Sinn Féin to hold conference to review gender identity policy
is to hold a special conference to review its policy on gender identity issues as the party continues to grapple with the matter.
Earlier this year, the party's health spokesman
David Cullinane
apologised after he published a social media post welcoming as 'common sense' a UK supreme court ruling that the term 'woman' means a biological female.
The party was later banned from the Dublin trans and intersex
Pride
march, which takes place next week, with organisers saying it had not clarified its stance on transgender rights.
The party previously held talks with activist groups in the space, but Saturday's event will not be attended by outside groups and is for members only, the spokesman said, confirming that trans members of Sinn Féin will be attending.
READ MORE
There is expected to be in the region of 150 members attending the meeting, which is being convened on the back of a motion seeking a conference on the issue of gender identity issues, which will allow the party to inform future policy decisions.
Sinn Féin's Ard Comhairle – its governing body – will receive a report on the conference and ultimately to the party's annual Árd Fheis. The conference will be led by the party's chair, Declan Kearney, with leader Mary Lou McDonald also expected to attend and address the group.
Mr Cullinane is also expected to attend.
The party has faced criticism from transgender activists for its support of a ban on puberty blockers for children in Northern Ireland
In its 2024 health manifesto, Sinn Féin outlined its position that it believes transgender people have a right to gender recognition and the best support and care possible, and that healthcare should be driven by clinical professionals rather than politicians. It said that care should be made available based on clinical evidence, including access to gender affirming treatment for adults.
It promised to implement a 'new and holistic' model of care for gender identity services.
The HSE is developing a new model of care currently, which is expected to closely influence Sinn Féin's policy in the future. That is expected to be completed next year.
Ms McDonald has previously said that every individual has 'the right to respect' on gender identity issues. The Dublin Central TD has also previously discussed how the issues is personal to her as she has a trans sibling.
Speaking on RTÉ's The Late Late Show, in April Ms McDonald said the issue is also personal for her. 'I have a trans sibling, and I love my sister. She's loved beyond measure, and I want her to live a full life, and I want that for any individual.' She said that the discussion on equality and LGBTQ+ issues must start from a 'position of respect'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Expect plenty of cribbin' and moanin' as the budget games begin
The budget games are under way, right enough. Impending decisions about spending priorities for next year and into the future are now the unavoidable context of every political exchange – especially those within Government , some of which you'll see, most of which you won't. They are the subtext of every interview, news story and speech between now and October. As ever, the management of expectations at the centre is essential at this stage. At the recent National Economic Dialogue Paschal Donohoe solemnly warned of deep uncertainty about the future and that (inconveniently) positive headline economic figures so far this year mask 'considerable vulnerabilities'. 'The mood music is changing,' Donohoe warned. His party leader saw 'dark clouds on the horizon'. For the Taoiseach , 'challenging,' was the mot juste. In the Dáil this week, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers returned to the theme. READ MORE 'We face significant economic uncertainty,' he said. 'Everyone in this House needs to realise the level and degree of ... corporate risks that exists right now.' As the Bert used to say during the late stage hubris of the Celtic Tiger, sure this is all cribbin' and moanin' and talkin' down the country. Still, you can see what they're at. The country and its political system have become accustomed to massive giveaway budgets, and cannot contemplate restraint. Well, let me qualify that thought: everyone can contemplate restraint, just not for themselves. Everyone has a demand for extra spending, sourced from the public purse. Some have a good case; all believe they deserve priority. Much of our media – especially RTÉ – is in the habit of promoting the causes of all comers relentlessly and uncritically. Of course, RTÉ might feel a special affinity with bodies looking for money from the Government. But still. Some context would not go amiss – how much would this cost? What is the existing budget? Where might the money come from? What should not be done in order to pay for this? What taxes should be increased? The list of supplicants for greater public funding is literally unending. A casual glance at a political correspondent's inbox gives a flavour of the requests bombarding the budget ministers: extra provision for education for people with disabilities; extra funding for school capitation; VAT cuts for the embattled hospitality industry; a €25 per week increase in welfare rates; this week's cause celebre – retaining the €1,000 discount on fees for third level students; and so on, and so on. [ The Irish Times view on college fees: Government has a choice to make Opens in new window ] Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan played a more subtle hand. Speaking at the Free Legal Advice Centre in Dublin, he said it was clear that Ireland has 'a big problem' with domestic violence. He would like to provide more resources for Flac and for civil legal aid – but 'I'm limited in terms of budget'. He is getting to the heart of the entire question of budgeting: it's all a question of priorities. Few people would quibble with increasing the budget for legal aid to ensure that people can have access to justice and to the protection of the law, when that question is taken in isolation. But governments cannot take any of these questions in isolation – they must weigh it all up as part of a coherent and credible whole of Government budgetary plan. Within the justice budget, for example, how does that measure up as a priority against recruiting more gardaí? Or fixing the problem of prison overcrowding? Or supporting the victims of crime? Or rehabilitating young people who have fallen into criminality? And how should the justice allocation be compared to the other budgets within Government? Should justice be constrained so that we can spend more money on health? On disabilities? On child poverty? Not so simple now, is it? And, yes, you might want to do all these things. But you can't. Anyone who pretends you can isn't being straight. You have to choose. Now let's not feel too bad for Messers Donohoe and Chambers. It may be hard being in charge of budgets during a time of plenty, but it's better than being Rachel Reeves . As the tears rolled down Reeves' cheeks in the House of Commons on Wednesday, both sterling and the UK's standing in the bond markets were headed in the same direction. Whatever the problems of prosperity that Jack and Paschal have to manage, they are far, far preferable to the other kind of problem, now facing Reeves and her prime minister. Better to have surpluses than deficits. So you might think that an overriding national priority would be to maintain steady and stable public finances. To do that, the budget ministers and the leaders of the Government parties have decided, they must eliminate the once-off giveaways of the last three budgets. 'We can't and we won't' continue with them, Donohoe told Ivan Yates on Newstalk on Thursday. But how firm is that determination? My sense is that Donohoe's is rock solid. He is not, however, in charge of the Government. Both Simon Harris and Micheál Martin, while ruling out another goody basket of one-off giveaways, have insisted that they will also seek to help people with rising costs in the budget. Does this signal a middle ground will be found? This week's controversy over student fees shows just how hard it is to withdraw benefits to which voters have become accustomed. Does the Government have the political will and the capacity to restrain itself and take politically difficult but necessary decisions to position the country for future growth and to protect it against future adversity – or will we cross our fingers, plough on and hope for the best? We'll see. But I know one thing: the politics of no hard choices never, ever ends well.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Oliver Plunkett's story would make a great film – it's a shame modern, secular Ireland has forgotten him
Interest in Oliver Plunkett has fluctuated over the four centuries since he was found guilty of treason in a blatant miscarriage of justice in 1681, after which he was hanged, drawn and quartered at Tyburn . Interest may have peaked in the 1970s. In 1975, there was nearly a diplomatic incident because then taoiseach Liam Cosgrave and president Cearbhall Ó Dálaigh were vying to represent Ireland at the canonisation in Rome . Cosgrave won and even proclaimed the first reading at the canonisation Mass. Archbishop Karol Wojtyła of Kraków also attended, invited by Cardinal William Conway. Four years later, now Pope John Paul II, he prayed before the relics of St Oliver Plunkett at Drogheda before his famous plea for peace. Citing Oliver Plunkett as an exemplar of forgiveness, he begged 'in the language of passionate pleading ... on my knees ... turn away from the paths of violence and ... return to the ways of peace'. More than 50 years before, in 1920, when Terence McSwiney was Lord Mayor of Cork, Sinn Féin councillors successfully proposed that George's Street be renamed Oliver Plunkett Street in honour of his beatification. READ MORE This year marks the 400th anniversary of Oliver Plunkett's birth and the 50th since his canonisation. But in contrast, the national coverage has been scant and the response muted, aside from in places directly associated with the saint, such as Loughcrew in Co Meath, where he was born, Armagh, where he was primate, and Drogheda, the home of the national shrine in St Peter's Church. An extensive programme , concluding in November, has been held in these areas involving Masses and ecumenical services, walks, tours, exhibitions, concerts and competitions, thanks to a hard-working committee. It is not the first time that Oliver Plunkett has fallen from national attention. For example, in the 200 years after his death, only a loyal few kept his memory alive. Tommy Burns, writing in the Commemorative Book compiled by the St Oliver 400 Committee, includes in that small number the Siena Dominican Sisters in Drogheda. They preserved the executed archbishop's head for nearly 200 years, which sometimes involved great personal risk. While the relic may appear grisly to modern sensibilities, it is venerated not for ghoulish reasons but as evidence of his ultimate sacrifice for his faith. [ From the archive: Highlighting cruelty of St Oliver Plunkett's execution reaffirms our commitment to faith Opens in new window ] Oliver Plunkett's story would make a great film. He was connected to many of the Hiberno-Norman landed families. When he chose to be a priest, he also chose exile in Rome, as no seminary could operate in Ireland. He became a well-regarded professor of theology at the College for the Propagation of the Faith. When appointed as Archbishop of Armagh in 1670, the memory of Cromwell's slaughter of thousands in Drogheda and Wexford followed by deliberately induced famine that reduced the population by up to 25 per cent was still fresh. Plunkett managed to navigate a political situation where Catholics officially had no civil rights. It sometimes necessitated disguise as an English officer or hiding in caves. He worked tirelessly to be on good terms with Protestant bishops and included Protestant students in a newly established Jesuit school in Drogheda. The Irish Catholic Church was in chaos – religious orders fighting over property, alcohol-abusing priests leading scandalous lives, and the Rapparees – or partisans – launching raids. The Rapparees were viewed either as guerrilla defenders of fellow dispossessed Catholics or lawless criminals, and probably contained elements of both. Oliver Plunkett negotiated a settlement with the Rapparees in Tyrone, leading to an unprecedented peace. Some of the clerics he reprimanded or removed from office would eventually give false testimony against him, implicating him in Titus Oates' entirely fictitious Popish plot. Modern, secular Ireland does not have much space for a story like Oliver Plunkett's or, indeed, for contemporary examples of Christian persecution. But as Archbishop Eamon Martin said in a homily in Loughcrew last Sunday, 'sadly, even in 2025, martyrdom remains a reality for many of our Christian brothers and sisters around the world'. Archbishop Martin cited the recent murder of 200 Christians in western Nigeria. Fulani armed groups descended on a village full of displaced Christians and murdered them with machetes, before setting fire to their bodies. According to a UK Parliament research briefing , 4,476 Christians were killed for faith-related reasons in 2024. Seventy per cent of those killed were in Nigeria. The world mostly ignores it. The BBC recently provided a perfect example of this reluctance to ascribe religious motives in an explainer on the 200 deaths. It laid the blame on farmer versus herder conflicts and climate change before mentioning religion as an additional factor. According to the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, Fulani armed groups in northwest Nigeria engage in 'kidnapping, rape, property and cattle theft, illegal possession of weapons, and murder'. While the motivation behind individual attacks can be difficult to verify, they 'significantly restrict freedom of religion or belief, particularly for the predominantly Christian communities that live there'. We care about the shocking conditions of Palestinian children in Gaza because we see them daily on our screens. The courage and faith of St Oliver might remind us that other persecuted communities, including Christians, deserve visibility and no less of our concern.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘My Cosmos plants are struggling. How can I help them thrive?'
Some Cosmos bedding plants I recently planted in our new garden have struggled to get going. Their leaves have yellowed and they look stunted. Any suggestions as to what the problem is? In my old garden I grew these very easily. Rachel O'L, Kilkenny A fast-growing, floriferous, half-hardy annual, Cosmos bipinnatus is easily raised from seed sown under cover in spring. This very decorative member of the daisy family is great for quickly adding height and colour to a container display or summer border. It also makes an excellent cut flower. A wide range of varieties are available, with flowers in shades of pink as well as white, lemon-yellow and apricot. Annual cosmos is typically very vigorous, so much so that the standard advice is to avoid planting it into too rich a soil in order to encourage flower production over an excess of leafy growth. That said, plants can become sometimes infected by diseases such as aster yellows or fusarium, which cause stunted growth and yellowing of the foliage. Like most members of the daisy family, this species loves full sun and a free-draining soil, so overwatering, or growing plants in wet, poorly drained soil or in deep shade can also cause similar symptoms. There's also a chance that your plants may be suffering from what's known as lime-induced chlorosis. This happens when the soil has a high pH (a pH above 7), meaning it's alkaline or high in lime. READ MORE Plants vary in their ability to grow well in these kinds of soils. Ericaceous plants such as azalea, pieris, camellia and rhododendron, for example, can only be grown in soils where the pH is quite acidic (ideally a pH of 5-6). But most plant species including cosmos are happiest when the pH is just slightly acidic to neutral, with a pH of 6.5-7. In alkaline soils, however, an excess of lime can interfere with a plant's ability to absorb phosphorus, iron and manganese as well as other nutrients, causing the symptoms you describe. So I'd suggest you test your soil's pH, always a good idea with a new garden and something that can be done easily at home using a test widely available in most good garden centres. For accurate results, use a soil sample from an area that hasn't been recently manured or fertilised. Correcting an overly high soil pH is complicated and typically involves using products that acidify the soil, such as sulphur, aluminium sulphate and sulphur of iron, also known as ferrous sulphate. Mulching with pine needles or bark mulch are other solutions. But it's very important that this is done carefully and cautiously as the amount required will depend upon the degree of alkalinity. Bear in mind, too, that making the soil too acidic can also have a negative impact on plant growth. Detailed advice on .
