The Free Press adds more columnists as paid subscriber base expands
Why it matters: The company has managed to accrue a significant free and paid audience of general news consumers at a challenging time for the media industry.
The Free Press now has 1.25 million overall subscribers, and nearly 155,000 of those are paid, publisher Dennis K. Berman told Axios.
Zoom in: The Free Press announced Tuesday it's bringing on renowned economist Tyler Cowen, formerly of Bloomberg Opinion, as a contributor, as well as Jed Rubenfeld, who will focus on legal commentary.
Coleman Hughes is joining to cover complex issues such as race, philosophy and culture. He will bring his popular "Conversations with Coleman" podcast over to The Free Press.
Matthew Continetti will bring deeper expertise to The Free Press' coverage of the American Right and the future of the Republican Party.
Batya Ungar-Sargon will become a regular columnist, focusing on issues of class, culture and economics.
Between the lines: Hughes' podcast is part of a broader audio push by the company, which is piloting five new shows this summer, Berman told Axios.
The company also plans to expand its event portfolio, Weiss said. In addition to its regular national debate series, The Free Press is looking to offer more regular local events, such as salons and book clubs, Weiss said.
Until now, most of The Free Press' marketing strategy has been focused on organic user acquisition, but the company recently hired a full-time subscription growth leader from The Athletic to spearhead its expansion, Berman noted.
Zoom out: The expansion of The Free Press' roster, editorial coverage and products is "a testament to how much we've grown since the days when it was a personal blog and called Common Sense," Weiss told Axios.
Weiss started a personal newsletter, Common Sense, in 2021, shortly after she left the New York Times. She co-founded The Free Press in 2022, alongside her wife Nellie Bowles, and her sister, Suzy Weiss.
The big picture: The company, which was valued at more than $100 million after raising a $15 million series A round last year, has managed to break through a crowded media landscape while capturing the attention and ire of both political parties.
Berman pointed to an example of the JD Vance criticizing an editorial from The Free Press contributor Niall Ferguson, Ferguson's response and an authoritative analysis of both sides, as an example of how "The Free Press has become that rare, vital place where differing viewpoints can be heard. That is giving us real influence."
In the current media landscape, that type of position "seems kind of a radical," Weiss noted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M
April, an embedded tax platform, has raised $38 million in a Series B round led by QED Investors, founder Ben Borodach tells Axios exclusively. Why it matters: Embedding tax tools directly into financial apps can improve financial decision-making and boost customer retention. Zoom in: Nyca Partners and Team8 also participated in the Series B round, bringing the total funding April has raised to date to $78 million. How it works: Fintech apps and financial institutions use April's APIs to integrate tax filing and planning directly into their platforms, enabling year-round, real-time tax management. April operates on a SaaS-based model, offering flat-rate pricing to fintech partners, who can choose to mark up services for their end customers. "Our vision is to embed tax in every financial decision," Borodach says. "Taxes should be happening where you're managing your money. They should be happening in real time, and they should be personalized to you." Context: New York-based April operates in a market dominated by legacy tax-preparation giants like Intuit, H&R Block, Thomson Reuters, and Wolters Kluwer. But it recently became the first new company in 15 years to achieve national e-file coverage in all 50 states, Borodach says. The company has also launched a series of new products over the past year, including pro-assisted and pro-led tax filing, quarterly estimate tools for small business owners, and paycheck withholding optimizers. As a result, it is seeing increased demand from wealth management platforms, including integrations with digital advisers catering to mass-affluent clients and an upcoming partnership with a trillion-dollar asset manager. By the numbers: April claims it can reduce the time it takes to prepare and file taxes from the IRS' reported 13‑hour average down to just 22 minutes. The company processed hundreds of thousands of returns through partnerships with over 50 fintech apps and financial institutions this past tax season. It has seen its business grow three times year-to-date and more than seven times over the past 12 months, Borodach says. What's next: The company is preparing to launch advanced tax planning tools around capital gains, retirement planning, and stock transactions.
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
AI's global race in the dark
The U.S.'s great AI race with China, now freshly embraced by President Trump, is a competition in the dark with no clear prize or finish line. Why it matters: Similar "races" of the past — like the nuclear arms race and the space race — have sparked innovation, but victories haven't lasted long or meant much. The big picture: Both Silicon Valley and the U.S. government now agree that we must invest untold billions to build supporting infrastructure for an error-prone, energy-hungry technology with an unproven business model and an unpredictable impact on the economy and jobs. What they're saying:"America is the country that started the AI race. And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it," Trump said at a Wednesday event titled "Winning the AI Race." Policy experts and industry leaders who promote the "race" idea argue that the U.S. and China are in a head-to-head competition to win the future of AI by achieving research breakthroughs, establishing the technology's standards and breaking the AGI or "superintelligence" barrier. They suggest that the world faces a binary choice between free, U.S.-developed AI imbued with democratic values or a Chinese alternative that's under the thumb of the Communist Party. Flashback: The last time a scientific race had truly world-shaping consequences was during the Second World War, as the Manhattan Project beat the Nazis to the atomic bomb. But Germany surrendered well before the U.S. had revealed or made use of its discovery. The nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union that followed was a decades-long stalemate that cost fortunes and more than once left the planet teetering on an apocalyptic brink. The 1960s space race was similarly inconclusive. Russia got humanity into space ahead of the U.S., but the U.S. made it to the moon first. Once that leg of the race was over, both countries retreated from further human exploration of space for decades. State of play: With AI, U.S. leaders are once again saying the race is on — but this time the scorecard is even murkier. "Build a bomb before Hitler" or "Put a man on the moon" are comprehensible objectives, but no one is providing similar clarity for the AI competition. The best the industry can say is that we are racing toward AI that's smarter than people. But no two companies or experts have the same definition of "smart" — for humans or AI models. We can't even say with confidence which of any two AI models is "smarter" right now, because we lack good measures and we don't always know or agree on what we want the technology to do. Between the lines: The "beat China" drumbeat is coming largely from inside the industry, which now has a direct line to the White House via Trump's AI adviser, David Sacks. "Whoever ends up winning ends up building the AI rails for the world," OpenAI chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane said at an Axios event in March. Arguing for controls on U.S. chip exports to China earlier this year, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei described competitor DeepSeek as "beholden to an authoritarian government that has committed human rights violations, has behaved aggressively on the world stage, and will be far more unfettered in these actions if they're able to match the U.S. in AI." Yes, but: In the era of the second Trump administration, many Americans view their own government as increasingly authoritarian. With Trump himself getting into the business of dictating the political slant of AI products, it's harder for America's champions to sell U.S. alternatives as more "free." China has been catching up to the U.S. in AI research and development, most tech experts agree. They see the U.S. maintaining a shrinking lead of at most a couple of years and perhaps as little as months. But this edge is largely meaningless, since innovations propagate broadly and quickly in the AI industry. And cultural and language differences mean that the U.S. and its allies will never just switch over to Chinese suppliers even if their AI outruns the U.S. competition. In this, AI is more like social media than like steel, solar panels or other fungible goods. The bottom line: The U.S. and China are both going to have increasingly advanced AI in coming years. The race between them is more a convenient fiction that marshals money and minds than a real conflict with an outcome that matters.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
The GENIUS Act is law. What's next for crypto?
Bitcoin (BTC-USD), ether (ETH-USD), and other crypto stocks are on the rise after President Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law. Axios crypto reporter Brady Dale outlines what's next for the industry now that the first major crypto regulation is officially in the books. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and crypto-related stocks are on the move higher this morning, days after President Trump signed the Genius Act into law, making the first major piece of crypto regulation. Here with more on where crypto goes next is Brady Dale, Axios crypto reporter. So, that was the sort of landmark, Brady, that uh people in the industry pointed to the first big legislative win for them. Um I think there are a lot of questions now about what that unleashes. Like what happens now in terms of tangible products, changes to the industry? What are you watching most closely? Yeah, you know, the thing I'm most interested in is if consumers actually start to adopt stable coins. It's tough to get people to adopt new ways of payments here in the US. But if they do, you know, it could be really good for uh small businesses, retail, which all have a very narrow margin. Stable coins give them a way to have a digital version of actual cash we keep in our pocket. And you know the reason cash is nice for retailers is because it doesn't come with those interchange fees that credit cards have. Well, stable coins will be pretty much the same. And so, uh I think we'll see merchants starting to urge people to adopt stable coins, but who knows if they do. Well, and I mean, don't we have a digital version of cash already, which is just cash, right? Like Venmo and things, you know. There are ways obviously to transact online without credit cards. I guess just not that many. Um so, would this in theory make all of that easier? Yeah, it would make it all it would make it all easier, it would make it all faster, you don't have to have a third party involved. And you know, zooming out from that, um you know, Venmo doesn't work internationally. Um you can't pay people abroad with it. So there's a bunch of other, you know, more boring in the weeds sort of businessy things that we'll see folks use stable coins for. But in terms of like just the average person on the street, the thing I'm curious about is if, you know, normal American consumers start to use it. Um and what are we seeing in terms of the industry sort of preparing for that or trying to push that uh forward? Well, I mean the industry the crypto industry itself has been all in on stable coins for a long time. You know, a lot of them call it the first killer app of blockchains. Uh I think the thing that I'm curious about is, you know, the industry is going to try to own this space. You know, Circle, Tether, they're going to try to be the um, you know, the the Microsoft and Apples of the stable coins future. But uh the thing is, a bunch of the big banks like Bank of America, City, all of them are also talking about getting into the stable coin game. And of course, they have a lot more access to a lot more people, uh more immediately, and they're more trusted names. And so, uh I think it's not so much what the industry does, the existing blockchain industry as it is, like the the banking industry. How do they get into it? Related Videos Crypto on Wall Street: How eth 'unlocks' crypto narrative Sign in to access your portfolio
