Trader Shares How ChatGPT, Grok Helped Him Double His Money In 10 Days
The user revealed that by day four, his confidence in the AI's decision grew, and he decided to split the portfolio into two and set up a head-to-head match between ChatGPT and Grok. He fed both the AI bots with extensive "nerdy data," including spreadsheets and screenshots of detailed fundamentals, options chains, technical indicators, and macro data. He then instructed the chatbots to cut through the clutter and "spit out trades that'll turn my beer and BBQ budget into Kardashian-level cash".
Watching ChatGPT Make Me Money While I Chill and Crack a Cold One!
by u/Plastic-Edge-1654 in ChatGPT
After 10 trading days, the original poster (OP) said that he was shocked to see the results. "I've made 18 trades, closed out 17, and somehow these AI bros both have a flawless, 100% win rate," he wrote. The user revealed that while ChatGPT "nailed 13", Grok "hit 5" and "neither has let me down yet!"
"I'm hyped to see how far this YOLO AI adventure goes over the next six months. Stay tuned; It's time to crack another cold one-it's gonna be a wild ride!" the user concluded.
Since being shared, the Reddit post has gone viral, triggering an avalanche of reactions. While some praised AI, others warned against drawing conclusions from a short-term win.
"Goddamn, it's like the universe was screaming at me here. I was planning on trying this on Monday to see if I could make it work while I look for jobs. Guess this is all the motivation I need to push forward with the plan," one user wrote.
"I mean, ChatGPT has helped me tremendously with my golf game, so why not help me crush some trades too," said another.
However, some users were sceptical about using AI for trading. "Bro you realize it's not the AI, right? The saying is old as hell: "Everyone is a genius in a bull market ". Holds true time, and time again," wrote one user. "This is fun and all but don't fool yourself that this is anything more than putting money on red," commented another.
"Everyone is a genius when the market is hot. I wouldn't put your bets on ChatGPT compared to just getting lucky based on a trending up market," said a third user.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
China's exports of rare earth magnets to the US skyrocket in June
China's exports of rare earth magnets to the United States in June soared by more than seven times from May, a sharp recovery in the flow of critical minerals key to electric vehicles and wind turbines after a Sino-US trade deal. Outbound shipments to the United States from the world's largest producer of rare earth magnets surged to 353 metric tons in June, up 660 per cent from May, data from the General Administration of Customs showed on Sunday. That came after pacts reached in June to resolve issues around shipments of rare earth minerals and magnets to the United States, with chipmaker Nvidia's plan to resume sales of its H20 AI chips to China as part of the talks. China, which provides more than 90 per cent of global supply of rare earth magnets, decided in early April to add several rare earth items to its export restriction list in retaliation for US tariffs. The subsequent sharp falls in shipments in April and May, due to the lengthy times required to secure export licences, had rattled global suppliers, forcing some automakers outside China to halt partial production due to shortage of rare earths. In total, China exported 3,188 tons of rare earth permanent magnets last month, up 157.5 per cent from 1,238 tons in May, although the June volume was still 38.1 per cent lower than the corresponding month in 2024. Shipments of magnets are likely to recover further in July as more exporters obtained licences in June, analysts said. During the first half of 2025, exports of rare earth magnets fell 18.9 per cent on the year to 22,319 tons.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Elon Musk's xAI To Launch Baby Grok After Criticism Over Sexualized AI Avatars
Elon Musk's Child-Friendly AI App: Tech billionaire Elon Musk has revealed that his AI venture, xAI, is working on a child-friendly version of its chatbot Grok. The new app, tentatively named 'Baby Grok', aims to build on Grok's capabilities while tailoring its features for younger users. The announcement follows criticism of Grok's previous versions, particularly for featuring sexualized AI avatars that experts warned could negatively influence children. According to media reports, xAI stated that the program will bring its advanced AI capabilities to federal, local, state, and national security customers, signalling the firm's growing interest in public sector partnerships. In response, the upcoming chatbot is expected to feature stricter content controls and safety measures. However, Musk has not yet shared detailed insights into how Baby Grok will differ from xAI's standard offering. Earlier this month, xAI launched Grok 4, just months after its prior release, signaling the rapid pace of AI advancement. The update came in the wake of controversy over antisemitic remarks generated by the chatbot on X (formerly Twitter), which drew sharp public backlash. Google's Gemini Chatbot For Kids Meanwhile, Google has announced it is developing a children-focused version of its Gemini chatbot. Designed to assist with homework, answer questions, and foster creativity, the app will come with parental controls through the Family Link platform. Google has confirmed that the kids' version of Gemini will not include ads or collect data, focusing purely on educational and creative use.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Air India plane crash: Aviation minister defends AAIB amid Western media criticism – ‘No point in jumping to…'
Calling the Ahmedabad Air India plane crash reports published by the western media as their 'vested interests', the Union Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu Kinjarapu on Sunday said that there was no point jumping to conclusions before the AAIB report comes out. 'AAIB has made an appeal to all, especially Western media houses, which may have a vested interest in the kind of articles they are trying to publish,' Naidu said. 'I believe in AAIB. They have done a wonderful job in decoding the black box in India itself. Making any comments until the final report comes out is not a good exercise. There is no point in jumping to conclusions at this point,' he added. The civil aviation minister was referring to the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) preliminary report, released on July 12, on the crash of Air India's Boeing 787-8 plane that killed 260 people, including 241 people onboard. The aircraft, which was operating the flight AI171 from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, crashed into a building soon after takeoff. Seconds before Air India flight 171 crashed while ascending from Ahmedabad, the fuel control switches of both its engines were cut off, according to the preliminary investigation report, suggesting a catastrophic pilot error in the cockpit of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. A 15-page preliminary investigation report into the disaster revealed that fuel-control switches of the two engines moved from the "run" to the "cutoff" position, within the space of one second, leading to immediate loss of altitude. In the cockpit voice recording, one pilot is heard asking the other why he cut off the fuel. The other denied having done so. The report by the AIIB neither concluded any reason for the switches moving nor apportioned explicit blame for the crash. It also did not identify the pilots in the voice recording. But it also said no fault was found in the aircraft. The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) President Captain CS Randhawa on Saturday called out The Wall Street Journal and Reuters, accusing them of not basing their reports on factual content while highlights the AIIB's preliminary report on the AI-171 plane crash. Captain CS Randhawa's strong remark followed the FIP's initiation of legal action through a formal notice to The Wall Street Journal and Reuters. They have also sought an official apology. Strongly criticising the WSJ and Reuters, Randhawa blamed them for "misleading" the public, alleging that their reports are "not based on factual content." "I would totally blame the Wall Street Journal for misleading the public, they come out with their own conclusions. Are they the investigative body? They're talking all this crap around the world. They are not the investigative body, and the reports are not based on any factual content, which is mentioned in the preliminary report. So, how can they jump to conclusions and give press statements around the world?" he told ANI. Captain Randhawa said that FIP has issued a legal notice asking them to issue a statement in the press, giving an explanation of their reportage of the AAIB preliminary reports. "We strongly condemn it, and we've also issued legal notices to the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. We have clearly said that how can you jump to these conclusions which are not part of the preliminary report of the AAIB? How can you blame the pilots? So we have asked for an explanation and have asked that you give a statement to the press." he said.
