logo
Thailand and Cambodia trade accusations as deadly border clashes enter third day

Thailand and Cambodia trade accusations as deadly border clashes enter third day

Yahoo26-07-2025
Cambodia Thailand
SURIN, Thailand (AP) — Thailand and Cambodia traded accusations Saturday of fresh attacks as deadly border clashes entered a third day, leaving at least 33 people dead and more than 168,000 displaced, as international pressure mounted on both sides to reach a ceasefire.
Artillery fire and gunshots were reported near several border villages, expanding the area of the fighting that flared again Thursday after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Cambodian and Thai officials claimed to have acted in retaliation.
Both countries recalled their ambassadors and Thailand closed its northeastern border crossings with Cambodia.
Cambodian authorities reported on Saturday 12 new deaths, bringing its toll to 13, while Thai officials said a soldier was killed, raising the deaths to 20, mostly civilians.
The regional bloc, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, is under growing pressure to defuse the situation between its two members. During an emergency meeting on Friday, members of the U.N. Security Council called for de-escalation and urged ASEAN to mediate a peaceful solution.
The 800-kilometer (500-mile) frontier between Thailand and Cambodia has been disputed for decades, but past confrontations have been limited and brief. The current tensions broke out in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thailand's domestic politics.
Fresh attacks and rising tension
Cambodia's Defense Ministry condemned what it said was an expanded Thai offensive early Saturday after five heavy artillery shells were fired into multiple locations in the province of Pursat, calling the attack an "unprovoked and premeditated act of aggression.'
Ministry spokesperson Lt. Gen. Maly Socheata said tensions flared in the province of Koh Kong, where four Thai naval vessels were reportedly stationed offshore and four others en route. She said the naval deployment was an 'act of aggression' that risked further escalation.
Maly Socheata said seven civilians and five soldiers were killed in two days of fighting. Earlier, one man was reported dead after a pagoda he was hiding under was hit by Thai rockets.
The Thai army had denied targeting Cambodian civilian sites and accused Phnom Penh of using 'human shields' by positioning their weapons near residential areas.
Meanwhile, Thailand's navy, in a statement Saturday, accused Cambodian forces of initiating a new attack in the province of Trat, saying Thai forces responded swiftly and 'successfully pushed back the Cambodian incursion at three key points', warning that 'aggression will not be tolerated.'
Thai authorities also alleged several Cambodian artillery shells had landed across the border in Laos, damaging homes and property. Lao officials have not publicly responded to the claim.
The conflict has so far left thousands displaced.
Cambodia's Information Minister Neth Pheaktra said Saturday the clashes had forced 10,865 Cambodian families, or 37,635 people, in three border provinces to evacuate to safe locations, while Thai officials said more than 131,000 people had fled their border villages.
Call to protect civilians amid claim of cluster bomb use
Human Rights Watch urged the U.N. Security Council and concerned governments to press the Thai and Cambodian governments to abide by international humanitarian law and take all steps to protect civilians. Children have been harmed and Thai authorities have closed at least 852 schools and seven hospitals for safety reasons, the rights group said in a statement Saturday.
Both sides have employed rocket and artillery attacks, and after initially denying Cambodian claims that internationally prohibited cluster munitions were being used, a Thai military spokesperson in a statement Friday said that such weapons could be utilized 'when necessary' to target military objectives. HRW condemned the use of cluster munitions in populated areas.
Neither Thailand nor Cambodia is party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which bans the use of the weapon and Thai authorities had previously used them during a border dispute with Cambodia in February 2011 that left 20 people dead.
'Neither Thailand nor Cambodia appears to be paying attention to international humanitarian law at great expense to civilians,' John Sifton, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement. 'Diplomatic efforts underway need to prioritize protecting civilians and civilian infrastructure.'
Thai officials also acknowledged the use of F-16 jets and drones to launch airstrikes.
UN urges ASEAN bloc to mediate
The U.N. Security Council didn't issue a resolution on the crisis during its Friday emergency session, but Thai Foreign Minister Maris Sangiampongsa said Saturday all 15 member countries called on both sides to exercise restraint, halt attacks, and resolve the dispute peacefully. They also supported ASEAN's role in mediating between its two member states, he said.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, whose country is the current ASEAN chair, had earlier said Thailand and Cambodia were open in principle to his ceasefire proposal. Malaysian media said Anwar has tasked the country's foreign minister to mediate peace talks to halt the fighting.
Maris said Saturday his country agreed in principle to the proposal, but insisted that Cambodia must first show sincerity and cease hostilities, adding that Thailand would continue to engage constructively with Malaysia.
'Thailand reaffirms its commitment to resolving the conflict peacefully and in accordance with international law,' he said, urging Cambodia to 'return to the negotiating table with sincerity and in good faith.'
___
Associated Press writers Chalida Ekvitthayavechnukul and Grant Peck in Bangkok, and Eileen Ng in Kuala Lumpur contributed to this report. Sopheng Cheang reported from Oddar Meanchey, Cambodia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Where Can Gaza Go From Here?
Where Can Gaza Go From Here?

New York Times

time2 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Where Can Gaza Go From Here?

First and most obviously: The government of Israel needs to rush, in abundant quantities and to immediate and undeniable effect, food and medicine to the places in Gaza that desperately need them. This is as much a matter of self-interest as it is of humanitarianism. Few things hurt Israel more than the global perception, however tendentious, that it's deliberately starving kids. Nothing helps Hamas more, either. Whatever benefits Hamas might derive from the aid pale next to the propaganda boon it has achieved through the starvation narrative — even if it's Hamas itself that bears the final responsibility for causing and perpetuating Gaza's misery. But then what? There are three basic options. The first is a negotiated settlement. Until just two weeks ago, the prospect of a cease-fire appeared to be tantalizingly close. Then Hamas hardened its stance. It has flatly refused to disarm until a Palestinian state is created. It has also posted atrocity videos of two hostages, Evyatar David and Rom Braslavski, visibly starved and nearing death, which were guaranteed to spark anguish and outrage among Israelis, though the rest of the world barely seemed to notice. 'Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith,' Steve Witkoff, the American envoy, said after withdrawing from talks. A cease-fire now lies farther out of reach. France's feckless and destructive plan to recognize a Palestinian state, along with promises from Britain and Canada to follow suit, was a guaranteed incentive for Hamas to raise the diplomatic price on Israel. What a perverse reward for the terrorist group, and a punishment for ordinary Gazans. There are other diplomatic opportunities, most promisingly an Arab League declaration last week that condemned Oct. 7 and called for Hamas to disarm and release hostages. But that's a hortatory statement that has no teeth until Arab states like Qatar, which has hosted Hamas's leadership in luxury, exert extreme pressure on the group to come to terms. Until then, diplomacy is a winding road to nowhere. The second option is Israel's complete reoccupation of all of Gaza. Israeli news media are reporting that Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, has all but settled on this course over the strong opposition of some of his own senior military commanders. This may yet be a negotiating gambit to get Hamas to ease its terms. But it's also something that the far-right ministers in Netanyahu's government have called for since the war's beginning. Whatever the case, it's a risky and potentially catastrophic gamble. It would put the hostages at immediate risk, since their captors have been given execution orders if Israeli troops approach. It would require another round of bloody urban warfare. And it would involve Israel in a draining effort to stamp out every pocket of guerrilla warfare — a war that sooner or later would bring unbearable foreign and domestic pressure to bear on Israel. Beirut in 1982 is not an experience the Israeli government should ever want to repeat. But there's a third option, a middle way between capitulating to Hamas's outrageous demands and lunging for another Pyrrhic victory. Shortly after Oct. 7, I reported on a proposal from former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett called a 'squeeze approach,' which he saw as essential to 'not play along with the lines that Hamas wrote for us.' Bennett's central insight was that Israel should avoid being lured into nonstop urban combat and instead surround and isolate the battlefield, allowing food and medicine to get in but not the things Hamas would need to maintain its war machine, particularly fuel for generators in the tunnels. Updated for the present, this would mean an indefinite Israeli occupation of Gaza's inner perimeter, including its border with Egypt, and across the territory's midpoint. But as Jonathan Schanzer writes in Commentary magazine, there should be no reconstruction aid for Gaza until Hamas releases the hostages and agrees to disarm. Food and medicine, yes — in abundance. Concrete and rebar, no — not so long as it might be used to rebuild the territory's terror tunnels. It's time for Hamas to feel the brunt of pressure, most of all from Gazans themselves, for the ruins they created. Those who think of themselves as well-wishers of the Palestinians may want to forever put the moral onus on Israel for all of Gaza's tragedies. But Gaza would not be where it is now had it not been for Hamas, and Gaza cannot be more than it is now so long as Hamas retains effective control. No thoughtful person can be pro-Palestinian without also being anti-Hamas. At the same time, being pro-Israel means looking at Gaza through the wider lens of Israel's overall interests: the return of the hostages to heal Israel's heart; the relief of Gaza to rehabilitate Israel's reputation (above all among wavering friends); the resumption of regional diplomacy to take advantage of Israel's temporary victories over Hezbollah and Iran; and the restoration of deterrence against Israel's larger and still-menacing enemies. If Netanyahu makes the colossal mistake of trying to reoccupy Gaza for the long term, then no thoughtful person can be pro-Israel without also being against him. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@ Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.

S.Africa urges more countries to stand up to Israel's 'genocidal activities'
S.Africa urges more countries to stand up to Israel's 'genocidal activities'

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

S.Africa urges more countries to stand up to Israel's 'genocidal activities'

More countries must recognise a Palestinian state and stand up to Israel to stop its "genocidal activities", South Africa's Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola told AFP in an interview Tuesday. Pretoria has been a leading critic of Israel's actions in Gaza, bringing a case before the UN's top court in December 2023 arguing that its war in the Palestinian territory amounted to genocide. As some of Israel's allies "are now also saying, no, this can't continue, it means that it is bringing us closer and closer to the Israel regime to stop the genocidal activities", Lamola said. This will also boost efforts to "allow humanitarian access to the people of Gaza" and "to agree to go into a negotiation table to cease the fire", he said. "We really welcome this development, and we call for more countries to continue to recognise Palestine." "We welcome the intention to recognise by France, Canada, and all countries of the world. This will put the pressure so that we can end up with ceasefire," Lamola said. South Africa's case before the International Court of Justice argues that the war in Gaza, which began with the militant group Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, breached the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention. Israel has strongly denied that accusation. Several nations have added their weight to the proceedings, including Spain, Bolivia, Colombia, Mexico, Turkey, Chile and Libya. The leaders of France, the United Kingdom and Canada have meanwhile said they plan to recognise a Palestinian state in September, and urged other nations to do so. The announcements by some of Washington's closest allies have displeased US President Donald Trump. Lamola said that had the world acted when South Africa made its case at the ICJ, "we would not be where we are". "It's clear starvation is emerging, famine, and all these are things we warned about in our ICJ case -- that this will lead to famine, will lead to complete cleansing of the population," he said. "It's rather late, yes, but it's better than never. So let them act, let them support, let them put the pressure." fal/br/jcb/sbk

Witkoff scrambles for peace deal with Russia as sanctions loom targeting India, China
Witkoff scrambles for peace deal with Russia as sanctions loom targeting India, China

Fox News

time6 hours ago

  • Fox News

Witkoff scrambles for peace deal with Russia as sanctions loom targeting India, China

White House envoy Steve Witkoff is preparing for a trip to Russia on Wednesday, two days ahead of President Donald Trump's Aug. 8 deadline for Moscow to enter into a ceasefire or face stiff sanctions. But the escalated deadline, which Trump cut by nearly a month last week after first issuing Russian President Vladimir Putin a 50-day deadline in mid-July, has done little to curb the Kremlin's violence in Ukraine. If a peace deal is not reached by Friday, Putin's chief commodity will become the primary target as the U.S. will begin 100% sanctions on nations that purchase Russian oil in a move to dissuade them from fueling Russia's economy, and by extension, its war chest. But even with the threat of possibly lower oil sales to nations like India and China, which are the world's top purchasers of Russian oil, reports on Tuesday suggested that Witkoff's last-ditch effort to talk peace with Putin is not expected to make much, if any, headway. A report by Reuters said that not only is little expected from Witkoff's efforts, but Putin is also undeterred by Trump's threat of secondary sanctions. Trump on Tuesday told CNBC that he planned to raise the current 25% tariffs on India "very substantially" within the next 24 hours. "They're fueling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy," he said. Given that Trump has already said he plans to hit any nation that trades with Moscow with 100% secondary sanctions, it is unclear if he still plans to hit both India and China with trading fines this high. Neither the White House nor the Treasury Department returned Fox News Digital's questions regarding the unclear looming tariff rates. But India has pushed back on the tariffs, calling them "unjustified and unreasonable." In a statement on Monday, Randhir Jaiswal, spokesperson for India's foreign ministry, said following Russia's invasion and subsequent Western boycotts of Russian oil, the U.S. allegedly encouraged India to import Russian gas "for strengthening global energy markets stability." But it is not just financial aid that India is accused of being involved in when it comes to Russia's war in Ukraine. Ukraine on Tuesday said it had found "Indian-made components in Russian attack drones – including the Shahed/Geran models." "Russia must be denied access to foreign-made parts that enable these weapons and the killing of Ukrainians," Andriy Yermak, presidential chief of staff, said on X. These drones have infamously been used to not only hit military points along the front lines in Ukraine, but have routinely targeted Ukrainian civilians, including in a series of overnight strikes. "Last night, the Russians launched a ballistic missile and nearly 50 UAVs against Ukraine, most of them Russian-Iranian 'shaheds,'" Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Tuesday. "Many drones were shot down by our defenders, but unfortunately, there were hits." Zelenskyy confirmed that one person was killed and 10 were injured, including two children, after 25 shahed drones pounded the city of Lozova in the Kharkiv region. The Zaporizhzhia, Odesa and Sumy regions were also struck, and two others were apparently injured. "Once again, the Russian army is hunting civilians in an attempt to terrorize frontline cities and communities," Zelenskyy said. Despite concerns that sanctions could have little effect on Putin's war ambitions, Zelenskyy argued they could "contribute" to ending the war. "The world now sees that sanctions against Russia, and secondary sanctions against all those who help it profiteer from oil, can work if they are strong enough," he said. "Therefore, pressure must be increased, and this will undoubtedly contribute to peace." Fox News Digital could not immediately reach the Indian Embassy in Washington, D.C., or Witkoff's team for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store