
Entries Open for 2025 Social Business Wales Awards
Social enterprises across Wales are being encouraged to celebrate their impact and enter the 2025 Social Business Wales Awards, which are now officially open for entries.
Delivered by the Social Business Wales programme, the annual awards recognise the most inspiring and innovative social enterprises in Wales – organisations that are making a real difference to communities, the environment, and the economy.
This year, categories include:
• One to Watch – for emerging enterprises less than two years old • Innovation of the year – for creative enterprises developing new products and services • Environmental social enterprise of the year • Social enterprise building diversity, inclusion, equity and justice award • Community-based social enterprise – a place-based organisation making a big impact
• Wales social enterprise of the year
There's also a new 'Women's champion of the year' category, and a social impact award which will honour an organisation which brilliantly proves its impact through data and powerful storytelling.
The 2024 Social Business Wales awards were held at Venue Cymru, Llandudno, where the South Wales-based Community Impact Initiative (Cii) won the Social Enterprise of the Year award. The Community Impact Initiative
Trystan Jones, Chief Executive of the Community Impact Initiative, said:
'For the individuals we work with, seeing us win the Social Enterprise of the Year award gave them confidence that we know what we're doing, that we're an organisation worth talking to.
'Externally, it was the cherry on the cake.
'Internally, winning rubber-stamped our belief in what we're doing. It provided proof of the positive influence we have. It was a powerful affirmation.
'Winning a Social Business Wales award has been very meaningful for all of us.'
Rhondda Cynon Taff-based social enterprise Down to Zero won the 2024 One to Watch award.
Project Manager Tom Addiscott said:
'We were very proud of the One to Watch award. It has given us kudos as a company, raised our volunteer numbers, and given our staff that 'feel good factor'. That kind of recognition for volunteers is very important, and was wonderful to see.'
Glenn Bowen, Director of Enterprise at Cwmpas, said:
'The Social Business Wales awards are about shining a light on the incredible work happening across Wales's social enterprise sector.
'We've seen how an SBW award win can raise an organisation's profile and open doors to new opportunities – and this year's simplified online entry system makes it easier than ever to take part.'
Entries are open until Monday 14 July, with winners to be announced at a celebration event in October.
To enter or find out more, visit the Social Business Wales website here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
5 days ago
- Metro
Coca-Cola to release new Trump-approved version of the soda
Steve Charnock Published July 23, 2025 2:15pm Link is copied Comments Soda giant Coca-Cola is rolling out an all-new cane sugar-sweetened version of its world-famous signature drink, confirming a move that President Donald Trump teased last week. The beverage behemoth shared the update in its latest quarterly earnings report on Tuesday, saying that the drink will launch this fall and sit alongside - not replace - its current corn syrup–based line-up in the US. Trump claimed credit for the move on social media, saying it's a win for American consumers and their taste buds (Picture: AFP via Getty Images) 'This will be a very good move by them - You'll see. It's just better!' Trump had posted on Truth Social last week. He also wrote: 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so.' Coca-Cola later responded that it 'appreciates President Trump's enthusiasm,' but made clear that the original recipe isn't changing. Instead, this is a new product aimed at meeting growing consumer interest in alternative sweeteners (Picture: SOPA/Getty Images) According to the company's Tuesday announcement, the cane sugar version is part of Coca-Cola's 'ongoing innovation agenda' and will be an additional option within its US portfolio. 'This addition is designed to complement the company's strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences,' a spokesperson said. Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey told analysts, 'We are definitely looking to use the whole toolkit of available sweetening options where there are consumer preferences' (Picture: Getty Images) Trump had reportedly raised the issue of corn syrup with Coke's top brass back in January. According to the book 2024: How Trump Retook the White House, the president even brought billionaire sugar magnate and political donor José Fanjul into the conversation, phoning him during the meeting to press the case for using cane sugar. The result, Trump later claimed online, was Coca-Cola's decision to develop a new formula sweetened with traditional sugar (Picture: NBCUniversal via Getty Images) In many countries, including Mexico, Coke is already made with cane sugar. And it's become something of a cult item in America under the nickname 'Mexican Coke'. Sold in glass bottles, the imported version has built a loyal following since it was introduced to US stores back in 2005. Now, the company hopes that a domestic cane sugar product will reach more shoppers who want that Mexican taste without the higher import price tag (Picture: Margo Martin) Still, not everyone is convinced this is a meaningful health move. While Trump's Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has publicly attacked high-fructose corn syrup as a major driver of obesity, nutrition experts remain sceptical. Kennedy once called the sweetener a 'formula for making you obese and diabetic' in an appearance on Jordan Peterson's podcast. But others caution that switching sweeteners doesn't necessarily make soda healthy… (Picture: Tucker Carlson/YouTube) 'Excess consumption of sugar from any source harms health,' Eva Greenthal, senior policy scientist at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, previously told CNN. 'To make the US food supply healthier, the Trump administration should focus on less sugar, not different sugar.' Many dietitians also argue that cane sugar and corn syrup affect the body in much the same way, especially in the high quantities found in sugary soft drinks (Picture: REUTERS) Coca-Cola's move doesn't necessarily mark a return to pre-corn syrup days so much as merely a product expansion for them. The company shifted to high-fructose corn syrup in the 1980s because it was cheaper and more readily available thanks to US corn subsidies. Quincey noted that cane sugar already appears in some American Coca-Cola products like lemonade, vitamin water and coffee drinks, so this new cola isn't entirely uncharted territory for the brand (Picture: Getty Images) Meanwhile, PepsiCo has no plans to change its flagship formula, but is experimenting with sweetener variety in newer offerings. Its prebiotic soda and its recently acquired Poppi brand both contain cane sugar. CEO Ramon Laguarta recently told CNBC that sugar's high price in the United States poses a rather hefty challenge for the industry. 'There is a conversation with the government probably on how do we make sugar more affordable in the US,' he said (Picture: Getty Images)


North Wales Live
16-07-2025
- North Wales Live
Llandudno councillors to attempt call-in of library building closure decision
Two Llandudno councillors say they will call in a decision to close the Mostyn Street library and relocate the service to Venue Cymru. Conwy 's cabinet took the highly controversial decision last week, which will see the council target £10m of UK Government funds to regenerate the 'tired' Venue Cymru into an arts centre – complete with a library extension. The decision was made despite a public consultation finding 76% of 999 residents fearing moving the service would create access problems, with another 1,100 objectors signing a petition against the move. Backed by Mostyn Estates, businesses in the town also worried closing the library building on Mostyn Street would result in a drop in foot fall in the town centre. But cabinet made the decision after a scrutiny committee had backed the move, on the condition a solid business case was supplied. Now Llandudno backbench Conservative councillors Louise Emery and Harry Saville are attempting to call the decision in, arguing a proper business case is yet to be produced. S ign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox. Cllr Emery claims she contacted the council's head officers a week ago, requesting a business case, with the email copying in cabinet members heading the move. But Cllr Emery says she is yet to see the documents and worries the cash-strapped council will struggle to pay for the maintenance of the new building once complete. Cllr Emery also said scrutiny weren't given the opportunity to scrutinise a list of costs presented on screen at the cabinet meeting, which were not made available to individual councillors at the time – or afterwards. 'We are trying to call this decision in because financial information was provided by the deputy leader, Cllr Emily Owen, and scrutiny members were not aware that this information was going to be presented at cabinet, and they had no previous opportunity to scrutinise the figures, which may have affected the decision on the previous Wednesday at the scrutiny meeting,' said Cllr Emery. 'I'm still waiting for the business case, the one they said is on a civil servant's desk in Westminster (as part of the £10m funding application). I would like to see that in detail and be able to go through the figures and to reassure myself that this £10m project is the right thing to do for Conwy, regardless of the fact it has already been passed by scrutiny, who haven't seen the business case. 'So I'm going to do my own due diligence as a Llandudno member, and if I find that the figures don't stack up, then I'm going to ask questions. That's my role. 'If you look at most capital projects and you look at industry standards, you do (set aside) between 2% and 4% of the value of the project for future maintenance. So let's say some of that is renovating the old bit of Venue Cymru – most of it is on the new building – so you're looking at a sizeable amount of money for revenue and maintenance costs, and I'm worried that some of that will fall on the library service.' 'It doesn't feel that the cabinet have listened to not just the residents but their representatives, the Llandudno councillors; across party, they feel it is a bad decision, and we just don't feel listened to, and that is really disheartening.' She added: 'We are going to try and call the decision in, hopefully today as we only have a limited number of days.' A call-in is a process that can see a scrutiny committee revisit a previous decision, with councillors or groups of councillors having the right to request a committee call a matter in. This means a decision can be re-debated if it's found, for instance, that processes weren't properly followed. Conwy County Council was contacted for a comment. Public notices in your area

Reuters
09-07-2025
- Reuters
Asia's budding dividend zeal needs more support to flourish: Raychaudhuri
HONG KONG, July 10 (Reuters) - While U.S. and European companies have reduced their average dividend payouts over the past decade, Asian corporates have maintained consistent payout ratios, reflecting the region's improving balance sheets, shifting investor preferences and increasingly supportive regulatory environment. To maximize shareholder value, economic theory argues that excess cash should be distributed to shareholders. Companies do this through dividends or share buybacks. Asian companies pay more dividends than their U.S. peers, who typically prefer share buybacks, but less than Europeans. Asia's average dividend payout ratio was 40% in 2024, compared to 31% for S&P 500 companies and 48% for Eurostoxx 50 companies, according to Factset. Asian companies were not always in the middle of the dividend rankings. Asia recorded the lowest dividend payouts of the three regions only a decade ago, when European companies sent more than 60% of their profits back to shareholders and Americans disbursed 40%. The decline in the U.S. is largely because corporates have increasingly jumped on the buyback bandwagon, despite a modest jump in dividend payouts in 2019-2020. Meanwhile, in Europe, firms have increasingly preferred to retain more capital, largely due to uncertainties created by rising competition from Asian imports. Dividend payouts in Asia, on the other hand, have benefited from investor preference for high dividend-yielding stocks and regulatory pushes. Reflecting the maxim that in uncertain times cash is king, Asian investors have shown a strong preference for dividend-paying companies in the volatile period since 2020. The MSCI Asia ex Japan High Dividend Yield Index has generated total returns that are more than double those of the MSCI Asia ex Japan index over the past five years. This gap has shrunk in the first half of 2025 due to strong performance among low-dividend yielding sectors such as China internet platforms and Korean tech, but demand for dividends will likely get a boost if interest rates continue to decline in many major Asian markets. If investors are indirectly pushing Asian companies to distribute more cash, regulators' approach is more direct, with officials in China, Japan and Korea at the forefront of this effort, though the results have been mixed. In January 2023, SASAC, the Chinese state-owned company regulator, announced a shift in the key performance indicator used for evaluating state-owned enterprises, replacing net earnings with Return on Equity (ROE). A company can enhance its ROE by distributing excess cash and thus reducing the size of its balance sheet, a course of action that most of the SOEs took. On top of this, the Chinese securities regulator CSRC in August 2023 restricted controlling shareholders of listed companies from selling shares in the secondary market if the company has not paid significant dividends in the previous three years. Japan's regulatory efforts commenced almost simultaneously. In March 2023, the Tokyo Stock Exchange asked firms to disclose plans to improve capital efficiency, especially if their share prices were below book value. And then in February 2024, South Korea's Financial Services Commission announced the 'Corporate Value Up Program', which urged companies to prioritise shareholder returns in exchange for tax benefits. The outcomes have varied meaningfully by country. China's and South Korea's average dividend payout ratios have increased over the past few years, though South Korea's has recently fallen and Japan's has stayed virtually flat. Exhortations by the regulators, in the absence of other reforms, particularly of tax laws, seem to be having limited impact on corporate behaviour. Indeed, tax treatment of dividends appears to be a key driver of companies' payout decisions. A wide range of dividend taxation policies apply in Asia, ranging from no or very low tax in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia to 20% to 30% in China, Japan and India. Unsurprisingly, the companies in the highest tax regimes have the lowest average dividend payouts. The earliest dividend tax reform, the elimination of double taxation of dividends by Taiwan in 1999, significantly increased dividend payouts among Taiwanese firms, a trend that continues to this day. Investors often reward companies for sustainable, increasing dividend payments, which ultimately depend on companies maintaining resilient profitability, strong cash generation and a healthy balance sheet. On these counts, many large Asian corporate markets score highly on average. Corporate leverage in India, Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea has been declining since 2023, while cash generation in all four has been increasing, and both trends are expected to continue, through 2027, according to Factset consensus forecasts. Asian corporates' shift toward greater dividend payments could still run into hurdles. Companies' profitability may be hurt by the ambiguity surrounding global trade policy, and this could lead them to conserve cash rather than distribute it. The persistence of this trend may largely depend on whether governments match supportive market regulations with beneficial tax treatment and whether high dividend-yielding stocks continue to generate robust performance, which management teams will have little choice but to notice. (The views expressed here are those of Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd. and the former Head of Asia-Pacific Equity Research at BNP Paribas Securities.) Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab