Malegaon blasts case timeline: Here's how things unfolded from 2008 as ex-BJP MP Pragya Thakur and six others acquitted
'All bail bonds stand cancelled and sureties are discharged,' the court said in its order.
The court also directed the Maharashtra government to pay compensation of ₹ 2 lakh each to the families of those killed in the blast and ₹ 50,000 each to those who were injured.
The blast took place on September 29 2008, when an explosive device attached to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in Bhikku Chowk, Malegaon. Six people lost their lives, and 95 others were injured in the explosion. Initially, 11 people were named as accused in the case, but charges were ultimately framed against only seven of them.
September 29, 2008: A bomb planted on a motorcycle goes off at Malegaon in Maharashtra's Nashik district. Six persons killed and 101 injured.
September 30, 2008: An FIR is lodged at Azad Nagar Police station in Malegaon.
October 21, 2008: Maharashtra's Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) takes over the probe into the case.
October 23, 2008: ATS makes first arrests in the case. Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and three others arrested. ATS claims the blast was carried out by right wing extremists.
November 2008: Lt Col Prasad Purohit arrested by ATS for his alleged involvement in the conspiracy of the blast.
January 20, 2009: ATS files charge-sheet against 11 arrested accused, including Pragya Thakur and Purohit before special court. Accused are charged under the stringent provisions of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Two persons - Ramji alias Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange are shown as wanted accused.
July 2009: Special court says provisions of MCOCA are not applicable in the case and the accused shall be tried by a court in Nashik.
August 2009: Maharashtra government moves Bombay High Court in appeal against special court order.
July 2010: Bombay High Court overturns special court order and upholds the charges under MCOCA.
August 2010: Purohit and Pragya Singh Thakur move Supreme Court against HC order.
February 1, 2011: ATS Mumbai arrests another person - Pravin Mutalik. A total of 12 persons arrested by then.
April 13, 2011: National Investigation Agency (NIA) takes over the case.
February and December 2012: NIA arrests two more persons - Lokesh Sharma and Dhan Singh Chaudhary. Total arrests 14 by then.
April 2015: Supreme Court sends back case to special court for reconsideration of applicability of MCOCA.
February 2016: NIA tells special court that it has taken the Attorney General's opinion on whether provisions of MCOCA can be applied in the case.
May 13, 2016: NIA files charge-sheet before special court. Drops MCOCA charges from the case. Gives clean chit to seven accused.
April 25, 2017: Bombay High court grants bail to Pragya Thakur. HC refuses bail to Purohit.
September 21, 2017: Purohit gets bail from the Supreme Court. By the end of the year, all arrested accused out on bail.
December 27, 2017: Special NIA court discharges accused Shivnarayan Kalsangra, Shyam Sahu and Praveen Mutalik Naik from the case.
Court also drops charges related to being members of a terrorist organisation and raising funds for terrorist acts under the UAPA.
October 30, 2018: Charges framed against seven accused - Thakur, Purohit, Ramesh Upadhyay, Sameer Kulkarni, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi and Sudhakar Chaturvedi. They face trial under UAPA for committing a terrorist act, and under IPC for criminal conspiracy and murder.
December 3, 2018: Trial begins with the examination of first witness in the case.
September 14, 2023: After examining 323 prosecution witnesses (of which 37 turned hostile), prosecution decides to close its evidence.
July 23 ,2024: Examination of defence witnesses (eight) completed.
August 12, 2024: Special court records final statements of accused under section 313 of Criminal Procedure Code. Matter posted for final arguments of prosecution and defence.
April 19, 2025: Special court closes trial for judgment.
July 31, 2025: Special NIA Judge A K Lahoti acquits all seven accused, including Thakur and Purohit, noting there was no "cogent and reliable" evidence to warrant conviction. Court says the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Yashasvi Jaiswal press conference: Message from Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli help, support from Gambhir
'Arrest Mohan Bhagwat': Ex-ATS Officer Drops Bombshell On Fake Saffron Terror Plot | Malegaon Blast In a staggering twist, a retired ATS officer has shaken the political landscape by claiming he was instructed to arrest RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat during the 2008 Malegaon blast probe. Speaking after the acquittal of all accused, including BJP MP Pragya Thakur, ex-Inspector Mehiboob Mujawar alleged that the saffron terror narrative was a fabrication, driven by political pressure. He described the directives as "horrific" and claims he refused to follow them, leading to his career's destruction via a false case. His allegations bring the focus sharply back to the credibility of terror investigations under UPA, and raise serious questions about the weaponisation of law enforcement. Opposition parties are now demanding answers, warning that faith in national security agencies is at risk. With claims of planted evidence, suppressed truths, and institutional vendetta, this case has reignited the saffron vs secular firestorm in Indian politics, and it's far from over.#malegaonblastcase, #mohanbhagwat, #mehiboobmujawar, #rsschiefcontroversy, #saffronterordebate, #pragyasinghthakur, #ltcolpurohit, #niacourtverdict, #faketerrorcharges, #atsinvestigation, #maharashtraats, #politicalvendetta, #antirssnarrative, #bjpvscongress, #indianjudiciary, #falseterrorcases, #nationalinvestigationagency, #indianpolitics, #judicialacquittal, #malegaoncaseacquittal, #hindutvanarrative, #2008malegaonblast #breakingnews #trending #bharat #toi #toibharat #indianews 2.8K views | 1 day ago
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC sets aside HC order granting anticipatory bail on condition to resume conjugal life
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Jharkhand High Court which granted anticipatory bail to a man on a condition that he would resume conjugal life with his wife and maintain her with dignity and honour. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih noted that the man was an accused in a case registered under various sections of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. "While considering the application for pre-arrest bail of the appellant, the court ought to have assessed whether the discretionary relief sought by the appellant for pre-arrest bail deserved to be granted within the settled parameters… but a condition such as the one impugned before us ought not to have been imposed in view of several decisions of this court," the bench said in its July 29 order. It said the high court should have considered the prayer for pre-arrest bail entirely on its own merit instead of imposing a condition, which is not traceable to section 438(2) of the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure. The apex court passed the order on a plea challenging a February 2025 order of the high court which had granted the prayer for pre-arrest bail on condition that the man resumes conjugal life with his wife and maintains her with dignity and honour as his lawful wife. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cardiologists: Teaspoon On an Empty Stomach Slims Waist from 36 To 22 Health Wellness Journal Learn more Undo During the hearing before the top court, the counsel appearing for the woman said the man, together with her, had jointly submitted before the high court that he was willing to resume his conjugal life. The lawyer contended that the man cannot now turn around and take a different stand. The bench said the counsel was partly right in the sense that the man had indeed agreed to resume conjugal life. "However, the respondent no.2 (woman) insisted for imposition of a further condition to which we do not find the appellant (man) to have agreed. The spouses seemingly, at one point of time, had drifted apart and resided separately for some time. Imposing a condition that the appellant would maintain the respondent no.2 with dignity and honour is beset with risk in that it can generate further litigation," the bench said. It said an application for cancellation of bail on the ground that such condition has not been complied with, if filed later, is bound to meet opposition from the man and could place the high court in further difficulty. "The impugned judgment and order, accordingly, stands set aside. The appeal is allowed," the bench said. It restored the anticipatory bail application on the file of the high court and asked it to decide it afresh on its own merits, as early as possible. The bench said till such time the matter is decided finally by the high court, the interim protection granted to the man by the top court earlier would continue. In its interim direction passed earlier, the top court had said the man be not arrested in connection with the case subject to his joining investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating officer. PTI Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Woman, Boyfriend Arrested For Killing Husband, Dumping Body In Drain In Delhi: Cops
New Delhi: Delhi Police has arrested a woman and her boyfriend for allegedly plotting and executing the murder of her husband and dumping his body in a drain in Haryana's Sonipat, an official said on Saturday. The arrested accused have been identified as Soniya (34), a resident of Alipur in Delhi, and her 28-year-old boyfriend Rohit, who hails from Sonipat, the official said, adding that another accused in the case, Vijay, is on the run. The murder was committed over the affair, as well as the victim's abusive and criminal behaviour, he added. Deputy Commissioner of Police (Crime) Harsh Indora said, "The victim, Pritam Prakash (42), was a known history-sheeter in Alipur. He had more than 10 cases registered against him, including those under the Arms Act, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, and under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. He had also been declared a proclaimed offender by the court." On July 5, 2024, Pritam came to pick up Soniya from her sister's house in Sonipat's Gannaur but left after an argument. That day, Soniya offered Rs 50,000 to her sister's brother-in-law Vijay and asked him to kill her husband. Later, when Pritam returned and pleaded with her, Soniya let him stay in the house. However, that night while she slept on the terrace, Vijay killed Pritam and dumped his body in a drain near Agwanpur. Vijay sent her a video of the body on social media, which was later deleted. On July 20, Soniya lodged a missing complaint with Alipur Police, claiming that her husband had gone out and never returned. While the case was initially treated as a routine missing person report, it raised suspicion when there were no financial or digital footprints of the victim for several weeks. During the investigation, the team traced the mobile number linked to Pritam, which had become active again after nearly a year. Surveillance revealed that the phone was being used in Sonipat, leading the team to Rohit. On being questioned, Rohit initially misled the investigators but later broke down and confessed to the crime, police said. Rohit told police that he was in a relationship with Soniya and that the two had conspired to kill Pritam, DCP Indora said. He admitted that Soniya allegedly paid Vijay to eliminate her husband. Around the same time, Haryana Police recovered an unidentified male body from the area, but were unable to identify it. The case remained unsolved until Delhi Police connected the dots nearly a year later. Police said Soniya later sold Pritam's auto rickshaw for Rs 4.5 lakh and gave his mobile phone to Rohit. DNA samples preserved during the Haryana post-mortem will now be used to conclusively identify the body. Soniya was about 15 years old when she fell in love with Pritam and got married against their families wishes. "The marriage was never reported to the police by the families, who later accepted the couple. They have three children from the wedlock, including a 16-year-old boy and two daughters," the DCP said. He said Rohit was previously involved in four criminal cases related to murder and arms possession. Rohit, who got married in April 2025 and used to work as a private cab driver, continued his extramarital affair with Soniya. Police are searching for Vijay, who is currently on the run, the DCP Indora said.
