IND vs ENG 4th Test: 'No issue with Ben Stokes, but Harry Brook ... ' - Harsha Bhogle slams England
The fourth Test between India and England at Old Trafford ended in a hard-earned draw for the visitors, but not without drama. While the result kept England 2-1 ahead in the five-match series, the final hour of play stirred emotions and brought the conduct of certain players under scrutiny, especially that of England's
Harry Brook
.
As India clawed their way back from 0/2 in the second innings, the visitors displayed grit and composure. Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar's partnership proved key, not just in terms of survival, but also in seizing the momentum ahead of the series finale at The Oval.
Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel.
SUBSCRIBE NOW!
The controversy unfolded late in the day, with England captain Ben Stokes offering a handshake to settle for a draw. But Jadeja declined, choosing instead to bat on in pursuit of a well-deserved century.
With England clearly frustrated, the mood turned tense. This was only their second draw in 40 matches under Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum.
Gautam Gambhir fiery press conference: Slams critics, big update on Jasprit Bumrah, Karun vs Sai
Stokes handed the ball to part-timer Harry Brook, who was promptly dispatched for a six by Jadeja. After bringing up his century, Jadeja's celebration was disrupted as Brook stepped in with another handshake attempt which Sundar visibly ignored, walking past with composure as the crowd buzzed.
Brook was left with a wry smile, but the incident didn't go unnoticed.
Veteran commentator Harsha Bhogle voiced his thoughts on X, calling out Brook's behaviour while applauding India's resolve.
Harsha Bhogle on X (Screengrab)
Bhogle commended India's dressing room for backing Jadeja and Sundar in the moment. Skipper Shubman Gill and head coach Gautam Gambhir were seen in full support of their players, dismissing England's subtle push to close out the game early.
'When you have batted 50 overs to save a Test match, you are perfectly entitled to seek a cherished landmark. And it is good to see that everyone is in the batters' camp on this one," wrote the 64-year-old.
Poll
Was Harry Brook's behavior during the match justified?
Yes, he was just trying to be sportsmanlike
No, it was inappropriate
It was a misunderstanding
"I have no issue with Stokes wanting to go off but I hope young Harry Brook, when he has a quiet moment to himself, will be a bit disappointed with what he did,' Bhogle wrote.
The final Test begins in three days' time at The Oval. While England retain the upper hand, India's fightback in Manchester, both with the bat and in midset, may just tilt the balance heading into the decider.
For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the
India vs England Test match
here.
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nicklas Backstrom returns to hockey career in Sweden with Brynas IF following subdued NHL goodbye
Nicklas Backstrom (via Getty Images) Washington Capitals veteran center Nicklas Backstrom has officially returned to the professional ranks, inking a contract with Brynas IF in Sweden, the same team he played for before joining the NHL . After his retirement due to chronic hip problems, Nicklas Backstrom has now opened a new chapter closer to home, restoring optimism among fans who never quite got to see him receive the sendoff he deserved. Nicklas Backstrom signs with Brynas IF, reviving his hockey career in Sweden Nicklas Backstrom is back on the ice—this time in the Swedish Hockey League. At age 37, the former Washington Capitals icon signed a 1+1 contract with Brynas IF, the same team he started his professional career with. Although he played only eight games in the NHL during the last two years and none since October 2023, Backstrom is set to lace up his skates again in front of home fans. A legend quietly bows out and returns to roots in Sweden When Nicklas Backstrom was taken fourth overall by the Capitals in the 2006 NHL Draft, he came aboard a flailing franchise. But with Alex Ovechkin, he formed part of a dynamic twosome that would come to define a Washington generation of hockey. Now, as Backstrom returns to play for Brynas IF, his old teammates and coaches are left with the emptiness of his low-key exodus. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Farmer Is Tired Of People Illegally Parking On His Land And Takes Revenge Novelodge Undo Good Luck in Sweden, Nicky! Nicklas Backstrom himself never sought the limelight. Even in the end, his appearances before the public were restricted to ceremonial puck drops or stands of encouragement for Ovechkin's achievements. His humility contrasted with the sensationalized career he constructed—a career that will never be forgotten by Capitals fans. Also read: NHL Rumors: Dillon Dube drawing interest from Sharks, Kraken, and Islanders after being cleared of sexual Nicklas Backstrom's return to Brynas IF is not a personal choice—it's a befitting continuation for a player who has never allowed his game to be overshadowed by words. While his NHL career may have closed out quietly, his legacy as a Washington Capitals legend is secured. Now, Swedish fans see the final view of a legend going home, still with something to offer on the ice. FAQs Who is Nicklas Backstrom? Nicklas Bäckström is a Swedish professional ice hockey center who plays for Brynäs IF of the Swedish Hockey League. How old is Nicklas Backstrom? 37 When is Nicklas Backstrom's birthday? November 23 Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
Ben Stokes " Ne Beizzati Karwa Li": England Captain Not Spared By Natwest Winner After Handshake Row
For England, the drawn fourth Test vs India might have tasted as a loss. Starting from the final session on the fourth day, as India fought to conquer a 311-run deficit, England were the firm favourites. But India fought with their heart to force a draw. In fact, after overnight batters Shubman Gill and KL Rahul fell on Day 5, Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja stitched a solid stand and completed their centuries. While the India duo was only a few runs aways from the century-marks, England captain Ben Stokes approached his Indian counterparts with an offer to shake hands and call it a day, only for India to refuse to budge and settle for a draw after the duo got their centuries. The skipper Stokes and the whole English unit looked completely unsettled, firing a barrage of remarks at the all-round duo and putting in a half-hearted effort while bowling, as their key players sought some rest. Former India star Mohammad Kaif blasted Ben Stokes for his act. "Ben Stokes ne Beiizzati karwali (Ben Stokes has lost respect) because of one moment when he wanted to stop the game. Ravindra Jadeja was batting on 90 while Washington Sundar was on 80. You should not have asked to stop the game," Kaif said in a clip on Instagram. "Why would we want to do that? You weren't able to bowl out India, had nearly two days to do that. You weren't able to win. I don't understand what he was trying to do by getting the game to stop. "Ben Stokes bowled so well, scored a century and everybody was lauding him. It takes years to earn respect and one moment to lose it. Today was that moment for Ben Stokes when he lost respect." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Mohammad Kaif (@mohammadkaif87) Meanwhile, former Indian cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar hailed the Team India for producing "warriors" every match and slammed the English skipper Ben Stokes for behaving like a "spoiled kid" as the visitors refused to draw the match without their all-rounders Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar getting to their centuries. "I think that was the perfect summation of what happened -- a draw that feels like a win. And yet again, this young Indian batting line-up continues to surprise. You expected KL Rahul and Shubman Gill to be the partnership to watch out for, but that stand was broken early in the day. However, India keeps producing warriors every Test match -- this time, it was Washington Sundar who stood tall. Fantastic batting once again. In the end, what we saw was frustration from a team that is used to dominating at home. It's rare to see England settle for a draw twice in the Bazball era. Remember, this is the first time Ben Stokes abandoned his principle of batting first after winning the toss -- and it happened against India. This draw, without any weather intervention, came against India. That says a lot," said Manjrekar.
Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Sunil Gavaskar slams Ben Stokes and co: ‘Everything cannot be done according to what the England team wants'
The final day of the fourth Test between India and England at Old Trafford saw England captain Ben Stokes offering the handshake to Indian batsmen Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar prior to the last one hour of the Test with the Indian batsman refusing so and deciding to continue. With Stokes and other England players targeting Jadeja and Sundar with comments like 'You want to get a Test hundred against Harry Brook?' and other comments, Jadeja and Sundar went on to complete their hundreds before they decided to agree for the draw. Former Indian captain and legend Sunil Gavaskar has called the English team including Stokes for their 'whining' tactics. 'Towards the end of the Test, a few grumpy English players were unhappy that the batters at the crease, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, declined the offer to end the day's play when England captain Ben Stokes proposed it at the start of the final hour. Instead, they opted to bat on and complete their hundreds. The England players felt that, since there was no chance of a result, the Indians should have accepted the offer to conclude proceedings. They seem to forget that two teams are playing out there, and if one decides to continue, the other simply has to accept it. They made sarcastic remarks about the batters, who were in their 80s, getting to their centuries off the bowling of a batter. What they overlooked was the hard work and resilience the batters had shown against frontline bowlers for over four hours to reach the 80s. If they wanted a hundred for their efforts, England should have denied them with proper bowlers rather than whining about them getting there against Harry Brook,' Gavaskar wrote in his column for Sportstar. Jadeja and Sundar stitched together an unbroken fifth wicket partnership of 202 runs to deny England a win to take a 3-1 series lead in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy. India had started the final day of the Test trailing England by 137 runs with eight wickets in hand in the fourth innings and needed to survive the day to have any hopes of not losing the five Test series. While India lost KL Rahul and captain Subhuman Gill, Jadeja and Sundar made sure that India were placed safely with 75 runs ahead of England with six wickets in hand before the start of the last hour. With Indian batsmen playing for five more overs, which also saw Jadeja and Sundar complete their hundreds, it meant that a frustrated England team targeted the Indian batsman with verbal comments. Gavaskar also shared how if he was the captain, he would have told the batsmen to play out the remaining overs. 'A Test century isn't easy and doesn't come every match, so the batters were fully entitled to bat on and reach their personal landmarks — which they eventually did. If I were the captain, I'd have told them to keep batting and play out the remaining overs, tiring out the fielders even more — especially after the shenanigans by the English players once their offer was declined,' wrote Gavaskar. Post the match, Stokes talked about how he wanted his frontline bowlers not facing the risk of injury and hence the offer for a draw. Gavaskar termed it as the England team wanting everything to be done what they want. 'Shubman Gill is a young skipper and a fine gentleman, so after the draw in Manchester, he didn't ask why England batted on to score over 600 and take a lead of 311. Were they afraid that if the lead was just 250, India might score 500 and then bowl England out for less in the fourth innings? By batting on even after Stokes got his century, England perhaps didn't leave their bowlers enough time to bowl India out and win the match and with it, the series. Everything cannot be done according to what the England team wants. This is yet another example of that old syndrome: when we do it, it's right; when the opposition does the same, it's wrong. Those days are long gone, and no one, least of all the Indian team, is going to simply accept it,' Gavaskar wrote further. Gavaskar was also of the view that England missed a trick with deteriorating light prior to the final hour. And this would have avoided the controversy. 'There's only a three-day break before the next Test. If England didn't want two more centuries recorded against them, they could have brought the quicks back on. The natural light was deteriorating, and the floodlights were on. Had Jofra Archer and Brydon Carse been given the ball, the umpires might have intervened and stopped play — so perhaps England missed a trick there,' Gavaskar wrote. With the last test at The Oval beginning on Thursday, India can still level the series with a win at the venue. Gavaskar also termed the five Test series as a 'terrific' series. 'These little irritants aside, it has been a terrific series, and the cricket from both sides has been riveting. The fifth and final Test at The Oval will hopefully deliver another thriller to round off what has been one of the finest Test series, a pleasure and privilege to watch,' concluded Gavaskar.
