Zelenskyy: There would have been no Spider's Web if Russia had agreed to ceasefire
Source: Zelenskyy at a briefing on 4 June
Quote: "A ceasefire could have been declared before the operation we carried out [Spider's Web]… Would the operation have taken place then? No."
Details: Zelenskyy added that Ukraine would not leave Russia's actions unanswered.
Quote: "That does not mean we are doing nothing while seeking a ceasefire. That is our approach… We must set the rules. I believe that if ceasefire rules apply to everyone, then they apply to everyone. If they are violated [by Russia – ed.], then we also can violate them."
Details: During the briefing, Zelenskyy noted that he had signed a classified decree to decorate officers from the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) for their role in conducting Spider's Web on Russian territory. He said that as a result of the operation, 41 aircraft had been damaged, half of which are beyond repair.
Background:
On 1 June 2025, the SSU carried out a special operation codenamed Pavutyna (Spider's Web), one of the largest and most complex sabotage operations against Russian military aviation.
The SSU reported that the operation resulted in the destruction of 41 Russian strategic aircraft, including Tu-95, Tu-22M3 and Tu-160 strategic bombers, as well as an A-50 long-range radar detection aircraft.
The North Atlantic Alliance has hailed the SSU's operation targeting Russian strategic aircraft as highly successful. NATO reported that at least 40 aircraft had been damaged. Between 10 and 13 aircraft were completely destroyed.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The questionable experts with the Global Fact-Checking Network, Russia's verification organisation
Russian organisation the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), which was launched in April 2025, claims to fight disinformation. But a number of the 60-odd members of the network regularly share disinformation online. We take a look. It was to be a platform 'uniting experts dedicated to exposing unreliable information', according to the spokesperson for the Russian ministry of foreign affairs, Maria Zakharova. On April 9, she announced during a press conference the launch of the Global Fact-checking Network (GFCN), a platform promoting the verification of information 'that fosters an honest and open approach to fact-checking'. And yet, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), the GFCN is the 'Kremlin's latest propaganda tool'. 'This initiative is part of a well-established Kremlin strategy: mimicking independent institutions to better spread its propaganda,' the international non-profit dedicated to press freedom said in a report published on June 24 about the GFCN. GFCN is upfront that it wants to serve as a counterpoint to Western fact-checking services, including the International Fact-checking Network (IFCN), an initiative founded in 2015 that brings together 170 fact-checking organisations [including our team at the FRANCE 24 Observers] from across the world around a shared code of ethics about fact-checking practices. At first glance, GFCN seems to resemble a fact-checking organisation like IFCN: the network has, for example, a 'code of responsible fact-checking", which includes values like objectivity and impartiality and the use of verified data. Since early June, it has also offered courses on fact-checking techniques as well as an "international contest" to help people learn to better detect AI-generated videos. Co-founded by Tass and an NGO under sanction However, critics of GFCN say that the organisations behind it aren't necessarily poster children for these values. GFCN was cofounded by the Russian state press agency TASS, the New Media School – a government-run training programme for Russian journalists – and the NGO Ano Dialog. A number of specialists and Western governments have described this NGO, which is currently under US sanctions, as being closely linked to the Kremlin – as well as a number of different disinformation operations. Its director general, Vladimir Tabak, who has been placed under sanctions by a number of Western countries, is now president of GFCN as well. Maxime Audinet and Colin Gérard, researchers specialised in Russian influence, say that Tabak is one of the main actors in the disinformation operation Doppelgänger, which creates fake websites that resemble Western news outlets to share false information. 'Our goal within the Network is to unite experts, journalists, and media representatives who are ready to jointly defend the right to reliable information,' said Tabak in mid-July 2025. At that point, GFCN was made up of 65 members from 40 different countries. Eight fake news items in 12 days However, a number of the experts who appear on GFCN's website regularly share false information online and draw from unverified, unsourced content. "Many of the voices on this list are extremely biased and lack legitimacy,' says Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University in the United States and author of a number of reports about Russian online disinformation networks. When our team took a look at the X account of Tim Anderson, the first name on the list of so-called experts, we noticed a number of fake news items on his feed. Anderson used to be a professor at an Australian university and founded an organisation called the Center for Counter Hegemonic Studies. From our count, Anderson shared eight false news items during the 12-day war between Israel and Iran last June. Among the fake news items he shared that are still online: images taken from video games or generated by artificial intelligence that Anderson claimed were proof that Iran had shot down Israeli F-35 bombers. And yet, as our team reported, there is still no viable proof to date that Iran downed any of these planes. Anderson also shared a video that claimed that Mossad chief David Barnea had died – which is also not true. These errors run counter to GFCN's purported code, which stipulates that it is important to 'verify information sources to make sure that they are reliable and authentic'. You can see our analysis of the eight fake news items shared by Anderson by following this link. Other GFCN experts have also shared false claims based on unverified sources. Pakistani journalist Furqan Rao, for example, shared on two separate occasions photos that were either false or taken out of context about the conflict between India and Pakistan last May. In one case, he shared a video of a military simulation game that made it look like Pakistan had destroyed a military base. He also shared a video filmed in Dubai in 2021 and falsely claimed that it showed a cache of Indian missiles that had been targeted. He did not publish corrections about his posts. The list of experts also includes people who are not journalists, like Roigar López Rivas. GFCN says that López Rivas is the president of the National Institute for the Development of Small and Medium Industry in Venezuela. Yet he appeared on a panel of experts at a GFCN event held in June. Between November 2023 and July 2025, this fervent supporter of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro got 33 Community Notes – notes added by users of the platform X to add context to false or misleading posts –, according to the tool Community-Notes-Leaderboard. These notes include a false montage criticising Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a false poster calling for the FBI to capture Venezuelan opposition figure Juan Guaido – which was investigated by our fact-checking partner IFCN Cazadores – as well as a video that he claimed was a strike on Moscow and which was actually an Iranian strike on Israel. Experts with links to 'Storm-1516' GFCN's list of experts also includes names of people known to work within other pro-Russian online disinformation networks. This includes Dutch independent journalist Sonja Van den Ende and Brazilian analyst Lucas Leiroz, both identified by the Clemson Institute or the French government agency for the defence against foreign digital interference Viginum as important figures within the Russian disinformation operation "Storm-1516". Storm-1516 is a complex operation whose main aim is to spread false information, primarily about the war in Ukraine and Western countries. They employ various methods of dissemination, but most often transmit these stories through fake news sites or websites that regularly share fake news. Both Sonja Van den Ende and Lucas Leiroz shared eight different narratives from this operation between 2023 and 2024, according to a report from the Clemson Institute. One that they shared was a fake news story from a Nigerian media outlet claiming that Zelensky had purchased a house in Egypt. Though Zelensky denied this and numerous fact-checking articles were published debunking this story, their X posts featuring the fake news story are still online (see links here and here). Leiroz is also known for his work in the BRICS Journalists Association (BJA), which claims to represent non-Western journalists. However, this organisation was just placed under European sanctions on July 15 for 'disseminating pro-Russian narratives and disinformation under the guise of independent journalism' following reports describing the involvement of several BJA members in Storm-1516. Leiroz has also publicly defended Irish RT journalist Chay Bowes, who is considered one of the main actors within Operation Storm-1516, as our team has documented on numerous occasions. "Russia's main success is that it has managed to build up a collection of voices that disseminate false information and give it legitimacy,' says Linvill, who describes organisations like the BRICS Journalists Association as 'tools for legitimising disinformation', in the same way as GFCN. Chay Bowes also has the support of Timofey V, whose real name is Vasiliev. Vasiliev, who is presented on GFCN's site as the head of the NGO ANO Dialog, is also behind the media outlet War on Fakes, which disseminated Russian propaganda under the guise of fact-checking. In February 2025, Timofey V shared a fake video posted by Bowes about an alleged electoral fraud carried out against the far-right German political party AfD. Our fact-checking colleagues at AFP Factuel reported that this video was staged. Our team contacted GFCN, which said that 'the experts in the articles posted under the aegis of GFCN respect the ethical and professional norms outlined in the Code of the association.' 'Communicating' on the international level "GFCN is not a structure that operates independently from the rest of the Russian influence network,' Pauline Maufrais, the RSF Regional Officer for Ukraine and author of the report on GFCN, told our team. "We see the same figures from the pro-Kremlin propaganda, who have been bouncing around in these circles for years and who pop up again when there are new projects.' Another GFCN participant is the media outlet International Reporters, founded in late 2023. This project is primarily run by French journalist Christelle Néant, who has been working in the Donbass region since 2016 and speaks out against what she says are Western 'lies' about Russia. Linvill says that the choice to bring in influential figures from across the globe is part of Russia's strategy of global influence. "Russia is very talented at giving the impression of being inclusive,' he says. 'This serves several functions – not only does this give them a good image, but it also enables them to communicate effectively in these communities.' "It's not insignificant that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is so involved,' Maufrais says. "The aim is to go and find new audiences to share their narrative with the aim of being visible on the international stage.' Russian embassies in Bangladesh and South Africa have also been known to tout the GFCN. An African press agency that has bought into GFCN The African Initiative, a Russian press agency created in 2023 that aims to be the main 'information bridge between Russia and Africa', joined the list of GFCN participating organisations – another sign of the collaboration between different bodies of Russian influence. The structure is an agency that promotes anti-Western and pro-Kremlin propaganda across the African continent, according to a report published by Viginum and the European External Action Service (SEAE) in May 2025. Like GFCN, the African Initiative also offers training sessions about disinformation so that it can 'independently counter the propaganda imposed by the West'. "Most Russian disinformation and propaganda aims to delegitimize the West politically, culturally, and institutionally,' says Linvill. "An organisation like the GFCN does these three things at once.'
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Trump says he gave new orders to US nuclear submarines in response to an ex-Russian president's 'foolish' talk
"Based on the highly provocative statements" from Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's security council, "I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. It was not immediately clear what type of submarine Trump was talking about. All Navy submarines are nuclear-powered vessels, but only the ballistic missile subs, or SSBNs, can launch Trident II missiles, which have nuclear warheads. US Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines are regularly on patrol, with a focus on adversarial nuclear powers like Russia or China. The US typically does not disclose the location of its secretive missile submarines, except in cases when it's trying to send a message to adversaries. Trump didn't give away the location, but the order serves the same purpose. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances," Trump said in his social media post. The Navy deferred questions on Trump's comments to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which deferred questions to the White House and the president's statement. The White House did not offer comment. Trump and Medvedev have been exchanging threats and warnings in the wake of the US president saying earlier in the week that Russia had just a matter of days to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face new tariffs. The White House continues to be frustrated with Moscow's unwavering position on the grinding war. Medvedev, nowadays a warmonger who regularly rattles the Russian nuclear saber, responded by referring to what is perceived as an ultimatum as a "threat" that brings the two countries "a step towards war." Trump later singled out Medvedev in a Truth Social post, calling him "the failed former President of Russia" and cautioning that he should "watch his words." "He's entering very dangerous territory!" Trump wrote. But Medvedev hit back on the Telegram messaging platform and said that Trump should remember "his favorite movies about 'The Walking Dead,' as well as how dangerous the nonexistent 'dead hand' can be." The "dead hand" is a reference to a Soviet-era nuclear weapons control system designed to ensure that Russia can launch a retaliatory strike, even if leadership is physically unable to do so. Medvedev, who served as Russia's president between 2008 and 2012, has been one of the most prominent anti-Western voices in the Kremlin since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in 2022. His comments this week mark the latest nuclear saber-rattling by Russia. President Vladimir Putin has also leaned on the country's nuclear arsenal, the largest in the world, in his warnings to the West amid the ongoing support for Ukraine.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gabbard Swipes at Obama's Response to Her MAGA Conspiracy
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard hit back at former President Barack Obama after he dismissed her claim that his administration cooked up intelligence on Russian election interference in a 'treasonous conspiracy' against President Donald Trump. On July 17, Gabbard released a report alleging that Obama and his top national security officials conspired to 'manipulate' intelligence to link Trump to Russia's meddling in the 2016 election, calling for him and other officials to be prosecuted. Through a spokesperson, Obama issued a rare response dismissing her claims as 'a weak attempt at distraction' from the Jeffrey Epstein story. Gabbard went on the offensive on Fox & Friends. 'President Obama's very carefully worded response that came from his office, again, deflects away from addressing any of the truth that was revealed,' Gabbard said Saturday. 'They would have to admit and actually address the details of their complicity in this or their absolute failure in conducting the most basic responsibilities of, again, asking, where is this intelligence coming from?' Gabbard's allegations come as the president's supporters have revolted over a July 6 report from the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) finding that discraced financier Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in 2019, rather than being murdered, and that no 'client list' of wealthy co-conspirators exists—conspiracies Trump has promoted and now fallen victim to. Obama's spokesperson, Patrick Rodenbush, said last week that the claims represented the 'constant nonsense and misinformation' that stemmed from the Trump administration. 'The bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' he said. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.' Rodenbush declined to comment on Gabbard's latest retort. Gabbard has described the Obama administration's intelligence findings as 'seditious' and 'treasonous,' releasing documents that she said prove Russia did not interfere with the 2016 election and that Obama officials relied too heavily on a dossier outlining Trump's ties to Russia. The Obama administration—and the first Trump administration—did not claim Russia changed any votes in 2016 but instead launched an influence campaign designed to sway voters to support Trump. Still, Gabbard has urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate and charge government officials such as former FBI Director James Comey, former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan, and Obama himself. Trump has urged reporters to investigate Gabbard's claims and amplified the case on Truth Social, sharing a nearly nine-minute segment on Saturday from Mark Levin's Fox News show that attacked Obama. Meanwhile, as the Epstein saga continued to consume his administration, Trump has deflected questions and told reporters on Friday to look at other friends of Epstein, including former President Bill Clinton.
