Even if the goal is to drive accreditation, why single out startup investors who are doing something worthwhile with their money and time? That already sets them apart from the nine out of 10 Indian retail traders betting on equity options and being taken to the cleaners by big whales like Jane Street. The public-market casino is where the regulator needs to police participation. Private markets don't need the same level of scrutiny beyond ensuring that the capital entering fledgling firms is not tainted. At present, angel investors only self-certify a minimum net worth to their fund manager. The thresholds are low, as is the compliance burden. It is a lax process. Not everyone who is being invited to dabble in unlisted securities has the risk appetite for it. But as long as they are giving informed consent, they can be safely left alone. It's the insurance and banking regulators that have to put a stop to much more widespread deceptive selling in their industries. Why's the Sebi rushing to fix what isn't broken? The $1.2 billion that angels have committed so far may not produce superstar enterprises. That's fine, as long as a growing pot of money helps nurture some gritty entrepreneurs. As I wrote last week, millennial and Gen Z billionaires among India's traditional family-owned firms are bored with business. They don't fancy their chances against either large tycoons, or smart startup founders. But the latter need financing. The Sebi's other ideas are laudable. Relaxing the floor and cap on investments, doing away with concentration limits on exposure, and allowing funds to keep backing startups as they mature will improve returns. But forcing investors to get accredited by third parties? That's sure to backfire, unless the Sebi itself obtains their permission to query the tax returns database. A simple yes or no answer to the eligibility question, based on information they have already shared with tax authorities, could help increase the number of 650 accredited investors manifold. The rich in India are far from endangered, but they don't want to flaunt their stripes any more than they have to.
