US environment agency axes nearly a quarter of workforce
Under the third round of "Deferred Resignation Program" cuts, that figure will drop to 12,448, a 22.9 percent reduction.
The cuts are made up of employees who took deferred resignation -- a program pushed by former Trump administration chief cost-cutter Elon Musk -- along with those who opted for early retirement or were laid off.
"EPA has taken a close look at our operations to ensure the agency is better equipped than ever to deliver on our core mission of protecting human health and the environment while Powering the Great American Comeback," EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a statement.
"This reduction in force will ensure we can better fulfill that mission while being responsible stewards of your hard-earned tax dollars," he added.
The statement added the cuts would generate $748.8 million in savings.
The White House is seeking to slash the EPA's budget by 54 percent to $4.2 billion for Fiscal Year 2026.
Friday's announcement drops staffing to below the 12,856 full-time positions outlined in the president's proposed budget.
The agency's scientific research arm -- the Office of Research and Development -- is also being dismantled, replaced by a smaller Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions.
According to the EPA, the new office will work to eliminate backlogs in reviewing hundreds of chemicals and thousands of pesticides, while developing a new strategy to address so-called "forever chemicals," or PFAS.
Zeldin has been at the forefront of Trump's push to aggressively deregulate pollution protections and "unleash" fossil fuels, drawing fierce backlash from scientists and environment advocates alike.
Earlier this month the EPA suspended 139 employees after they signed a scathing open letter accusing Zeldin of pushing policies hazardous to both people and the planet.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Trump threatens to block NFL D.C. stadium deal unless Commanders revert to 'Redskins' name
US President Donald Trump threatened on Sunday to interfere with a deal to build a new football stadium in Washington, D.C., unless the local NFL team, now known as the Commanders, changes its name back to Redskins. The American football team dropped the name Redskins in 2020 after decades of criticism that it was a racial slur with links to the US genocide of the Indigenous population. Trump had called for a return to the name Redskins – and for the Cleveland Guardians baseball team to once again adopt the name Indians – on other occasions, but on Sunday he added that he may take official action. "I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. The team moved from Washington to suburban Landover, Maryland, in 1997, but earlier this year reached an agreement with the local District of Columbia government to return to the city with a new stadium expected to open in 2030. Trump has limited authority to intervene under the current home-rule law governing federal oversight of the District of Columbia, but he has raised the prospect of taking more control, telling reporters in February, "I think we should take over Washington, D.C." Representatives of the Commanders did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Some fans have advocated readopting the name Redskins out of tradition, but leading Indigenous rights organisations have opposed the name, including the National Congress of American Indians, the Association on American Indian Affairs, and Cultural Survival. At least one group, the Native American Guardian's Association, has supported the name Redskins and the "respectful use of Native American names and imagery in sports, education and public life".
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Musk's X says French probe into algorithm is ‘politically motivated'
Elon Musk's social media platform X denied allegations by French authorities that it was part of a criminal investigation into alleged data tampering. The company also said on Monday that the French investigation is 'politically-motivated' and designed to 'restrict free speech' and denied the allegations. 'French authorities have launched a politically-motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged 'fraudulent data extraction,'' the company wrote on X. In January, French prosecutors launched an investigation following allegations that X's algorithm was being used for the purposes of foreign interference. The first complaint was filed by a centrist member of parliament, Eric Bothorel, a member of President Emmanuel Macron's party. Bothorel warned against "recent changes to the X algorithm, as well as apparent interference in its management" since Elon Musk acquired the company in 2022. "Concerns about the impartiality' He said there has been in "reduction in the diversity of voices and options" that go against a secure and respectful environment on the social media platform. He blamed this on "a lack of clarity in criteria that led to algorithm changes and moderation decisions", and to "personal interventions from Elon Musk in the management of his platform". In February, the French investigative media Le Canard Enchaine reported that the second complaint came from a cybersecurity director in the public administration. The individual had reported a "major modification in the algorithm used by the X platform,' which had resulted in a huge amount of political content that is 'hateful, racist, anti-LGBTQ (or) homophobic, and aims to skew democratic debate in France". X said that it remained in the dark about what the allegations were but that 'based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech'. It said that for these reasons, X would not hand over data, despite the prosecutor's demand. X has also said that the experts who will review X's algorithm are biased. The two experts are David Chavalarias, director of the Paris Complex Systems Institute (ISC-PIF) and Maziyar Panahi, an AI platform leader at ISC-PIF. X said that Chavalarias runs a campaign called 'Escape X,' which encourages users to leave the social media platform and that Panahi had in the past participated in research projects with Chavalarias that demonstrate open hostility towards X'. 'The involvement of these individuals raises serious concerns about the impartiality, fairness, and political motivations of the investigation, to put it charitably. A predetermined outcome is not a fair one,' X said. Euronews Next has reached out to the prosecutors' office and X but did not receive a reply at the time of publication. X owner Elon Musk has previously caused outcry by European politicians for commenting about domestic politics and publicly supporting Germany's far-right AfD party.
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Musk's X denies French allegations of algorithm manipulation
Elon Musk's social media platform X said on Monday it denied all allegations made by French authorities over manipulation of its algorithm and "fraudulent data extraction", adding that it has not acceded to the demands made in a French criminal investigation. "French authorities have requested access to X's recommendation algorithm and real-time data about all user posts on the platform in order for several 'experts' to analyze the data and purportedly 'uncover the truth' about the operation of the X platform," X said, adding that they denied the demands since they "have a legal right to do." Earlier this year, the Paris public prosecutor's office opened an investigation into the X social media platform after receiving two complaints. The first was filed by centrist parliamentarian Eric Bothorel, a member of President Emmanuel Macron 's party, who has looked into cybersecurity. The second was from a "senior official of a French public institution", the prosecutor's office said in a statement. The investigation was handed over to the French police in early July on charges of "altering the functioning of an automated data processing system as part of an organised criminal enterprise" and "fraudulent extraction of data from an automated data processing system as part of an organised criminal enterprise". The French authorities, according to X, requested access to its recommendation algorithm and real-time data on all posts by users of the platform as part of the investigation, which the group refused. In its statement posted on X, the social media firm accused the investigation of "distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech. Elon Musk The EU's former digital affairs commissioner, French politician Thierry Breton has described some of his pro-AfD comments as "foreign interference". The commission opened a probe against X in December 2023 and accused it in July 2024 of breaching its digital services regulations. The network risks being ordered to pay a fine of billions of euros.
