Harrowing moment man snatches woman off street at random
The harrowing clip shows Cameron Boxall, 22, attempting to drag his victim off the street in the seaside suburb of Hove, near Brighton in the UK, and into a stolen car before driving off.
The 20-year-old Brit screamed out 'No, no, no' repeatedly before kicking her attacker as he pulled her into the back seat of a Mini Cooper, which sped off while her legs were still hanging out of the door.
She continued to try to fight off Boxall, punching him until he eventually kicked her out of the car. She was then helped by a passer-by who found her in a state of shock.
'Did not deserve what happened'
Boxall has now been jailed for five years following a hearing at Hove Crown Court on Friday after he admitted to kidnapping the woman, stealing a car, and possessing cannabis, according to the BBC.
He was also issued an indefinite restraining order against his victim.
In a statement, Boxall's victim expressed that she felt she had 'lost her freedom,' adding: 'I struggle to understand the level of violence he used against me and I feel lucky to be alive'.
'I had bruises and scratches on my back, arms, and legs from where he threw me out of the car, and a massive lump on my head,' she added.
'What happened has changed the way I view the world. I've not done anything wrong and did not deserve what happened to me.'
The attempted kidnapping
The court heard that Boxall, then 21, was driving a stolen car in Hove during the early hours of August 5, 2024, and switched his number plates with those of a nearby car.
He then got out of the car after selecting his victim and asked the woman, who was a local, for directions.
'He had already identified her as his intended victim. The Mini was positioned to block her route. He called out to her,' prosecutor Gareth Burrows said.
'He said: 'Excuse me, I'm a bit lost, I'm looking for Brunswick Place, can you help me?'
'His intention was to draw her close. He got out of the car, saying 'Get in the f***ing car'.'
After a struggle, she was pulled into the back seat, and he drove off while repeatedly trying to close the door, striking her legs several times.
'He pushed her out of the moving vehicle and she was found on the ground in a state of shock,' the prosecutor explained.
Boxall claimed in court that he intended to rob the young woman to settle a drug debt.
Her handbag was discovered untouched on the footpath where the incident occurred.
'Dangerous predator'
Detective Jack Sagar, from the Surrey and Sussex Major Crime Team, called Boxall a 'dangerous, violent offender'.
'(He is a) dangerous predator who preyed on a young woman innocently walking home, putting her through a horrific, distressing ordeal where she feared for her life,' he said.
'We commend her for the immense strength and bravery she has shown throughout the incident and during our subsequent investigation.'
In 2023-24, police in England recorded 7,277 kidnapping offences.
For comparison, Australia saw 501 recorded kidnapping victims in 2023.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Salim Mehajer's phone claim in fight against domestic violence charges after jail release
Salim Mehajer has used a bizarre claim about needing to go to an Apple Store to make a failed bid to secure more time in his fight against domestic violence charges. The former Auburn mayor was found guilty of fraud and domestic violence matters after punching his ex-partner in the head during an argument in his car, squeezing her hand and crushing her phone that she was holding, suffocating her by putting his hand over her nose and mouth until she passed out, and threatening to kill her mother. A jury found him guilty of six charges, including assault, intimidation and suffocating, and he was later found guilty of creating false documents by forging the signatures of his solicitor, Zali Burrows, and his sister during a separate trial. Mehajer was sentenced to a maximum of seven years and nine months in jail for the domestic violence and fraud offences, and was released from prison last Friday upon the expiry of his non-parole period for the offences. He's since lodged an appeal to fight the domestic violence charges. Mehajer beamed into the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal via video link on Thursday morning where he attempted to push back his hearing in August by three weeks, arguing he needed to go to an Apple Store to recover photos from his phone. He claimed the woman had his ID, and he needed time to get new identification to allow him to go to an Apple Store and recover photos from his iCloud to use as evidence to support his affidavit. He alleged the complainant had edited photos tendered during the trial which depicted bruising from an assault. Sporting a navy blue suit, white shirt and slicked-back hair, he claimed his phone had been 'remotely deleted', and he hoped attending an Apple Store would help him with supporting evidence. He sought a delay of up to three weeks, however the Crown opposed, arguing the hearing date had already been changed to accommodate Mehajer's release from custody and that the issue had already been raised at trial. 'It's not a fresh issue,' the Crown prosecutor told the court. 'The Crown's position is very firmly this: it is too late to be raising it at this stage, this is entirely speculative … the appeal can proceed.' If a delay was granted, the hearing would likely need to be moved to November due to the availability of the crown, to which Mehajer told registrar Peter Clayton he wasn't seeking such a lengthy delay. Mr Clayton said if Mehajer hadn't dropped his bid for a later hearing date he would have rejected it, noting three weeks to obtain new ID was 'optimistic, in any event'. He confirmed the hearing will remain on August 4, with Mehajer telling the court he intends to appear in person. Mehajer was last week spotted visiting Paramatta Westfield, Service NSW for a new drivers' license, and a cosmetic dentist in Hornsby following his release from John Morony Correction Centre at Berkshire Park last week, according to the Daily Mail. He'd been in prison for just short of five years, as he'd also been serving back-to-back sentences for multiple offences. As per a long list of parole conditions, Mehajer will need to participate in any domestic violence programs where directed, receive ongoing treatment from a private psychologist, and also undergo drug and alcohol testing. Mehajer's lawyer Zawat Zreika last week said the former Auburn Mayor's focus is on his family. 'Mr Mehajer has now been released from custody,' she said. 'This is a long awaited and deeply personal moment for him and his family. 'He asks that their privacy be respected during this time.'
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Qatar Airways: Australian women granted right to sue airline for invasive searches at Hamad Airport
Five Australian women who were subjected to invasive internal examinations at Doha's Hamad International Airport after being forcibly removed from a Qatar Airways flight have secured the right to pursue legal action against the airline following an important Federal Court appeal victory. The women experienced the ordeal in October 2020, when airport police ordered dozens of female passengers off the aircraft for internal checks after a newborn baby was found abandoned in a bin at the airport. Shocked and distressed by the experience and the lack of an apology from Qatar Airways, the women are taking legal action against the airline, the airport operator MATAR, and Qatar's Civil Aviation Authority. In April 2024, Justice John Halley ruled the women's claim could not proceed under the Montreal Convention, reasoning that the invasive examinations did not occur during embarking or disembarking the plane. The women, represented by Marque Lawyers, appealed, arguing the searches took place as part of the disembarking process and that airline staff were aware. On Thursday, the Federal Court overturned the initial dismissal, with Justice Angus Stewart stating, 'There is no sufficiently high degree of certainty that what happened to the (women) in the ambulance could not ultimately be found to have been in 'the course of any operations of embarking or disembarking'... That issue can only be decided at trial and not on a summary basis.' The court also ruled that the women could pursue claims against MATAR for the conduct of those who performed the examinations. Justice Stewart noted, 'It cannot be concluded with sufficient confidence at this stage that the appellants (women) have or will have no basis to plead that the 'nurse' was an employee or a true agent of MATAR. It is also an error to conclude that MATAR's duty of care cannot possibly extend to the circumstances in and around the ambulance.' The appeal against Qatar's Civil Aviation Authority, however, was dismissed. The court ordered Qatar Airways and MATAR to pay the appeal costs, and the case will now return to the Federal Court for trial. 'The Full Court has set aside the orders of the primary judge summarily dismissing the claims against Qatar Airways and giving strike out relief in favour of MATAR. It has also granted liberty to the (women) to apply to file amended pleadings and ordered Qatar Airways and MATAR to pay the costs of the appeal. As regards QCAA, the Full Court has dismissed the appeal with costs,' Justice Stewart concluded. Marque Lawyers partner Damian Sturzaker said, 'Our clients endured a traumatic experience on that night in Doha and they deserve to have their day in court and compensation for their suffering.' 'They have shown enormous courage in standing up for what they believe is right and we will continue to support them as the case continues to the Federal Court,' he added. In 2023, Transport Minister Catherine King blocked Qatar Airways' application for increased flights into Australia, partly citing this case. The airline denies any wrongdoing, maintaining it cannot be held responsible for actions taken by airport police. If you or someone you know needs help, contact 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732). Lifeline: 13 11 14.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Major win for women over invasive searches in Qatar airport
Five Australian women who were subjected to invasive internal examinations at Doha's Hamad International Airport after being forcibly removed from a Qatar Airways flight have secured the right to pursue legal action against the airline following an important Federal Court appeal victory. The women experienced the ordeal in October 2020, when airport police ordered dozens of female passengers off the aircraft for internal checks after a newborn baby was found abandoned in a bin at the airport. Shocked and distressed by the experience and the lack of an apology from Qatar Airways, the women are taking legal action against the airline, the airport operator MATAR, and Qatar's Civil Aviation Authority. In April 2024, Justice John Halley ruled the women's claim could not proceed under the Montreal Convention, reasoning that the invasive examinations did not occur during embarking or disembarking the plane. The women, represented by Marque Lawyers, appealed, arguing the searches took place as part of the disembarking process and that airline staff were aware. On Thursday, the Federal Court overturned the initial dismissal, with Justice Angus Stewart stating, 'There is no sufficiently high degree of certainty that what happened to the (women) in the ambulance could not ultimately be found to have been in 'the course of any operations of embarking or disembarking'... That issue can only be decided at trial and not on a summary basis.' Doha's Hamad International Airport. Credit: Stephen Scourfield / The West Australian The court also ruled that the women could pursue claims against MATAR for the conduct of those who performed the examinations. Justice Stewart noted, 'It cannot be concluded with sufficient confidence at this stage that the appellants (women) have or will have no basis to plead that the 'nurse' was an employee or a true agent of MATAR. It is also an error to conclude that MATAR's duty of care cannot possibly extend to the circumstances in and around the ambulance.' The central hall at Hamad International Airport, Doha. Credit: Stephen Scourfield / The West Australian The appeal against Qatar's Civil Aviation Authority, however, was dismissed. The court ordered Qatar Airways and MATAR to pay the appeal costs, and the case will now return to the Federal Court for trial. 'The Full Court has set aside the orders of the primary judge summarily dismissing the claims against Qatar Airways and giving strike out relief in favour of MATAR. It has also granted liberty to the (women) to apply to file amended pleadings and ordered Qatar Airways and MATAR to pay the costs of the appeal. As regards QCAA, the Full Court has dismissed the appeal with costs,' Justice Stewart concluded. Marque Lawyers partner Damian Sturzaker said, 'Our clients endured a traumatic experience on that night in Doha and they deserve to have their day in court and compensation for their suffering.' 'They have shown enormous courage in standing up for what they believe is right and we will continue to support them as the case continues to the Federal Court,' he added. In 2023, Transport Minister Catherine King blocked Qatar Airways' application for increased flights into Australia, partly citing this case. The airline denies any wrongdoing, maintaining it cannot be held responsible for actions taken by airport police. If you or someone you know needs help, contact 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732). Lifeline: 13 11 14.
