logo
Ohio lawmakers introduce competing proposal for online age verification

Ohio lawmakers introduce competing proposal for online age verification

Yahoo09-06-2025
Rep. Heidi Workman, R-Rootstown, (left) alongside Rep. Phil Plummer, R-Dayton, introducing their legislation. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.)
Ohio lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are concerned about protecting minors on the internet, but how exactly to handle age verification has been a bit of challenge. Now, legislators are offering competing visions for determining an internet users' age.
One of those visions, backed by social media companies like Facebook parent company Meta, would put the onus squarely on app stores. Another, introduced last week, shares responsibility between the app stores and app developers.
A complicated system added to the 2023 state budget was summarily rejected by federal courts earlier this year.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The newest proposal, House Bill 302, is sponsored by state Reps. Heidi Workman, R-Rootstown, and Phil Plummer, R-Dayton. They describe the proposal as a way to split duties between the companies building apps and the ones providing access to those apps.
An app store would act as a kind of dashboard, providing a central location for parental controls, and delivering an 'age signal' to developers so they can determine what user experience is appropriate.
'These duties reflect what app stores are uniquely positioned to do,' Workman said, 'provide infrastructure, support consistency and enable parental oversight in a scalable, privacy-conscious way.'
But the work doesn't end there.
'App developers who understand the intricacies of their own platforms are responsible for implementing practical protections tailored to the risks present in their apps,' she said.
Plummer said their approach ensures developers get no more information than is necessary. The bill also contains safeguards against developers sharing that age information or leveraging children's data for targeted ads.
Plummer said H.B. 302 is 'structured to provide meaningful protections where they're needed, without overreaching into areas where they are not.'
He also said the measure is flexible enough to respond as technology grows and changes.
Part of that flexibility, however, comes from seemingly vague standards and requirements in the bill's language. Apps are only 'covered' if they offer different experiences for adults and minors. Initial determinations about a user's age come down to an estimate, the nature of which is unclear.
Ohio judge permanently blocks social media age verification law
Companies 'may use' tools that are 'commercially reasonable' to estimate a user's age category 'with a reasonable level of certainty proportionate to the risks that arise from access to and use of the relevant service or portion thereof,' according to the bill's language.
Users who are estimated to be a minor can verify their age. The bill doesn't describe how they do so.
It's a notable departure from Ohio's first stab at age verification, known as the Social Media Parental Notification Act. That measure tried to pre-determine every sort of website where adult content might be available, while drafting exceptions for news or commerce sites.
When he put that law on hold, U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley called it a 'breathtakingly blunt instrument.' Marbley permanently enjoined the measure last April.
Running parallel to Workman and Plummer's proposal is a competing measure sponsored by state Rep. Melanie Miller, R-Ashland, and state Sen. Michele Reynolds, R-Canal Winchester.
Miller and Reynolds want to put the responsibility for age verification and parental consent on the app store. Meta strongly supports the legislation.
Ohio Republicans propose new social media age verification plan
Jennifer Hanley, who heads up North American safety policy for the company told Ohio lawmakers understanding a user's age is 'fundamental' to providing age-appropriate content, but insisted that responsibility shouldn't fall on her company.
'We think the easiest, most consistent, and most privacy-protective solution is to require app stores to verify age and get a parent's approval any time a teen wants to download an app,' Hanley said.
The method compares to a person buying a six-pack of Budweiser at a store – they show their ID to the cashier, not to the beer company. If app stores are a one-stop-shop for all the games, messaging and social media services a person will download, the app store, not the app company, would determine the age.
But companies who operate app stores, most notably Apple and Google, are uncomfortable with carrying that much responsibility.
As Plummer put it, 'app stores can provide consistent tools (and) centralized access points, but they should not be forced to manage risk they cannot fully access.'
Speaking after the hearing introducing the bill, Workman acknowledged they've been working with app store companies to develop their legislation.
She said they wanted to 'bring all stakeholders to the table.'
Workman said those companies believe the proposal offers a workable solution, but no other state has actually implemented the provisions.
Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SentryPODS Enhances Correctional Facility PSaaS Capabilities via Centralized Video Monitoring Services
SentryPODS Enhances Correctional Facility PSaaS Capabilities via Centralized Video Monitoring Services

Associated Press

time21 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

SentryPODS Enhances Correctional Facility PSaaS Capabilities via Centralized Video Monitoring Services

Improve Inmate and Staff Safety with Innovative Security Offerings from SentryPODS ASHLAND, OHIO / ACCESS Newswire / July 3, 2025 / Ohio-based SentryPODS, a trusted name in the security sector, recently deployed the Fortress, a cloud-based video monitoring system that allows SentryPODS users to connect to their surveillance system remotely, from any location or Surveillance For Correctional Facilities SentryPODS' units feed video to prison guards the moment they are powered on. This industry-disrupting technology can be used across a variety of industries, but is especially adaptable for service within correctional facilities. With almost 2 million inmates incarcerated in state, federal, and local prisons across the nation, correctional facilities are turning to technology to help enhance the safety and security of both staff and inmates. 'The SentryPODS system protects both staff and inmates from situations that can compromise their safety, whether that threat is at the perimeter or inner walls of a correctional facility,' says Brent Canfield, founder and CEO of SentryPODS. 'With the addition of the Fortress, security personnel can view live feeds from any camera, no matter where they are located, and proactively address safety risks before they escalate.' Centralized surveillance solutions like the Fortress provide many operational advantages for correctional staff, with a focus on the following key areas: The SentryPODS Fortress combines the accuracy of a high-performing, threat detection surveillance system with the capability of analytics and AI to provide instant, live surveillance video that users can monitor 24/7, from any location or device, to improve security planning as well as day-to-day operations. It is also scalable, integrating seamlessly with all current SentryPODS cameras and accessories. The SentryPODS Fortress delivers: Security risks faced by correctional staff can make it difficult to ensure safety within correctional facilities. But with new technologies, including video monitoring systems like the SentryPODS Fortress, corrections staff can maintain order and ensure a safe environment for staff, inmates, and the public. For more information about video monitoring systems and other security systems, contact SentryPODS today. Contact InformationBrent Canfield Founder & Owner +1419-614-6620 SOURCE: SentryPODS press release

U.S. applications for jobless aid fell to 233,000 last week as layoffs remain low
U.S. applications for jobless aid fell to 233,000 last week as layoffs remain low

Washington Post

time38 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

U.S. applications for jobless aid fell to 233,000 last week as layoffs remain low

Fewer Americans applied for unemployment benefits last week as layoffs in the U.S. remain low despite uncertainty about how tariffs will impact the economy. The Labor Department reported Thursday that jobless claims for the week ending June 28 fell by 4,000 to 233,000, less than the 241,000 that analysts forecast. The four-week average of claims, which evens out some of the weekly volatility, fell by 3,750 to 241,500.

‘We Live in a Surveillance State': Reddit Users Explode Over Reports of ICE's New Face and Fingerprint Scanning App
‘We Live in a Surveillance State': Reddit Users Explode Over Reports of ICE's New Face and Fingerprint Scanning App

Gizmodo

time38 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

‘We Live in a Surveillance State': Reddit Users Explode Over Reports of ICE's New Face and Fingerprint Scanning App

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is reportedly using a new tool called Mobile Fortify, a smartphone-based facial recognition and fingerprint scanning app that allows agents to identify people in real time using only a phone camera. The tool taps into the same biometric system used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at ports of entry. But ICE is now using it inside the U.S., in field operations across the country. According to internal ICE emails reviewed by 404 Media, the app is being deployed by Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), the branch of ICE tasked with arresting and deporting undocumented immigrants. The app, reportedly called 'Mobile Fortify,' gives federal agents the power to use their phones to identify people in the field via facial recognition, a development that many online see as a horrifying leap forward for the surveillance state. The 404 Media report has ignited outrage on Reddit, where users are voicing deep concern about how far this technology could go and what it says about the direction of American governance. 'Surveillance state in full effect,' one user posted bluntly. 'The next step is to label anyone who opposes them a terrorist or criminal, strip you of any rights and probably use unconstitutional surveillance to find any dirt on you,' warned another. Others drew a straight line between mass surveillance and the erosion of civil liberties. 'We live in a surveillance state and anyone who believes otherwise reads too much Fox News,' said one user. 'Everyone mask up like it's COVID! We have already witnessed an attempted arrest and then release,' another user added. Some users offered practical resistance strategies—or at least suggestions for anonymity. 'I wonder if facial ID blocking glasses, like Reflectacles, would work on this. Apparently they block iPhone facial recognition,' said one commenter. 'Definitely wear a mask (preferably ones that hide your whole head, i.e. UV Blocking Balaclava), wear sunglasses and bring an umbrella. Also bring a flashlight, headlamp, flashlight with strobing capabilities,' wrote another. A few users expressed bitter disillusionment with the political divide over surveillance. 'Mass surveillance was something right-wingers always said they would fight against. Now that it's happening they aren't doing shit,' one user said. 'They are doing shit… they are doing the mass surveillance,' another replied, 'which is entirely made of shit.' 'They always figured that when authoritarianism came to the U.S., it would be left-wing. But since it's right-wing, they are fine with it,' added another. The most chilling posts reflected the loss of faith in institutional leadership altogether. 'Creepy. I remember noticing this at the airport a few years ago and how it felt Orwellian. I was right.' 'Wondering how long into the police state our remaining leaders will allow the country to slip before everything burns down,' wrote one user. 'We have been wholly betrayed by everyone who vowed to serve the public besides educators and emergency service workers. I have learned nothing this year that leads me to believe anyone of means gives enough fucks to stop any of this.' The growing backlash taps into long-standing fears that technologies built for border enforcement or national security are now being turned inward, aimed not just at suspects but potentially at anyone. Civil liberties groups have warned for years that biometric surveillance tools, especially those powered by AI and facial recognition, lack proper oversight and accountability and risk targeting marginalized communities. Gizmodo has reached out to ICE for comment on whether Mobile Fortify is currently in use and how the agency justifies deploying such tools in domestic operations. So far, no comment. For now, Reddit is sounding the alarm.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store