Albo's $1.2bn pledge amid tariff threat
This comes as Australian steel and aluminium imports have been hit with a 25 per cent levy, with other imports slapped with a 10 per cent tariff.
Anthony Albanese will on Thursday announce plans to create a Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve to secure quantities of the select minerals that will be made available for domestic projects and select international partners. Anthony Albanese will make the pledge on Thursday. Mark Stewart / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
If re-elected, $1.2bn will be used to secure the initial resource stockpile, and purchases will be made according to strategic and market-conditions.
These include elements like titanium, lithium, nickel and cobalt, which are essential for the production of mobile phones, computer chips, electric vehicles, solar panels and defence technologies.
Altogether Australia has listed 31 critical minerals, and holds at least 4 per cent of the world's rare earth reserves.
The Reserve is expected to be in operation from the second half of 2026, and a taskforce will be created to consult on the design and function of the reserve.
Although the Prime Minister did not directly refer to the Trump administration in the announcement, he said the $1.2bn investment into Australia's critical mineral industry would help safeguard 'critical national assets' in 'time of global uncertainty'.
'The Strategic Reserve will mean Government has the power to purchase, own and sell critical minerals found here in Australia,' he said.
'It will mean we can deal with trade and market disruptions from a position of strength. Because Australia will be able to call on an internationally-significant quantity of resources in global demand.
'This will be a national asset and our Government will use it to advance Australia's national interest.'
Resources Minister Catherine King said the boost to the industry would also drive industry and jobs in Western Australia, where Mr Albanese will spend Thursday campaigning.
'Critical minerals and rare earths and essential not only to reducing emissions but also for our security and the security of our key partners,' she said.
'While we will continue to supply the world with critical minerals, it's also important that Australia has access to the critical minerals and rare earths we need for a Future Made in Australia.
'The Strategic Reserve, combined with Production Tax Credits and the expansion of the Critical Minerals Facility, shows the Albanese Government is taking the development of an Australian critical minerals industry seriously.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
16 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
TV host drops major ‘truth bomb' about Donald Trump's re-election
Sky News host James Morrow has dropped a 'truth bomb' about ways that the world has 'gotten better' since Donald Trump was elected US President. 'Thanks to the return of Trump 2.0 and the end of wokeness, we are seeing the entire culture swing back to normality,' he said. 'Gone are the bonkers woke corporate campaigns and back in is natural beauty.'
The Australian
32 minutes ago
- The Australian
AFCA complaints handling hurry leaves thousands exposed
Thousands of decisions by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority could be called into question because it has resorted to checking its own homework to process a backlog of claims. AFCA insiders are concerned that the organisation is drifting from its promise to apply a high standard of scrutiny to complaints. Instead, it has resorted to allegedly misrepresenting that a fresh set of eyes had ruled on matters when they had not, sources told The Australian. Where an AFCA ombudsman would rule on complaints at the final stage, these were routinely overseen by more junior case managers. The involvement of the ombudsman was allegedly limited to signing off on their recommendations. This is despite AFCA's assurance that decisions would be subject to review where either party to a complaint disagreed with the preliminary ruling. AFCA, assembled in the wake of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation, and Financial Services Industry, is designed to keep disputes from clogging up the court system and free-up regulators to pursue more egregious misconduct. In its first six months, AFCA received 34,263 complaints. Between July 1, 2023 and June 30, 2024, the latest period for which data is available, it was handed 98,622 matters. Of these, 41,583 were related to bank behaviour. AFCA insiders told The Australian it has resorted to 'quick and dirty' decision making in a bid to shift its backlog of claims, warning it put the outcomes of thousands of matters at risk. It's process boils down to a two-tiered arrangement. Matters are initially allocated to a case manager, who attempts to resolve the complaint by mutual agreement. If this fails, the complaint progresses to a second stage where a case manager assesses the merits of the case. The matter proceeds to an ombudsman if a party refuses to accept the case manager's finding. But poor resourcing meant ombudsman matters were often being sent back to the initial staffers, leaving the ombudsman to sign-off on their thinking. This may be as little as a 'quick glance'. 'There were often times where instructions were given to not send out decisions by ombudsman because it looked like it was too quick,' a former AFCA staffer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, recalled. AFCA was pinged for weak processes in the 2022 NSW Supreme Court Notesco case, which saw a third party broker sue the body alleging it had acted without impartiality when awarding a decision to Jean Pasquier, a retired 83-year old living in France who lost €306,900 ($545,724) after making thousands of trades on Nextrade. AFCA staffer May Chng had sought the view of her manager, who in turn consulted ombudsman Nicolas Crowhurst, before issuing a decision in Mr Pasquier's favour. When Notesco contested the decision, it was sent to Mr Crowhurst to rule on, again in Mr Pasquier's favour. Following this, AFCA engaged former Federal Court judge Julie Dodds-Streeton and barrister Ahmed Terzic to review 30 decisions. AFCA deputy chief ombudsman Dr June Smith said the dispute's body had reviewed the Notesco decision. 'Steps were then taken to ensure that a final decision maker is not involved in the early investigation stage of a complaint they will determine,' she said. Dr Smith said AFCA had commissioned regular independent audits and its next review is slated for 2026 or 2027. 'These reviews have all found that AFCA is engaging in procedural and substantive fairness, and is meeting its obligations of independence and impartiality,' she said. 'These consistent results should give consumers and industry full confidence that AFCA interprets and applies its fairness jurisdiction appropriately and in accordance with its remit.' Resolving cases at AFCA has proven costly as it hires more staff in a bid to catch up to a spiralling case load. Parties before AFCA are slugged for each case, starting at $105.81 for a matter to be registered and up to $10,234 for a final decision. As revealed in The Australian, AFCA has been warning many complainants it would take up to six months to assign them case managers. AFCA chief executive and lead ombudsman David Locke told The Australian in February he was 'mortified' over the delays. AFCA has also been hampered by financial institutions poaching from its ranks, with ANZ recruiting its former banking lead Evelyn Hall as 'customer fairness advisor' in March 2022. David Ross is a Sydney-based journalist at The Australian. He previously worked at the European Parliament and as a freelance journalist, writing for many publications including Myanmar Business Today where he was an Australian correspondent. He has a Masters in Journalism from The University of Melbourne. Markets With the ASX trading near record highs despite subdued earnings forecasts, this reporting season will show whether investors are paying too much for a recovery that may not materialise. DataRoom Executives from Canada's largest mining company have been spotted at Bellevue Gold's flagship Western Australian project, fuelling takeover bid speculation.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Why huge WFH plan could be here to stay
Millions of Victorians could be given the legal right to work from home two days a week under a bold new plan from the state's Labor government. But the Victorian Chamber of Commerce has raised 'major concerns' on whether the plan could create 'inequality' in the workforce due to the small percentage of people being granted such a right. The state government is promising to introduce the law — covering both public and private sectors — by next year, with it applying to anyone who can 'reasonably' carry out their work away from the office. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan announced her government would attempt to enshrine the right for workers to work from home twice a week under new laws. NewsWire / Nadir Kinani Credit: News Corp Australia Premier Jacinta Allan told the annual state Labor conference: 'Working from home works for families and it's good for the economy.' 'Day after day, unions are being contacted by workers who have been denied reasonable requests to work from home, and across the country, Liberals are drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office and back to the past. 'Enshrining work from home in law means this life-changing practice isn't something you or your loved ones have to politely ask for. It's a right you'll be entitled to.' However, the Victorian Chamber of Commerce has raised concerns about how the move would damage productivity and teamwork, removing the ability for employers to negotiate appropriate agreements with staff. The body's chief executive Paul Guerra said it was 'perplexing' why the policy was a priority, given the Federal Government's focus on boosting productivity through the Economic Reform Roundtable. 'If Victoria moves away from the legislated national system, businesses will move interstate and jobs will be lost. 'If we want businesses to be productive – and to raise the economic prospects of everyone in this state and this country – we need to get out of their way and let them operate in a way that best suits their model.' Concerns have also been raised by the Chamber about whether the work from home proposal is unconstitutional – if enterprise bargaining agreements (EBAs) are already in place, as they operate under the federal jurisdiction. Ms Allan will add that a consultation will take place on the proposed Australia-first law, but added it won't determine if the plans should go ahead. 'We're already clear on that: it should be. We just need the appropriate laws to reflect it,' she said. Ms Allan said the new policy is aimed directly at supporting families, promising average savings of $110 per week, or $5308 annually in commuting costs. 'Work from home supports women with children, carers and people with a disability to work,' Ms Allan said. 'Thanks to work from home, workforce participation is 4.4 per cent higher than before the pandemic.' The legislation is expected to be introduced later this year. The move follows significant debate about work from home policies during the federal election, with Peter Dutton forced to backtrack on a proposed policy to limit remote work for public servants due to public backlash.
