Harvard-trained investor: I've repeated this 6-word mantra daily since I was 20—it helped me become more successful than most
"I've had it, probably, since I was 20: 'Get up, dress up, show up,'" says von Tobel, 41. "[It means] get up early, get dressed and show up with a very positive attitude."
A founder and managing partner of venture fund Inspired Capital, von Tobel says she typically wakes up by 6 a.m. to "get ahead" of her three children and exercise so she can be "ready to take on the day in a powerful way."
That positive outlook helped give her the confidence to drop out of Harvard Business School and move to New York to launch a startup at age 24, she says. The startup was online financial advisory LearnVest, which she founded as startups struggled to access venture capital amid the start of the Great Recession.
Von Tobel credits a detailed, 75-page business plan and her own unshakeable conviction for her ability to raise more than $1 million from investors within a year of launching. "There was just an absolute desert of capital and my mindset was, like, 'There's only one plan. It's plan A and we'll figure it out," she says.Building a successful business — LearnVest reached 1.5 million users before selling to Northwestern Mutual for a reported $375 million in 2015 — required "extreme trust in my ability to figure things out, [which] stems from this very positive outlook," adds von Tobel.
Every entrepreneur should develop their own version of a relentlessly optimistic mindset about their business, so they can build the confidence and resilience they'll need to forge ahead while weathering inevitable setbacks, she says.
"It's natural to me, [but] the mindset of, literally, 'the impossible is possible' is very important for an entrepreneur: to only look for the path to make something successful, and the sheer commitment to extremely detailed positive thinking to make [that] happen," von Tobel says.
Positive thinking can provide real benefits ranging from reduced stress and better overall health to increased productivity and improved problem-solving skills, research shows. It can be especially powerful when combined with diligent preparation and a commitment to hard work — particularly important traits in the business world, according to serial entrepreneur and Stanford University adjunct professor Steve Blank.
Skipping out on research and preparation is the "biggest mistake" people make that often leads to failure in business, Blank told CNBC Make It in March. Billionaire Mark Cuban touts a similar message, phrased more bluntly: "You [need to] know your s--- better than anyone else in the room," he told GQ in 2022.
Some other successful entrepreneurs agree. "Positive thinking is [an] incredibly powerful tool," billionaire Richard Branson wrote in a 2018 blog post. "Simply put: positive, proactive behavior spurs positive, proactive behavior."
You can boost your own positivity by avoiding constantly comparing yourself to others and working on how you judge yourself, psychologists say. Replacing self-criticism with self-compassion — everyone makes mistakes, and you can learn something from every setback — can help shift your mindset from negative to positive, according to leadership and mental strength expert Scott Mautz.
"Stop all that negative inner chatter — the destructive thoughts, beliefs, and attitudes that take over..." Mautz wrote in August. "Instead, talk to yourself as you would to a friend in need, with compassion and empathy."
Von Tobel is also right, according to author and financial therapist Aja Evans: Regular uplifting affirmations genuinely help, too. They can help "fortify you, so when the crisis does come, you truly believe that you can handle it," Evans said in December.
,
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
What Most People Don't Know About Our 250-Year History, Part I
The Fed allowed one-third of U.S. banks to fail during the Depression. FPG/Hulton Archive. As we approach our country's 250th birthday, there is no better time to reflect on where we have been and how we got here. Yet Americans are surprisingly ignorant about our past. One reason: So much bad history has entered the popular culturecourtesy of bad historians, a few bad economists, and some talented writers like Charles Dickens and Upton Sinclair, who didn't understand history or economics at all. To remedy this problem, I highly recommend The Triumph of Economic Freedom: Debunking the Seven Myths of American Capitalism by Phil Gramm and Donald J. Boudreaux. Gramm is a former U.S. senator and Boudreaux is a professor of economics at George Mason University. Together they have combed through the scholarly literature and savagely dismantled myths about our economic history – myths that are routinely taught in high schools and colleges across the country. In this essay, I will address two severe economic downturns: the Great Depression and the more recent Great Recession. The Great Depression There are five myths here, beginning with the assertion that the depression was caused by capitalism and greed. Put differently, it's the idea that the worst economic downturn in our country's history occurred because of too much individual freedom and too little government. In contrast, the authors write, The worst failure was that of the Federal Reserve System, created to be a lender of last resort, providing liquidity to banks in times of a credit crisis. In fact, the Fed stood by, allowing one-third of the nation's banks to go out of business. A second myth is the idea that in the early stages of the depression, Herbert Hoover stood by and did nothing. In fact, Hoover was a very activist president. In response to the economic downturn, he raised taxes, increased spending, signed the Davis-Bacon Act (ensuring higher wages on federal construction projects) and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act. Like many of Franklin Roosevelt's policies, most of what Hoover did made things worse, not better. A third myth is that Roosevelt's policies saved us from the depression. In fact, they almost certainly caused the depression to extend for 12 years— longer than it did in any other industrialized country except for France. The authors write: A fourth myth is that Roosevelt united the public in times of crisis. In fact, Roosevelt was a divider, not a uniter. He vilified successful industrialists who opposed his policies as 'economic royalists' who made up an 'economic autocracy.' In fact, it is probably no exaggeration to say that Roosevelt vilified the rich in the United States the way Hitler, at the same time, was vilifying the Jews in Germany. University of Texas historian Henry W. Brands says that 'Roosevelt came disturbingly close to the demagoguery not only of Father Coughlin and the late Huey Long, but also of the fascists of Europe.' The final myth is the idea that it took the enormous increase in government spending during World War II to pull us out of the depression. Were that really true, when the war ended and government spending precipitously retracted, we should have been right back into the depression again. In the four years following the end of World War II, government spending fell by 75 percent. The federal deficit fell by more than 50 percent and then eased into a small surplus. Yet income, output and economic wellbeing continued to rise. The Great Recession Following the Great Depression, the Great Recession—from 2007 to 2009—was our nation's most severe economic downturn. It encompassed a sharp fall in housing prices, accompanied by a spike in mortgage defaults, especially on subprime loans. The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)—two government-sponsored enterprises established to support home ownership—went into receivership. There are four myths here, beginning with the assertion that the recession was caused by too much private sector greed and risk-taking and too little government supervision. If anything, the reverse is true. Subprime lending actually became a goal of the federal government—beginning under the Clinton administration, primarily through the expansion of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). The authors explain: Using newly expanded CRA requirements, bank regulators began to pressure banks to make subprime loans. Guidelines turned into mandates as each bank was assigned a letter grade on its making of CRA loans. Banks could not even open ATMs or branches, much less acquire another bank without a passing grade—and getting a passing grade was no longer about meeting local credit needs. Increasingly, passing grades were gotten by making subprime home loans. By 2008, roughly half of all outstanding mortgage loans in America—28 million in all—were high-risk loans. The second myth is that the crisis was caused by lack of regulatory authority. In fact, there were a slew of federal and state banking laws, which gave rise to an army of regulators with the power to investigate, mandate corrective action, and fine and even imprison violators. The problem was that the traditional interest in meeting community credit needs with sound banking practices was overridden by a new federal policy designed to make 'affordable housing' available to more and more people. A third myth is that the recession was caused by banking deregulation—in particular by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB). In fact, GLB removed barriers to competition in banking—making the financial sector more efficient. But regulatory authority did not decrease. It increased. The Congressional Budget Office actually scored GLB as increasing regulatory costs. Regarding GLB, President Clinton said, 'There's not a single solitary example that it had anything to do with the financial crash.' The final myth is the idea that the length of the recession was somehow caused by banking practices. In fact, an unusually weak recovery was more likely caused by increased penalties for working and increased subsidies for not working. During the Obama years, the authors say, the 'American economy was hit with a tidal wave of new rules and regulations across health care, financial services, energy and manufacturing.' At the same time there was an explosion in the enrollment numbers for disability benefits, food stamps and cash welfare. So why are these facts so important to know? George Santayana is reputed to have said, "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." The experiences of the Great Depression and the Great Recession are events that no sane person should want to experience again.
Wall Street Journal
11 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
America Should Travel Fast
Regarding Allysia Finley's 'California's Bullet Train Is a Model of Progressive Governance' (Life Science, July 21): Every highway and airport in America is subsidized—by billions more than we've ever given to high-speed rail. The $6 billion private line in Florida isn't high-speed, which costs more. But the benefit of true high-speed rail is that more people ride it because it's more convenient than driving or flying. Dozens of other countries, even those with far fewer resources than America, such as Morocco, build it because it's a better return on investment. I conducted a financial analysis of the California high-speed rail with some Harvard Business School colleagues more than a decade ago, and we came to two conclusions: It will cost more than they say, and it will still cost less than expanding highways or airports. The rail project should be reformed, not tanked.
CNBC
2 days ago
- CNBC
Harvard expert: This 30-second strategy can make you more influential in everyday conversations
Rehearsing a big presentation or jotting down some notes before a one-on-one meeting with your boss is normal. You should use a similar, truncated practice before casual interactions, recommends conversation expert Alison Wood Brooks: Take 30 seconds before greeting the other person to think about topics to go over, questions you want to ask or your goals for the conversation. Putting forethought into your casual chats can make you look smart, prepared and considerate — like a good friend who remembers even minute details of past conversations — says Wood Brooks, a Harvard University associate professor who teaches an MBA course called "How to talk gooder in business and life." Try preparing for even casual conversations, whether you're meeting a co-worker for lunch or an old friend for dinner, Wood Brooks advises. "Even if you're calling a friend you know well or your mom, what we find in our research is that even 30 seconds of forethought will make that conversation go better," she says. A small moment of mental preparation can help you stay present while you're talking and listening, says Wood Brooks, author of the 2025 book, "Talk: The Science of Conversation and the Art of Being Ourselves." After the conversation starts, you'll have less brainpower to come up with talking prompts or conversational segues, she adds. "Once the conversation is underway, your brain becomes very busy ... listening to the other person's words, trying to read their emotional expressions, preparing what you're going to say next," says Wood Brooks. "It's a very cognitively overwhelming task. We're better at brainstorming what we should talk about ... before that conversation begins." Sharp communication skills can help build relationships and propel your career, but being a good conversationalist often takes continual practice, Wood Brooks says. For example, you can always practice focusing more on the other person than yourself, speaking expert and author John Bowe wrote for CNBC Make It on September 25. "You've asked this person for their attention; now give them yours," wrote Bowe. "Concentrate on what they're saying and try to intuit why they're saying it. Everything else will come naturally." One particularly powerful phrase, according to conversation expert and Stanford University lecturer Matt Abrahams: "Tell me more." "'Tell me more' is a support response; it what the other person is saying. The opposite is a 'shift' response," which is a statement that the conversation back to you," Abrahams wrote in October 2023, adding: "So many people make the mistake of treating other people's stories as openings for them to talk about themselves. But if you do that often, you miss an opportunity to learn more."
