
Who's to blame for Labour's welfare 'clusterf***'? Knives out for Keir Starmer's top team after Commons shambles - but PM tells critics to lay off his chief aide Morgan McSweeney
So, after ministers were forced to gut their welfare plans in dramatic scenes in the House of Commons last night, who is to blame for the Government's humiliation?
The architects of Labour's initial welfare plans were Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Chancellor Rachel Reeves, and Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall.
They wanted to cut nearly £5billion from Britain's ballooning benefits bill by tightening access to welfare payments.
This included restricting eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is the main disability payment in England.
But, in the face of a rebellion by Labour MPs, the Government shelved its plans to change PIP rules during an eleventh hour climbdown.
The failure to realise the strength of anger among Labour MPs at the proposed cuts has been blamed on the party's chief whip Sir Alan Campbell.
Key members of Sir Keir's team of aides in Downing Street are also seen as being at fault.
This includes Claire Reynolds, the PM's political director, and Morgan McSweeney, the No10 chief of staff.
Yet Sir Keir has launched a full-throated defence of Mr McSweeney, telling Cabinet ministers that briefings against his most powerful adviser must stop.
Who's to blame for Labour's welfare shambles?
Keir Starmer
The PM ultimately takes responsibility for what is now the third U-turn he has made in a matter of weeks.
The welfare climbdown follows other reversals on axing winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners, and the holding of a national inquiry into grooming gangs.
Sir Keir recently admitted he had failed to get to grips with the revolt by Labour MPs over benefits cuts as he was distracted by the Middle East crisis and a NATO summit.
The Prime Minister spent much of the previous fortnight out of the country to attend a meeting of G7 leaders in Canada, and then a NATO gathering in The Hague.
He was also hunkered down in domestic emergency meetings over the Israel-Iran conflict, as well as the US bombing of Iran 's nuclear sites.
Sir Keir told the Sunday Times he had been 'heavily focused' on international affairs.
He added had not been able to give the welfare row his 'full' attention until after he returned from The Hague.
Rachel Reeves
Following the Government's climbdown on welfare cuts, the Chancellor is now facing an even bigger black hole in the public finances.
The £4.8billion savings that she had hoped for will now have to be found elsewhere, increasing the likelihood of further tax rises.
It is the Chancellor's demand for those savings in the first place, in order to balance the books, that is attracting criticism from Labour rebels.
Some in the party want Ms Reeves to loosen her 'iron-clad' fiscal rules.
There is a belief that her strict approach meant she approached welfare reform from the standpoint of trying to make savings, rather than getting more people into work.
Ms Reeves is also accused of compounding Labour's benefits shambles amid claims her efforts to talk round rebel MPs ended in disaster.
One phone call between the Chancellor and a rebel MP is reported to have left the latter 'deeply shaken' and 'in tears'.
Liz Kendall
The Work and Pensions Secretary is spearheading the Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, which has now been shredded.
Ms Kendall is facing claims the legislation was rushed and poorly drafted, while she has also been criticised for her performance in the Commons on Monday afternoon.
Rather than successfully heading off a Labour revolt by detailing the Government's initial concessions on welfare cuts, she was accused of making the situation worse.
This led, ultimately, to ministers having to perform an even greater climbdown on Tuesday night.
The drastic action was taken in order to stave off the threat of a humiliating defeat when the Commons voted on the Bill's second reading.
Alan Campbell
As Labour's chief whip, Sir Alan Campbell is responsible for corralling the party's MPs in order for the Government to push its legislative agenda through the Commons.
But last night's climbdown suggests Sir Alan had little confidence the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill would pass its second reading.
Questions are now being asked about how Sir Alan allowed the Labour rebellion on welfare cuts to grow to such a scale that the Government was at threat of defeat.
Claire Reynolds
The wife of Jonathan Reynolds, the Business and Trade Secretary, is Sir Keir's political director in No10.
Her job is to liaise between Labour MPs and the Government in order to keep enough of the party's backbenchers on board with Sir Keir's agenda.
It should be a fairly simple task, seeing as the PM won a huge majority at last year's general election.
But, as Tuesday night demonstrated, there was a stunning absence of loyalty among Labour MPs towards the PM.
There have been gripes that Ms Reynolds has failed to meet or speak to all of Labour's 400-plus MPs since the party's election victory.
Morgan McSweeney
The PM's chief of staff is under pressure following Sir Keir's hat-trick of U-turns in recent weeks.
The welfare row saw some calls for 'regime change' in No10, with Mr McSweeney criticised for alienating or ignoring Labour backbenchers.
He is also accused of presiding over a 'bunker mentality' in Downing Street.
But Sir Keir has made clear he won't be ditching his most senior adviser, who is widely credited with masterminding Labour's general election landslide.
In a pointed address to the Cabinet on Tuesday morning, the PM said he 'will not countenance' criticism of Mr McSweeney.
'We will learn from our mistakes, but we will not turn in on each other,' Sir Keir said.
'We will not resile from our record of achievement and we will not turn on our staff - including our chief of staff, without whom none of us would be sitting around this Cabinet table.'
Mr McSweeney replaced Sue Gray as Sir Keir's chief of staff in October, as he emerged the apparent victor of a bitter No10 feud.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
29 minutes ago
- Wales Online
'I believe in Wales, its people and its possibilities'
'I believe in Wales, its people and its possibilities' In this opinion piece to mark one year of Keir Starmer's government, Plaid leader Rhun ap Iorwerth argues the Prime Minister has failed to fulfil his promises Leader of Plaid Cymru Rhun ap Iorwerth (Image: Ben Birchall/PA ) Restore hope, stop the chaos. The message - foregrounded and front-loaded in Labour's 2024 General Election Manifesto - was, superficially at least, a nod to better days ahead. It was a positive, and ultimately persuasive promise, which drew a line under the torrid Tory years – implying not only a new sense of order but an awareness that the founding principle of any government should be the betterment of those it serves. A palpable sense of anger had built up, not least driven by the unfairness and inequality which characterises modern Britain. A well-off family at the 80th wealth percentile had seen its wealth increase by 37 per cent between 2006-08 and 2018-20, whilst a modest family at the 40th wealth percentile had seen no real wealth growth at all. Few would deny that a re-building job was urgently required. The need to re-evaluate priorities and re-shape society, and to embed equity and equality became so apparent that not even the blue tinge of Starmer's Labour could ignore it. Article continues below And somewhere in this equation lay Wales, a nation reminded time and time again that we're 'better together' – and 'better still' with two Labour governments working together. It would therefore not be unreasonable for Wales to expect to see the promised dividend being delivered, with early signs to become apparent that years of Wales being short-changed by Westminster would come to an end. Exactly one year on since that General Election, the reality could hardly be more different. It is somewhat ironic that Keir Starmer's first anniversary in office coincides with Independence Day in the USA. Yes, Keir Starmer has set off his fair share of fireworks over the past year, but they've not been of the joyous kind that traditionally mark Fourth of July celebrations across the pond. Some of those feeling let down over the past 12 months may well cite Starmer's stance on UK-US relations as symptomatic of a wider lack of moral leadership. An unwillingness by the Labour leader to challenge Trump on foreign affairs in particular parallels many of his attitudes towards the domestic agenda, where principles have too often been cast aside. The disabled fearful, pensioners paying the price and farmers furious. Seldom has an incoming government wasted so little time before taking hope away. The 'Change' placards have long been flung on the scrapheap, replaced by a trudging managerialism at best, a reckless attitude towards some of the party's values at worst, and tired platitudes which can so often be painful to watch. Of course, the managerialism to which I refer has pervaded Welsh politics for far too long on Labour's watch. Six years ago, the current First Minister enthusiastically cheered America's freedom on Independence Day whilst serving as Minister for International Relations. Eluned Morgan appears to believe that independence, be it literal or independence of thought, is something for others to enjoy, whether for nations or individuals. And not only has she never appeared to fully believe in our nation's ability to stand on its own two feet, she's also failed to make our relationship with Westminster less unjust. Independence of thought and spirit on her part would go a long way in making the 'Red Welsh Way' something more meaningful than a slogan. I believe in Wales, its people and its possibilities. For this reason 'the power of partnership' holds more currency for me than Labour's adopted 'Partnership in Power' mantra. The former cements the contract between the government and the people it serves, while the latter serves only to celebrate hegemony. Next May, the people of Wales have the opportunity to elect a new government underpinned by a new contract of respect and understanding. A new way whereby individuals feel that when the actions of government brush against their lives, they do so in a positive and meaningful sense. A contract which means that those in power lead rather than manage, and take responsibility for their actions – truthfully and transparently. I'm excited by the prospects of what Wales can achieve, and for Plaid Cymru, delivering positive change to build our nation is not just something we talk about, it's an instinctive driving force. From forcing the Labour Welsh Government's hand in introducing free school meals for all primary school pupils to winning the debate on taking action on second homes to help people be able to live in their communities, we already have a proud recent record of delivering. And that's been from opposition! When UK Labour's Secretary of State for Wales stood on the stage of her party conference last weekend to wrongly claim that Plaid Cymru would scrap free prescriptions, she achieved two things. Article continues below Firstly, she exposed her party's desperation in resorting to smearing opponents rather than offering positive solutions. Secondly, she strengthened my resolve to restore people's trust in those they put in office. From the expenses scandal to the plainly immoral Covid VIP lanes, voters are rightly angry, but I want to turn that anger into hope. With Plaid Cymru's plans to cut waiting times, support small businesses, tackle the cost of living crisis and harness our natural wealth, we can do things differently in Wales. For anyone who refuses to believe that this is as good as it gets for our communities, and for everyone let down by Westminster's broken promises, real change is possible with a Plaid Cymru government next May.

Rhyl Journal
31 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Corbyn says ‘discussions ongoing' as Sultana quits Labour to ‘co-lead new party'
The former Labour Party leader congratulated Coventry South MP Ms Sultana on her 'principled decision' to leave Sir Keir Starmer's party. In a statement on X, independent Islington North MP Mr Corbyn said: 'Real change is coming. Real change is coming. — Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) July 4, 2025 'One year on from the election, this Labour Government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. Our country needs to change direction, now. 'Congratulations to Zarah Sultana on her principled decision to leave the Labour Party. I am delighted that she will help us build a real alternative. 'The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. Discussions are ongoing – and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve. 'Together, we can create something that is desperately missing from our broken political system: hope.' Ms Sultana, who had the Labour whip suspended last year, said on Thursday night she was quitting Sir Keir's party and would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with the ex-Labour leader.


Powys County Times
31 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Starmer and Macron to host coalition of the willing meeting next week
Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron will host a meeting of the coalition of the willing when the French President visits Britain next week. The Prime Minister and France's leader will dial into a meeting with allies on Thursday, as Mr Macron makes his first state visit to the UK, it is understood. Britain and France have led efforts to establish the coalition, a peacekeeping force aimed at policing any future ceasefire deal in Ukraine, and deterring further threats by Russia. The effectiveness of the coalition has been called into question, as only London and Paris have so far indicated they would provide frontline soldiers towards it. The peacekeeping mission would also be predicated on American air support, something which US President Donald Trump has been unwilling to openly say he would provide. Russia launched a massive barrage of drone strikes on Kyiv overnight, reportedly the largest since the war began. Some 550 drones and missiles were fired at Ukraine in the strikes, with the capital Kyiv the primary target. At least 23 people were injured, with 14 taken to hospital, according to the city's mayor Vitali Klitschko. The strikes came hours after Mr Trump held a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, pushing him to accept a truce. No 10 said the continued Russia strikes were 'clear evidence that Putin was not serious about peace', as it condemned them. A Downing Street spokesman added: 'Since Ukraine agreed to an unconditional ceasefire over four months ago, 700 civilians have been killed, more than 3,000 injured, 'We are, alongside our allies, absolutely united in support of a just and lasting peace in Ukraine. We are clear that must start with a full, immediate and unconditional ceasefire.' The UK's immediate focus is 'stepping up our support Ukraine, ratcheting up the pressure on Russia', he said. Mr Trump has halted some shipments of critical weapons to Kyiv in recent days, including those used for air defences.