logo
Bupa fined $35m for ‘misleading or deceptive conduct' impacting 4k Aussies

Bupa fined $35m for ‘misleading or deceptive conduct' impacting 4k Aussies

News.com.au7 days ago
Private health insurer Bupa has been fined $35m after conceding it engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct to talk more than 4000 Australians out of claiming hospital treatments.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement on Monday that Bupa admitted to the breaches after telling customers they were not entitled to private health insurance benefits for their claims, even though they were entitled to make a claim.
This left some customers thousands of dollars out of pocket for medical treatments they had to pay for when Bupa should have paid at least part of the bill.
The ACCC said some policyholders also upgraded to more expensive policies to ensure they were covered.
ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said Bupa's conduct affected thousands of members over more than five years and caused harm to consumers, some of whom delayed, cancelled or went without treatment for which they were, at least partially, covered under their health insurance policies.
'Consumers purchase private health insurance to provide peace of mind, certainty of coverage and the ability to choose where and when to undertake their procedures,' Ms Cass-Gottlieb said.
'Bupa's conduct denied certain members benefits to which they were entitled to under their private health insurance policies.'
Bupa APAC chief executive Nick Stone said he was deeply sorry for failing to get things right because customers were saddened by the impacts this has had on them or their families.
'Our priority has been to communicate and compensate our affected health insurance
customers and providers, along with putting in place measures to help ensure this does not
happen again,' Mr Stone said.
Bupa has admitted over a five-year period between May 2018 and August 2023 that it misrepresented members over two separate insurance types – 'mixed cover claims' and 'uncategorised items'.
A mixed cover claim includes both treatment that is covered in part by a customer's policy and another part covered by the customer itself.
According to Bupa, the private health insurer pays out more than $20m in claims a year as well as six million in-hospital and medical claims, with the mixed coverage claims representing less than 0.02 per cent of assessed customers over the five-year period.
Similarly, Bupa says about 0.004 per cent of claims fall under uncategorised items, which include treatments that were not assigned to a standard clinical category in Bupa's claims assessment systems.
The ACCC says Bupa's conduct occurred because Bupa staff did not have consistent and clear instructions and training for assessing mixed coverage claims, and its systems were programmed to incorrectly reject mixed coverage and uncategorised item claims.
'Private health insurance is complex, and consumers should be able to trust their health insurer to assess and pay health insurance claims accurately,' Ms Cass-Gottlieb said.
'Bupa's conduct is very serious and falls well short of what is expected of one of the largest health insurers in Australia. Bupa should have invested in the necessary systems, processes and training to prevent this from happening, and address it promptly when it occurred.'
The ACCC and Bupa will jointly ask the court to order Bupa to pay a penalty of $35m among other orders. It is a matter for the court to determine whether the penalty and other orders are appropriate.
Bupa started compensating affected members, medical providers and hospitals before the start of this legal action and has paid $14.3m for more than 4100 affected claims.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than medicine: A different view of health
More than medicine: A different view of health

SBS Australia

time3 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

More than medicine: A different view of health

For Yolŋu people, true wellbeing is inseparable from land, kinship, and spiritual balance. Unlike Western medicine, which often focuses on physical symptoms, Yolŋu healing traditions view health holistically-through connection to country, ancestors, and community. For Yolngu, health is more than being alive. It's making sure that we look after spirituality, look after the connection that we have, with our community, with our family. Marcus Lacey This episode explores Yolŋu perspectives on health and healing, where nature, community, and spirituality play just as vital a role as physical care. Marcus Lacey discusses the role of country in maintaining wellbeing, the importance of understanding and respecting the land as a source of healing, and the challenges of balancing traditional healing with modern healthcare. But as life in Galiwin'ku continues to change, how can Yolŋu health traditions continue to thrive? And what can we all learn from a different way of thinking about health? Credits: Two Worlds, One Health is created by Dr Sarah Hanieh Field Host: Dr Sarah Hanieh Studio Host: Kerri-Lee Barry Production assistance: Lindy Marlow Audio assistance: Tom Hayman Artwork: Ruth Gulamanda Dhurrkay and Rickisha Banba Gurruwiwi Theme music: Luki Manymak Ngatha, Uncle Jimmy Thumbs Up LTD 2010 and singer/writer Shellie Morris Photo credit: Lindy Marlow Mixed by Max Gosford Thanks to Joel Supple for her guidance. This podcast was recorded on the lands of the Yolŋu people in Galiwin'ku. I pay my respect to their Elders, past and present, and acknowledge their ongoing connection to the land, water, and culture. Links :

The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says are a threat to the US relationship
The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says are a threat to the US relationship

Sydney Morning Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says are a threat to the US relationship

But with Albanese now unable to secure a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump, even as the AUKUS defence pact is being reviewed by the Pentagon and Australia is lobbying for exemptions to US tariffs, Sussan Ley argued it was the wrong time to inch away from the US. 'At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-United States relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it,' she said in a statement. 'Many Australians will wonder whether this speech at this time was in our national interest, given so many things crucial to Australia's future are currently being considered by the US administration.' The AUKUS defence pact is a trilateral agreement with the United States and United Kingdom that will allow Australia to acquire nuclear submarine capabilities. James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney, said that since John Howard it was unusual for Australian prime ministers to speak positively about a more independent foreign policy not tied solely to US interests. Loading 'It's not entirely inconsistent with where Albanese has been headed,' Laurenceson said, pointing to remarks from Trade Minister Don Farrell about growing trade with China following Trump's tariffs. Laurenceson said Albanese would be confident that the Australian public was comfortable with his coming meeting with Xi occurring before a face-to-face with Trump, pointing to polling showing Trump's unpopularity in Australia. Coalition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said on Sky News on Sunday that 'it is embarrassing' Albanese had not yet met Trump. Sydney University international affairs historian James Curran said there was a contradiction in putting a spotlight on sovereignty at a time when Australia was tying itself more firmly into US military framework through the AUKUS submarine pact. He said Albanese's speech was significant because it came at a time when the US was pressuring allies to boost defence spending and contain a rising power in China. 'While it's not a new strategic doctrine, it is saying that there are times when Australia has to determine its own destiny,' Curran said. 'After the best part of two decades, in which the culture of the alliance has been awash in the sentimental claptrap of '100 years of mateship', it's not necessarily a bad thing for the loose cannons in the Trump administration – who are perhaps getting used to allies capitulating – to hear an Australian PM saying that, from time to time, Australia needs to express itself differently.' During the election campaign, Albanese and his ministers used Trump's haphazard approach to discredit the Peter Dutton-led Coalition, whose policy agenda and style had similarities with the US president's.

The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says are a threat to the US relationship
The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says are a threat to the US relationship

The Age

time5 hours ago

  • The Age

The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says are a threat to the US relationship

But with Albanese now unable to secure a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump, even as the AUKUS defence pact is being reviewed by the Pentagon and Australia is lobbying for exemptions to US tariffs, Sussan Ley argued it was the wrong time to inch away from the US. 'At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-United States relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it,' she said in a statement. 'Many Australians will wonder whether this speech at this time was in our national interest, given so many things crucial to Australia's future are currently being considered by the US administration.' The AUKUS defence pact is a trilateral agreement with the United States and United Kingdom that will allow Australia to acquire nuclear submarine capabilities. James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney, said that since John Howard it was unusual for Australian prime ministers to speak positively about a more independent foreign policy not tied solely to US interests. Loading 'It's not entirely inconsistent with where Albanese has been headed,' Laurenceson said, pointing to remarks from Trade Minister Don Farrell about growing trade with China following Trump's tariffs. Laurenceson said Albanese would be confident that the Australian public was comfortable with his coming meeting with Xi occurring before a face-to-face with Trump, pointing to polling showing Trump's unpopularity in Australia. Coalition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said on Sky News on Sunday that 'it is embarrassing' Albanese had not yet met Trump. Sydney University international affairs historian James Curran said there was a contradiction in putting a spotlight on sovereignty at a time when Australia was tying itself more firmly into US military framework through the AUKUS submarine pact. He said Albanese's speech was significant because it came at a time when the US was pressuring allies to boost defence spending and contain a rising power in China. 'While it's not a new strategic doctrine, it is saying that there are times when Australia has to determine its own destiny,' Curran said. 'After the best part of two decades, in which the culture of the alliance has been awash in the sentimental claptrap of '100 years of mateship', it's not necessarily a bad thing for the loose cannons in the Trump administration – who are perhaps getting used to allies capitulating – to hear an Australian PM saying that, from time to time, Australia needs to express itself differently.' During the election campaign, Albanese and his ministers used Trump's haphazard approach to discredit the Peter Dutton-led Coalition, whose policy agenda and style had similarities with the US president's.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store