Working from home? Discover which expenses you can claim as tax deductions
Image: Image: Unsplash
With the 2025 tax filing season looming, many South Africans working from home are asking what home office expenses they can claim as tax-deductible items and how to do it correctly.
This question is especially relevant for the growing number of South African employees working remotely for global companies who are increasingly turning to tax practitioners for guidance, says Thokozile Kumalo, Tax Consultant at Tax Consulting South Africa.
'While home office deductions may seem straightforward, the Income Tax Act includes specific provisions regulating these claims. Commission earners generally have more flexibility, but salaried employees working from home often face challenges because of the more restrictive rules applying to them,' Kumalo said.
According to Fine & Country Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), what began as a temporary shift during the pandemic has evolved into a long-term lifestyle for millions, and the ripple effect was being felt across the real estate sector, where demand is growing for homes that seamlessly support this new way of living: flexible, tech-savvy, and lifestyle-enhancing.
'The future of work is hybrid, flexible, and mobile – and the homes we live in need to reflect that,' said John Herbst, the CEO of the luxury property for sale and expert service provider, earlier this year.
'We are seeing a clear shift in what buyers and renters are looking for – from built-in workspaces and tech to locations that offer not just beauty and tranquillity, but the infrastructure and services to support productive remote work,' Herbst said.
She said that if you earn only a fixed salary, work from home full time, and use a dedicated space solely for work, there may be grounds for claiming home office expenses, provided you meet the strict requirements set out in law.
The tax practice said the three key sections of the Income Tax Act that govern these deductions are: Section 11(a) – General deduction formula, Section 23(b) – Use of home for trade and Section 23(m) – Limitations for salaried employees.
It said Section 11(a), often referred to as the 'general deduction formula,' allows a taxpayer who is "carrying on a trade" to deduct 'expenditure and losses incurred in the production of income, provided such expenses are not of a capital nature.
In the context of a salaried employee, it said 'trade' includes employment.
'Therefore, an employee who earns remuneration is regarded as carrying on a trade in the form of employment. If a salaried employee incurs home office expenses in the production of employment income, those expenses will conceptually fall within the scope of Section 11(a).
"It is important when claiming home office expenditure that Section 11(a) is applied in conjunction with the limitations imposed by Section 23.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The tax consultant said Section 23(b) imposes a specific prohibition against claiming deductions for expenses related to premises used for "domestic or private" purposes.
She said there is, however, an exception where there is a dedicated area used for the purposes of employment, that area is specifically equipped for such employment and the area is regularly and exclusively used for employment.
For salaried employees (not commission earners), Kumalo said it is required that more than 50% of their duties must be performed in the home office and the home office must be a clearly defined and exclusive workspace.
She said for full-time remote workers with a defined, exclusive home office, this meant they may qualify-in theory. Many salaried employees meet the conditions under Section 11(a) and 23(b), which often raises hopes for a successful claim, Kumalo said.
She added that the biggest hurdle comes in Section 23(m), which disallows most deductions under Section 11 for employees who earn remuneration (i.e., salary) and do not earn more than 50% of that income as commission or variable-based remuneration.
Tax Consulting South Africa said that for taxpayers who earn a fixed salary only, Section 23(m) prohibits deductions for most expenditure, losses or allowances that would otherwise be allowable under Section 11(a).
It said only expenses directly tied to the use of the premises, such as rent, electricity, and cleaning, may be considered and only under very specific conditions.
In short, Kumalo said, while Section 11(a) allows the deduction of qualifying expenses, Section 23 (b) adds strict conditions for home office use, and Section 23(m) disallows most deductions for salaried earners.
'In practice, this means that even if the general and home-office-specific conditions are met, fixed-salary earners are still barred from deducting most business-related expenses, including internet and cell phone costs, accounting fees, and stationery.'
Sharing a professional tip, the consultant said if one is a fixed-salary earner working from home full-time and wish to claim deductions, they must ensure that their employer provides a formal letter confirming remote work, they have a dedicated, exclusive workspace, more than 50% of the duties are performed in that space and the claim is limited to premises-related expenses.
Even then, Kumalo said SARS may still challenge deductions beyond the narrow exemptions outlined above. She said that, therefore, the onus is on the taxpayer to prove that the deduction should be allowed.
The firm said that in preparation for the 2025 Tax Filing Season, taxpayers must be reminded that SARS applies the rules around home office deductions strictly and conservatively, particularly for salaried employees.
Taxpayers are advised to consult a qualified tax practitioner before submitting any home office-related claims to avoid audit risk, disputes, and potential penalties, it warned.
In May, Nomie Nxumalo, the executive head for people and transformation at Miway, said the integration of workspaces into personal residences brings about certain dynamics to home usage. She said many homeowners have invested in expensive office equipment, increased their reliance on home internet, and even started running businesses from their residences.
However, failing to inform insurers about these changes could lead to gaps in coverage or even rejected claims in some cases.
'Most standard home insurance covers are structured around personal use of the home. Whether you're running a business or working remotely, it's crucial to declare to your insurer if a portion of your home is being used for business purposes,' Nxumalo said.
'Not doing so could result in your claims being declined or certain losses not being covered.'
Independent Media Property
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
22 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Amid wrecking balls like Trump, ANC, here's how organisations can still thrive
With rising global and South African uncertainty, as US President Donald Trump upends global politics, trade and markets, and as the ANC battles to transform from the unilateral decision-making of one-party dominance to collaborative multiparty governance, threatening the life of the country's Government of National Unity, organisations, whether state, private or nonprofit, have to be resilient — able to thrive in adversity, to navigate these shocks and see opportunities in uncertainty...
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Shelter or income generator — Risks and rewards of owning a property
In South Africa, keeping a roof over your head means more than just making monthly payments, it's about doing whatever it takes to hold onto the family's most valuable asset. Whether you're in a townhouse in a leafy suburb, or in a crowded taxi in a township, you probably know someone who's moved into a back room or a smaller flat so they can rent out their main home and keep up with the bond. 'The property is most probably the biggest asset you will ever own,' said Mfundo Mabaso, product head of FNB's home and structure business unit. For many South Africans, especially first-generation homeowners, a house is more than shelter; it's a symbol of progress and a vessel for generational wealth. But what happens when life throws a curveball and money gets tight? An all too common trend Mabaso has seen families 'vacate the main home and take residence in the garage to rent out the main home so that they can keep up with the repayment of the bond.' For them, losing the property is unthinkable. It's the last thing they're willing to give up. Two speeds of property investment Mass-market homeowners: These are often first-time buyers who see property ownership as a milestone and a way to build wealth. When financial pressures mount, these families might downsize within their own property – moving into smaller spaces like garages or back rooms – and rent out the main home to cover bond repayments. Affluent investors: Those with multiple properties who, when faced with economic challenges, tend to rent out their primary residences and downsize to smaller units. This strategy helps them maintain their investment portfolios and keep their long-term financial plans intact. Even if you're rich, you aren't immune to financial pressures. Mabaso explained that when wealthier families hit hard times, they often rent out their primary residence and downsize to something more manageable, all in a bid to hold onto their investment properties and keep their financial plans intact. The numbers behind the struggle This determination to hold onto property is riding a swell of a rising market. Property prices in South Africa are soaring, with the average residential price surpassing R1.6-million for the first time, and the annual growth rate in average residential prices now reaching 6.4%. Source: The Africanvestor Pieter Wessels, trustee of the PD Wessels Trust and owner of a Stellenbosch property, understands this well. 'Property like a house or flat is 'bricks and mortar'. You can see it,' he said. For Wessels, the appeal lies in leveraging a relatively small deposit into a significant investment, something much harder to achieve with shares or crypto. However, he quickly pointed out the risks. 'The less you pay, the easier it is to earn a better return in the form of rental. If you buy in a 'good' area, you might also get meaningful capital growth on your property apart from earning rental income.' Legal fees, transfer costs, and taxes on rental income are all part of the reality check for would-be investors. Security in a steady job While Wessels approaches property ownership from an investment perspective, others such as Thato Pheko, a high school teacher in the Free State, focus on the security that comes with steady employment. For Pheko, buying a house on a bond was about providing her children access to better schools near the city. 'I manage the payment with my salary,' she told Daily Maverick. Pheko feels insulated from major risk because she works for the government; a sector where, in her experience, sudden job losses are rare. 'I do not feel that there is much risk for me because I work for the government,' she said, confident that her employment stability will see her through the life of her bond. What this means for you Understand the full cost of property ownership: Beyond the purchase price, factor in legal fees, transfer costs, taxes on rental income, and ongoing maintenance; Plan for financial fluctuations: Job security and steady income can help, but unexpected challenges happen. Know your options, such as payment holidays or loan term extensions, and communicate early with your lender if you face difficulties; and Seek professional advice: Whether it's financial planning, tax implications, or legal matters, expert guidance can help you make informed decisions and protect your investment. When trouble strikes Financial stability can be fragile. Mabaso urged homeowners not to wait until it's too late. 'When you hit hard times, talk to your bank and that's the best thing that you can do for yourself.' Too often, he said, customers avoid the conversation, missing out on solutions such as payment holidays, interest-only periods or term extensions. If those options don't do the trick, banks may offer a 'quick-sell' process to protect your credit record before repossession becomes the only option. 'The execution or repossession of the properties is the action of last resort,' Mabaso said. By understanding the risks and rewards and knowing when and how to seek help, you can better navigate the complexities of the market and safeguard your home for the future. DM
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
South Africa's inflation target under review: Weighing risks and rewards for stability
Should South Africa lower its inflation target? Does inflation targeting work? And if so, what should the target be? After surviving yet another week of political turbulence and internecine bickering, South Africa's increasingly rickety coalition government might be about to face yet another thorny dilemma: the South African Reserve Bank's (SARB) push to lower the country's inflation target to below 3%, from the current band of 3-6%. Speaking on Monday, 30 June 2025, Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago reiterated his argument for a lower inflation target, saying that the current rate undermined the value of the rand and contributed to persistent price increases. The SARB, along with the National Treasury, is 'almost done' completing a technical review of the inflation targeting framework and plans to submit recommendations to Kganyago and Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana shortly. 'Although an inflation rate of 4.5% may seem moderate, it still causes prices to double every 16 years,' Kganyago noted in the SARB's annual report. 'This is hard to reconcile with our constitutional obligation to safeguard the value of the currency. 'The main concern with South African inflation is not our ability to hit the target,' Kganyago said. 'Rather, it is that our target is high compared to other countries. For this reason, despite our success in stabilising inflation, the price level is almost 20% higher than it was in 2021.' The central bank currently aims to anchor inflation expectations at the midpoint of its 3-6% target, but this range is now under formal review. With May's inflation reading at 2.8%, Kganyago and his colleagues see an opportunity to lock in gains and update a framework that has remained unchanged since its introduction in 2000. 'Perfect opening for reform' David Fowkes, a member of the Monetary Policy Committee, recently called this moment 'amazing', suggesting that current low inflation levels provided the perfect opening for reform as they would minimise any potential transition costs, which might come in the form of momentarily higher interest rates. According to the bank's modelling, shifting to a 3% target would yield significant benefits, with inflation expectations declining quickly while 'borrowing costs would fall more significantly' compared with the SARB's baseline forecast. Behind the push is a clear driver: investor appetite. Global asset managers have been pressuring the government to support the SARB's plan in the hopes that a lower target would permanently reduce bond yields and lending rates. South African bonds and the rand have both strengthened recently, with South African borrowing costs at a three-year low, partly on expectations and hopes that the Treasury will approve the new target by early next year. According to insiders, hedge funds and portfolio managers are actively lobbying the Treasury, advising a cautious transition to manage market impact and the inevitable political fallout. And there is some merit in the proposal. South Africa's base interest rate keeps the prime lending rate near 11%, with 10-year bond yields around 10%. These rates are at least partly elevated because of the high upper bound of the inflation target. It is for this reason that other emerging economies, like Brazil, have already lowered their targets — from 4.5% to 3% — with a 1.5% tolerance range. It is clear that international investors would like to see an emerging market like South Africa fit into what they see as global monetary policy best practice. Yet despite these compelling arguments, there are three issues with changing it that the SARB is either missing or conveniently ignoring. First, it is politically toxic. Lowering the inflation target would be further ammunition for the ANC-led government to suppress wage growth in the public sector and restrain price hikes by state-owned enterprises and municipalities. Public sector unions, which of course dominate all critical wage negotiations, rely heavily on past inflation data and expectations — which are largely driven by the inflation target — to argue for increases. There have even been recent calls from the academic community on why South Africa should actually be looking at raising the target threshold, not lowering it. The factions of the ANC who are not aligned with the Treasury, which has consistently been viewed as 'neoliberal', will be spoiling for a fight. Second, moderate inflation is one of the few tools available for reducing public debt. For an emerging market with high debt-to-GDP like South Africa, a bit of inflation is critical to 'inflate away' liabilities. A lower target would negate this effect, making debt consolidation even harder and potentially putting more pressure on the Treasury to cut spending at a time when the economy needs all the stimulus it can get. This could, theoretically, have adverse consequences for growth. Importance overstated Finally, the long-term importance of the inflation target is overstated. While financial markets might care about the level of the target, its long-term effect on economic fundamentals is minimal. The actual target itself is essentially random. The first economists who devised inflation targeting in New Zealand in the 1980s knew this — it is essentially a pragmatic and political decision as to what you make the target, not an economic one. What matters more is whether inflation expectations are well anchored and consistent, and then of course whether wages rise in tandem with prices. On that latter point, South Africa has clearly fallen short. Wage growth, especially outside the public sector, has consistently lagged inflation since the global financial crisis. The gap widened sharply during the Zuma-era stagnation and the Covid-19 pandemic. Rising food and transport costs, load shedding-related expenses and record-high unemployment have meant that even with inflation near historic lows most South Africans feel worse off than ever. For this reason, the debate is a red herring. The SARB should quit listening to the demands of the investor community and rather stick to its job of keeping prices in line with expectations. If the economy was being properly managed by the government and creating private sector jobs — which would mean more people being paid a decent salary — then we would not be having this debate in the first place. DM
