logo
NCERT issues clarification on revised Class 8 social science textbook content on Mughals: 'Facts based on…'

NCERT issues clarification on revised Class 8 social science textbook content on Mughals: 'Facts based on…'

Hindustan Times17-07-2025
The National Council for Education Research and Training (NCERT) on Wednesday detailed its rationale behind modifying some content in its Class 8 social science textbook and said that the facts stated were "based on well-known primary and secondary academic sources". Cover of Part 1 of the Class 8 Social Science textbook that the NCERT released.(X/@ncert)
Part 1 of the Class 8 textbook in question, titled 'Exploring Society: Indian and Beyond', introduces students to the Delhi Sultanate, Mughals, Marathas and more. The book emphasises "many instances of religious intolerance" during the Mughal era.
"This textbook attempts to provide an idea about the geography, history (medieval & modern), economic life and governance of the country, from a multi-disciplinary perspective in an integrated way," the NCERT statement read.
Introducing the book, the NCERT said it aims to avoid burdening the child with too much information and to develop a critical understanding.
"Class 8 being the last year of the middle stage, the students are expected to acquire broad multidisciplinary perspective in understanding of our past between 13th to Mid-19th century and how the various events of that period have helped to shape and influenced the evolution of India of today," the NCERT said in a press release.
The book references "brutal and ruthless conqueror" Babur's wiping off "entire populations of cities", and Aurangzeb destroying temples and gurdwaras.
These references are made in the 'Note on Some Darker Periods in History' section at the beginning of the book. The section comes as a disclaimer for students before they begin learning about war and bloodshed. The NCERT says this section was added to "avoid generation of any prejudice and misunderstanding".
"A cautionary note has been inserted in one of the chapters to make it clear that no one should be held responsible today for events of the past. The emphasis is on an honest approach to history with a view to drawing from it important lessons for a better future,' NCERT earlier said in a statement.
It argues that the historical account mentioned in the book is evidence-based and balanced.
'Indian history cannot be cannot sanitised and presented as a smooth, happy development throughout. There were bright periods but also dark periods where people suffered, so we have given note on the darker chapters of history, and also given a disclaimer that no one today should be regarded as responsible for whatever happened in the past,' The Hindu quoted Michel Danino, head of NCERT's Curricular Area Group for Social Science, as saying.
Although earlier editions addressed some of these topics in Class 7, the NCERT states that the timeline has now been moved entirely to Class 8, in accordance with the recommendations of the 2023 National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Microsoft restores services, Delhi HC closes Nayara Energy's plea
Microsoft restores services, Delhi HC closes Nayara Energy's plea

The Hindu

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Microsoft restores services, Delhi HC closes Nayara Energy's plea

Nayara Energy informed the Delhi High Court on Wednesday (July 30, 2025) that Microsoft has restored cloud services to its cloud-based services, following which the court allowed the company to withdraw its petition. Nayara Energy — an Indo-Russian oil refining and marketing company — had approached the court after being suddenly locked out of its Microsoft account, disrupting critical business operations. Also Read | CEO of Russia-backed Indian refiner Nayara Energy resigns after E.U. sanctions, sources say The company contended that Microsoft's unilateral action was based solely on its interpretation of recent European Union (EU) sanctions against Russia, despite Nayara being an Indian entity. At the outset of the hearing, counsel for Nayara Energy told the court that 'the matter is resolved because they (Microsoft) have restored all services.' The court then allowed Nayara to withdraw the petition, granting liberty to approach the court again should Microsoft take similar action in the future. Senior advocates Rajiv Nayyar and Dayan Krishnan, appearing for Nayara, argued that Microsoft had acted without notice and urged the court to record that any future termination of services should not be abrupt. 'At least they should give 3–4 days' notice before terminating. There can't be an abrupt shutting,' the lawyers said. Narrating the background, Mr. Krishnan said, 'Originally, there were servers. Then the Ukraine war started. They (Microsoft) came to us to move to cloud servers. We were apprehensive. They assured us: 'Don't worry, the Indian entity will not be affected by any of these (sanctions).' After that, this has happened.' Microsoft's counsel said the service has been restored but further clarified that no assurances could be given for the future. 'They (Nayara) are a sanctioned entity by the EU. We have restored today, but I can't make these statements for the future,' Microsoft's counsel submitted. Taking note of the developments, the court observed, 'Earlier, without notice, they had shut their services. You came to court. Now they have restored it. The grievance stands mitigated. In the future, we believe they would not do the same exercise, and as and when they intend to, they will perhaps give you notice. If they don't, you can come back to court.' In a recent press statement Nayara had said, 'While the sanctions originate exclusively from the EU, Microsoft—a U.S.-headquartered corporation—has chosen to withdraw services from Nayara Energy without any legal requirement to do so under U.S. or Indian law'. According to a Microsoft spokesperson, 'Microsoft is committed to supporting all its customers in India and worldwide, and has restored services for Nayara Energy. We are engaged in ongoing discussions with the European Union towards service continuity for the organization.' Nayara Energy said it is a vital contributor to India's energy security, accounting for approximately 8% of the country's total refining capacity, approx 7% of its retail petrol pump network.

'India-US ties go beyond trade deal or ceasefire claims': Govt sources on why India didn't call Trump 'a liar'
'India-US ties go beyond trade deal or ceasefire claims': Govt sources on why India didn't call Trump 'a liar'

First Post

time3 minutes ago

  • First Post

'India-US ties go beyond trade deal or ceasefire claims': Govt sources on why India didn't call Trump 'a liar'

Regarding Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's call for Prime Minister Narendra Modi to declare US President Donald Trump a 'liar', sources in the government have said that the India-US relationship goes beyond the disagreement over the ceasefire and trade talks and should not be compromised on these issues. read more Sources in the Union government have stressed that the India-US relationship goes beyond the disagreement over the ceasefire in the India-Pakistan conflict earlier this year and cannot be compromised over the issue. Since May when India and Pakistan clashed for four days before reaching a ceasefire on May 10, US President Donald Trump has claimed that he brokered the ceasefire between the two countries. India, on the other hand, has maintained that Pakistan made a request after four days of battering that India granted. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi of the Congress party said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should publicly declare Trump a 'liar' over his false claims. Notably, while the government has not used the word 'liar', it has repeated multiple times that the ceasefire was a result of India accepting Pakistan's request and no third-party intervention was at play there. 'If Narendra Modi has even 50 per cent of the courage of Indira Gandhi, he should declare in the House that Trump is lying about the ceasefire,' said Rahul. On the intervening night of May 6-7, India launched Operation Sindoor and struck terrorist sites in Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK). It was launched in response to the attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam in which terrorists killed 26 people on April 22. After Pakistan responded to Indian strikes with attacks on Indian civilian and military sites, India struck Pakistani military sites, including airbases and air defence units and, after four days of battering, Pakistan reached out to India with a request for a ceasefire on May 10. India granted Pakistan the request. India-US ties go beyond disagreements, say sources Sources in the Union government have said that the India-US relationship goes beyond ongoing differences, such as differences over the ceasefire in the India-Pakistan conflict and ongoing trade talks. Even as the August 1 deadline for a trade deal is just around the corner, India and the United States have not been able to reach any deal. It is believed that the Trump administration's refusal to respect Indian red lines about sensitive sectors of dairy and agriculture and genetically modified (GM) crops is the main barrier in the two sides reaching a deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump on Tuesday said that India will likely face 20-25 per cent tariff starting August 1, which will be much higher than the 15 per cent tariff that he has imposed on the European Union (EU) and Japan that he has struck deals with. Sources said that the United States has so far stood with India in disputes with China, such as during the Doklam standoff of 2017, and such an important relationship cannot be compromised on one or two differences. Moreover, sources stressed that the prime minister has publicly declared that no leader asked India to stop the war. Similarly, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has said that Modi and Trump never had the discussion about stopping the war. Sources further said that the Congress party has been in power before and it should know how governments function, suggesting that the party should realise the kind of words that the government would use to assert disagreement with the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Nayara Energy withdraws lawsuit against Microsoft after restoration of services
Nayara Energy withdraws lawsuit against Microsoft after restoration of services

Mint

time3 minutes ago

  • Mint

Nayara Energy withdraws lawsuit against Microsoft after restoration of services

Oil refining major Nayara Energy on Wednesday withdrew its lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. after the US techgiant restored critical digital services that had earlier been suspended, impacting the company's operations. A bench led by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav of the Delhi High Court allowed Nayara's plea to withdraw the case, granting the company liberty to approach the court again should similar grievances arise. Earlier, on 28 July, the Delhi High Court had issued a notice to Microsoft on Nayara's plea seeking an interim injunction and immediate restoration of access to essential software, tools, and digital infrastructure. In its petition, Nayara had accused Microsoft of unilaterally halting services despite the company having valid, paid-up licences for all Microsoft products in use. The company argued that Microsoft's move was based solely on the European Union's sanctions, announced on 18 July, targeting Nayara as part of EU's broader efforts to pressure Russia over its invasion of Ukraine. Nayara is partly owned by Russian oil giant Rosneft, which holds a 49.13% stake through a consortium with Kesani Enterprises, including Italy's Mareterra and Russia's United Capital Partners. In court filings and public statements, Nayara maintained that Microsoft's decision had no basis under US or Indian law, and was a case of corporate overreach. 'This decision, based solely on Microsoft's interpretation of EU sanctions, sets a dangerous precedent for corporate overreach and raises serious concerns regarding its implications on India's energy ecosystem,' Nayara said in an earlier statement. The company further noted that the EU sanctions were unilateral and not binding on US corporations, especially when the impacted entity operates entirely under Indian jurisdiction. 'Despite foreign ownership, Nayara Energy is governed by Indian law and operates as a fully Indian entity,' it said. The EU sanctions bar Nayara from exporting refined petroleum products to Europe and could potentially affect its engagements with European businesses. Nayara has called the sanctions 'baseless, unilateral, and a violation of international law', and has said it is exploring legal remedies in appropriate forums. Following the suspension of services by Microsoft, Nayara had also begun transitioning to domestic digital service providers to maintain business continuity. The legal action was initiated to secure immediate relief while broader strategic transitions were underway. Nayara Energy, formerly known as Essar Oil, operates a 20-million-tonne-per-annum refinery in Vadinar, Gujarat, and runs one of India's largest private fuel retailnetworks with around 6,800 outlets. The company accounts for about 8% of India's refining capacity and 7% of retail fuel distribution. Despite geopolitical headwinds, India has continued to deepen its reliance on Russian crude. In May, India's imports of Russian oil surged to a 10-month high of 1.96 million barrels per day, driven by steep discounts compared to globalbenchmarks, according to ship-tracking data from Kpler.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store